StoneMor Inc.
StoneMor Inc. STON Peers
See (STON) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Personal Products & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STON | $3.53 | +0.86% | 0 | -6.64 | -$0.53 | N/A |
| ROL | $56.48 | +0.71% | 27.4B | 57.05 | $0.99 | +1.15% |
| SCI | $78.60 | +0.38% | 11.2B | 21.71 | $3.62 | +1.59% |
| HRB | $54.88 | -0.44% | 7.3B | 13.62 | $4.03 | +2.75% |
| BFAM | $122.37 | +0.11% | 7B | 44.18 | $2.77 | N/A |
| FTDR | $58.55 | +1.72% | 4.3B | 19.07 | $3.07 | N/A |
| DSEY | $8.40 | +0.06% | 2.7B | -14.47 | -$0.58 | N/A |
| ROVR | $11.00 | +0.05% | 2B | 183.25 | $0.06 | N/A |
| MCW | $6.14 | +0.33% | 2B | 25.58 | $0.24 | N/A |
| CSV | $43.77 | -1.46% | 686.9M | 14.64 | $2.99 | +1.03% |
Stock Comparison
STON vs ROL Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, ROL has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while ROL trades at $56.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ROL's P/E ratio is 57.05. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ROL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to ROL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs SCI Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, SCI has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while SCI trades at $78.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SCI's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SCI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to SCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs HRB Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, HRB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while HRB trades at $54.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas HRB's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to HRB's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to HRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs BFAM Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, BFAM has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while BFAM trades at $122.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas BFAM's P/E ratio is 44.18. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BFAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to BFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs FTDR Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, FTDR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while FTDR trades at $58.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FTDR's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FTDR's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to FTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs DSEY Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, DSEY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while DSEY trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DSEY's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DSEY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is more volatile compared to DSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs ROVR Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, ROVR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while ROVR trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ROVR's P/E ratio is 183.25. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ROVR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is more volatile compared to ROVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs MCW Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, MCW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while MCW trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas MCW's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MCW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to MCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs CSV Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, CSV has a market cap of 686.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while CSV trades at $43.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CSV's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CSV's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to CSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs MED Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, MED has a market cap of 155.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while MED trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas MED's P/E ratio is -22.09. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MED's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to MED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs EM Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, EM has a market cap of 140.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while EM trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas EM's P/E ratio is -111.00. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to EM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to EM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs YYGH Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, YYGH has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while YYGH trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas YYGH's P/E ratio is -15.14. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to YYGH's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to YYGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs XSPA Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, XSPA has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while XSPA trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas XSPA's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to XSPA's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to XSPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs RGS Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, RGS has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while RGS trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas RGS's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RGS's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to RGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs WW Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, WW has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while WW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas WW's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to WW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs MRM Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, MRM has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while MRM trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas MRM's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MRM's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is more volatile compared to MRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs EJH Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, EJH has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while EJH trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas EJH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to EJH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to EJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs IVP Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, IVP has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while IVP trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas IVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to IVP's ROE of -11.83%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to IVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs TRNR Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, TRNR has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while TRNR trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TRNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TRNR's ROE of -13.46%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to TRNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs XWEL Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, XWEL has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while XWEL trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas XWEL's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to XWEL's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to XWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs TMX Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, TMX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while TMX trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TMX's P/E ratio is 70.13. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to TMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.
STON vs NEBCU Comparison
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, NEBCU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while NEBCU trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NEBCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NEBCU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to NEBCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.