MercadoLibre, Inc.
MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MELI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MELI | $2,381.39 | -0.15% | 120.7B | 58.74 | $40.54 | N/A |
| AMZN | $230.19 | -0.35% | 2.4T | 37.49 | $6.14 | N/A |
| BABA | $117.38 | -1.66% | 279.8B | 12.93 | $9.07 | +1.69% |
| PDD | $112.92 | -2.16% | 156.8B | 12.06 | $9.36 | N/A |
| SE | $159.25 | -0.75% | 94.3B | 111.38 | $1.43 | N/A |
| ORLY | $99.38 | +0.49% | 85B | 35.63 | $2.79 | N/A |
| CVNA | $333.59 | -0.86% | 71.4B | 116.57 | $2.86 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,843.11 | -0.79% | 64.3B | 26.03 | $147.59 | N/A |
| CPNG | $29.45 | -1.27% | 53.5B | 210.43 | $0.14 | N/A |
| JD | $31.75 | -1.46% | 46.3B | 7.71 | $4.12 | +3.09% |
Stock Comparison
MELI vs AMZN Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while AMZN trades at $230.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 37.49. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check AMZN's competition here
MELI vs BABA Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 279.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while BABA trades at $117.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check BABA's competition here
MELI vs PDD Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 156.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while PDD trades at $112.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check PDD's competition here
MELI vs SE Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 94.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while SE trades at $159.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 111.38. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check SE's competition here
MELI vs ORLY Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 85B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while ORLY trades at $99.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 35.63. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check ORLY's competition here
MELI vs CVNA Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while CVNA trades at $333.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 116.57. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check CVNA's competition here
MELI vs AZO Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while AZO trades at $3,843.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check AZO's competition here
MELI vs CPNG Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while CPNG trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 210.43. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check CPNG's competition here
MELI vs JD Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while JD trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check JD's competition here
MELI vs EBAY Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while EBAY trades at $77.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check EBAY's competition here
MELI vs TSCO Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while TSCO trades at $57.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 28.49. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check TSCO's competition here
MELI vs WSM Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while WSM trades at $190.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check WSM's competition here
MELI vs ULTA Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while ULTA trades at $517.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check ULTA's competition here
MELI vs CASY Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while CASY trades at $525.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check CASY's competition here
MELI vs GPC Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while GPC trades at $132.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check GPC's competition here
MELI vs DKS Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while DKS trades at $213.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check DKS's competition here
MELI vs CHWY Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while CHWY trades at $35.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check CHWY's competition here
MELI vs BBY Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while BBY trades at $65.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check BBY's competition here
MELI vs CART Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while CART trades at $46.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check CART's competition here
MELI vs GME Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while GME trades at $22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 42.37. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check GME's competition here
MELI vs W Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, W has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while W trades at $65.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas W's P/E ratio is -23.10. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check W's competition here
MELI vs MUSA Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while MUSA trades at $408.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check MUSA's competition here
MELI vs VIPS Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while VIPS trades at $15.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check VIPS's competition here
MELI vs FIVE Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while FIVE trades at $138.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check FIVE's competition here
MELI vs ETSY Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while ETSY trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 44.91. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check ETSY's competition here
MELI vs BBWI Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while BBWI trades at $30.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check BBWI's competition here
MELI vs GLBE Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while GLBE trades at $33.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -89.76. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check GLBE's competition here
MELI vs RH Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while RH trades at $207.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 49.37. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check RH's competition here
MELI vs ASO Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while ASO trades at $52.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check ASO's competition here
MELI vs AAP Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while AAP trades at $55.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check AAP's competition here
MELI vs OZON Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check OZON's competition here
MELI vs EYE Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while EYE trades at $24.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -76.37. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check EYE's competition here
MELI vs SVV Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while SVV trades at $9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 70.21. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check SVV's competition here
MELI vs MNSO Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while MNSO trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check MNSO's competition here
MELI vs RVLV Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while RVLV trades at $20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 29.89. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check RVLV's competition here
MELI vs WINA Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while WINA trades at $383.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check WINA's competition here
MELI vs TA Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check TA's competition here
MELI vs EVGOW Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while EVGOW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check EVGOW's competition here
MELI vs EVGO Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while EVGO trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -8.41. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check EVGO's competition here
MELI vs RERE Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while RERE trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 35.06. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check RERE's competition here
MELI vs SBH Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while SBH trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check SBH's competition here
MELI vs TANNI Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check TANNI's competition here
MELI vs OLPX Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 932.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while OLPX trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 70.00. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check OLPX's competition here
MELI vs TDUP Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 889.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while TDUP trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -25.93. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check TDUP's competition here
MELI vs NEGG Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 872.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while NEGG trades at $44.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -19.99. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check NEGG's competition here
MELI vs WOOF Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 853.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while WOOF trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check WOOF's competition here
MELI vs YSG Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 827.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while YSG trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check YSG's competition here
MELI vs HEPS Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 806.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while HEPS trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -19.31. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check HEPS's competition here
MELI vs OSTK Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check OSTK's competition here
MELI vs LQDT Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 756.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while LQDT trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 30.68. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check LQDT's competition here
MELI vs BBW Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 675.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while BBW trades at $51.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check BBW's competition here
MELI vs ODP Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 562.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while ODP trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check ODP's competition here
MELI vs BYON Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 527.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while BYON trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check BYON's competition here
MELI vs HNST Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 508.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while HNST trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -230.50. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check HNST's competition here
MELI vs DADA Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check DADA's competition here
MELI vs BWMX Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 491.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while BWMX trades at $13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -77.41. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check BWMX's competition here
MELI vs HZO Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 486.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while HZO trades at $22.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is -18.73. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to HZO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check HZO's competition here
MELI vs ARKO Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 477.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while ARKO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 139.67. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check ARKO's competition here
MELI vs ZKH Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 472.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while ZKH trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -14.89. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check ZKH's competition here
MELI vs FLWS Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 375M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while FLWS trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check FLWS's competition here
MELI vs LE Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 360.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while LE trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 91.00. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check LE's competition here
MELI vs BNED Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 302.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while BNED trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check BNED's competition here
MELI vs JMIA Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 275.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while JMIA trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check JMIA's competition here
MELI vs FTCH Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check FTCH's competition here
MELI vs QRTEA Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check QRTEA's competition here
MELI vs CHPT Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 208.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while CHPT trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check CHPT's competition here
MELI vs LOGC Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 201.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while LOGC trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check LOGC's competition here
MELI vs BZUN Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 173.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while BZUN trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -6.58. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check BZUN's competition here
MELI vs BARK-WT Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 155.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while BARK-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check BARK-WT's competition here
MELI vs BARK Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 154.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while BARK trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check BARK's competition here
MELI vs VLTA Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check VLTA's competition here
MELI vs QRTEP Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check QRTEP's competition here
MELI vs GOED Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check GOED's competition here
MELI vs SPWH Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while SPWH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check SPWH's competition here
MELI vs AKA Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 121.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while AKA trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check AKA's competition here
MELI vs OCG Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 102.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while OCG trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -27.44. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check OCG's competition here
MELI vs APRN Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check APRN's competition here
MELI vs DIBS Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while DIBS trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check DIBS's competition here
MELI vs HOUR Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while HOUR trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 180.00. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check HOUR's competition here
MELI vs GRWG Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while GRWG trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check GRWG's competition here
MELI vs NHTC Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while NHTC trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 116.50. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check NHTC's competition here
MELI vs QRTEB Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check QRTEB's competition here
MELI vs CTIB Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check CTIB's competition here
MELI vs PRTS Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while PRTS trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check PRTS's competition here
MELI vs QVCGP Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while QVCGP trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check QVCGP's competition here
MELI vs BBBY Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check BBBY's competition here
MELI vs QVCGB Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while QVCGB trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check QVCGB's competition here
MELI vs LGCB Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, LGCB has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while LGCB trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas LGCB's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LGCB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to LGCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check LGCB's competition here
MELI vs KIRK Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while KIRK trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check KIRK's competition here
MELI vs SSU Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check SSU's competition here
MELI vs BGFV Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while BGFV trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check BGFV's competition here
MELI vs DTC Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while DTC trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DTC's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check DTC's competition here
MELI vs QVCGA Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while QVCGA trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check QVCGA's competition here
MELI vs TLF Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while TLF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.32. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check TLF's competition here
MELI vs CGTL Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while CGTL trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 4.70. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check CGTL's competition here
MELI vs IPW Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while IPW trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -12.76. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check IPW's competition here
MELI vs ZOOZ Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while ZOOZ trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check ZOOZ's competition here
MELI vs JBDI Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while JBDI trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check JBDI's competition here
MELI vs MI Comparison July 2025
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 120.7B. In comparison, MI has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,381.39, while MI trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 58.74, whereas MI's P/E ratio is 1.98. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to MI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.Check MI's competition here