Sea Limited
Sea Limited SE Peers
See (SE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SE | $170.43 | +1.35% | 100.9B | 118.35 | $1.44 | N/A |
| AMZN | $207.94 | +0.34% | 2.2T | 33.92 | $6.13 | N/A |
| BABA | $119.93 | +0.40% | 289B | 13.22 | $9.07 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,580.07 | +0.24% | 130.8B | 63.55 | $40.60 | N/A |
| ORLY | $1,371.80 | +0.38% | 78.2B | 33.57 | $40.86 | N/A |
| CVNA | $343.34 | -0.67% | 73.5B | 120.05 | $2.86 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,720.02 | +0.08% | 62.2B | 25.19 | $147.67 | N/A |
| CPNG | $28.55 | +0.69% | 51.8B | 203.89 | $0.14 | N/A |
| JD | $33.08 | -0.77% | 47.9B | 8.09 | $4.09 | +2.96% |
| VIPS | $14.47 | +0.59% | 37.2B | 7.49 | $1.93 | +3.31% |
Stock Comparison
SE vs AMZN Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while AMZN trades at $207.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 33.92. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs BABA Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 289B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while BABA trades at $119.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs MELI Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while MELI trades at $2,580.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 63.55. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs ORLY Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while ORLY trades at $1,371.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs CVNA Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while CVNA trades at $343.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 120.05. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs AZO Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while AZO trades at $3,720.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs CPNG Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while CPNG trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 203.89. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs JD Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while JD trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs VIPS Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while VIPS trades at $14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs EBAY Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while EBAY trades at $77.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs PDD Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while PDD trades at $99.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs TSCO Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while TSCO trades at $51.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs ULTA Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while ULTA trades at $467.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs CHWY Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while CHWY trades at $47.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 52.19. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs WSM Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while WSM trades at $157.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs GPC Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while GPC trades at $126.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs CASY Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while CASY trades at $445.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 31.08. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs BBY Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while BBY trades at $70.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs DKS Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while DKS trades at $178.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs GME Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while GME trades at $29.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 89.29. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs CART Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while CART trades at $46.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 30.42. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs MUSA Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while MUSA trades at $419.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs FIVE Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while FIVE trades at $128.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs ETSY Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while ETSY trades at $62.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 45.45. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs GLBE Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while GLBE trades at $34.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -93.43. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs W Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, W has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while W trades at $44.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas W's P/E ratio is -15.82. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs BBWI Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while BBWI trades at $26.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs RH Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while RH trades at $175.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 48.46. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs AAP Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while AAP trades at $52.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs ASO Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while ASO trades at $42.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs OZON Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs EYE Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while EYE trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -65.19. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs SVV Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while SVV trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 74.11. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs RVLV Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while RVLV trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 32.23. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs WINA Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while WINA trades at $428.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 38.32. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs MNSO Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while MNSO trades at $18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs TA Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs EVGOW Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while EVGOW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs EVGO Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while EVGO trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -9.29. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs WOOF Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while WOOF trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs TANNI Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs TDUP Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 888M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while TDUP trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -25.90. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs SBH Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 884.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while SBH trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs HEPS Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 845.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while HEPS trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -18.79. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs OLPX Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 839.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while OLPX trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 63.00. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs RERE Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 826M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while RERE trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RERE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs OSTK Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs LQDT Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 764.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while LQDT trades at $24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 30.98. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs BBW Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 611.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while BBW trades at $46.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs HNST Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 564.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while HNST trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -256.00. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs ODP Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 541.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while ODP trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs ARKO Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 501.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while ARKO trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 146.67. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs HZO Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 471.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while HZO trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs BNED Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 400.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while BNED trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs BYON Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 385.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while BYON trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs FLWS Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 319.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while FLWS trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs CHPT Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 312.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while CHPT trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs BWMX Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 298.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while BWMX trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -42.16. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs LE Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 276.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while LE trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 44.70. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs FTCH Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs BARK-WT Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 232.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while BARK-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs QRTEA Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs NEGG Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 204.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while NEGG trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs JMIA Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 199.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while JMIA trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs LOGC Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 178.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while LOGC trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -8.79. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs BZUN Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 169.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while BZUN trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -6.54. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs BARK Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 166.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while BARK trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -5.29. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs VLTA Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs AKA Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 144.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while AKA trades at $13.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs DADA Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 130.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while DADA trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs QRTEP Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs GOED Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs OCG Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 119.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while OCG trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -31.98. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs WBUY Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, WBUY has a market cap of 101.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while WBUY trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas WBUY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WBUY's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to WBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs SPWH Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 100.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while SPWH trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs APRN Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs DIBS Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 98.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while DIBS trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs QVCGB Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 90M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while QVCGB trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs QVCGP Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 76.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while QVCGP trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs GRWG Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while GRWG trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs NHTC Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 55.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while NHTC trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 120.00. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs PRTS Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while PRTS trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs QRTEB Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs CTIB Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs HOUR Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while HOUR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 126.40. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs BBBY Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs SSU Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs YSG Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while YSG trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs BGFV Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while BGFV trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs KIRK Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while KIRK trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs TLF Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while TLF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.01. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs JBDI Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while JBDI trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs QVCGA Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while QVCGA trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs CGTL Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while CGTL trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs IPW Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while IPW trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -10.80. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs BOXD Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs ZOOZ Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while ZOOZ trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs ZKH Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while ZKH trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -15.53. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.
SE vs MI Comparison
SE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SE stands at 100.9B. In comparison, MI has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SE is priced at $170.43, while MI trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SE currently has a P/E ratio of 118.35, whereas MI's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, SE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SE is less volatile compared to MI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SE.