Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. SPWH Peers
See (SPWH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPWH | $2.00 | -5.66% | 76.6M | -2.30 | -$0.87 | N/A |
| AMZN | $200.99 | -1.04% | 2.1T | 32.79 | $6.13 | N/A |
| BABA | $120.73 | -0.62% | 289.6B | 13.31 | $9.07 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,507.83 | -3.77% | 127.1B | 61.72 | $40.63 | N/A |
| SE | $164.06 | +2.10% | 97.1B | 114.73 | $1.43 | N/A |
| ORLY | $1,374.37 | +0.70% | 78.3B | 33.67 | $40.82 | N/A |
| CVNA | $304.11 | +0.62% | 65.1B | 106.33 | $2.86 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,826.46 | -0.85% | 64B | 25.71 | $148.85 | N/A |
| CPNG | $27.45 | +0.62% | 49.8B | 196.07 | $0.14 | N/A |
| JD | $33.35 | -1.01% | 48.9B | 8.13 | $4.10 | +2.94% |
Stock Comparison
SPWH vs AMZN Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while AMZN trades at $200.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 32.79. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs BABA Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 289.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while BABA trades at $120.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs MELI Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 127.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while MELI trades at $2,507.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 61.72. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs SE Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 97.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while SE trades at $164.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 114.73. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs ORLY Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while ORLY trades at $1,374.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 33.67. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs CVNA Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while CVNA trades at $304.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 106.33. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs AZO Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while AZO trades at $3,826.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs CPNG Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while CPNG trades at $27.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 196.07. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs JD Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while JD trades at $33.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs PDD Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while PDD trades at $119.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs VIPS Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while VIPS trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs EBAY Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while EBAY trades at $71.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs TSCO Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while TSCO trades at $49.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs FIVE Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while FIVE trades at $107.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs WSM Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while WSM trades at $157.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs ULTA Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while ULTA trades at $407.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs CHWY Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while CHWY trades at $43.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 48.26. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs GPC Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while GPC trades at $126.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs CASY Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while CASY trades at $445.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs BBY Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while BBY trades at $69.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs GME Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while GME trades at $33.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 100.09. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs DKS Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while DKS trades at $167.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs CART Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while CART trades at $46.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs MUSA Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while MUSA trades at $443.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs BBWI Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while BBWI trades at $30.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs GLBE Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while GLBE trades at $31.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -85.35. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs ETSY Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while ETSY trades at $47.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs W Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while W trades at $36.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas W's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs RH Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while RH trades at $184.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 51.07. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs AAP Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while AAP trades at $48.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs ASO Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while ASO trades at $40.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs OZON Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs SVV Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while SVV trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 70.29. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs EYE Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while EYE trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -58.91. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs WINA Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while WINA trades at $417.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 37.31. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs MNSO Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while MNSO trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs RVLV Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while RVLV trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs TA Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs EVGO Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while EVGO trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -9.37. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs EVGOW Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while EVGOW trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs WOOF Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while WOOF trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -9.81. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs TANNI Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs HEPS Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 909.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while HEPS trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -20.21. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs SBH Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 884.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while SBH trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs TDUP Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 872.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while TDUP trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -25.45. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs RERE Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 872.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while RERE trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RERE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs OLPX Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 792.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while OLPX trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 59.50. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs OSTK Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs LQDT Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 741.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while LQDT trades at $23.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 30.08. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs BBW Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 540M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while BBW trades at $40.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs HNST Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 534.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while HNST trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -242.50. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs ARKO Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 512.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while ARKO trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 150.00. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs ODP Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 479.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while ODP trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs HZO Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 455.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while HZO trades at $21.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs BNED Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 359.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while BNED trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs CHPT Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 334M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while CHPT trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs BYON Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 325.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while BYON trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs BWMX Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 317.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while BWMX trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -42.50. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs FLWS Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 296.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while FLWS trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs LE Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 273.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while LE trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 44.30. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs FTCH Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs QRTEA Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs BARK Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while BARK trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -6.72. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs BARK-WT Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while BARK-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs LOGC Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 208.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while LOGC trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs JMIA Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 198.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while JMIA trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs BZUN Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 174.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while BZUN trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs VLTA Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs DADA Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while DADA trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs AKA Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 135.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while AKA trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs QRTEP Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs GOED Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs WBUY Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, WBUY has a market cap of 128.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while WBUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas WBUY's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WBUY's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to WBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs OCG Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 121.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while OCG trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -32.67. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs QVCGP Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 121.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while QVCGP trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs NEGG Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while NEGG trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs APRN Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to APRN's ROE of +3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs DIBS Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while DIBS trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs QVCGB Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 67.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while QVCGB trades at $195.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -59.89. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs GRWG Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while GRWG trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs NHTC Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while NHTC trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 115.92. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs QRTEB Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs PRTS Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while PRTS trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs CTIB Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs HOUR Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while HOUR trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 123.00. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs BBBY Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs SSU Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs QVCGA Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while QVCGA trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs KIRK Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while KIRK trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KIRK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs TLF Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while TLF trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs BGFV Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while BGFV trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs YSG Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while YSG trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs JBDI Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while JBDI trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is more volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs CGTL Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while CGTL trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs IPW Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while IPW trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -9.81. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs ZOOZ Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while ZOOZ trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs BOXD Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs ZKH Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while ZKH trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -15.05. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.
SPWH vs LITB Comparison
SPWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPWH stands at 76.6M. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPWH is priced at $2.00, while LITB trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPWH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, SPWH's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LITB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SPWH is less volatile compared to LITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPWH.