Nutrien Ltd.
Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NTR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTR | $57.90 | +0.50% | 28.2B | 20.82 | $2.78 | +3.75% |
| CTA-PB | $71.63 | +1.47% | 62.2B | N/A | N/A | +6.28% |
| CTVA | $73.37 | +0.53% | 49.8B | 33.81 | $2.17 | +0.93% |
| CF | $86.51 | +0.17% | 14B | 11.33 | $7.63 | +2.31% |
| MOS | $32.55 | -0.18% | 10.3B | 11.03 | $2.95 | +2.64% |
| ICL | $6.30 | +0.80% | 8.2B | 21.78 | $0.29 | +2.91% |
| FMC | $40.69 | +3.43% | 5.1B | 39.12 | $1.04 | +5.70% |
| SMG | $63.42 | +4.69% | 3.7B | 77.35 | $0.82 | +4.18% |
| UAN | $90.05 | -0.22% | 952.8M | 10.84 | $8.32 | +10.09% |
| IPI | $28.15 | +0.00% | 374.2M | -1.80 | -$15.62 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NTR vs CTA-PB Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while CTA-PB trades at $71.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check CTA-PB's competition here
NTR vs CTVA Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while CTVA trades at $73.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check CTVA's competition here
NTR vs CF Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while CF trades at $86.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check CF's competition here
NTR vs MOS Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while MOS trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check MOS's competition here
NTR vs ICL Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while ICL trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check ICL's competition here
NTR vs FMC Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while FMC trades at $40.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is 39.12. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FMC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check FMC's competition here
NTR vs SMG Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while SMG trades at $63.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 77.35. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check SMG's competition here
NTR vs UAN Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 952.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while UAN trades at $90.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check UAN's competition here
NTR vs IPI Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 374.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while IPI trades at $28.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPI's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check IPI's competition here
NTR vs LVRO Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 204.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while LVRO trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check LVRO's competition here
NTR vs BIOX Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 183.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while BIOX trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -20.93. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check BIOX's competition here
NTR vs AVD Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 154.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while AVD trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check AVD's competition here
NTR vs MULG Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while MULG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check MULG's competition here
NTR vs BHIL-WT Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check BHIL-WT's competition here
NTR vs CGA Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CGA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check CGA's competition here
NTR vs ENFY Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, ENFY has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while ENFY trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas ENFY's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ENFY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to ENFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check ENFY's competition here
NTR vs SEED Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while SEED trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEED's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check SEED's competition here
NTR vs NITO Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while NITO trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check NITO's competition here
NTR vs RKDA Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while RKDA trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check RKDA's competition here
NTR vs SVFD Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -3.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check SVFD's competition here
NTR vs FMTO Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while FMTO trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FMTO's ROE of -10.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check FMTO's competition here
NTR vs BHIL Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check BHIL's competition here
NTR vs YTEN Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YTEN's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check YTEN's competition here
NTR vs CTA-PA Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while CTA-PA trades at $55.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check CTA-PA's competition here
NTR vs MBII Comparison August 2025
NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 28.2B. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $57.90, while MBII trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.82, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check MBII's competition here