The Container Store Group, Inc.
The Container Store Group, Inc. TCS Peers
See (TCS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCS | $2.65 | +22.69% | 9.1M | -0.09 | -$29.86 | N/A |
| AMZN | $219.39 | -1.75% | 2.3T | 35.67 | $6.15 | N/A |
| BABA | $113.41 | -0.59% | 270.5B | 12.50 | $9.07 | +1.74% |
| PDD | $104.66 | -0.46% | 145.3B | 11.23 | $9.32 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,613.63 | +2.09% | 132.5B | 64.19 | $40.72 | N/A |
| SE | $159.94 | +0.40% | 94.7B | 111.85 | $1.43 | N/A |
| ORLY | $90.13 | +1.09% | 77B | 33.14 | $2.72 | N/A |
| CVNA | $336.96 | +5.54% | 72.2B | 117.03 | $2.88 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,712.23 | +2.85% | 62.1B | 25.14 | $147.64 | N/A |
| CPNG | $29.96 | -2.76% | 54.4B | 214.00 | $0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TCS vs AMZN Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while AMZN trades at $219.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 35.67. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs BABA Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 270.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while BABA trades at $113.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs PDD Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 145.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while PDD trades at $104.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs MELI Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while MELI trades at $2,613.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 64.19. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs SE Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 94.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while SE trades at $159.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 111.85. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs ORLY Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 77B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while ORLY trades at $90.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 33.14. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs CVNA Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while CVNA trades at $336.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 117.03. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs AZO Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while AZO trades at $3,712.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs CPNG Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while CPNG trades at $29.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 214.00. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs JD Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while JD trades at $32.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs VIPS Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while VIPS trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs EBAY Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while EBAY trades at $74.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs TSCO Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while TSCO trades at $52.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs ULTA Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while ULTA trades at $467.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs WSM Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while WSM trades at $163.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs CASY Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while CASY trades at $510.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 34.90. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs CHWY Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while CHWY trades at $42.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 46.84. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs GPC Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while GPC trades at $121.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs DKS Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while DKS trades at $197.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs BBY Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while BBY trades at $67.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs CART Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while CART trades at $45.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs GME Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while GME trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 45.99. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs MUSA Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while MUSA trades at $406.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs FIVE Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while FIVE trades at $131.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs W Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while W trades at $51.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas W's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs BBWI Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while BBWI trades at $29.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs GLBE Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while GLBE trades at $33.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -90.65. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs ETSY Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while ETSY trades at $50.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 36.35. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs RH Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while RH trades at $189.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 44.95. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs ASO Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while ASO trades at $44.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs AAP Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while AAP trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs OZON Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs EYE Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while EYE trades at $23.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -71.91. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs SVV Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while SVV trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 72.86. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs RVLV Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while RVLV trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs MNSO Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while MNSO trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs WINA Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while WINA trades at $377.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 33.78. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs TA Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs EVGOW Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while EVGOW trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs EVGO Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while EVGO trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs TANNI Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs SBH Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 935.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while SBH trades at $9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs OLPX Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 932.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while OLPX trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 70.00. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs YSG Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 890.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while YSG trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -11.93. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs TDUP Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 885.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while TDUP trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -25.83. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs HEPS Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 867.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while HEPS trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -19.29. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs WOOF Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 789.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while WOOF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -11.79. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs OSTK Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs RERE Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 737.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while RERE trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 36.89. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs LQDT Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 736.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while LQDT trades at $23.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 29.86. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs BBW Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 680.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while BBW trades at $51.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs HNST Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 561.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while HNST trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -254.50. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs ODP Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 545.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while ODP trades at $18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs HZO Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while HZO trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs ZKH Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 493M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while ZKH trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -16.37. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs ARKO Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 482M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while ARKO trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 141.00. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs BNED Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 400.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while BNED trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs BYON Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 397.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while BYON trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs LE Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 326.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while LE trades at $10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 82.38. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs CHPT Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 325.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while CHPT trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs BWMX Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 325.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while BWMX trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -43.57. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs NEGG Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 315M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while NEGG trades at $16.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs FLWS Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 312.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while FLWS trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs FTCH Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs JMIA Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 245.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while JMIA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs QRTEA Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs LOGC Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 180.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while LOGC trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs VLTA Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs BARK Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 148.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while BARK trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs BZUN Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 147.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while BZUN trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -5.81. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs OCG Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while OCG trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -35.72. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs SPWH Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 132.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while SPWH trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs QRTEP Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs GOED Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs DADA Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs AKA Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while AKA trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs APRN Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs DIBS Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 98.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while DIBS trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs GRWG Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while GRWG trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs BARK-WT Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while BARK-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs QVCGP Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while QVCGP trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs QRTEB Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs NHTC Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while NHTC trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 110.75. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs HOUR Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while HOUR trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs CTIB Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs PRTS Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 43.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while PRTS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs BBBY Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs SSU Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs BGFV Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while BGFV trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs CGTL Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while CGTL trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs TLF Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while TLF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs QVCGB Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while QVCGB trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs KIRK Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while KIRK trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs QVCGA Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while QVCGA trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs JBDI Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while JBDI trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs IPW Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while IPW trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -12.93. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs LGCB Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, LGCB has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while LGCB trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas LGCB's P/E ratio is -11.70. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to LGCB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to LGCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs BOXD Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.
TCS vs ZOOZ Comparison
TCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCS stands at 9.1M. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCS is priced at $2.65, while ZOOZ trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, TCS's ROE is -0.60%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TCS is more volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCS.