North American Construction Group Ltd.
North American Construction Group Ltd. (NOA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NOA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOA | $15.39 | -2.78% | 452.1M | 15.67 | $0.98 | +2.12% |
| SLB | $35.47 | +0.65% | 53.3B | 12.15 | $2.92 | +3.14% |
| BKR | $46.05 | +0.72% | 45.6B | 15.05 | $3.06 | +1.91% |
| TS | $38.07 | -0.24% | 20.2B | 11.60 | $3.28 | +5.77% |
| HAL | $22.45 | +0.13% | 19.3B | 10.55 | $2.13 | +3.01% |
| FTI | $36.45 | -2.90% | 15.3B | 17.35 | $2.10 | +0.54% |
| NOV | $13.97 | +1.90% | 5.2B | 9.38 | $1.49 | +3.66% |
| CHX | $25.81 | -2.97% | 4.9B | 17.09 | $1.51 | +1.47% |
| WFRD | $56.86 | -1.80% | 4.1B | 8.76 | $6.49 | +1.75% |
| AROC | $23.30 | -0.30% | 4.1B | 19.59 | $1.19 | +3.08% |
Stock Comparison
NOA vs SLB Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while SLB trades at $35.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check SLB's competition here
NOA vs BKR Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while BKR trades at $46.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check BKR's competition here
NOA vs TS Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while TS trades at $38.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check TS's competition here
NOA vs HAL Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while HAL trades at $22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check HAL's competition here
NOA vs FTI Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while FTI trades at $36.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check FTI's competition here
NOA vs NOV Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while NOV trades at $13.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NOV's competition here
NOA vs CHX Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while CHX trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check CHX's competition here
NOA vs WFRD Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while WFRD trades at $56.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check WFRD's competition here
NOA vs AROC Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while AROC trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check AROC's competition here
NOA vs VAL Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while VAL trades at $50.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check VAL's competition here
NOA vs VAL-WT Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while VAL-WT trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check VAL-WT's competition here
NOA vs WHD Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while WHD trades at $46.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check WHD's competition here
NOA vs USAC Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while USAC trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 36.65. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USAC's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check USAC's competition here
NOA vs KGS Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while KGS trades at $31.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 62.53. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check KGS's competition here
NOA vs TDW-WT Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check TDW-WT's competition here
NOA vs TDW Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while TDW trades at $51.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check TDW's competition here
NOA vs NEX Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NEX's competition here
NOA vs OII Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while OII trades at $22.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check OII's competition here
NOA vs SEI Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while SEI trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 65.01. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check SEI's competition here
NOA vs LBRT Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while LBRT trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check LBRT's competition here
NOA vs AESI Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while AESI trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is 46.80. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AESI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check AESI's competition here
NOA vs FLOC Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while FLOC trades at $19.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLOC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check FLOC's competition here
NOA vs DNOW Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while DNOW trades at $15.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DNOW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check DNOW's competition here
NOA vs LB Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while LB trades at $56.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas LB's P/E ratio is -19.46. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check LB's competition here
NOA vs ACDC Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while ACDC trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -5.15. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check ACDC's competition here
NOA vs MRC Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while MRC trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 28.56. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check MRC's competition here
NOA vs SLCA Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check SLCA's competition here
NOA vs PFHC Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check PFHC's competition here
NOA vs INVX Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while INVX trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check INVX's competition here
NOA vs RES Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while RES trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check RES's competition here
NOA vs VTOL Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while VTOL trades at $36.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check VTOL's competition here
NOA vs WTTR Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, WTTR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while WTTR trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas WTTR's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTTR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to WTTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check WTTR's competition here
NOA vs XPRO Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 995.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while XPRO trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check XPRO's competition here
NOA vs EFXT Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 990.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while EFXT trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check EFXT's competition here
NOA vs HLX Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 934.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while HLX trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check HLX's competition here
NOA vs NPKI Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 762.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while NPKI trades at $9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NPKI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NPKI's competition here
NOA vs NESR Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 641.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while NESR trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NESR's competition here
NOA vs NR Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NR's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NR's competition here
NOA vs PUMP Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 622.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while PUMP trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check PUMP's competition here
NOA vs NESRW Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 564.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while NESRW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NESRW's competition here
NOA vs CLB Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 549.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while CLB trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check CLB's competition here
NOA vs DRQ Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check DRQ's competition here
NOA vs SOI Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check SOI's competition here
NOA vs TTI Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 493.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while TTI trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check TTI's competition here
NOA vs FTK Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 369M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while FTK trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check FTK's competition here
NOA vs OIS Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 357.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while OIS trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is 72.19. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check OIS's competition here
NOA vs CCLP Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check CCLP's competition here
NOA vs NGS Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 305M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while NGS trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NGS's competition here
NOA vs RNGR Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 277.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while RNGR trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check RNGR's competition here
NOA vs FET Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 243.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while FET trades at $19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check FET's competition here
NOA vs BOOM Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 174.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while BOOM trades at $8.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check BOOM's competition here
NOA vs GEOS Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while GEOS trades at $12.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check GEOS's competition here
NOA vs PFIE Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check PFIE's competition here
NOA vs LSE Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 94.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while LSE trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LSE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check LSE's competition here
NOA vs SND Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while SND trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas SND's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SND's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check SND's competition here
NOA vs RCON Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while RCON trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check RCON's competition here
NOA vs DTI Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 79M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while DTI trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is -31.71. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check DTI's competition here
NOA vs NCSM Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while NCSM trades at $30.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NCSM's competition here
NOA vs DWSN Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while DWSN trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DWSN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check DWSN's competition here
NOA vs KLXE Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 33.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while KLXE trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check KLXE's competition here
NOA vs NINE Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while NINE trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NINE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NINE's competition here
NOA vs SDPI Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check SDPI's competition here
NOA vs ENSV Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 5.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while ENSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -4.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check ENSV's competition here
NOA vs CELP Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while CELP trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check CELP's competition here
NOA vs ACDCW Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, ACDCW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check ACDCW's competition here
NOA vs FTSI Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while FTSI trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check FTSI's competition here
NOA vs IO Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while IO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check IO's competition here
NOA vs EXTN Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while EXTN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check EXTN's competition here
NOA vs USWS Comparison July 2025
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 452.1M. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $15.39, while USWS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.67, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check USWS's competition here