Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A.
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TGS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TGS | $29.42 | -0.74% | 4.4B | 14.16 | $2.08 | +3.18% |
| XOM | $157.92 | +3.36% | 654.6B | 26.59 | $5.94 | +2.60% |
| CVX | $191.10 | +2.39% | 380.5B | 33.23 | $5.75 | +3.63% |
| SHEL | $85.36 | +1.01% | 240.6B | 13.30 | $6.42 | +3.39% |
| TTE | $92.28 | +0.94% | 205.5B | 13.69 | $6.74 | +4.30% |
| PBR | $19.93 | +0.76% | 128.4B | 6.56 | $3.04 | +5.96% |
| BP | $44.35 | +0.53% | 116.3B | 35.77 | $1.24 | +4.50% |
| PBR-A | $17.99 | -0.33% | 115.9B | 5.92 | $3.04 | +6.64% |
| EQNR | $39.48 | +2.52% | 100.1B | 17.87 | $2.21 | +3.79% |
| E | $55.49 | +0.29% | 81.7B | 23.71 | $2.34 | +3.98% |
Stock Comparison
TGS vs XOM Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 654.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while XOM trades at $157.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS and XOM have similar daily volatility (3.22).Check XOM's competition here
TGS vs CVX Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 380.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while CVX trades at $191.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 33.23. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check CVX's competition here
TGS vs SHEL Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 240.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while SHEL trades at $85.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check SHEL's competition here
TGS vs TTE Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 205.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while TTE trades at $92.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check TTE's competition here
TGS vs PBR Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 128.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while PBR trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check PBR's competition here
TGS vs BP Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 116.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while BP trades at $44.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas BP's P/E ratio is 35.77. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check BP's competition here
TGS vs PBR-A Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 115.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while PBR-A trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check PBR-A's competition here
TGS vs EQNR Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while EQNR trades at $39.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is less volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check EQNR's competition here
TGS vs E Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, E has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while E trades at $55.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas E's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check E's competition here
TGS vs SU Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 81.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while SU trades at $68.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check SU's competition here
TGS vs IMO Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while IMO trades at $134.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 31.35. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check IMO's competition here
TGS vs CVE Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while CVE trades at $30.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check CVE's competition here
TGS vs EC Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while EC trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check EC's competition here
TGS vs YPF Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while YPF trades at $43.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YPF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check YPF's competition here
TGS vs NFG Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while NFG trades at $81.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check NFG's competition here
TGS vs TANNZ Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check TANNZ's competition here
TGS vs SLNG Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 73.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while SLNG trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is -17.95. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SLNG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check SLNG's competition here
TGS vs CGBS Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while CGBS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check CGBS's competition here
TGS vs SKYQ Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while SKYQ trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -5.58. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check SKYQ's competition here
TGS vs ZEST Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check ZEST's competition here
TGS vs CGBSW Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CGBSW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while CGBSW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas CGBSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CGBSW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to CGBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check CGBSW's competition here
TGS vs SNP Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while SNP trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check SNP's competition here
TGS vs RDS-A Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check RDS-A's competition here
TGS vs TELZ Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while TELZ trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check TELZ's competition here
TGS vs RDS-B Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check RDS-B's competition here
TGS vs PTR Comparison May 2026
TGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGS stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TGS is priced at $29.42, while PTR trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TGS is more volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGS.Check PTR's competition here