TravelCenters of America Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for TA
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for TA
TravelCenters of America Inc. (TA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA | $86.00 | +0.00% | 1.3B | 9.03 | $9.52 | N/A |
| AMZN | $209.77 | -0.38% | 2.3T | 29.22 | $7.18 | N/A |
| BABA | $122.05 | -1.36% | 283.3B | 22.56 | $5.41 | +1.62% |
| PDD | $100.87 | -0.89% | 141.5B | 10.40 | $9.70 | N/A |
| MELI | $1,715.52 | -0.20% | 87B | 43.47 | $39.46 | N/A |
| SE | $82.28 | +0.15% | 48.7B | 32.65 | $2.52 | N/A |
| EBAY | $94.14 | +1.08% | 42.6B | 22.10 | $4.26 | +1.25% |
| JD | $28.46 | -1.42% | 40B | 15.22 | $1.87 | +3.44% |
| CPNG | $18.95 | +0.16% | 34.6B | 172.27 | $0.11 | N/A |
| CASY | $743.42 | +0.85% | 27.6B | 42.70 | $17.41 | +0.30% |
Stock Comparison
TA vs AMZN Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while AMZN trades at $209.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check AMZN's competition here
TA vs BABA Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 283.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BABA trades at $122.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BABA's competition here
TA vs PDD Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 141.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while PDD trades at $100.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check PDD's competition here
TA vs MELI Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 87B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while MELI trades at $1,715.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 43.47. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check MELI's competition here
TA vs SE Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while SE trades at $82.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 32.65. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check SE's competition here
TA vs EBAY Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while EBAY trades at $94.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check EBAY's competition here
TA vs JD Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while JD trades at $28.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check JD's competition here
TA vs CPNG Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CPNG trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 172.27. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CPNG's competition here
TA vs CASY Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CASY trades at $743.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 42.70. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CASY's competition here
TA vs ULTA Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ULTA trades at $537.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check ULTA's competition here
TA vs TSCO Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while TSCO trades at $43.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check TSCO's competition here
TA vs WSM Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while WSM trades at $180.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check WSM's competition here
TA vs DKS Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while DKS trades at $191.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check DKS's competition here
TA vs GPC Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while GPC trades at $103.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 220.15. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check GPC's competition here
TA vs BBY Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BBY trades at $64.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BBY's competition here
TA vs CHWY Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CHWY trades at $26.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 51.67. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CHWY's competition here
TA vs GME Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while GME trades at $23.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 30.34. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check GME's competition here
TA vs CART Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CART trades at $38.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CART's competition here
TA vs W Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, W has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while W trades at $72.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas W's P/E ratio is -29.76. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check W's competition here
TA vs MUSA Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while MUSA trades at $502.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check MUSA's competition here
TA vs VIPS Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while VIPS trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check VIPS's competition here
TA vs GLBE Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while GLBE trades at $31.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is 79.95. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GLBE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check GLBE's competition here
TA vs ETSY Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ETSY trades at $51.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 37.15. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check ETSY's competition here
TA vs MNSO Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while MNSO trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check MNSO's competition here
TA vs ASO Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ASO trades at $57.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check ASO's competition here
TA vs BBWI Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BBWI trades at $18.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BBWI's competition here
TA vs AAP Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while AAP trades at $51.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is 45.87. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check AAP's competition here
TA vs OZON Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OZON's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check OZON's competition here
TA vs RH Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while RH trades at $113.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RH's ROE of -5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check RH's competition here
TA vs EYE Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while EYE trades at $23.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is 64.03. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EYE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check EYE's competition here
TA vs RERE Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while RERE trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check RERE's competition here
TA vs RVLV Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while RVLV trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check RVLV's competition here
TA vs BOBS Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BOBS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BOBS trades at $11.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BOBS's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BOBS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BOBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BOBS's competition here
TA vs OLPX Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while OLPX trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is -203.00. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check OLPX's competition here
TA vs SBH Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while SBH trades at $13.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check SBH's competition here
TA vs SVV Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while SVV trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 53.57. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check SVV's competition here
TA vs TANNI Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check TANNI's competition here
TA vs LQDT Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 966.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while LQDT trades at $31.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 33.87. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check LQDT's competition here
TA vs HEPS Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 869M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while HEPS trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check HEPS's competition here
TA vs ODP Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ODP trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TA and ODP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ODP's competition here
TA vs NEGG Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 797.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while NEGG trades at $38.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -32.23. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check NEGG's competition here
TA vs OSTK Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check OSTK's competition here
TA vs WOOF Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 762M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while WOOF trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is 89.33. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WOOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check WOOF's competition here
TA vs BWMX Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 631.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BWMX trades at $16.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BWMX's competition here
TA vs ARKO Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 629.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ARKO trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 37.67. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check ARKO's competition here
TA vs HZO Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 598.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while HZO trades at $27.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is -10.49. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HZO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check HZO's competition here
TA vs BYON Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BYON trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BYON's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BYON's competition here
TA vs EVGO Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 535.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while EVGO trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -5.52. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check EVGO's competition here
TA vs DADA Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check DADA's competition here
TA vs BBW Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 499.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BBW trades at $38.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BBW's competition here
