Forgent Power Solutions, Inc. (FPS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FPS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPS | $57.49 | -2.77% | 14.5B | 2965.50 | $0.02 | N/A |
| VRT | $284.95 | -5.18% | 115.5B | 75.73 | $3.97 | +0.07% |
| BE | $256.13 | -2.84% | 72.1B | -5070.60 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| ABB | $37.13 | -1.14% | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| AME | $228.24 | +0.74% | 51.8B | 34.12 | $6.62 | +0.56% |
| NVT | $161.25 | -0.99% | 26.5B | 55.51 | $2.95 | +0.50% |
| HUBB | $480.33 | +0.74% | 25.6B | 28.65 | $16.93 | +1.15% |
| AEIS | $303.79 | +3.05% | 11.6B | 63.77 | $4.80 | +0.13% |
| POWL | $278.39 | -2.27% | 10.7B | 57.23 | $5.13 | +0.12% |
| AYI | $299.47 | -0.85% | 9B | 21.69 | $13.65 | +0.25% |
Stock Comparison
FPS vs VRT Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while VRT trades at $284.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 75.73. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check VRT's competition here
FPS vs BE Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while BE trades at $256.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas BE's P/E ratio is -5070.60. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check BE's competition here
FPS vs ABB Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check ABB's competition here
FPS vs AME Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while AME trades at $228.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 34.12. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check AME's competition here
FPS vs NVT Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while NVT trades at $161.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 55.51. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check NVT's competition here
FPS vs HUBB Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while HUBB trades at $480.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check HUBB's competition here
FPS vs AEIS Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while AEIS trades at $303.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 63.77. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check AEIS's competition here
FPS vs POWL Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while POWL trades at $278.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 57.23. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check POWL's competition here
FPS vs AYI Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while AYI trades at $299.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check AYI's competition here
FPS vs ENS Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while ENS trades at $223.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 29.66. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check ENS's competition here
FPS vs WIRE Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check WIRE's competition here
FPS vs PLUG Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while PLUG trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check PLUG's competition here
FPS vs HAYW Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while HAYW trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check HAYW's competition here
FPS vs ATKR Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while ATKR trades at $79.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is -22.33. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATKR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check ATKR's competition here
FPS vs AMPX Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while AMPX trades at $16.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -60.74. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check AMPX's competition here
FPS vs PLPC Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while PLPC trades at $361.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 53.70. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check PLPC's competition here
FPS vs EOSE Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while EOSE trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check EOSE's competition here
FPS vs HOLI Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check HOLI's competition here
FPS vs ENVX Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while ENVX trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -9.04. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check ENVX's competition here
FPS vs TE Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while TE trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check TE's competition here
FPS vs ENR Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while ENR trades at $19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ENR's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check ENR's competition here
FPS vs AMPX-WT Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while AMPX-WT trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -21.55. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check AMPX-WT's competition here
FPS vs FCEL Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 821.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while FCEL trades at $17.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check FCEL's competition here
FPS vs ADSE Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 676.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while ADSE trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -9.82. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check ADSE's competition here
FPS vs KE Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 609.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while KE trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check KE's competition here
FPS vs SLDP Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 545.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while SLDP trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check SLDP's competition here
FPS vs EOSEW Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 423.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while EOSEW trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check EOSEW's competition here
FPS vs MVST Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 408.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while MVST trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -6.81. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check MVST's competition here
FPS vs ELVA Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 404.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while ELVA trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is 94.09. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELVA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check ELVA's competition here
FPS vs LTBR Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 246.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while LTBR trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check LTBR's competition here
FPS vs FREY-WT Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, FREY-WT has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while FREY-WT trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas FREY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FREY-WT's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to FREY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check FREY-WT's competition here
FPS vs FREY Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check FREY's competition here
FPS vs TE-WT Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, TE-WT has a market cap of 231.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while TE-WT trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas TE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TE-WT's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to TE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check TE-WT's competition here
FPS vs EAF Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 230.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while EAF trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EAF's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check EAF's competition here
FPS vs STI Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 224.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while STI trades at $21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas STI's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STI's ROE of +4.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check STI's competition here
FPS vs TGEN Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while TGEN trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -17.74. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check TGEN's competition here
FPS vs RFIL Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 180.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while RFIL trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is 555.67. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RFIL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check RFIL's competition here
