MINISO Group Holding Limited
MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MNSO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNSO | $19.64 | +0.00% | 6.1B | 19.43 | $1.01 | +3.10% |
| AMZN | $204.86 | +0.00% | 2.3T | 29.34 | $7.16 | N/A |
| BABA | $154.27 | +0.00% | 358.3B | 21.08 | $7.33 | +1.28% |
| PDD | $101.95 | +0.00% | 146.8B | 10.50 | $9.99 | N/A |
| MELI | $1,996.55 | +0.00% | 101.2B | 48.73 | $40.98 | N/A |
| SE | $114.60 | +0.00% | 68B | 50.19 | $2.29 | N/A |
| EBAY | $84.75 | +0.00% | 39.8B | 19.53 | $4.51 | +1.32% |
| JD | $27.27 | +0.00% | 38.9B | 8.90 | $3.08 | +3.58% |
| CPNG | $18.45 | +0.03% | 34.3B | 89.33 | $0.21 | N/A |
| ULTA | $692.79 | +0.00% | 30.6B | 26.07 | $26.19 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MNSO vs AMZN Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while AMZN trades at $204.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check AMZN's competition here
MNSO vs BABA Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 358.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while BABA trades at $154.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BABA's competition here
MNSO vs PDD Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 146.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while PDD trades at $101.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check PDD's competition here
MNSO vs MELI Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 101.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while MELI trades at $1,996.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 48.73. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check MELI's competition here
MNSO vs SE Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while SE trades at $114.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 50.19. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check SE's competition here
MNSO vs EBAY Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while EBAY trades at $84.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check EBAY's competition here
MNSO vs JD Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while JD trades at $27.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check JD's competition here
MNSO vs CPNG Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while CPNG trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 89.33. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check CPNG's competition here
MNSO vs ULTA Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while ULTA trades at $692.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check ULTA's competition here
MNSO vs TSCO Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while TSCO trades at $51.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check TSCO's competition here
MNSO vs WSM Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while WSM trades at $210.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check WSM's competition here
MNSO vs CASY Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while CASY trades at $663.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 41.08. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check CASY's competition here
MNSO vs DKS Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while DKS trades at $202.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check DKS's competition here
MNSO vs GPC Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while GPC trades at $119.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check GPC's competition here
MNSO vs BBY Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while BBY trades at $66.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BBY's competition here
MNSO vs CHWY Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while CHWY trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 53.98. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check CHWY's competition here
MNSO vs W Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, W has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while W trades at $79.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas W's P/E ratio is -31.69. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check W's competition here
MNSO vs GME Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while GME trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check GME's competition here
MNSO vs CART Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while CART trades at $35.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check CART's competition here
MNSO vs VIPS Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while VIPS trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check VIPS's competition here
MNSO vs MUSA Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while MUSA trades at $396.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check MUSA's competition here
MNSO vs GLBE Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while GLBE trades at $36.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is 902.00. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GLBE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check GLBE's competition here
MNSO vs ETSY Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while ETSY trades at $48.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 35.28. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check ETSY's competition here
MNSO vs BBWI Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while BBWI trades at $24.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BBWI's competition here
MNSO vs ASO Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while ASO trades at $59.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check ASO's competition here
MNSO vs RH Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while RH trades at $204.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to RH's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check RH's competition here
MNSO vs AAP Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while AAP trades at $55.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is 49.42. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check AAP's competition here
MNSO vs BOBS Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BOBS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while BOBS trades at $20.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas BOBS's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BOBS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BOBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BOBS's competition here
MNSO vs OZON Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to OZON's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check OZON's competition here
MNSO vs EYE Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while EYE trades at $27.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -547.00. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check EYE's competition here
MNSO vs RERE Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while RERE trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 32.56. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check RERE's competition here
MNSO vs RVLV Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while RVLV trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 32.71. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check RVLV's competition here
MNSO vs SVV Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while SVV trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is -1044.00. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check SVV's competition here
MNSO vs SBH Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while SBH trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check SBH's competition here
MNSO vs TA Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check TA's competition here
MNSO vs OLPX Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while OLPX trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 82.50. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check OLPX's competition here
MNSO vs NEGG Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while NEGG trades at $52.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -43.08. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check NEGG's competition here
MNSO vs TANNI Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check TANNI's competition here
MNSO vs LQDT Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 987.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while LQDT trades at $31.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 34.61. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check LQDT's competition here
MNSO vs HEPS Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 872.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while HEPS trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -12.90. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check HEPS's competition here
MNSO vs EVGO Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 862.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while EVGO trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check EVGO's competition here
MNSO vs ODP Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while ODP trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check ODP's competition here
MNSO vs OSTK Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check OSTK's competition here
MNSO vs WOOF Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 719.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while WOOF trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -256.00. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check WOOF's competition here
MNSO vs BWMX Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 696.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while BWMX trades at $19.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is 38.90. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BWMX's competition here
MNSO vs BBW Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 689.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while BBW trades at $53.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BBW's competition here
MNSO vs ARKO Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 676.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while ARKO trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 55.18. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check ARKO's competition here
MNSO vs HZO Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 628.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while HZO trades at $28.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is -11.02. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to HZO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check HZO's competition here
MNSO vs ZKH Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 591.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while ZKH trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -18.25. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check ZKH's competition here
MNSO vs TDUP Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while TDUP trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -24.42. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check TDUP's competition here
MNSO vs LE Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 578M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while LE trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 51.14. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check LE's competition here
MNSO vs BYON Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while BYON trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BYON's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BYON's competition here
MNSO vs JMIA Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 567M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while JMIA trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -18.52. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check JMIA's competition here
MNSO vs DADA Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check DADA's competition here
MNSO vs YSG Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 389M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while YSG trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check YSG's competition here
MNSO vs BBBY Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 362M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while BBBY trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BBBY's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BBBY's competition here
MNSO vs BNED Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 284.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while BNED trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BNED's competition here
MNSO vs FTCH Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check FTCH's competition here
MNSO vs HNST Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 253.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while HNST trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is 37.83. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to HNST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check HNST's competition here
MNSO vs LOGC Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 215.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while LOGC trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -12.71. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check LOGC's competition here
MNSO vs QRTEA Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check QRTEA's competition here
MNSO vs FLWS Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 208.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while FLWS trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check FLWS's competition here
MNSO vs DIBS Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 198.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while DIBS trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -11.06. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check DIBS's competition here
MNSO vs BZUN Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 159.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while BZUN trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BZUN's competition here
MNSO vs VLTA Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check VLTA's competition here
MNSO vs CHPT Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 145.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while CHPT trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check CHPT's competition here
MNSO vs BARK Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 140M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while BARK trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BARK's competition here
MNSO vs JMG Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, JMG has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while JMG trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas JMG's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to JMG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to JMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check JMG's competition here
MNSO vs QRTEP Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check QRTEP's competition here
MNSO vs GOED Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check GOED's competition here
MNSO vs QVCGB Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 127.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while QVCGB trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check QVCGB's competition here
MNSO vs NPT Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NPT has a market cap of 122M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while NPT trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas NPT's P/E ratio is -137.50. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NPT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to NPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check NPT's competition here
MNSO vs AKA Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 113.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while AKA trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check AKA's competition here
MNSO vs APRN Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check APRN's competition here
MNSO vs HOUR Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while HOUR trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 65.67. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check HOUR's competition here
MNSO vs GRWG Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 65.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while GRWG trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check GRWG's competition here
MNSO vs CGTL Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 55.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while CGTL trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CGTL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check CGTL's competition here
MNSO vs QRTEB Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check QRTEB's competition here
MNSO vs CTIB Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check CTIB's competition here
MNSO vs QVCGP Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while QVCGP trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check QVCGP's competition here
MNSO vs SPWH Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while SPWH trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check SPWH's competition here
MNSO vs PRTS Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while PRTS trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check PRTS's competition here
MNSO vs NHTC Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while NHTC trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is -41.50. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NHTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check NHTC's competition here
MNSO vs KIRK Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while KIRK trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check KIRK's competition here
MNSO vs QVCGA Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while QVCGA trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check QVCGA's competition here
MNSO vs SSU Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check SSU's competition here
MNSO vs BGFV Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while BGFV trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BGFV's competition here
MNSO vs DTC Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while DTC trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DTC's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check DTC's competition here
MNSO vs TLF Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while TLF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.56. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check TLF's competition here
MNSO vs LITB Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while LITB trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to LITB's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to LITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check LITB's competition here
MNSO vs MI Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, MI has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while MI trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas MI's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to MI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check MI's competition here
MNSO vs TBHC Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TBHC has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while TBHC trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas TBHC's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to TBHC's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to TBHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check TBHC's competition here
MNSO vs MOGU Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, MOGU has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while MOGU trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas MOGU's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MOGU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to MOGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check MOGU's competition here
MNSO vs LGCB Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, LGCB has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while LGCB trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas LGCB's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to LGCB's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to LGCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check LGCB's competition here
MNSO vs JBDI Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while JBDI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check JBDI's competition here
MNSO vs BOXD Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BOXD's competition here
MNSO vs SBDS Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SBDS has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while SBDS trades at $6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas SBDS's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SBDS's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to SBDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check SBDS's competition here
MNSO vs TCS Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TCS has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while TCS trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas TCS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to TCS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to TCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check TCS's competition here
MNSO vs EVGOW Comparison February 2026
MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 6.1B. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $19.64, while EVGOW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.43, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check EVGOW's competition here