Nature's Miracle Holding Inc.
Nature's Miracle Holding Inc. NMHIW Peers
See (NMHIW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMHIW | $0.01 | -28.57% | 20K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ETN | $360.62 | +0.83% | 141.1B | 36.45 | $9.89 | +1.10% |
| PH | $714.91 | +0.09% | 91.4B | 27.54 | $25.97 | +1.16% |
| EMR | $140.10 | -0.41% | 78.8B | 40.60 | $3.45 | +1.88% |
| ITW | $259.70 | -0.92% | 76.1B | 22.88 | $11.35 | +2.31% |
| HWM | $179.68 | +0.64% | 72.5B | 58.73 | $3.06 | +0.23% |
| ROP | $547.46 | -0.43% | 58.9B | 39.50 | $13.86 | +0.72% |
| CMI | $338.82 | -0.36% | 46.7B | 16.68 | $20.31 | +2.64% |
| AME | $180.97 | -0.26% | 41.8B | 29.63 | $6.11 | +0.81% |
| OTIS | $99.49 | -0.47% | 39.2B | 26.03 | $3.82 | +1.99% |
Stock Comparison
NMHIW vs ETN Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 141.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while ETN trades at $360.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 36.45. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs PH Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 91.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while PH trades at $714.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs EMR Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while EMR trades at $140.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 40.60. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs ITW Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while ITW trades at $259.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs HWM Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, HWM has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while HWM trades at $179.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWM's P/E ratio is 58.73. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to HWM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to HWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs ROP Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while ROP trades at $547.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs CMI Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CMI trades at $338.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs AME Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while AME trades at $180.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs OTIS Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while OTIS trades at $99.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs ROK Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while ROK trades at $343.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 43.26. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs B Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, B has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while B trades at $21.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas B's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs IR Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while IR trades at $89.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 44.05. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs XYL Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while XYL trades at $130.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs HWM-P Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, HWM-P has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while HWM-P trades at $72.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWM-P's P/E ratio is 101.96. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to HWM-P's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to HWM-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs DOV Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while DOV trades at $188.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs PNR Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while PNR trades at $107.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs GGG Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while GGG trades at $87.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 30.98. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs IEX Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while IEX trades at $181.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 28.80. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs NDSN Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while NDSN trades at $220.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs ITT Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while ITT trades at $157.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs CR Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CR trades at $184.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 37.51. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs RRX Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while RRX trades at $151.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 43.40. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs AOS Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while AOS trades at $69.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs GNRC Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while GNRC trades at $150.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs WTS Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while WTS trades at $254.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs DCI Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while DCI trades at $70.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs SPXC Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while SPXC trades at $172.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 39.57. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs MIDD Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while MIDD trades at $149.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to MIDD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs PSN Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while PSN trades at $74.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 31.83. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs GTLS Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while GTLS trades at $167.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 33.52. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to GTLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs FLS Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while FLS trades at $53.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs JBTM Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while JBTM trades at $133.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is -92.33. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to JBTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs GTES Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while GTES trades at $24.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 29.42. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs CSWI Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs MIR Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while MIR trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is -408.40. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to MIR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs NPO Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while NPO trades at $204.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 51.05. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs FELE Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while FELE trades at $91.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs AIMC Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs JBT Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to JBT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs MWA Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while MWA trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs KAI Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while KAI trades at $332.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs CXT Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CXT trades at $58.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs ATS Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while ATS trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is -140.50. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ATS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs GTLS-PB Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while GTLS-PB trades at $61.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs CFX Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs SHPW Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs EPAC Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while EPAC trades at $37.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs SXI Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while SXI trades at $163.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 32.30. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs ENOV Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while ENOV trades at $34.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs AMSC Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while AMSC trades at $39.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 244.94. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs XMTR Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while XMTR trades at $34.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -34.84. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs PSIX Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while PSIX trades at $72.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs HI Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while HI trades at $22.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HI's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to HI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs TNC Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while TNC trades at $83.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs NNE Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while NNE trades at $34.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -34.90. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs HLIO Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while HLIO trades at $36.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 32.62. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs CIR Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs GRC Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 989.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while GRC trades at $37.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs BW-PA Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 977.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while BW-PA trades at $9.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs THR Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 936.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while THR trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs CYD Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 923.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CYD trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs KRNT Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 910.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while KRNT trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -111.56. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs SERV Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 573.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while SERV trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -10.80. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs BLDP Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 562.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while BLDP trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs GHM Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 554.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while GHM trades at $50.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 45.59. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs OFLX Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 350M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while OFLX trades at $34.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs BGRY Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs LXFR Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while LXFR trades at $12.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs PKOH Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 259.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while PKOH trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs NPWR Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 257.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while NPWR trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs RR Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 208.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while RR trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -12.96. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs HUHU Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 154.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while HUHU trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -73.00. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs TAYD Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 144.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while TAYD trades at $45.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs TWIN Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 133M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while TWIN trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 32.41. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs SHMD Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 130.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while SHMD trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs HURC Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 129.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while HURC trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs BW Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 102.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while BW trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs XCH Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 81.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while XCH trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to XCH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs SIMA Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, SIMA has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while SIMA trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to SIMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to SIMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs PYR Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs LASE Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 55.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while LASE trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to LASE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs BWEN Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while BWEN trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -46.50. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to BWEN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs TPIC Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while TPIC trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs WFF Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while WFF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is 70.00. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to WFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is less volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs GTEC Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while GTEC trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 1.68. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs HCAI Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while HCAI trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs LBGJ Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, LBGJ has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while LBGJ trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBGJ's P/E ratio is -21.25. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to LBGJ's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to LBGJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs CVV Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CVV trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -324.00. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs INLF Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, INLF has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while INLF trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INLF's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to INLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to INLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs BURU Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while BURU trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is 4.45. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to BURU's ROE of +1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs CETY Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, CETY has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CETY trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CETY's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CETY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is less volatile compared to CETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs SHMDW Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while SHMDW trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs CGRN Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CGRN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CGRN's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs JCSE Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while JCSE trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs NMHI Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, NMHI has a market cap of 352.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while NMHI trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMHI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to NMHI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is less volatile compared to NMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs RAVN Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, RAVN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while RAVN trades at $58.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAVN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to RAVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to RAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs CFXA Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, CFXA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while CFXA trades at $177.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFXA's P/E ratio is 248.89. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to CFXA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to CFXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs BGRYW Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, BGRYW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while BGRYW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGRYW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to BGRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to BGRYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.
NMHIW vs WBT Comparison
NMHIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMHIW stands at 20K. In comparison, WBT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NMHIW is priced at $0.01, while WBT trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMHIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBT's P/E ratio is 47.08. In terms of profitability, NMHIW's ROE is +0.98%, compared to WBT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NMHIW is more volatile compared to WBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMHIW.