NET Power Inc.
NET Power Inc. NPWR Peers
See (NPWR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPWR | $2.92 | +35.27% | 226.6M | -1.42 | -$2.06 | N/A |
| ETN | $331.50 | +1.54% | 129.7B | 33.45 | $9.91 | +1.20% |
| PH | $671.40 | +1.42% | 85.8B | 25.83 | $25.99 | +1.00% |
| ITW | $247.48 | +0.55% | 72.5B | 21.77 | $11.37 | +2.38% |
| HWM | $175.36 | +0.20% | 70.8B | 57.31 | $3.06 | +0.21% |
| EMR | $123.49 | +0.81% | 69.5B | 35.69 | $3.46 | +1.71% |
| ROP | $572.85 | +0.59% | 61.6B | 41.33 | $13.86 | +0.55% |
| CMI | $326.51 | +1.05% | 45B | 16.09 | $20.29 | +2.23% |
| AME | $178.35 | +0.80% | 41.2B | 29.19 | $6.11 | +0.65% |
| OTIS | $96.07 | +0.83% | 37.9B | 25.15 | $3.82 | +1.66% |
Stock Comparison
NPWR vs ETN Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 129.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while ETN trades at $331.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 33.45. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs PH Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 85.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while PH trades at $671.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs ITW Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while ITW trades at $247.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs HWM Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, HWM has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while HWM trades at $175.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas HWM's P/E ratio is 57.31. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HWM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to HWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs EMR Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 69.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while EMR trades at $123.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 35.69. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs ROP Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while ROP trades at $572.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 41.33. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs CMI Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while CMI trades at $326.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs AME Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while AME trades at $178.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs OTIS Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while OTIS trades at $96.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs ROK Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while ROK trades at $324.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 40.78. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs B Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, B has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while B trades at $19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas B's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs IR Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while IR trades at $83.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 41.14. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs XYL Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while XYL trades at $126.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 34.14. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs HWM-P Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, HWM-P has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while HWM-P trades at $70.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas HWM-P's P/E ratio is 99.17. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HWM-P's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to HWM-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs DOV Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while DOV trades at $179.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs PNR Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while PNR trades at $99.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs GGG Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while GGG trades at $85.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 30.04. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs IEX Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while IEX trades at $183.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs NDSN Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while NDSN trades at $214.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs ITT Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while ITT trades at $152.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs CR Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while CR trades at $177.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 36.17. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs RRX Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while RRX trades at $139.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 39.97. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs AOS Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while AOS trades at $64.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs DCI Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while DCI trades at $70.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs WTS Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while WTS trades at $244.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs MIDD Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while MIDD trades at $147.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MIDD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs GNRC Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while GNRC trades at $127.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs PSN Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while PSN trades at $69.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs SPXC Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while SPXC trades at $157.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 36.24. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs GTLS Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while GTLS trades at $152.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 30.30. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GTLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs FLS Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while FLS trades at $48.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs JBTM Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while JBTM trades at $121.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is -85.20. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JBTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs GTES Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while GTES trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs CSWI Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.41. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs MIR Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while MIR trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is -397.70. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MIR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs NPO Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while NPO trades at $192.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 47.97. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs AIMC Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs JBT Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JBT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs FELE Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while FELE trades at $86.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs KAI Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while KAI trades at $329.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 35.02. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs MWA Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while MWA trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs CXT Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while CXT trades at $54.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs ATS Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while ATS trades at $30.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is -143.29. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs GTLS-PB Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while GTLS-PB trades at $57.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs EPAC Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while EPAC trades at $43.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs CFX Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs SXI Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while SXI trades at $153.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs ENOV Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while ENOV trades at $31.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs XMTR Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while XMTR trades at $36.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -37.12. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs HI Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while HI trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas HI's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs TNC Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while TNC trades at $74.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs AMSC Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while AMSC trades at $31.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 196.75. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs NNE Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while NNE trades at $31.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -32.15. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs CIR Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs PSIX Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while PSIX trades at $47.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs HLIO Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while HLIO trades at $32.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 29.12. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs KRNT Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while KRNT trades at $22.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -125.22. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs GRC Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 977.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while GRC trades at $37.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs BW-PA Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 935.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while BW-PA trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 33.25. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs THR Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 919.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while THR trades at $27.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs SERV Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 739.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while SERV trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -13.92. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs CYD Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 673.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while CYD trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs BLDP Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 458.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while BLDP trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs GHM Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 457.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while GHM trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 50.60. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs BGRY Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs LXFR Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 321.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while LXFR trades at $11.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs OFLX Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 321.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while OFLX trades at $31.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs SIMA Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, SIMA has a market cap of 320M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while SIMA trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas SIMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIMA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to SIMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs RR Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 270.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while RR trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -16.86. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs PKOH Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while PKOH trades at $17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs WFF Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 146.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while WFF trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is 290.50. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs BW Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 124M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while BW trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs SHMD Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 116.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while SHMD trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs TAYD Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 114.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while TAYD trades at $36.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs TWIN Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 104.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while TWIN trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs HUHU Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 104.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while HUHU trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -49.20. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs HURC Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 90.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while HURC trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs XCH Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while XCH trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to XCH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs PYR Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs TPIC Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while TPIC trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs HCAI Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 45.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while HCAI trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs BWEN Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while BWEN trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -45.75. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BWEN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs GTEC Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while GTEC trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 1.82. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs LASE Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while LASE trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LASE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs LBGJ Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, LBGJ has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while LBGJ trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas LBGJ's P/E ratio is -23.71. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LBGJ's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to LBGJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs CVV Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while CVV trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -315.00. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs BURU Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while BURU trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BURU's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs CETY Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, CETY has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while CETY trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CETY's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CETY's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to CETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs INLF Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, INLF has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while INLF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas INLF's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to INLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs SHMDW Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while SHMDW trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs CGRN Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while CGRN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CGRN's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs JCSE Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while JCSE trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs SHPW Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs NMHI Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, NMHI has a market cap of 521.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while NMHI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas NMHI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NMHI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to NMHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs NMHIW Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, NMHIW has a market cap of 24K. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while NMHIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas NMHIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NMHIW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to NMHIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs RAVN Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, RAVN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while RAVN trades at $58.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas RAVN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RAVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to RAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs CFXA Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, CFXA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while CFXA trades at $177.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CFXA's P/E ratio is 248.89. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CFXA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to CFXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs WBT Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, WBT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while WBT trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas WBT's P/E ratio is 47.08. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WBT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to WBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.
NPWR vs BGRYW Comparison
NPWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPWR stands at 226.6M. In comparison, BGRYW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NPWR is priced at $2.92, while BGRYW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPWR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas BGRYW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NPWR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BGRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NPWR is more volatile compared to BGRYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPWR.