QVC Group Inc.
QVC Group Inc. QVCGB Peers
See (QVCGB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QVCGB | $32.00 | -20.00% | 26.3M | -0.21 | -$175.50 | N/A |
| AMZN | $220.09 | +0.32% | 2.3T | 35.85 | $6.15 | N/A |
| BABA | $111.37 | -1.80% | 272B | 12.57 | $9.07 | +1.73% |
| PDD | $104.30 | -0.35% | 146.5B | 11.32 | $9.32 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,512.59 | -3.87% | 126.8B | 61.43 | $40.72 | N/A |
| SE | $151.15 | -5.50% | 89.1B | 105.26 | $1.43 | N/A |
| ORLY | $89.24 | -0.99% | 77.4B | 33.27 | $2.72 | N/A |
| CVNA | $345.02 | +2.39% | 72.4B | 117.44 | $2.88 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,678.31 | -0.91% | 62.2B | 25.17 | $147.64 | N/A |
| CPNG | $30.24 | +0.93% | 54.3B | 213.68 | $0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QVCGB vs AMZN Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while AMZN trades at $220.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 35.85. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs BABA Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 272B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while BABA trades at $111.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs PDD Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 146.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while PDD trades at $104.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs MELI Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 126.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while MELI trades at $2,512.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 61.43. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs SE Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while SE trades at $151.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 105.26. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs ORLY Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 77.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while ORLY trades at $89.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 33.27. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs CVNA Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while CVNA trades at $345.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 117.44. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs AZO Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while AZO trades at $3,678.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 25.17. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs CPNG Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while CPNG trades at $30.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 213.68. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs JD Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while JD trades at $32.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs VIPS Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while VIPS trades at $15.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs EBAY Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while EBAY trades at $75.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs TSCO Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while TSCO trades at $54.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs ULTA Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while ULTA trades at $471.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs WSM Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while WSM trades at $171.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs CASY Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while CASY trades at $508.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 34.93. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs GPC Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while GPC trades at $124.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs CHWY Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while CHWY trades at $41.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 46.01. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs DKS Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while DKS trades at $203.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs BBY Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while BBY trades at $70.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs CART Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while CART trades at $46.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 30.03. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs GME Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while GME trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 44.81. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs MUSA Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while MUSA trades at $409.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs FIVE Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while FIVE trades at $130.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs BBWI Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while BBWI trades at $32.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs W Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while W trades at $54.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas W's P/E ratio is -18.29. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs GLBE Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while GLBE trades at $32.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -88.78. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs ETSY Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while ETSY trades at $53.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 37.22. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs RH Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while RH trades at $204.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 47.23. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs ASO Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while ASO trades at $46.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs AAP Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while AAP trades at $48.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs OZON Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs EYE Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while EYE trades at $24.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -75.59. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs SVV Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while SVV trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 75.25. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs RVLV Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while RVLV trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 30.43. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs MNSO Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while MNSO trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs WINA Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while WINA trades at $381.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 34.53. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs TA Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs EVGOW Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while EVGOW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs EVGO Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while EVGO trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -8.61. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs OLPX Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while OLPX trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 75.75. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs TANNI Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs SBH Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 992.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while SBH trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs TDUP Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 921.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while TDUP trades at $7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -26.86. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs YSG Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 907.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while YSG trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -12.15. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs HEPS Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 896.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while HEPS trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -19.93. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs WOOF Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 800.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while WOOF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -11.96. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs OSTK Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs RERE Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 747.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while RERE trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 37.39. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs LQDT Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 741.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while LQDT trades at $23.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 30.08. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs BBW Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while BBW trades at $52.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs ODP Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 592M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while ODP trades at $19.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs HZO Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 572.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while HZO trades at $26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs HNST Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 560M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while HNST trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -254.00. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs ARKO Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 525.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while ARKO trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs ZKH Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 488.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while ZKH trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -16.21. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs BYON Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 412.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while BYON trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs BNED Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 398.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while BNED trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs LE Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 354.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while LE trades at $11.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 89.54. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs FLWS Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while FLWS trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs CHPT Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 325.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while CHPT trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs BWMX Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 321.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while BWMX trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -43.05. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs NEGG Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 304.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while NEGG trades at $15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -6.98. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs JMIA Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 286.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while JMIA trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -7.42. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs FTCH Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs QRTEA Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs LOGC Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 188.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while LOGC trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -9.28. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs BZUN Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 155.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while BZUN trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs BARK Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while BARK trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs VLTA Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs QRTEP Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs GOED Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs OCG Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 127M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while OCG trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -34.03. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs DADA Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs SPWH Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while SPWH trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs AKA Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 114.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while AKA trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs DIBS Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 102.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while DIBS trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs APRN Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs QVCGP Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while QVCGP trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs GRWG Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while GRWG trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs HOUR Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while HOUR trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs BARK-WT Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while BARK-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is less volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs NHTC Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while NHTC trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 111.50. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs QRTEB Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB and QRTEB have similar daily volatility (11.76).
QVCGB vs CTIB Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs PRTS Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while PRTS trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs BBBY Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs SSU Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs BGFV Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while BGFV trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs TLF Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while TLF trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.10. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs CGTL Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while CGTL trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs KIRK Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while KIRK trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs QVCGA Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while QVCGA trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs IPW Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while IPW trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -13.12. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs JBDI Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while JBDI trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs LGCB Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, LGCB has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while LGCB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas LGCB's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to LGCB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to LGCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs BOXD Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs ZOOZ Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while ZOOZ trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.
QVCGB vs MI Comparison
QVCGB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCGB stands at 26.3M. In comparison, MI has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCGB is priced at $32.00, while MI trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MI's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, QVCGB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to MI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCGB is more volatile compared to MI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCGB.