Nature's Miracle Holding Inc.
Nature's Miracle Holding Inc. (NMHIW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NMHIW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMHIW | $0.01 | +0.00% | 56.4K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ETN | $358.16 | -0.56% | 141.3B | 36.44 | $9.96 | +1.12% |
| PH | $697.13 | -3.89% | 93B | 26.83 | $27.13 | +0.92% |
| ITW | $257.51 | +0.28% | 74.9B | 22.65 | $11.35 | +2.33% |
| EMR | $133.93 | +0.83% | 74.7B | 34.13 | $3.89 | +1.59% |
| HWM | $182.06 | +0.26% | 72.9B | 52.85 | $3.42 | +0.22% |
| ROP | $541.84 | +0.96% | 57.5B | 37.58 | $14.22 | +0.60% |
| CMI | $381.68 | -0.76% | 53.4B | 18.15 | $21.34 | +1.87% |
| AME | $185.47 | +1.77% | 42B | 29.31 | $6.21 | +0.65% |
| B | $22.73 | -1.47% | 40.3B | 17.75 | $1.32 | +2.39% |
Stock Comparison
NMHIW vs ETN Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 141.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while ETN trades at $358.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 36.44. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check ETN's competition here
NMHIW vs PH Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while PH trades at $697.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check PH's competition here
NMHIW vs ITW Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 74.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while ITW trades at $257.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check ITW's competition here
NMHIW vs EMR Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while EMR trades at $133.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 34.13. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check EMR's competition here
NMHIW vs HWM Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, HWM has a market cap of 72.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while HWM trades at $182.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWM's P/E ratio is 52.85. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to HWM's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to HWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check HWM's competition here
NMHIW vs ROP Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while ROP trades at $541.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check ROP's competition here
NMHIW vs CMI Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CMI trades at $381.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check CMI's competition here
NMHIW vs AME Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while AME trades at $185.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 29.31. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check AME's competition here
NMHIW vs B Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, B has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while B trades at $22.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas B's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check B's competition here
NMHIW vs ROK Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while ROK trades at $328.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 38.71. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check ROK's competition here
NMHIW vs XYL Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while XYL trades at $143.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 37.25. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check XYL's competition here
NMHIW vs OTIS Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while OTIS trades at $86.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check OTIS's competition here
NMHIW vs IR Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while IR trades at $76.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 58.84. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check IR's competition here
NMHIW vs HWM-P Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, HWM-P has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while HWM-P trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWM-P's P/E ratio is 96.35. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to HWM-P's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to HWM-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check HWM-P's competition here
NMHIW vs DOV Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while DOV trades at $174.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check DOV's competition here
NMHIW vs PNR Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while PNR trades at $102.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check PNR's competition here
NMHIW vs GGG Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while GGG trades at $83.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 29.61. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check GGG's competition here
NMHIW vs ITT Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while ITT trades at $165.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check ITT's competition here
NMHIW vs NDSN Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while NDSN trades at $211.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check NDSN's competition here
NMHIW vs IEX Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while IEX trades at $159.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check IEX's competition here
NMHIW vs GNRC Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while GNRC trades at $193.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 32.71. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check GNRC's competition here
NMHIW vs CR Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CR trades at $194.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 37.62. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check CR's competition here
NMHIW vs AOS Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while AOS trades at $70.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check AOS's competition here
NMHIW vs SPXC Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while SPXC trades at $203.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 44.73. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check SPXC's competition here
NMHIW vs RRX Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while RRX trades at $145.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 36.99. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check RRX's competition here
NMHIW vs GTLS Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while GTLS trades at $199.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 36.58. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to GTLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check GTLS's competition here
NMHIW vs WTS Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while WTS trades at $263.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 30.38. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check WTS's competition here
NMHIW vs DCI Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while DCI trades at $72.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check DCI's competition here
NMHIW vs PSN Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while PSN trades at $75.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 34.82. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check PSN's competition here
NMHIW vs JBTM Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while JBTM trades at $136.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is -59.09. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to JBTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check JBTM's competition here
NMHIW vs FLS Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while FLS trades at $53.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check FLS's competition here
NMHIW vs MIDD Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while MIDD trades at $118.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to MIDD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check MIDD's competition here
NMHIW vs GTES Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while GTES trades at $24.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check GTES's competition here
NMHIW vs CSWI Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check CSWI's competition here
NMHIW vs MIR Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while MIR trades at $21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 420.60. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check MIR's competition here
NMHIW vs NPO Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while NPO trades at $220.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 53.48. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check NPO's competition here
NMHIW vs FELE Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while FELE trades at $94.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check FELE's competition here
NMHIW vs AIMC Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check AIMC's competition here
NMHIW vs MWA Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while MWA trades at $25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check MWA's competition here
NMHIW vs JBT Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to JBT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check JBT's competition here
NMHIW vs KAI Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while KAI trades at $323.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 36.30. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check KAI's competition here
NMHIW vs CXT Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CXT trades at $56.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check CXT's competition here
NMHIW vs GTLS-PB Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while GTLS-PB trades at $71.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check GTLS-PB's competition here
NMHIW vs ATS Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while ATS trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is -97.22. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ATS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check ATS's competition here
NMHIW vs AMSC Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while AMSC trades at $54.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 127.48. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check AMSC's competition here
NMHIW vs PSIX Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while PSIX trades at $90.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check PSIX's competition here
NMHIW vs SXI Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while SXI trades at $193.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 40.32. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check SXI's competition here
NMHIW vs EPAC Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while EPAC trades at $40.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check EPAC's competition here
NMHIW vs CFX Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check CFX's competition here
NMHIW vs SHPW Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check SHPW's competition here
NMHIW vs XMTR Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while XMTR trades at $44.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -33.85. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check XMTR's competition here
NMHIW vs ENOV Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while ENOV trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check ENOV's competition here
