Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TGS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TGS | $30.39 | -3.55% | 4.6B | 14.97 | $2.03 | +3.00% |
| XOM | $139.74 | +0.91% | 579.2B | 23.52 | $5.94 | +2.97% |
| CVX | $176.03 | +0.55% | 350.6B | 30.67 | $5.74 | +4.03% |
| SHEL | $79.50 | -0.21% | 221.6B | 12.38 | $6.42 | +3.73% |
| TTE | $80.40 | -0.33% | 179.1B | 11.93 | $6.74 | +4.90% |
| PBR | $17.02 | +0.06% | 109.7B | 5.40 | $3.15 | +6.85% |
| BP | $39.32 | -1.16% | 103.1B | 10.95 | $3.59 | +5.06% |
| PBR-A | $15.22 | -0.26% | 98.1B | 4.79 | $3.18 | +7.63% |
| EQNR | $32.64 | -0.70% | 82.7B | 14.77 | $2.21 | +4.60% |
| E | $48.75 | -1.32% | 71.3B | 21.10 | $2.31 | +4.96% |
Stock Comparison
TGS vs XOM Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 579.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while XOM trades at $139.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to XOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check XOM's competition here
TGS vs CVX Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 350.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while CVX trades at $176.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check CVX's competition here
TGS vs SHEL Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 221.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while SHEL trades at $79.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check SHEL's competition here
TGS vs TTE Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 179.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while TTE trades at $80.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check TTE's competition here
TGS vs PBR Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 109.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while PBR trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check PBR's competition here
TGS vs BP Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 103.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while BP trades at $39.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas BP's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check BP's competition here
TGS vs PBR-A Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 98.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while PBR-A trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check PBR-A's competition here
TGS vs EQNR Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 82.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while EQNR trades at $32.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check EQNR's competition here
TGS vs E Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, E has a market cap of 71.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while E trades at $48.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas E's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check E's competition here
TGS vs SU Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 66.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while SU trades at $56.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check SU's competition here
TGS vs IMO Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while IMO trades at $114.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check IMO's competition here
TGS vs CVE Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while CVE trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check CVE's competition here
TGS vs EC Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while EC trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check EC's competition here
TGS vs YPF Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while YPF trades at $48.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is -46.17. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YPF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check YPF's competition here
TGS vs NFG Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while NFG trades at $77.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check NFG's competition here
TGS vs TANNZ Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check TANNZ's competition here
TGS vs SLNG Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while SLNG trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SLNG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check SLNG's competition here
TGS vs CGBS Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while CGBS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check CGBS's competition here
TGS vs ZEST Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check ZEST's competition here
TGS vs SKYQ Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while SKYQ trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check SKYQ's competition here
TGS vs CGBSW Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CGBSW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while CGBSW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas CGBSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CGBSW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to CGBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check CGBSW's competition here
TGS vs RDS-A Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check RDS-A's competition here
TGS vs TELZ Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while TELZ trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check TELZ's competition here
TGS vs PTR Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while PTR trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check PTR's competition here
TGS vs SNP Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while SNP trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check SNP's competition here
TGS vs RDS-B Comparison June 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $30.39, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.97, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check RDS-B's competition here