Qurate Retail, Inc.

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while AMZN trades at $214.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 32.74. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check AMZN's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 279.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BABA trades at $117.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BABA's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 152.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while PDD trades at $110.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check PDD's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while MELI trades at $2,375.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 58.35. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check MELI's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 91.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while SE trades at $154.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 107.84. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check SE's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 84.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while ORLY trades at $99.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 35.53. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check ORLY's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while CVNA trades at $367.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 91.55. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check CVNA's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while AZO trades at $3,858.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check AZO's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while CPNG trades at $28.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 205.29. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check CPNG's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while JD trades at $30.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check JD's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while EBAY trades at $91.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check EBAY's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while TSCO trades at $57.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check TSCO's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while WSM trades at $187.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check WSM's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while ULTA trades at $507.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check ULTA's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while CASY trades at $522.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 35.76. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check CASY's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while GPC trades at $128.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check GPC's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while DKS trades at $206.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check DKS's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while CHWY trades at $35.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 39.47. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check CHWY's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BBY trades at $64.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BBY's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while CART trades at $47.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check CART's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while GME trades at $22.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 41.72. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check GME's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while W trades at $65.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas W's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check W's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while VIPS trades at $15.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check VIPS's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while FIVE trades at $133.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check FIVE's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while MUSA trades at $362.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check MUSA's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BBWI trades at $28.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BBWI's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while ETSY trades at $58.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 47.40. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check ETSY's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while GLBE trades at $31.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -84.92. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check GLBE's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while RH trades at $200.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 47.55. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check RH's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while ASO trades at $49.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check ASO's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while AAP trades at $52.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check AAP's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while OZON trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check OZON's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while EYE trades at $24.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -75.66. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check EYE's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while SVV trades at $11.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 81.99. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check SVV's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while RVLV trades at $20.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check RVLV's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while MNSO trades at $18.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check MNSO's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while WINA trades at $370.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 32.98. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check WINA's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while TA trades at $86.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check TA's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while NEGG trades at $53.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -23.79. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check NEGG's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while RERE trades at $3.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 34.44. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check RERE's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while EVGOW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check EVGOW's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while EVGO trades at $3.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -8.05. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check EVGO's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while TDUP trades at $8.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -29.17. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check TDUP's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while TANNI trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check TANNI's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 973.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while SBH trades at $9.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check SBH's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 872.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while OLPX trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 65.50. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check OLPX's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 842M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while HEPS trades at $2.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -20.15. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check HEPS's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 814.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while WOOF trades at $2.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -12.17. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check WOOF's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 800M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while YSG trades at $8.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check YSG's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while OSTK trades at $16.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check OSTK's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 733.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while LQDT trades at $23.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check LQDT's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 651.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BBW trades at $49.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BBW's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 516.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while ODP trades at $17.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check ODP's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while DADA trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check DADA's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 493.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while HNST trades at $4.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -224.00. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check HNST's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 486.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BWMX trades at $13.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -76.71. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BWMX's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 478.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while HZO trades at $22.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is -18.43. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to HZO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check HZO's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 475.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while ZKH trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check ZKH's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 468.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BYON trades at $8.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BYON's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 454.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while ARKO trades at $3.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 133.00. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check ARKO's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 351.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while LE trades at $11.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 88.69. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check LE's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 342M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while FLWS trades at $5.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check FLWS's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 285.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BNED trades at $8.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BNED's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 272.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while JMIA trades at $4.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check JMIA's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while FTCH trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check FTCH's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 221.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while CHPT trades at $9.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check CHPT's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check QRTEA's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 193.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while LOGC trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -9.54. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check LOGC's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 188.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BARK-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BARK-WT's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 168.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BZUN trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BZUN's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while VLTA trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check VLTA's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 143.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BARK trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BARK's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check QRTEP's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while GOED trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check GOED's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while SPWH trades at $3.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check SPWH's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while AKA trades at $11.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check AKA's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 103.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while OCG trades at $5.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -27.83. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check OCG's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while APRN trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check APRN's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 93.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while DIBS trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check DIBS's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 60.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while HOUR trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 172.20. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check HOUR's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while GRWG trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check GRWG's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 53.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while NHTC trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 155.67. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check NHTC's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while PRTS trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check PRTS's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while CTIB trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check CTIB's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while QVCGP trades at $5.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check QVCGP's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BBBY trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BBBY's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while KIRK trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check KIRK's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 36.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while QVCGB trades at $32.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check QVCGB's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while SSU trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check SSU's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, LGCB has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while LGCB trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas LGCB's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to LGCB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to LGCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check LGCB's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BGFV trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BGFV's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while DTC trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to DTC's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check DTC's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while TLF trades at $3.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check TLF's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while QVCGA trades at $3.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check QVCGA's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while CGTL trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check CGTL's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while IPW trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -12.60. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check IPW's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while JBDI trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -6.11. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check JBDI's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while ZOOZ trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check ZOOZ's competition here

QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, MI has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while MI trades at $3.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas MI's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +4.53%, compared to MI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to MI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check MI's competition here