NMHIW vs HLIO Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while HLIO trades at $48.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 46.46. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check HLIO's competition here
NMHIW vs TNC Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while TNC trades at $82.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check TNC's competition here
NMHIW vs NNE Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while NNE trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -36.56. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check NNE's competition here
NMHIW vs HI Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while HI trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HI's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to HI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check HI's competition here
NMHIW vs CIR Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check CIR's competition here
NMHIW vs GRC Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while GRC trades at $41.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check GRC's competition here
NMHIW vs CYD Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CYD trades at $23.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check CYD's competition here
NMHIW vs BW-PA Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while BW-PA trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 35.66. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check BW-PA's competition here
NMHIW vs THR Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 801.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while THR trades at $28.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check THR's competition here
NMHIW vs KRNT Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 684M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while KRNT trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -60.36. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check KRNT's competition here
NMHIW vs SERV Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 598.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while SERV trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -11.26. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check SERV's competition here
NMHIW vs BLDP Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 539.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while BLDP trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check BLDP's competition here
NMHIW vs GHM Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 529.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while GHM trades at $49.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 38.30. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check GHM's competition here
NMHIW vs BGRY Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check BGRY's competition here
NMHIW vs OFLX Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 327.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while OFLX trades at $32.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check OFLX's competition here
NMHIW vs LXFR Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 326.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while LXFR trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check LXFR's competition here
NMHIW vs SIMA Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, SIMA has a market cap of 319.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while SIMA trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to SIMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to SIMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check SIMA's competition here
NMHIW vs PKOH Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while PKOH trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check PKOH's competition here
NMHIW vs RR Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 210.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while RR trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -13.07. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check RR's competition here
NMHIW vs NPWR Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 209.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while NPWR trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check NPWR's competition here
NMHIW vs TAYD Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 138.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while TAYD trades at $45.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check TAYD's competition here
NMHIW vs HUHU Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 135.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while HUHU trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -63.80. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check HUHU's competition here
NMHIW vs BW Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 129.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while BW trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check BW's competition here
NMHIW vs TWIN Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 125.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while TWIN trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check TWIN's competition here
NMHIW vs HURC Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 122.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while HURC trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -6.28. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check HURC's competition here
NMHIW vs SHMD Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 114.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while SHMD trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check SHMD's competition here
NMHIW vs XCH Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 70M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while XCH trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to XCH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check XCH's competition here
NMHIW vs PYR Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check PYR's competition here
NMHIW vs BWEN Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while BWEN trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -59.50. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to BWEN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check BWEN's competition here
NMHIW vs LASE Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while LASE trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -8.65. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to LASE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check LASE's competition here
NMHIW vs GTEC Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while GTEC trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 1.36. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check GTEC's competition here
NMHIW vs WFF Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while WFF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is 49.34. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to WFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check WFF's competition here
NMHIW vs CVV Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CVV trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -361.00. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check CVV's competition here
NMHIW vs HCAI Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while HCAI trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check HCAI's competition here
NMHIW vs LBGJ Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, LBGJ has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while LBGJ trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBGJ's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to LBGJ's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to LBGJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check LBGJ's competition here
NMHIW vs CETY Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, CETY has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CETY trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CETY's P/E ratio is -3.71. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CETY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to CETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check CETY's competition here
NMHIW vs INLF Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, INLF has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while INLF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INLF's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to INLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to INLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check INLF's competition here
NMHIW vs BURU Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while BURU trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to BURU's ROE of +1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check BURU's competition here
NMHIW vs TPIC Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while TPIC trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check TPIC's competition here
NMHIW vs SHMDW Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while SHMDW trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check SHMDW's competition here
NMHIW vs CGRN Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CGRN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CGRN's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check CGRN's competition here
NMHIW vs NMHI Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, NMHI has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while NMHI trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMHI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to NMHI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to NMHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check NMHI's competition here
NMHIW vs JCSE Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while JCSE trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check JCSE's competition here
NMHIW vs RAVN Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, RAVN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while RAVN trades at $58.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAVN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to RAVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to RAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check RAVN's competition here
NMHIW vs CFXA Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, CFXA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CFXA trades at $177.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFXA's P/E ratio is 248.89. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CFXA's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to CFXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check CFXA's competition here
NMHIW vs WBT Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, WBT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while WBT trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBT's P/E ratio is 47.08. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to WBT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to WBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check WBT's competition here
NMHIW vs BGRYW Comparison August 2025
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 56.4K. In comparison, BGRYW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while BGRYW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGRYW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to BGRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to BGRYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.Check BGRYW's competition here