Skillsoft Corp.
Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SKIL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKIL | $15.95 | +4.45% | 136.6M | -0.99 | -$16.02 | N/A |
| EDU | $47.45 | -0.38% | 7.7B | 20.63 | $2.30 | +1.22% |
| LRN | $166.37 | +0.73% | 7.3B | 27.97 | $5.95 | N/A |
| TAL | $10.80 | -0.64% | 6.6B | 63.56 | $0.17 | N/A |
| LOPE | $203.07 | -0.16% | 5.7B | 24.58 | $8.26 | N/A |
| ATGE | $135.33 | +0.33% | 4.9B | 22.30 | $6.07 | N/A |
| GHC | $1,089.57 | -0.58% | 4.8B | 7.07 | $154.09 | +0.65% |
| LAUR | $26.88 | -0.15% | 4B | 16.10 | $1.67 | N/A |
| PRDO | $33.06 | -0.93% | 2.1B | 14.37 | $2.30 | +1.57% |
| STRA | $81.83 | -0.25% | 2B | 17.01 | $4.81 | +2.93% |
Stock Comparison
SKIL vs EDU Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, EDU has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while EDU trades at $47.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas EDU's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to EDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to EDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check EDU's competition here
SKIL vs LRN Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, LRN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while LRN trades at $166.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas LRN's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to LRN's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to LRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check LRN's competition here
SKIL vs TAL Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, TAL has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while TAL trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas TAL's P/E ratio is 63.56. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to TAL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to TAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check TAL's competition here
SKIL vs LOPE Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, LOPE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while LOPE trades at $203.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas LOPE's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to LOPE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to LOPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check LOPE's competition here
SKIL vs ATGE Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, ATGE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while ATGE trades at $135.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas ATGE's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to ATGE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to ATGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check ATGE's competition here
SKIL vs GHC Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, GHC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while GHC trades at $1,089.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas GHC's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to GHC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to GHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check GHC's competition here
SKIL vs LAUR Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, LAUR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while LAUR trades at $26.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas LAUR's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to LAUR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to LAUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check LAUR's competition here
SKIL vs PRDO Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, PRDO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while PRDO trades at $33.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas PRDO's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to PRDO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to PRDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check PRDO's competition here
SKIL vs STRA Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, STRA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while STRA trades at $81.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas STRA's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to STRA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to STRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check STRA's competition here
SKIL vs COUR Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, COUR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while COUR trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas COUR's P/E ratio is -33.74. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to COUR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to COUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check COUR's competition here
SKIL vs UTI Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, UTI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while UTI trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas UTI's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to UTI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to UTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check UTI's competition here
SKIL vs GOTU Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, GOTU has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while GOTU trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas GOTU's P/E ratio is -7.73. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to GOTU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to GOTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check GOTU's competition here
SKIL vs AFYA Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, AFYA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while AFYA trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas AFYA's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to AFYA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to AFYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check AFYA's competition here
SKIL vs UDMY Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, UDMY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while UDMY trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas UDMY's P/E ratio is -33.48. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to UDMY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to UDMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check UDMY's competition here
SKIL vs DAO Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, DAO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while DAO trades at $8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas DAO's P/E ratio is 33.13. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to DAO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to DAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check DAO's competition here
SKIL vs ARCE Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, ARCE has a market cap of 927.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while ARCE trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas ARCE's P/E ratio is -73.58. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to ARCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to ARCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check ARCE's competition here
SKIL vs KLC Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, KLC has a market cap of 893.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while KLC trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas KLC's P/E ratio is -10.96. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to KLC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to KLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check KLC's competition here
SKIL vs REDU Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, REDU has a market cap of 730.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while REDU trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas REDU's P/E ratio is -23.04. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to REDU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to REDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check REDU's competition here
SKIL vs LINC Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, LINC has a market cap of 621.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while LINC trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas LINC's P/E ratio is 42.72. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to LINC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to LINC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check LINC's competition here
SKIL vs APEI Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, APEI has a market cap of 545.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while APEI trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas APEI's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to APEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to APEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check APEI's competition here
SKIL vs QSG Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, QSG has a market cap of 434.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while QSG trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas QSG's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to QSG's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to QSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check QSG's competition here
SKIL vs VSTA Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, VSTA has a market cap of 337.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while VSTA trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas VSTA's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to VSTA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to VSTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check VSTA's competition here
SKIL vs VTRU Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, VTRU has a market cap of 304.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while VTRU trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas VTRU's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to VTRU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to VTRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check VTRU's competition here
SKIL vs LGCY Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, LGCY has a market cap of 154.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while LGCY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas LGCY's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to LGCY's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to LGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check LGCY's competition here
SKIL vs CHGG Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, CHGG has a market cap of 139.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while CHGG trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas CHGG's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to CHGG's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to CHGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check CHGG's competition here
SKIL vs STG Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, STG has a market cap of 133.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while STG trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas STG's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to STG's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to STG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check STG's competition here
SKIL vs GNS Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, GNS has a market cap of 83.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while GNS trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas GNS's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to GNS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to GNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check GNS's competition here
SKIL vs VSA Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 78.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while VSA trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to VSA's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check VSA's competition here
SKIL vs ONE Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, ONE has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while ONE trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas ONE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to ONE's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to ONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check ONE's competition here
SKIL vs RYET Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, RYET has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while RYET trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas RYET's P/E ratio is -146.00. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to RYET's ROE of -10.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to RYET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check RYET's competition here
SKIL vs JZ Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, JZ has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while JZ trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas JZ's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to JZ's ROE of -846.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to JZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check JZ's competition here
SKIL vs IH Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, IH has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while IH trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas IH's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to IH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to IH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check IH's competition here
SKIL vs AACG Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, AACG has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while AACG trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas AACG's P/E ratio is -16.36. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to AACG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to AACG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check AACG's competition here
SKIL vs BTCT Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, BTCT has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while BTCT trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas BTCT's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to BTCT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to BTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check BTCT's competition here
SKIL vs KIDZ Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, KIDZ has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while KIDZ trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas KIDZ's P/E ratio is -129.00. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to KIDZ's ROE of +2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to KIDZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check KIDZ's competition here
SKIL vs AIU Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, AIU has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while AIU trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas AIU's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to AIU's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to AIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check AIU's competition here
SKIL vs GEHI Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, GEHI has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while GEHI trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas GEHI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to GEHI's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to GEHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check GEHI's competition here
SKIL vs YQ Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, YQ has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while YQ trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas YQ's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to YQ's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to YQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check YQ's competition here
SKIL vs EDTK Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, EDTK has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while EDTK trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas EDTK's P/E ratio is -5.58. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to EDTK's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to EDTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check EDTK's competition here
SKIL vs BEDU Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, BEDU has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while BEDU trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas BEDU's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to BEDU's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to BEDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check BEDU's competition here
SKIL vs TEDU Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, TEDU has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while TEDU trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas TEDU's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to TEDU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to TEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check TEDU's competition here
SKIL vs EEIQ Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, EEIQ has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while EEIQ trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas EEIQ's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to EEIQ's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to EEIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check EEIQ's competition here
SKIL vs VEDU Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, VEDU has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while VEDU trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas VEDU's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to VEDU's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to VEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check VEDU's competition here
SKIL vs GV Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, GV has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while GV trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas GV's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to GV's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to GV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check GV's competition here
SKIL vs WAFU Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, WAFU has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while WAFU trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas WAFU's P/E ratio is -13.36. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to WAFU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to WAFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check WAFU's competition here
SKIL vs GSUN Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, GSUN has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while GSUN trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas GSUN's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to GSUN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to GSUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check GSUN's competition here
SKIL vs TCTM Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, TCTM has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while TCTM trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas TCTM's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to TCTM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to TCTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check TCTM's competition here
SKIL vs TWOU Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, TWOU has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while TWOU trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas TWOU's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to TWOU's ROE of +9.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to TWOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check TWOU's competition here
SKIL vs CLEU Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, CLEU has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while CLEU trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas CLEU's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to CLEU's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to CLEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check CLEU's competition here
SKIL vs FEDU Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, FEDU has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while FEDU trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas FEDU's P/E ratio is 263.67. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to FEDU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to FEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check FEDU's competition here
SKIL vs COE Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, COE has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while COE trades at $34.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas COE's P/E ratio is -58.08. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to COE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to COE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check COE's competition here
SKIL vs METX Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, METX has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while METX trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas METX's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to METX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to METX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check METX's competition here
SKIL vs MYND Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, MYND has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while MYND trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas MYND's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to MYND's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to MYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check MYND's competition here
SKIL vs ASPU Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, ASPU has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while ASPU trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas ASPU's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to ASPU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to ASPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check ASPU's competition here
SKIL vs KIDZW Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, KIDZW has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while KIDZW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas KIDZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to KIDZW's ROE of +2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to KIDZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check KIDZW's competition here
SKIL vs LXEH Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, LXEH has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while LXEH trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas LXEH's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to LXEH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to LXEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check LXEH's competition here
SKIL vs RYB Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, RYB has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while RYB trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas RYB's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to RYB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to RYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check RYB's competition here
SKIL vs AMBO Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, AMBO has a market cap of 525.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while AMBO trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas AMBO's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to AMBO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to AMBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check AMBO's competition here
SKIL vs BTCTW Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, BTCTW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while BTCTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas BTCTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to BTCTW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to BTCTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check BTCTW's competition here
SKIL vs FHS Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, FHS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while FHS trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas FHS's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to FHS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to FHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check FHS's competition here
SKIL vs NEW Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, NEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while NEW trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas NEW's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to NEW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to NEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check NEW's competition here
SKIL vs GPX Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, GPX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while GPX trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas GPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to GPX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to GPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check GPX's competition here
SKIL vs HMHC Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, HMHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while HMHC trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas HMHC's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to HMHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to HMHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check HMHC's competition here
SKIL vs ZVO Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, ZVO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while ZVO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas ZVO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to ZVO's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to ZVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check ZVO's competition here
SKIL vs HLG Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, HLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while HLG trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas HLG's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to HLG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is more volatile compared to HLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check HLG's competition here
SKIL vs ZME Comparison August 2025
SKIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIL stands at 136.6M. In comparison, ZME has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKIL is priced at $15.95, while ZME trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas ZME's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SKIL's ROE is -0.98%, compared to ZME's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIL is less volatile compared to ZME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIL.Check ZME's competition here