N2OFF, Inc.
N2OFF, Inc. (NITO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NITO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NITO | $0.66 | +5.72% | 630.3K | -0.05 | -$12.75 | N/A |
| CTA-PB | $67.57 | -0.92% | 58.8B | N/A | N/A | +0.85% |
| CTVA | $83.28 | +0.39% | 56.3B | 47.85 | $1.75 | +0.85% |
| CTA-PA | $54.45 | +0.00% | 36.8B | N/A | N/A | +6.43% |
| NTR | $73.63 | -3.81% | 36.5B | 16.19 | $4.66 | +2.92% |
| CF | $125.55 | -8.76% | 20B | 14.47 | $8.97 | +1.55% |
| MOS | $25.52 | +2.06% | 8.1B | 14.99 | $1.70 | +3.46% |
| ICL | $5.20 | +0.13% | 6.7B | 28.78 | $0.18 | +3.48% |
| SMG | $60.68 | +0.92% | 3.5B | 21.81 | $2.79 | +4.34% |
| FMC | $16.91 | +0.59% | 2.2B | -0.98 | -$17.59 | +7.67% |
Stock Comparison
NITO vs CTA-PB Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while CTA-PB trades at $67.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check CTA-PB's competition here
NITO vs CTVA Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while CTVA trades at $83.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 47.85. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check CTVA's competition here
NITO vs CTA-PA Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while CTA-PA trades at $54.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check CTA-PA's competition here
NITO vs NTR Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while NTR trades at $73.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check NTR's competition here
NITO vs CF Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while CF trades at $125.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check CF's competition here
NITO vs MOS Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while MOS trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check MOS's competition here
NITO vs ICL Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while ICL trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check ICL's competition here
NITO vs SMG Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while SMG trades at $60.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 21.81. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check SMG's competition here
NITO vs FMC Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while FMC trades at $16.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to FMC's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check FMC's competition here
NITO vs UAN Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while UAN trades at $125.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check UAN's competition here
NITO vs PURR Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 631M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while PURR trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to PURR's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to PURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check PURR's competition here
NITO vs IPI Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 574.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while IPI trades at $41.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is 50.39. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to IPI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check IPI's competition here
NITO vs BHST Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, BHST has a market cap of 75.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while BHST trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BHST's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to BHST's ROE of -11.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to BHST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check BHST's competition here
NITO vs AVD Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 71.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while AVD trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check AVD's competition here
NITO vs MULG Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while MULG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check MULG's competition here
NITO vs BHIL-WT Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check BHIL-WT's competition here
NITO vs FNUC Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, FNUC has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while FNUC trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FNUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to FNUC's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to FNUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check FNUC's competition here
NITO vs CGA Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to CGA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check CGA's competition here
NITO vs BIOX Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while BIOX trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check BIOX's competition here
NITO vs LVRO Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while LVRO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check LVRO's competition here
NITO vs AGRZ Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, AGRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while AGRZ trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AGRZ's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to AGRZ's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to AGRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check AGRZ's competition here
NITO vs SEED Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while SEED trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to SEED's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check SEED's competition here
NITO vs SVFD Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -366.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check SVFD's competition here
NITO vs FMTO Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while FMTO trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to FMTO's ROE of -35.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check FMTO's competition here
NITO vs RKDA Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while RKDA trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check RKDA's competition here
NITO vs BHIL Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check BHIL's competition here
NITO vs YTEN Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to YTEN's ROE of -15.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check YTEN's competition here
NITO vs MBII Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while MBII trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check MBII's competition here
NITO vs TNH Comparison April 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 630.3K. In comparison, TNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $0.66, while TNH trades at $83.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -1.14%, compared to TNH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to TNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check TNH's competition here