Rockwell Automation, Inc.
Rockwell Automation, Inc. ROK Peers
See (ROK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROK | $332.17 | +0.67% | 37.4B | 41.89 | $7.93 | +1.56% |
| ETN | $356.99 | +1.06% | 139.7B | 35.98 | $9.92 | +1.11% |
| PH | $698.47 | -0.30% | 89.2B | 26.89 | $25.97 | +0.96% |
| HWM | $186.13 | +0.67% | 75.1B | 60.82 | $3.06 | +0.19% |
| EMR | $133.33 | +0.12% | 75B | 38.52 | $3.46 | +1.58% |
| ITW | $247.25 | -0.33% | 72.4B | 21.76 | $11.36 | +2.44% |
| ROP | $566.84 | +0.59% | 60.9B | 40.90 | $13.86 | +0.56% |
| CMI | $327.50 | +0.55% | 45.1B | 16.14 | $20.30 | +2.22% |
| AME | $180.96 | +0.24% | 41.8B | 29.56 | $6.12 | +0.65% |
| OTIS | $99.02 | +1.45% | 39.1B | 25.91 | $3.82 | +1.61% |
Stock Comparison
ROK vs ETN Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 139.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while ETN trades at $356.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 35.98. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs PH Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 89.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while PH trades at $698.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs HWM Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, HWM has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while HWM trades at $186.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas HWM's P/E ratio is 60.82. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HWM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to HWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs EMR Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while EMR trades at $133.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 38.52. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs ITW Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while ITW trades at $247.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs ROP Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while ROP trades at $566.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 40.90. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs CMI Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while CMI trades at $327.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs AME Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while AME trades at $180.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs OTIS Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while OTIS trades at $99.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs B Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, B has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while B trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas B's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs IR Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while IR trades at $83.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs XYL Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while XYL trades at $129.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 34.96. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs HWM-P Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, HWM-P has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while HWM-P trades at $70.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas HWM-P's P/E ratio is 98.53. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HWM-P's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to HWM-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs DOV Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while DOV trades at $183.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs PNR Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while PNR trades at $102.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs GGG Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while GGG trades at $85.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs IEX Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while IEX trades at $175.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 27.88. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs ITT Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while ITT trades at $156.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs NDSN Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while NDSN trades at $214.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs CR Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while CR trades at $189.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 38.59. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs RRX Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while RRX trades at $144.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 41.31. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs AOS Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while AOS trades at $65.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs GNRC Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while GNRC trades at $143.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs WTS Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while WTS trades at $245.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs DCI Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while DCI trades at $69.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs SPXC Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while SPXC trades at $167.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 38.54. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs MIDD Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while MIDD trades at $144.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MIDD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs PSN Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while PSN trades at $71.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs GTLS Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while GTLS trades at $164.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GTLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs FLS Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while FLS trades at $52.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs JBTM Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while JBTM trades at $120.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is -84.69. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to JBTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs GTES Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while GTES trades at $23.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs MIR Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while MIR trades at $21.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is -430.40. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MIR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs CSWI Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs FELE Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while FELE trades at $89.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs AIMC Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs NPO Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while NPO trades at $191.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 47.86. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs JBT Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to JBT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs MWA Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while MWA trades at $24.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs KAI Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while KAI trades at $317.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 33.69. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs ATS Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while ATS trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is -151.95. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs CXT Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while CXT trades at $53.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs GTLS-PB Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while GTLS-PB trades at $60.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs EPAC Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while EPAC trades at $40.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs CFX Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs SXI Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while SXI trades at $156.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 30.97. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs ENOV Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while ENOV trades at $31.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs XMTR Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while XMTR trades at $33.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -34.13. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs AMSC Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while AMSC trades at $36.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 229.31. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs PSIX Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while PSIX trades at $64.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs TNC Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while TNC trades at $77.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs NNE Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while NNE trades at $34.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -35.18. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs HI Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while HI trades at $20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas HI's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs CIR Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs HLIO Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while HLIO trades at $33.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 30.08. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs BW-PA Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while BW-PA trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 37.34. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs GRC Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 965M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while GRC trades at $36.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs THR Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 933.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while THR trades at $28.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs KRNT Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 902.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while KRNT trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -110.61. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs CYD Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 897.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while CYD trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs SERV Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 653.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while SERV trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -12.30. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs GHM Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 542.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while GHM trades at $49.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 44.60. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs BLDP Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 476.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while BLDP trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs BGRY Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs LXFR Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 331.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while LXFR trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs OFLX Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 326.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while OFLX trades at $32.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs PKOH Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 254.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while PKOH trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs RR Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 223.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while RR trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -13.93. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs NPWR Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 192.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while NPWR trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NPWR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs TAYD Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 136.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while TAYD trades at $43.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs TWIN Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 124.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while TWIN trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs SHMD Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while SHMD trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs HURC Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 123M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while HURC trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -6.32. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs HUHU Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 102.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while HUHU trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -48.60. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs BW Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 94.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while BW trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs XCH Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 81.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while XCH trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to XCH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs SIMA Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SIMA has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while SIMA trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas SIMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SIMA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to SIMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs PYR Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs WFF Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while WFF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is 116.50. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs TPIC Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 41.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while TPIC trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs BWEN Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while BWEN trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -45.50. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BWEN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs LASE Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while LASE trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LASE's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs GTEC Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while GTEC trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs LBGJ Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, LBGJ has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while LBGJ trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas LBGJ's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LBGJ's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to LBGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs HCAI Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while HCAI trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs BURU Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while BURU trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BURU's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs INLF Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, INLF has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while INLF trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas INLF's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to INLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to INLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs CVV Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while CVV trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -298.00. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs CETY Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, CETY has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while CETY trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas CETY's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CETY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs SHMDW Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while SHMDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs CGRN Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while CGRN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CGRN's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs JCSE Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while JCSE trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs SHPW Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs NMHI Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, NMHI has a market cap of 459.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while NMHI trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas NMHI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NMHI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to NMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs NMHIW Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, NMHIW has a market cap of 20K. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while NMHIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas NMHIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NMHIW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to NMHIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs CFXA Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, CFXA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while CFXA trades at $177.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas CFXA's P/E ratio is 248.89. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CFXA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to CFXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs RAVN Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, RAVN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while RAVN trades at $58.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas RAVN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RAVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to RAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs WBT Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, WBT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while WBT trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas WBT's P/E ratio is 47.08. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WBT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is more volatile compared to WBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.
ROK vs BGRYW Comparison
ROK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, BGRYW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROK is priced at $332.17, while BGRYW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROK currently has a P/E ratio of 41.89, whereas BGRYW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ROK's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BGRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ROK is less volatile compared to BGRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROK.