TravelCenters of America Inc.
TravelCenters of America Inc. (TA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA | $86.00 | +0.00% | 1.3B | 9.03 | $9.52 | N/A |
| AMZN | $230.98 | +0.00% | 2.5T | 35.22 | $6.56 | N/A |
| BABA | $122.28 | +0.00% | 281.2B | 13.37 | $9.07 | +1.63% |
| PDD | $114.74 | +0.00% | 165.6B | 12.75 | $9.33 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,319.80 | +0.00% | 121.3B | 58.92 | $40.60 | N/A |
| SE | $174.01 | +0.00% | 105.1B | 91.40 | $1.94 | N/A |
| ORLY | $101.50 | +0.00% | 86.2B | 36.39 | $2.79 | N/A |
| CVNA | $342.59 | +0.00% | 75.3B | 87.26 | $4.01 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,992.48 | +0.00% | 67.1B | 27.15 | $147.72 | N/A |
| CPNG | $28.33 | +0.00% | 51.3B | 140.68 | $0.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TA vs AMZN Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while AMZN trades at $230.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check AMZN's competition here
TA vs BABA Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 281.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BABA trades at $122.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BABA's competition here
TA vs PDD Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 165.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while PDD trades at $114.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check PDD's competition here
TA vs MELI Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 121.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while MELI trades at $2,319.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 58.92. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check MELI's competition here
TA vs SE Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 105.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while SE trades at $174.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 91.40. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check SE's competition here
TA vs ORLY Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 86.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ORLY trades at $101.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 36.39. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check ORLY's competition here
TA vs CVNA Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 75.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CVNA trades at $342.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 87.26. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CVNA's competition here
TA vs AZO Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while AZO trades at $3,992.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check AZO's competition here
TA vs CPNG Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CPNG trades at $28.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 140.68. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CPNG's competition here
TA vs EBAY Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while EBAY trades at $98.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check EBAY's competition here
TA vs JD Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while JD trades at $31.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check JD's competition here
TA vs TSCO Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while TSCO trades at $59.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check TSCO's competition here
TA vs WSM Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while WSM trades at $205.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check WSM's competition here
TA vs ULTA Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ULTA trades at $526.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check ULTA's competition here
TA vs GPC Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while GPC trades at $137.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check GPC's competition here
TA vs CASY Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CASY trades at $508.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 34.71. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CASY's competition here
TA vs DKS Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while DKS trades at $222.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check DKS's competition here
TA vs CHWY Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CHWY trades at $38.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 44.49. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CHWY's competition here
TA vs BBY Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BBY trades at $71.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BBY's competition here
TA vs CART Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CART trades at $43.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CART's competition here
TA vs GME Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while GME trades at $22.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 43.27. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check GME's competition here
TA vs W Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, W has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while W trades at $79.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas W's P/E ratio is -32.95. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check W's competition here
TA vs VIPS Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while VIPS trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check VIPS's competition here
TA vs MUSA Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while MUSA trades at $388.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check MUSA's competition here
TA vs FIVE Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while FIVE trades at $134.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check FIVE's competition here
TA vs ETSY Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ETSY trades at $68.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 53.57. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check ETSY's competition here
TA vs BBWI Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BBWI trades at $28.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BBWI's competition here
TA vs GLBE Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while GLBE trades at $30.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -192.56. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check GLBE's competition here
TA vs RH Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while RH trades at $235.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check RH's competition here
TA vs ASO Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ASO trades at $54.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check ASO's competition here
TA vs AAP Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while AAP trades at $56.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check AAP's competition here
TA vs OZON Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check OZON's competition here
TA vs NEGG Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while NEGG trades at $128.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -44.90. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check NEGG's competition here
TA vs EYE Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while EYE trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -113.65. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check EYE's competition here
TA vs SVV Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while SVV trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check SVV's competition here
TA vs WINA Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while WINA trades at $428.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 38.26. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check WINA's competition here
TA vs MNSO Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while MNSO trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check MNSO's competition here
TA vs RVLV Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while RVLV trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 34.16. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check RVLV's competition here
TA vs RERE Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while RERE trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 46.78. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check RERE's competition here
TA vs SBH Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while SBH trades at $13.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check SBH's competition here
TA vs TDUP Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while TDUP trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -42.04. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check TDUP's competition here
TA vs EVGO Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while EVGO trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check EVGO's competition here
TA vs EVGOW Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while EVGOW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check EVGOW's competition here
TA vs TANNI Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check TANNI's competition here
TA vs HEPS Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 951.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while HEPS trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -19.73. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check HEPS's competition here
TA vs OLPX Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 940.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while OLPX trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 70.50. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check OLPX's competition here
TA vs WOOF Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 933.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while WOOF trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -13.92. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check WOOF's competition here
