Rockwell Automation, Inc.
Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ROK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROK | $347.51 | +0.00% | 38.5B | 40.20 | $8.52 | +1.50% |
| ETN | $355.10 | +0.00% | 136.7B | 35.31 | $9.94 | +1.16% |
| PH | $745.34 | +0.00% | 93.3B | 26.92 | $27.13 | +0.92% |
| ITW | $262.49 | +0.00% | 75.4B | 22.71 | $11.39 | +2.32% |
| EMR | $134.37 | +0.00% | 74.1B | 33.95 | $3.88 | +1.60% |
| HWM | $175.99 | +0.00% | 69B | 50.22 | $3.41 | +0.23% |
| ROP | $524.96 | +0.00% | 57B | 37.22 | $14.23 | +0.61% |
| CMI | $404.80 | +0.00% | 55B | 18.72 | $21.33 | +1.83% |
| AME | $184.78 | +0.00% | 41.9B | 29.21 | $6.21 | +0.65% |
| B | $23.62 | +0.00% | 41.5B | 15.17 | $1.59 | +2.33% |
Stock Comparison
ROK vs ETN Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 136.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while ETN trades at $355.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 35.31. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check ETN's competition here
ROK vs PH Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 93.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while PH trades at $745.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check PH's competition here
ROK vs ITW Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while ITW trades at $262.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check ITW's competition here
ROK vs EMR Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while EMR trades at $134.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 33.95. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check EMR's competition here
ROK vs HWM Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, HWM has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while HWM trades at $175.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas HWM's P/E ratio is 50.22. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HWM's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to HWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check HWM's competition here
ROK vs ROP Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while ROP trades at $524.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 37.22. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check ROP's competition here
ROK vs CMI Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while CMI trades at $404.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CMI's competition here
ROK vs AME Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while AME trades at $184.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 29.21. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check AME's competition here
ROK vs B Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, B has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while B trades at $23.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas B's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to B's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check B's competition here
ROK vs OTIS Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while OTIS trades at $87.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check OTIS's competition here
ROK vs XYL Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while XYL trades at $141.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 36.68. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check XYL's competition here
ROK vs IR Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while IR trades at $80.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 60.72. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check IR's competition here
ROK vs HWM-P Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, HWM-P has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while HWM-P trades at $69.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas HWM-P's P/E ratio is 95.65. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HWM-P's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to HWM-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check HWM-P's competition here
ROK vs DOV Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while DOV trades at $179.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check DOV's competition here
ROK vs PNR Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while PNR trades at $106.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check PNR's competition here
ROK vs GGG Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while GGG trades at $85.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check GGG's competition here
ROK vs ITT Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while ITT trades at $167.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check ITT's competition here
ROK vs IEX Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while IEX trades at $167.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check IEX's competition here
ROK vs NDSN Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while NDSN trades at $217.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check NDSN's competition here
ROK vs GNRC Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while GNRC trades at $198.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 33.08. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check GNRC's competition here
ROK vs CR Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while CR trades at $190.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 36.65. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CR's competition here
ROK vs AOS Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while AOS trades at $72.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check AOS's competition here
ROK vs RRX Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while RRX trades at $148.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 38.74. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check RRX's competition here
ROK vs WTS Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while WTS trades at $274.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check WTS's competition here
ROK vs GTLS Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while GTLS trades at $198.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 36.37. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GTLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check GTLS's competition here
ROK vs SPXC Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while SPXC trades at $186.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 41.43. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check SPXC's competition here
ROK vs DCI Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while DCI trades at $74.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check DCI's competition here
ROK vs PSN Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while PSN trades at $79.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 35.67. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check PSN's competition here
ROK vs JBTM Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while JBTM trades at $140.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is -60.27. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JBTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check JBTM's competition here
ROK vs FLS Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while FLS trades at $53.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check FLS's competition here
ROK vs MIDD Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while MIDD trades at $134.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MIDD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check MIDD's competition here
ROK vs GTES Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while GTES trades at $24.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check GTES's competition here
ROK vs CSWI Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CSWI's competition here
ROK vs NPO Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while NPO trades at $224.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 55.74. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check NPO's competition here
ROK vs MIR Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while MIR trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 410.80. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check MIR's competition here
ROK vs FELE Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while FELE trades at $96.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check FELE's competition here
ROK vs MWA Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while MWA trades at $26.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check MWA's competition here
ROK vs AIMC Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check AIMC's competition here
ROK vs KAI Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while KAI trades at $340.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 37.86. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check KAI's competition here
ROK vs JBT Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JBT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check JBT's competition here
ROK vs CXT Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while CXT trades at $60.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CXT's competition here
ROK vs GTLS-PB Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while GTLS-PB trades at $71.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check GTLS-PB's competition here
ROK vs ATS Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while ATS trades at $28.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is -95.50. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ATS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check ATS's competition here
ROK vs SXI Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while SXI trades at $203.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 43.82. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check SXI's competition here
ROK vs AMSC Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while AMSC trades at $52.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 132.65. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check AMSC's competition here
ROK vs XMTR Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while XMTR trades at $47.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -38.76. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check XMTR's competition here
ROK vs EPAC Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while EPAC trades at $41.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check EPAC's competition here
ROK vs CFX Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CFX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CFX's competition here
ROK vs SHPW Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check SHPW's competition here
ROK vs PSIX Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while PSIX trades at $81.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check PSIX's competition here
ROK vs HI Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while HI trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas HI's P/E ratio is -86.86. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check HI's competition here
ROK vs HLIO Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while HLIO trades at $53.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check HLIO's competition here