TA vs ZKH Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 496.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ZKH trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -30.60. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check ZKH's competition here
TA vs TDUP Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 426.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while TDUP trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check TDUP's competition here
TA vs JMIA Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 426.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while JMIA trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -13.76. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check JMIA's competition here
TA vs LE Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 354.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while LE trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 64.11. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check LE's competition here
TA vs BBBY Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 318.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BBBY trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBBY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BBBY's competition here
TA vs HNST Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 317.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while HNST trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -20.14. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check HNST's competition here
TA vs BNED Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 308.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BNED trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -31.03. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BNED's competition here
TA vs YSG Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 284M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while YSG trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -25.42. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check YSG's competition here
TA vs NPT Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NPT has a market cap of 280.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while NPT trades at $12.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas NPT's P/E ratio is -316.50. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NPT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to NPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check NPT's competition here
TA vs FTCH Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check FTCH's competition here
TA vs LOGC Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 222.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while LOGC trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check LOGC's competition here
TA vs QRTEA Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check QRTEA's competition here
TA vs FLWS Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 205M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while FLWS trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check FLWS's competition here
TA vs DIBS Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 196.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while DIBS trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -14.24. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check DIBS's competition here
TA vs VLTA Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check VLTA's competition here
TA vs BZUN Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 146.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BZUN trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -4.13. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BZUN's competition here
TA vs JMG Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JMG has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while JMG trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas JMG's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JMG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to JMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check JMG's competition here
TA vs QRTEP Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check QRTEP's competition here
TA vs GOED Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check GOED's competition here
TA vs CHPT Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 113.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CHPT trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CHPT's competition here
TA vs AKA Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while AKA trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check AKA's competition here
TA vs APRN Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check APRN's competition here
TA vs BARK Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 85.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BARK trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BARK's competition here
TA vs QVCGB Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while QVCGB trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TA and QVCGB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QVCGB's competition here
TA vs GRWG Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 66.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while GRWG trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check GRWG's competition here
TA vs HOUR Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while HOUR trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 36.40. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check HOUR's competition here
TA vs PRTS Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while PRTS trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check PRTS's competition here
TA vs QRTEB Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check QRTEB's competition here
TA vs SPWH Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while SPWH trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check SPWH's competition here
TA vs CTIB Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CTIB's competition here
TA vs KIRK Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while KIRK trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check KIRK's competition here
TA vs SSU Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check SSU's competition here
TA vs BGFV Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BGFV trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TA and BGFV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BGFV's competition here
TA vs NHTC Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while NHTC trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is -35.25. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NHTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check NHTC's competition here
TA vs DTC Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while DTC trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DTC's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check DTC's competition here
TA vs CGTL Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CGTL trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CGTL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CGTL's competition here
TA vs QVCGP Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while QVCGP trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check QVCGP's competition here
TA vs TBHC Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TBHC has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while TBHC trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas TBHC's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TBHC's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to TBHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check TBHC's competition here
TA vs LITB Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while LITB trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LITB's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to LITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check LITB's competition here
TA vs TLF Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while TLF trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.16. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check TLF's competition here
TA vs MOGU Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MOGU has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while MOGU trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas MOGU's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MOGU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to MOGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check MOGU's competition here
TA vs QVCGA Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while QVCGA trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check QVCGA's competition here
TA vs LGCB Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LGCB has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while LGCB trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas LGCB's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LGCB's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to LGCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check LGCB's competition here
TA vs BOXD Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BOXD's competition here
TA vs JBDI Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while JBDI trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check JBDI's competition here
TA vs TCS Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TCS has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while TCS trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas TCS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TCS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to TCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check TCS's competition here
TA vs YJ Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, YJ has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while YJ trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas YJ's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YJ's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to YJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check YJ's competition here
TA vs TKAT Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TKAT has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while TKAT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas TKAT's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TKAT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to TKAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check TKAT's competition here
TA vs SBDS Comparison April 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SBDS has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while SBDS trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SBDS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SBDS's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to SBDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check SBDS's competition here