TA vs YSG Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 925.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while YSG trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -11.73. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check YSG's competition here
TA vs LQDT Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 793.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while LQDT trades at $26.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 30.60. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check LQDT's competition here
TA vs OSTK Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check OSTK's competition here
TA vs BBW Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 734.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BBW trades at $55.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BBW's competition here
TA vs ODP Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 634.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ODP trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ODP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check ODP's competition here
TA vs ARKO Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 546.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ARKO trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 60.62. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check ARKO's competition here
TA vs HZO Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 545.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while HZO trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HZO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check HZO's competition here
TA vs BYON Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 508.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BYON trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BYON's competition here
TA vs DADA Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check DADA's competition here
TA vs ZKH Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 495M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ZKH trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -16.03. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check ZKH's competition here
TA vs BWMX Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 483.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BWMX trades at $12.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -76.18. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BWMX's competition here
TA vs JMIA Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 474.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while JMIA trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -13.83. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check JMIA's competition here
TA vs HNST Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 426.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while HNST trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is 63.83. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HNST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check HNST's competition here
TA vs LE Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 394.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while LE trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 99.54. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check LE's competition here
TA vs FLWS Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 347.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while FLWS trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check FLWS's competition here
TA vs BNED Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BNED trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BNED's competition here
TA vs CHPT Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 279.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CHPT trades at $11.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CHPT's competition here
TA vs FTCH Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check FTCH's competition here
TA vs QRTEA Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check QRTEA's competition here
TA vs LOGC Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while LOGC trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -9.61. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check LOGC's competition here
TA vs BZUN Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 163.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BZUN trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BZUN's competition here
TA vs BARK-WT Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BARK-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BARK-WT's competition here
TA vs VLTA Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check VLTA's competition here
TA vs BARK Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 137.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BARK trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BARK's competition here
TA vs QRTEP Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check QRTEP's competition here
TA vs GOED Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check GOED's competition here
TA vs AKA Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 115.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while AKA trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check AKA's competition here
TA vs SPWH Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 103.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while SPWH trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check SPWH's competition here
TA vs APRN Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check APRN's competition here
TA vs DIBS Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 93.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while DIBS trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check DIBS's competition here
TA vs GRWG Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 86.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while GRWG trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check GRWG's competition here
TA vs OCG Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 65.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while OCG trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -17.61. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check OCG's competition here
TA vs HOUR Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 61.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while HOUR trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 58.67. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check HOUR's competition here
TA vs QRTEB Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check QRTEB's competition here
TA vs NHTC Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while NHTC trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 143.67. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check NHTC's competition here
TA vs CTIB Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CTIB's competition here
TA vs PRTS Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while PRTS trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check PRTS's competition here
TA vs BBBY Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BBBY's competition here
TA vs QVCGP Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while QVCGP trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check QVCGP's competition here
TA vs QVCGB Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while QVCGB trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check QVCGB's competition here
TA vs KIRK Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while KIRK trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check KIRK's competition here
TA vs SSU Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check SSU's competition here
TA vs LGCB Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LGCB has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while LGCB trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas LGCB's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LGCB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to LGCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check LGCB's competition here
TA vs QVCGA Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while QVCGA trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check QVCGA's competition here
TA vs BGFV Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BGFV trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BGFV's competition here
TA vs DTC Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while DTC trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DTC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check DTC's competition here
TA vs TLF Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while TLF trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 42.13. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check TLF's competition here
TA vs ZOOZ Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ZOOZ trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check ZOOZ's competition here
TA vs JBDI Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while JBDI trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check JBDI's competition here
TA vs IPW Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while IPW trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check IPW's competition here
TA vs CGTL Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CGTL trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CGTL's competition here
TA vs MI Comparison August 2025
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MI has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while MI trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas MI's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to MI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check MI's competition here