NFT Limited
NFT Limited (MI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MI | $3.05 | +0.66% | 15.2M | 1.96 | $1.53 | N/A |
| AMZN | $234.11 | +1.70% | 2.5T | 38.07 | $6.15 | N/A |
| BABA | $120.63 | +2.77% | 287.7B | 13.30 | $9.07 | +1.65% |
| PDD | $113.45 | +0.47% | 157.6B | 12.15 | $9.34 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,373.89 | -0.31% | 120.4B | 58.56 | $40.54 | N/A |
| SE | $156.65 | -1.63% | 92.7B | 109.55 | $1.43 | N/A |
| ORLY | $98.32 | -1.07% | 84B | 35.24 | $2.79 | N/A |
| CVNA | $390.17 | +16.96% | 83.4B | 136.33 | $2.86 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,768.38 | -1.94% | 62.9B | 25.47 | $147.59 | N/A |
| CPNG | $29.43 | -0.07% | 53.4B | 210.14 | $0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MI vs AMZN Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while AMZN trades at $234.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 38.07. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check AMZN's competition here
MI vs BABA Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 287.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while BABA trades at $120.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check BABA's competition here
MI vs PDD Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 157.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while PDD trades at $113.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check PDD's competition here
MI vs MELI Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 120.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while MELI trades at $2,373.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 58.56. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check MELI's competition here
MI vs SE Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 92.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while SE trades at $156.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 109.55. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check SE's competition here
MI vs ORLY Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 84B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while ORLY trades at $98.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 35.24. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check ORLY's competition here
MI vs CVNA Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while CVNA trades at $390.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 136.33. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check CVNA's competition here
MI vs AZO Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while AZO trades at $3,768.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check AZO's competition here
MI vs CPNG Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while CPNG trades at $29.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 210.14. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check CPNG's competition here
MI vs JD Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while JD trades at $31.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check JD's competition here
MI vs EBAY Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while EBAY trades at $91.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check EBAY's competition here
MI vs TSCO Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while TSCO trades at $56.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check TSCO's competition here
MI vs ULTA Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while ULTA trades at $515.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check ULTA's competition here
MI vs WSM Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while WSM trades at $187.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check WSM's competition here
MI vs CASY Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while CASY trades at $520.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 35.50. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check CASY's competition here
MI vs GPC Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while GPC trades at $128.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check GPC's competition here
MI vs DKS Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while DKS trades at $211.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check DKS's competition here
MI vs CHWY Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while CHWY trades at $36.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 40.32. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check CHWY's competition here
MI vs BBY Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while BBY trades at $65.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check BBY's competition here
MI vs CART Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while CART trades at $47.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 31.56. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check CART's competition here
MI vs GME Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while GME trades at $22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 42.38. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check GME's competition here
MI vs W Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while W trades at $65.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas W's P/E ratio is -23.10. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check W's competition here
MI vs VIPS Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while VIPS trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check VIPS's competition here
MI vs FIVE Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while FIVE trades at $136.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check FIVE's competition here
MI vs MUSA Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while MUSA trades at $362.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check MUSA's competition here
MI vs BBWI Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while BBWI trades at $28.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check BBWI's competition here
MI vs ETSY Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while ETSY trades at $58.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 47.01. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check ETSY's competition here
MI vs GLBE Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while GLBE trades at $33.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -89.59. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check GLBE's competition here
MI vs RH Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while RH trades at $205.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 48.71. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check RH's competition here
MI vs ASO Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while ASO trades at $50.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check ASO's competition here
MI vs AAP Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while AAP trades at $53.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check AAP's competition here
MI vs OZON Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check OZON's competition here
MI vs EYE Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while EYE trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -75.78. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check EYE's competition here
MI vs SVV Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while SVV trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 74.50. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check SVV's competition here
MI vs RVLV Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while RVLV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check RVLV's competition here
MI vs MNSO Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while MNSO trades at $19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check MNSO's competition here
MI vs WINA Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while WINA trades at $377.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 33.67. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check WINA's competition here
MI vs TA Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check TA's competition here
MI vs NEGG Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while NEGG trades at $63.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -28.35. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check NEGG's competition here
MI vs RERE Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while RERE trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check RERE's competition here
MI vs EVGO Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while EVGO trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -8.22. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check EVGO's competition here
MI vs TANNI Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check TANNI's competition here
MI vs SBH Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 982.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while SBH trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check SBH's competition here
MI vs TDUP Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 976.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while TDUP trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -28.48. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check TDUP's competition here
MI vs EVGOW Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 961M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while EVGOW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check EVGOW's competition here
MI vs OLPX Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 925.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while OLPX trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 69.50. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check OLPX's competition here
MI vs HEPS Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 864.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while HEPS trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -20.69. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check HEPS's competition here
MI vs WOOF Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 839.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while WOOF trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -12.54. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check WOOF's competition here
MI vs YSG Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 820.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while YSG trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -10.99. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check YSG's competition here
MI vs OSTK Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check OSTK's competition here
MI vs LQDT Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 745.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while LQDT trades at $23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check LQDT's competition here
MI vs BBW Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 669.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while BBW trades at $50.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check BBW's competition here
MI vs ODP Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 536.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while ODP trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check ODP's competition here
MI vs BYON Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 515.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while BYON trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check BYON's competition here
MI vs HNST Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 508.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while HNST trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -230.50. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check HNST's competition here
MI vs DADA Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check DADA's competition here
MI vs BWMX Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 490.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while BWMX trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -77.29. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check BWMX's competition here
MI vs HZO Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 487.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while HZO trades at $22.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is -18.76. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HZO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check HZO's competition here
MI vs ZKH Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 475.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while ZKH trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check ZKH's competition here
MI vs ARKO Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 474.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while ARKO trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 138.67. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check ARKO's competition here
MI vs FLWS Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 375.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while FLWS trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check FLWS's competition here
MI vs LE Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while LE trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 90.23. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check LE's competition here
MI vs BNED Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 301M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while BNED trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check BNED's competition here
MI vs JMIA Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 286.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while JMIA trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check JMIA's competition here
MI vs FTCH Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check FTCH's competition here
MI vs CHPT Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 214.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while CHPT trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check CHPT's competition here
MI vs QRTEA Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check QRTEA's competition here
MI vs BARK-WT Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 204.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while BARK-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check BARK-WT's competition here
MI vs LOGC Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 197.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while LOGC trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check LOGC's competition here
MI vs BZUN Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 166.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while BZUN trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check BZUN's competition here
MI vs VLTA Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check VLTA's competition here
MI vs BARK Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 145.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while BARK trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check BARK's competition here
MI vs QRTEP Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check QRTEP's competition here
MI vs GOED Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check GOED's competition here
MI vs SPWH Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 129.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while SPWH trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check SPWH's competition here
MI vs AKA Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 121.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while AKA trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check AKA's competition here
MI vs OCG Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 106M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while OCG trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -28.39. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check OCG's competition here
MI vs APRN Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check APRN's competition here
MI vs DIBS Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while DIBS trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check DIBS's competition here
MI vs HOUR Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while HOUR trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 181.50. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check HOUR's competition here
MI vs GRWG Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 58.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while GRWG trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check GRWG's competition here
MI vs NHTC Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while NHTC trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check NHTC's competition here
MI vs QRTEB Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check QRTEB's competition here
MI vs PRTS Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while PRTS trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check PRTS's competition here
MI vs CTIB Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check CTIB's competition here
MI vs QVCGP Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while QVCGP trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check QVCGP's competition here
MI vs BBBY Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check BBBY's competition here
MI vs KIRK Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while KIRK trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check KIRK's competition here
MI vs QVCGB Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 36.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while QVCGB trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check QVCGB's competition here
MI vs SSU Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check SSU's competition here
MI vs LGCB Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, LGCB has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while LGCB trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas LGCB's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LGCB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to LGCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check LGCB's competition here
MI vs BGFV Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while BGFV trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check BGFV's competition here
MI vs DTC Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while DTC trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTC's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check DTC's competition here
MI vs QVCGA Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while QVCGA trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check QVCGA's competition here
MI vs TLF Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while TLF trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.33. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check TLF's competition here
MI vs IPW Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while IPW trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -13.19. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check IPW's competition here
MI vs CGTL Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while CGTL trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check CGTL's competition here
MI vs JBDI Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while JBDI trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is more volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check JBDI's competition here
MI vs ZOOZ Comparison August 2025
MI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MI is priced at $3.05, while ZOOZ trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.96, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, MI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MI is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MI.Check ZOOZ's competition here