ROK vs ENOV Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while ENOV trades at $28.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check ENOV's competition here
ROK vs TNC Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while TNC trades at $82.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check TNC's competition here
ROK vs NNE Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while NNE trades at $35.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -36.62. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check NNE's competition here
ROK vs BW-PA Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while BW-PA trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 43.53. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check BW-PA's competition here
ROK vs CIR Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CIR's competition here
ROK vs GRC Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while GRC trades at $42.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check GRC's competition here
ROK vs CYD Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while CYD trades at $28.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CYD's competition here
ROK vs THR Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 834.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while THR trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check THR's competition here
ROK vs KRNT Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 679.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while KRNT trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check KRNT's competition here
ROK vs BLDP Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 599.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while BLDP trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check BLDP's competition here
ROK vs SERV Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 581.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while SERV trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check SERV's competition here
ROK vs GHM Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 545.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while GHM trades at $50.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check GHM's competition here
ROK vs BGRY Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check BGRY's competition here
ROK vs OFLX Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 331.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while OFLX trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check OFLX's competition here
ROK vs LXFR Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 331.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while LXFR trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check LXFR's competition here
ROK vs SIMA Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, SIMA has a market cap of 320.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while SIMA trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas SIMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SIMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to SIMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check SIMA's competition here
ROK vs PKOH Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 278.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while PKOH trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check PKOH's competition here
ROK vs RR Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 222.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while RR trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -13.81. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check RR's competition here
ROK vs NPWR Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 185M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while NPWR trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check NPWR's competition here
ROK vs BW Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 158.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while BW trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check BW's competition here
ROK vs HUHU Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 141.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while HUHU trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check HUHU's competition here
ROK vs TAYD Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 133.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while TAYD trades at $42.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check TAYD's competition here
ROK vs TWIN Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 120.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while TWIN trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 29.31. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check TWIN's competition here
ROK vs HURC Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 119.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while HURC trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -6.13. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check HURC's competition here
ROK vs SHMD Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 111.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while SHMD trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check SHMD's competition here
ROK vs PYR Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check PYR's competition here
ROK vs XCH Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 67.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while XCH trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XCH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check XCH's competition here
ROK vs BWEN Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while BWEN trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -22.80. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BWEN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check BWEN's competition here
ROK vs LASE Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while LASE trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LASE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check LASE's competition here
ROK vs WFF Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while WFF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is 48.50. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check WFF's competition here
ROK vs GTEC Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while GTEC trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 1.11. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check GTEC's competition here
ROK vs LBGJ Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, LBGJ has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while LBGJ trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas LBGJ's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LBGJ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to LBGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check LBGJ's competition here
ROK vs CVV Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while CVV trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -58.88. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CVV's competition here
ROK vs HCAI Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while HCAI trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check HCAI's competition here
ROK vs INLF Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, INLF has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while INLF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas INLF's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to INLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check INLF's competition here
ROK vs CETY Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, CETY has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while CETY trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas CETY's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CETY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CETY's competition here
ROK vs BURU Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while BURU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BURU's ROE of +1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check BURU's competition here
ROK vs TPIC Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while TPIC trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check TPIC's competition here
ROK vs SHMDW Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while SHMDW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check SHMDW's competition here
ROK vs CGRN Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while CGRN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CGRN's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CGRN's competition here
ROK vs JCSE Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while JCSE trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check JCSE's competition here
ROK vs NMHI Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, NMHI has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while NMHI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas NMHI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NMHI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to NMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check NMHI's competition here
ROK vs NMHIW Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, NMHIW has a market cap of 92K. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while NMHIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas NMHIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NMHIW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to NMHIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check NMHIW's competition here
ROK vs CFXA Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, CFXA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while CFXA trades at $177.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas CFXA's P/E ratio is 248.89. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CFXA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CFXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check CFXA's competition here
ROK vs BGRYW Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, BGRYW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while BGRYW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas BGRYW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BGRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to BGRYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check BGRYW's competition here
ROK vs WBT Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, WBT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while WBT trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas WBT's P/E ratio is 47.08. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WBT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to WBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check WBT's competition here
ROK vs RAVN Comparison August 2025
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, RAVN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $347.51, while RAVN trades at $58.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 40.20, whereas RAVN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RAVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to RAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.Check RAVN's competition here