Newpark Resources, Inc.
Newpark Resources, Inc. (NR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NR | $7.25 | -4.86% | 627.1M | 19.08 | $0.38 | N/A |
| SLB | $50.77 | -1.49% | 76B | 21.64 | $2.35 | +2.27% |
| BKR | $63.14 | +0.93% | 61.5B | 23.93 | $2.60 | +1.48% |
| HAL | $35.17 | -0.58% | 29.5B | 23.41 | $1.50 | +1.94% |
| TS | $53.33 | -0.58% | 28B | 14.04 | $3.72 | +3.26% |
| FTI | $63.98 | +3.59% | 26.1B | 28.60 | $2.22 | +0.32% |
| WFRD | $104.53 | -0.95% | 7.5B | 17.61 | $5.93 | +0.99% |
| NOV | $19.83 | -2.03% | 7.4B | 52.28 | $0.39 | +2.51% |
| VAL | $96.17 | +3.98% | 6.7B | 17.13 | $5.59 | N/A |
| AROC | $32.74 | -0.41% | 5.8B | 21.77 | $1.51 | +2.54% |
Stock Comparison
NR vs SLB Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 76B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while SLB trades at $50.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check SLB's competition here
NR vs BKR Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while BKR trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check BKR's competition here
NR vs HAL Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while HAL trades at $35.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check HAL's competition here
NR vs TS Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while TS trades at $53.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check TS's competition here
NR vs FTI Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while FTI trades at $63.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check FTI's competition here
NR vs WFRD Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while WFRD trades at $104.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check WFRD's competition here
NR vs NOV Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while NOV trades at $19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 52.28. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check NOV's competition here
NR vs VAL Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while VAL trades at $96.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check VAL's competition here
NR vs AROC Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while AROC trades at $32.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check AROC's competition here
NR vs LB Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while LB trades at $67.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas LB's P/E ratio is 77.86. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to LB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check LB's competition here
NR vs CHX Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while CHX trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check CHX's competition here
NR vs LBRT Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while LBRT trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 30.18. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check LBRT's competition here
NR vs KGS Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while KGS trades at $49.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 60.30. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check KGS's competition here
NR vs WHD Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while WHD trades at $57.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check WHD's competition here
NR vs TDW Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while TDW trades at $77.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check TDW's competition here
NR vs SEI Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while SEI trades at $47.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 53.51. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check SEI's competition here
NR vs OII Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while OII trades at $36.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check OII's competition here
NR vs USAC Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while USAC trades at $26.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to USAC's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check USAC's competition here
NR vs TDW-WT Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check TDW-WT's competition here
NR vs NESR Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while NESR trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check NESR's competition here
NR vs NEX Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check NEX's competition here
NR vs EFXT Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while EFXT trades at $19.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check EFXT's competition here
NR vs FLOC Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while FLOC trades at $23.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FLOC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check FLOC's competition here
NR vs XPRO Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while XPRO trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check XPRO's competition here
NR vs INVX Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while INVX trades at $25.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 39.15. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check INVX's competition here
NR vs TTI Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while TTI trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check TTI's competition here
NR vs AESI Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while AESI trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is -117.00. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to AESI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check AESI's competition here
NR vs DNOW Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while DNOW trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to DNOW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check DNOW's competition here
NR vs RES Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while RES trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 40.73. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check RES's competition here
NR vs VTOL Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while VTOL trades at $47.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check VTOL's competition here
NR vs PUMP Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while PUMP trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -66.18. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PUMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check PUMP's competition here
NR vs HLX Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while HLX trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check HLX's competition here
NR vs NPKI Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while NPKI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 38.36. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NPKI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check NPKI's competition here
NR vs SLCA Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check SLCA's competition here
NR vs PFHC Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check PFHC's competition here
NR vs MRC Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while MRC trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 59.91. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to MRC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check MRC's competition here
NR vs VAL-WT Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 987.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while VAL-WT trades at $13.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check VAL-WT's competition here
NR vs ACDC Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 960.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while ACDC trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check ACDC's competition here
NR vs CLB Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 858.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while CLB trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 27.10. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check CLB's competition here
NR vs OIS Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 748.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while OIS trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is 33.84. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to OIS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check OIS's competition here
NR vs NESRW Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while NESRW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check NESRW's competition here
NR vs FET Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 688M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while FET trades at $59.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check FET's competition here
NR vs DRQ Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check DRQ's competition here
NR vs FTK Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 499.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while FTK trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check FTK's competition here
NR vs SOI Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check SOI's competition here
NR vs NOA Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 480M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while NOA trades at $16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check NOA's competition here
NR vs NGS Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 473.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while NGS trades at $37.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check NGS's competition here
NR vs RNGR Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 398.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while RNGR trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check RNGR's competition here
NR vs CCLP Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check CCLP's competition here
NR vs SND Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 208.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while SND trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas SND's P/E ratio is 52.50. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check SND's competition here
NR vs OMSE Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, OMSE has a market cap of 191M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while OMSE trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas OMSE's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to OMSE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to OMSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check OMSE's competition here
NR vs BOOM Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 176M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while BOOM trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -18.19. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check BOOM's competition here
NR vs DTI Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while DTI trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is -21.05. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check DTI's competition here
NR vs GEOS Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 120.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while GEOS trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check GEOS's competition here
NR vs PFIE Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check PFIE's competition here
NR vs NCSM Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 101.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while NCSM trades at $39.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check NCSM's competition here
NR vs DWSN Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while DWSN trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -29.60. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to DWSN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check DWSN's competition here
NR vs LSE Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while LSE trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 59.00. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to LSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check LSE's competition here
NR vs KLXE Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while KLXE trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check KLXE's competition here
NR vs RCON Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while RCON trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check RCON's competition here
NR vs SDPI Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check SDPI's competition here
NR vs STAK Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, STAK has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while STAK trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas STAK's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to STAK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to STAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check STAK's competition here
NR vs NINE Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 866.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while NINE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NINE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check NINE's competition here
NR vs ENSV Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 49.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while ENSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -28.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check ENSV's competition here
NR vs EXTN Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while EXTN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check EXTN's competition here
NR vs FTSI Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while FTSI trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check FTSI's competition here
NR vs CELP Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while CELP trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check CELP's competition here
NR vs USWS Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while USWS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check USWS's competition here
NR vs VLI Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, VLI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while VLI trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas VLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to VLI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to VLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check VLI's competition here
NR vs ACDCW Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, ACDCW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check ACDCW's competition here
NR vs IO Comparison February 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while IO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.56%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check IO's competition here