Nutrien Ltd.

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while CTA-PB trades at $68.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check CTA-PB's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while CTVA trades at $77.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 43.62. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check CTVA's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while CTA-PA trades at $54.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check CTA-PA's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while CF trades at $99.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check CF's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while MOS trades at $30.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check MOS's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while ICL trades at $5.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check ICL's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while SMG trades at $69.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 25.09. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check SMG's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while FMC trades at $14.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMC's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check FMC's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while UAN trades at $107.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check UAN's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 531.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while PURR trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PURR's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to PURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check PURR's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 450.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while IPI trades at $33.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPI's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check IPI's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 151.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while AVD trades at $5.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check AVD's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, BHST has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while BHST trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas BHST's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHST's ROE of -11.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to BHST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check BHST's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while MULG trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check MULG's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check BHIL-WT's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while LVRO trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check LVRO's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while BIOX trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check BIOX's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while CGA trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check CGA's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, AGRZ has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while AGRZ trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas AGRZ's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGRZ's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to AGRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check AGRZ's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while SEED trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEED's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check SEED's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while SVFD trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -366.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check SVFD's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while FMTO trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMTO's ROE of -35.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check FMTO's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while RKDA trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check RKDA's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while BHIL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check BHIL's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 886.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while NITO trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NITO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check NITO's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while YTEN trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YTEN's ROE of -15.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check YTEN's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 34.7B. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $71.78, while MBII trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.20, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check MBII's competition here