FPS vs ESP Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 166.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while ESP trades at $56.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check ESP's competition here
FPS vs ENVXW Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, ENVXW has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while ENVXW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas ENVXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ENVXW's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to ENVXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check ENVXW's competition here
FPS vs SVT Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while SVT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.36. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check SVT's competition here
FPS vs SKYX Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 114.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while SKYX trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -4.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check SKYX's competition here
FPS vs ULBI Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 110.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while ULBI trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is -13.59. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ULBI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check ULBI's competition here
FPS vs NVX Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 90.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while NVX trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check NVX's competition here
FPS vs NEOV Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 70.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while NEOV trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check NEOV's competition here
FPS vs CBAT Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while CBAT trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CBAT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check CBAT's competition here
FPS vs NEOVW Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while NEOVW trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check NEOVW's competition here
FPS vs OPTT Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while OPTT trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check OPTT's competition here
FPS vs IPWR Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while IPWR trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check IPWR's competition here
FPS vs PPSI Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 46.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while PPSI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -6.74. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PPSI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check PPSI's competition here
FPS vs ZOOZ Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while ZOOZ trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check ZOOZ's competition here
FPS vs SLDPW Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while SLDPW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check SLDPW's competition here
FPS vs OESX Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while OESX trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check OESX's competition here
FPS vs APWC Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while APWC trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check APWC's competition here
FPS vs ADSEW Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while ADSEW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check ADSEW's competition here
FPS vs FLUX Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while FLUX trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FLUX's ROE of -7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check FLUX's competition here
FPS vs SDST Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while SDST trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SDST's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check SDST's competition here
FPS vs CHEV Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while CHEV trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -17.86. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHEV's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check CHEV's competition here
FPS vs PITA Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check PITA's competition here
FPS vs GWH Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while GWH trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GWH's ROE of -12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check GWH's competition here
FPS vs SES-WT Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while SES-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check SES-WT's competition here
FPS vs GCDT Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, GCDT has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while GCDT trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas GCDT's P/E ratio is -10.57. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GCDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to GCDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check GCDT's competition here
FPS vs NXU Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NXU's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check NXU's competition here
FPS vs POLA Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while POLA trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to POLA's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check POLA's competition here
FPS vs GWH-WT Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while GWH-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check GWH-WT's competition here
FPS vs MVSTW Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while MVSTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check MVSTW's competition here
FPS vs XPON Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while XPON trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XPON's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check XPON's competition here
FPS vs SDSTW Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while SDSTW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check SDSTW's competition here
FPS vs DFLI Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while DFLI trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check DFLI's competition here
FPS vs ELPW Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while ELPW trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check ELPW's competition here
FPS vs CCTG Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 529.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while CCTG trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check CCTG's competition here
FPS vs DFLIW Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 386.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while DFLIW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check DFLIW's competition here
FPS vs RAYA Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 370.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while RAYA trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check RAYA's competition here
FPS vs ZOOZW Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, ZOOZW has a market cap of 312.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while ZOOZW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas ZOOZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZOOZW's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to ZOOZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check ZOOZW's competition here
FPS vs DCFCW Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check DCFCW's competition here
FPS vs DCFC Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check DCFC's competition here
FPS vs JUNO Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, JUNO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while JUNO trades at $86.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas JUNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JUNO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to JUNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check JUNO's competition here
FPS vs AIRM Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, AIRM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while AIRM trades at $42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas AIRM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIRM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to AIRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check AIRM's competition here
FPS vs ENR-PA Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check ENR-PA's competition here
FPS vs BLNKW Comparison June 2026
FPS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPS stands at 14.5B. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FPS is priced at $57.49, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPS currently has a P/E ratio of 2965.50, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FPS is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPS.Check BLNKW's competition here