MercadoLibre, Inc.
MercadoLibre, Inc. MELI Peers
See (MELI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MELI | $2,560.05 | -0.01% | 129.8B | 62.87 | $40.72 | N/A |
| AMZN | $223.30 | +2.85% | 2.4T | 36.31 | $6.15 | N/A |
| BABA | $114.05 | +0.11% | 272.1B | 12.57 | $9.07 | +1.74% |
| PDD | $105.14 | -0.58% | 146B | 11.28 | $9.32 | N/A |
| SE | $159.26 | +0.47% | 94.3B | 111.37 | $1.43 | N/A |
| ORLY | $89.16 | +1.05% | 76.2B | 33.02 | $2.70 | N/A |
| CVNA | $319.02 | +4.09% | 68.3B | 110.77 | $2.88 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,608.77 | +2.46% | 60.4B | 24.44 | $147.64 | N/A |
| CPNG | $30.80 | +3.32% | 55.9B | 220.00 | $0.14 | N/A |
| JD | $33.07 | -0.57% | 47.7B | 8.05 | $4.11 | +2.95% |
Stock Comparison
MELI vs AMZN Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while AMZN trades at $223.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 36.31. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs BABA Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 272.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while BABA trades at $114.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs PDD Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 146B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while PDD trades at $105.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs SE Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 94.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while SE trades at $159.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 111.37. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs ORLY Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 76.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while ORLY trades at $89.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 33.02. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs CVNA Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while CVNA trades at $319.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 110.77. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs AZO Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while AZO trades at $3,608.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs CPNG Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while CPNG trades at $30.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 220.00. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs JD Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while JD trades at $33.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs VIPS Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while VIPS trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs EBAY Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while EBAY trades at $73.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs TSCO Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while TSCO trades at $51.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs ULTA Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while ULTA trades at $458.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs WSM Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while WSM trades at $164.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs CASY Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while CASY trades at $506.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 34.62. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs CHWY Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while CHWY trades at $42.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 47.07. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs GPC Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while GPC trades at $120.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs DKS Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while DKS trades at $202.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs BBY Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while BBY trades at $68.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs CART Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while CART trades at $44.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 29.51. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs GME Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while GME trades at $23.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 44.51. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs MUSA Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while MUSA trades at $407.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs FIVE Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while FIVE trades at $130.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs W Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, W has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while W trades at $51.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas W's P/E ratio is -18.04. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs BBWI Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while BBWI trades at $30.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs GLBE Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while GLBE trades at $32.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -88.70. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs ETSY Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while ETSY trades at $50.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 36.70. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs RH Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while RH trades at $190.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 45.33. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs ASO Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while ASO trades at $46.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs AAP Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while AAP trades at $46.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs OZON Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs EYE Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while EYE trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -72.41. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs SVV Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while SVV trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 73.29. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs RVLV Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while RVLV trades at $20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs MNSO Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while MNSO trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs WINA Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while WINA trades at $374.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 33.54. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs TA Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs RERE Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while RERE trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 38.83. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs EVGO Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while EVGO trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -9.12. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs EVGOW Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while EVGOW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs TANNI Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs OLPX Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 998.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while OLPX trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs YSG Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 956.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while YSG trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -12.80. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs SBH Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 910.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while SBH trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs TDUP Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 880.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while TDUP trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -25.69. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs HEPS Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 864.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while HEPS trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -19.21. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs WOOF Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 789.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while WOOF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -11.79. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs OSTK Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs LQDT Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 738.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while LQDT trades at $23.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 29.92. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs BBW Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 714.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while BBW trades at $54.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs HZO Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 560.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while HZO trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs ODP Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 538.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while ODP trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs HNST Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 538M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while HNST trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -244.00. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs ZKH Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while ZKH trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -16.66. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs ARKO Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 496.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while ARKO trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 145.33. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs BNED Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 400.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while BNED trades at $11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs BYON Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 385.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while BYON trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs CHPT Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 344M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while CHPT trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs BWMX Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 329.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while BWMX trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -44.10. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs FLWS Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 326.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while FLWS trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs LE Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 321.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while LE trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 81.23. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs FTCH Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs NEGG Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 232.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while NEGG trades at $11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs JMIA Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 223.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while JMIA trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs QRTEA Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs LOGC Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 180.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while LOGC trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs VLTA Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs BZUN Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 148.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while BZUN trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs BARK Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 144.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while BARK trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs SPWH Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while SPWH trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs QRTEP Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs GOED Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs DADA Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs OCG Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 119.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while OCG trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -33.82. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs AKA Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 115.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while AKA trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs DIBS Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 100.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while DIBS trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs APRN Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs QVCGP Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while QVCGP trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs GRWG Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while GRWG trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs QRTEB Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs BARK-WT Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while BARK-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs NHTC Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while NHTC trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 108.25. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs CTIB Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs HOUR Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while HOUR trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 135.00. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs PRTS Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while PRTS trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs BBBY Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs SSU Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs QVCGB Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while QVCGB trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs BGFV Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while BGFV trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs CGTL Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while CGTL trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs TLF Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while TLF trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs KIRK Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while KIRK trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs QVCGA Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while QVCGA trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs JBDI Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while JBDI trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs IPW Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while IPW trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -12.24. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs BOXD Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs MI Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, MI has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while MI trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas MI's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to MI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs ZOOZ Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while ZOOZ trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.
MELI vs LITB Comparison
MELI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MELI stands at 129.8B. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MELI is priced at $2,560.05, while LITB trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MELI currently has a P/E ratio of 62.87, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, MELI's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LITB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MELI is less volatile compared to LITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MELI.