Merchants Bancorp
Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MBIN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBIN | $46.54 | +1.11% | 2.1B | 11.35 | $4.10 | +0.88% |
| USB-PA | $772.00 | -0.58% | 1.2T | 219.94 | $3.51 | +3.78% |
| HDB | $24.62 | -0.04% | 126.3B | 17.59 | $1.40 | +4.55% |
| MFG | $9.27 | +2.37% | 113.1B | 14.73 | $0.63 | +1.86% |
| IBN | $25.89 | +0.82% | 92.7B | 16.60 | $1.56 | +0.96% |
| ITUB | $8.00 | +0.76% | 88.2B | 9.76 | $0.82 | +7.81% |
| PNC | $218.37 | +0.71% | 87.7B | 12.69 | $17.20 | +3.12% |
| LYG | $5.41 | -0.37% | 79.5B | 13.51 | $0.40 | +3.69% |
| USB-PS | $17.42 | -0.68% | 66.4B | N/A | N/A | +3.78% |
| DB | $32.90 | +0.09% | 62.9B | 8.96 | $3.67 | +2.34% |
Stock Comparison
MBIN vs USB-PA Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while USB-PA trades at $772.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 219.94. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check USB-PA's competition here
MBIN vs HDB Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 126.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while HDB trades at $24.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check HDB's competition here
MBIN vs MFG Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while MFG trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check MFG's competition here
MBIN vs IBN Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 92.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while IBN trades at $25.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check IBN's competition here
MBIN vs ITUB Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 88.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while ITUB trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check ITUB's competition here
MBIN vs PNC Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while PNC trades at $218.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check PNC's competition here
MBIN vs LYG Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 79.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while LYG trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check LYG's competition here
MBIN vs USB-PS Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while USB-PS trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check USB-PS's competition here
MBIN vs DB Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while DB trades at $32.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check DB's competition here
MBIN vs TFC Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while TFC trades at $47.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check TFC's competition here
MBIN vs BSBR Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while BSBR trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check BSBR's competition here
MBIN vs HBANZ Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HBANZ has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while HBANZ trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas HBANZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HBANZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to HBANZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check HBANZ's competition here
MBIN vs HBANL Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while HBANL trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check HBANL's competition here
MBIN vs BBD Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while BBD trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check BBD's competition here
MBIN vs KB Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while KB trades at $104.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check KB's competition here
MBIN vs HBANM Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while HBANM trades at $22.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check HBANM's competition here
MBIN vs FITB Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while FITB trades at $49.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check FITB's competition here
MBIN vs BBDO Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while BBDO trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check BBDO's competition here
MBIN vs MTB Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while MTB trades at $212.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check MTB's competition here
MBIN vs SHG Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while SHG trades at $64.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check SHG's competition here
MBIN vs KEY-PL Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while KEY-PL trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check KEY-PL's competition here
MBIN vs CFG Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while CFG trades at $62.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check CFG's competition here
MBIN vs TFC-PO Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while TFC-PO trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check TFC-PO's competition here
MBIN vs HBANP Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while HBANP trades at $16.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check HBANP's competition here
MBIN vs HBAN Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while HBAN trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check HBAN's competition here
MBIN vs TFC-PI Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while TFC-PI trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check TFC-PI's competition here
MBIN vs RF Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while RF trades at $27.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check RF's competition here
MBIN vs FITBM Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FITBM has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while FITBM trades at $25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas FITBM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FITBM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to FITBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check FITBM's competition here
MBIN vs KEY Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while KEY trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check KEY's competition here
MBIN vs TFC-PR Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while TFC-PR trades at $18.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check TFC-PR's competition here
MBIN vs FCNCA Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while FCNCA trades at $1,989.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check FCNCA's competition here
MBIN vs FCNCN Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FCNCN has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while FCNCN trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas FCNCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FCNCN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to FCNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check FCNCN's competition here
MBIN vs RF-PF Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while RF-PF trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check RF-PF's competition here
MBIN vs KEY-PJ Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check KEY-PJ's competition here
MBIN vs RF-PC Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while RF-PC trades at $24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check RF-PC's competition here
MBIN vs KEY-PI Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while KEY-PI trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check KEY-PI's competition here
MBIN vs BCH Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while BCH trades at $37.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check BCH's competition here
MBIN vs FHN-PC Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while FHN-PC trades at $36.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is less volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check FHN-PC's competition here
MBIN vs KEY-PK Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while KEY-PK trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check KEY-PK's competition here
MBIN vs FITBI Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while FITBI trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check FITBI's competition here
MBIN vs FITBP Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while FITBP trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check FITBP's competition here
MBIN vs CIB Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while CIB trades at $66.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check CIB's competition here
MBIN vs WF Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while WF trades at $62.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check WF's competition here
MBIN vs CFG-PD Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check CFG-PD's competition here
MBIN vs BSAC Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while BSAC trades at $31.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check BSAC's competition here
MBIN vs RF-PE Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while RF-PE trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check RF-PE's competition here
MBIN vs VLYPN Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while VLYPN trades at $25.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check VLYPN's competition here
MBIN vs FITBO Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while FITBO trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check FITBO's competition here
MBIN vs FHN-PB Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check FHN-PB's competition here
MBIN vs CFG-PH Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while CFG-PH trades at $25.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check CFG-PH's competition here
MBIN vs FHN-PE Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while FHN-PE trades at $24.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check FHN-PE's competition here
MBIN vs WBS Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while WBS trades at $72.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check WBS's competition here
MBIN vs FHN Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while FHN trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check FHN's competition here
MBIN vs CMA Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while CMA trades at $88.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check CMA's competition here
MBIN vs WTFC Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while WTFC trades at $149.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check WTFC's competition here
MBIN vs UMBF Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while UMBF trades at $130.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check UMBF's competition here
MBIN vs BPOP Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while BPOP trades at $149.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check BPOP's competition here
MBIN vs ONBPO Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while ONBPO trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 27.87. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check ONBPO's competition here
MBIN vs ONBPP Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while ONBPP trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check ONBPP's competition here
MBIN vs ONB Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while ONB trades at $23.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check ONB's competition here
MBIN vs SSB Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while SSB trades at $93.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check SSB's competition here
MBIN vs ZION Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while ZION trades at $61.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check ZION's competition here
MBIN vs FHN-PD Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check FHN-PD's competition here
MBIN vs CFR Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while CFR trades at $139.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check CFR's competition here
MBIN vs FHN-PF Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while FHN-PF trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check FHN-PF's competition here
MBIN vs WAL Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while WAL trades at $78.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check WAL's competition here
MBIN vs CFG-PE Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while CFG-PE trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check CFG-PE's competition here
MBIN vs BOKF Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while BOKF trades at $129.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check BOKF's competition here
MBIN vs CADE Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while CADE trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check CADE's competition here
MBIN vs CBSH Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while CBSH trades at $52.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is less volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check CBSH's competition here
MBIN vs PNFP Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while PNFP trades at $97.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check PNFP's competition here
MBIN vs VLY Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while VLY trades at $13.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check VLY's competition here
MBIN vs BSMX Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check BSMX's competition here
MBIN vs GGAL Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while GGAL trades at $44.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 115.82. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check GGAL's competition here
MBIN vs COLB Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while COLB trades at $29.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check COLB's competition here
MBIN vs PB Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while PB trades at $69.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check PB's competition here
MBIN vs SNV Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while SNV trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check SNV's competition here
MBIN vs CHYM Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while CHYM trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is less volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check CHYM's competition here
MBIN vs CBC Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while CBC trades at $28.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 713.25. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to CBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check CBC's competition here
MBIN vs SNV-PD Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check SNV-PD's competition here
MBIN vs CUBI-PE Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check CUBI-PE's competition here
MBIN vs FNB Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while FNB trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check FNB's competition here
MBIN vs GBCI Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while GBCI trades at $47.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check GBCI's competition here
MBIN vs UBSI Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while UBSI trades at $43.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check UBSI's competition here
MBIN vs ABCB Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while ABCB trades at $84.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check ABCB's competition here
MBIN vs FLG Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while FLG trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -64.71. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check FLG's competition here
MBIN vs IFS Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IFS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while IFS trades at $50.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas IFS's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is less volatile compared to IFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check IFS's competition here
MBIN vs VLYPO Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while VLYPO trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check VLYPO's competition here
MBIN vs VLYPP Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while VLYPP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check VLYPP's competition here
MBIN vs HWC Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while HWC trades at $66.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check HWC's competition here
MBIN vs AUB Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while AUB trades at $37.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check AUB's competition here
MBIN vs HOMB Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while HOMB trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check HOMB's competition here
MBIN vs OZK Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while OZK trades at $48.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check OZK's competition here
MBIN vs BXS Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check BXS's competition here
MBIN vs AVAL Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AVAL has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while AVAL trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas AVAL's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVAL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to AVAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check AVAL's competition here
MBIN vs BMA Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while BMA trades at $78.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is less volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check BMA's competition here
MBIN vs NYCB-PA Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NYCB-PA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while NYCB-PA trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas NYCB-PA's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NYCB-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to NYCB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check NYCB-PA's competition here
MBIN vs AX Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while AX trades at $85.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas AX's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check AX's competition here
MBIN vs ASB Comparison May 2026
MBIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBIN stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ASB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBIN is priced at $46.54, while ASB trades at $28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBIN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.35, whereas ASB's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, MBIN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBIN is more volatile compared to ASB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBIN.Check ASB's competition here