Nutrien Ltd.
Nutrien Ltd. NTR Peers
See (NTR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTR | $58.06 | +3.31% | 28.37B | 42.69 | $1.36 | +3.73% |
| CTA-PB | $69.08 | -0.19% | 59.95B | N/A | N/A | +6.45% |
| CTVA | $67.90 | -0.10% | 46.32B | 55.65 | $1.22 | +0.98% |
| CF | $87.72 | +3.95% | 14.21B | 13.01 | $6.74 | +2.27% |
| MOS | $34.23 | +3.88% | 10.86B | 29.51 | $1.16 | +2.48% |
| ICL | $6.84 | -0.07% | 8.82B | 21.36 | $0.32 | +2.76% |
| FMC | $38.13 | -0.24% | 4.76B | 12.42 | $3.07 | +6.07% |
| SMG | $59.02 | +3.54% | 3.41B | 101.76 | $0.58 | +4.47% |
| UAN | $82.15 | +0.37% | 868.29M | 11.52 | $7.13 | +8.54% |
| IPI | $36.32 | +1.79% | 483.67M | -2.28 | -$15.94 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NTR vs CTA-PB Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 59.95B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while CTA-PB trades at $69.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs CTVA Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 46.32B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while CTVA trades at $67.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 55.65. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs CF Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 14.21B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while CF trades at $87.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs MOS Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 10.86B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while MOS trades at $34.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 29.51. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs ICL Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 8.82B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while ICL trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs FMC Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 4.76B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while FMC trades at $38.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs SMG Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while SMG trades at $59.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 101.76. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs UAN Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 868.29M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while UAN trades at $82.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs IPI Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 483.67M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while IPI trades at $36.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IPI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs BIOX Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 293.49M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while BIOX trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is 234.00. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BIOX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs LVRO Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 285.45M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while LVRO trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs AVD Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 127.24M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while AVD trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs MULG Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.09M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while MULG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs BHIL-WT Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49.03M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs CGA Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.29M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CGA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs ENFY Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, ENFY has a market cap of 17.20M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while ENFY trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas ENFY's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ENFY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to ENFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs SEED Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 9.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while SEED trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SEED's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs NITO Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 6.86M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while NITO trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs RKDA Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 5.63M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while RKDA trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs SVFD Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.17M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs FMTO Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 2.81M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while FMTO trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FMTO's ROE of -9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs BHIL Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.52M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs YTEN Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345460.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YTEN's ROE of +4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.
NTR vs CTA-PA Comparison
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.37B. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 10900.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $58.06, while CTA-PA trades at $54.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 42.69, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.