Regions Financial Corporation
Regions Financial Corporation (RF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RF | $26.97 | +1.16% | 23B | 11.19 | $2.41 | +3.88% |
| USB-PA | $778.03 | +0.00% | 1.2T | 221.66 | $3.51 | +3.85% |
| HDB | $24.63 | +0.74% | 126.3B | 17.46 | $1.41 | +4.55% |
| MFG | $8.39 | -3.40% | 102.4B | 15.84 | $0.53 | +2.34% |
| IBN | $25.86 | -0.73% | 92.6B | 16.57 | $1.56 | +0.96% |
| ITUB | $7.89 | +0.64% | 87.1B | 9.63 | $0.82 | +7.95% |
| PNC | $213.72 | +0.41% | 85.9B | 12.42 | $17.22 | +3.18% |
| LYG | $5.17 | +2.38% | 76.1B | 12.63 | $0.41 | +3.85% |
| USB-PS | $17.67 | +0.06% | 67B | N/A | N/A | +3.85% |
| DB | $31.36 | +1.49% | 60B | 8.48 | $3.70 | +2.46% |
Stock Comparison
RF vs USB-PA Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while USB-PA trades at $778.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 221.66. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check USB-PA's competition here
RF vs HDB Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 126.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while HDB trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check HDB's competition here
RF vs MFG Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 102.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while MFG trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check MFG's competition here
RF vs IBN Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while IBN trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check IBN's competition here
RF vs ITUB Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while ITUB trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check ITUB's competition here
RF vs PNC Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 85.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while PNC trades at $213.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check PNC's competition here
RF vs LYG Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while LYG trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check LYG's competition here
RF vs USB-PS Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while USB-PS trades at $17.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check USB-PS's competition here
RF vs DB Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while DB trades at $31.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check DB's competition here
RF vs TFC Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while TFC trades at $47.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check TFC's competition here
RF vs HBANZ Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, HBANZ has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while HBANZ trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas HBANZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to HBANZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check HBANZ's competition here
RF vs BSBR Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while BSBR trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check BSBR's competition here
RF vs HBANL Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while HBANL trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check HBANL's competition here
RF vs BBD Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while BBD trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check BBD's competition here
RF vs KB Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while KB trades at $103.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check KB's competition here
RF vs HBANM Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while HBANM trades at $22.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check HBANM's competition here
RF vs FITB Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while FITB trades at $47.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FITB's competition here
RF vs BBDO Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while BBDO trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check BBDO's competition here
RF vs MTB Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while MTB trades at $206.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check MTB's competition here
RF vs SHG Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while SHG trades at $63.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check SHG's competition here
RF vs KEY-PL Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while KEY-PL trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check KEY-PL's competition here
RF vs TFC-PO Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while TFC-PO trades at $20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check TFC-PO's competition here
RF vs HBANP Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while HBANP trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check HBANP's competition here
RF vs CFG Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while CFG trades at $61.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CFG's competition here
RF vs HBAN Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while HBAN trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check HBAN's competition here
RF vs TFC-PI Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while TFC-PI trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check TFC-PI's competition here
RF vs FITBM Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, FITBM has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while FITBM trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas FITBM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FITBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FITBM's competition here
RF vs TFC-PR Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while TFC-PR trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.08. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check TFC-PR's competition here
RF vs KEY Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while KEY trades at $21.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check KEY's competition here
RF vs FCNCN Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, FCNCN has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while FCNCN trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas FCNCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FCNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FCNCN's competition here
RF vs RF-PF Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while RF-PF trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check RF-PF's competition here
RF vs FCNCA Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while FCNCA trades at $1,942.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FCNCA's competition here
RF vs KEY-PJ Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check KEY-PJ's competition here
RF vs RF-PC Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while RF-PC trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check RF-PC's competition here
RF vs KEY-PI Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while KEY-PI trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check KEY-PI's competition here
RF vs BCH Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while BCH trades at $36.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check BCH's competition here
RF vs KEY-PK Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while KEY-PK trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check KEY-PK's competition here
RF vs FITBI Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while FITBI trades at $25.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FITBI's competition here
RF vs FITBP Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while FITBP trades at $23.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FITBP's competition here
RF vs FHN-PC Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while FHN-PC trades at $33.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FHN-PC's competition here
RF vs CIB Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while CIB trades at $64.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CIB's competition here
RF vs WF Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while WF trades at $61.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check WF's competition here
RF vs CFG-PD Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CFG-PD's competition here
RF vs RF-PE Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while RF-PE trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check RF-PE's competition here
RF vs VLYPN Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while VLYPN trades at $25.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check VLYPN's competition here
RF vs BSAC Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while BSAC trades at $30.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check BSAC's competition here
RF vs FITBO Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while FITBO trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FITBO's competition here
RF vs FHN-PB Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FHN-PB's competition here
RF vs CFG-PH Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while CFG-PH trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CFG-PH's competition here
RF vs FHN-PE Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while FHN-PE trades at $24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FHN-PE's competition here
RF vs WBS Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while WBS trades at $71.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check WBS's competition here
RF vs CMA Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while CMA trades at $88.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CMA's competition here
RF vs FHN Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while FHN trades at $23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FHN's competition here
RF vs WTFC Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while WTFC trades at $146.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check WTFC's competition here
RF vs UMBF Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while UMBF trades at $126.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check UMBF's competition here
RF vs ONBPO Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while ONBPO trades at $24.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check ONBPO's competition here
RF vs BPOP Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while BPOP trades at $146.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check BPOP's competition here
RF vs ONBPP Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while ONBPP trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check ONBPP's competition here
RF vs SSB Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while SSB trades at $92.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check SSB's competition here
RF vs ONB Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while ONB trades at $23.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check ONB's competition here
RF vs FHN-PD Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FHN-PD's competition here
RF vs ZION Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while ZION trades at $60.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check ZION's competition here
RF vs FHN-PF Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while FHN-PF trades at $17.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FHN-PF's competition here
RF vs CFR Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while CFR trades at $137.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CFR's competition here
RF vs WAL Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while WAL trades at $76.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check WAL's competition here
RF vs CFG-PE Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while CFG-PE trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CFG-PE's competition here
RF vs CADE Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while CADE trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CADE's competition here
RF vs BOKF Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while BOKF trades at $127.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check BOKF's competition here
RF vs CBSH Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while CBSH trades at $51.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CBSH's competition here
RF vs BSMX Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check BSMX's competition here
RF vs PNFP Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while PNFP trades at $94.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check PNFP's competition here
RF vs VLY Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while VLY trades at $13.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check VLY's competition here
RF vs SNV Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while SNV trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check SNV's competition here
RF vs COLB Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while COLB trades at $29.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check COLB's competition here
RF vs PB Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while PB trades at $68.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check PB's competition here
RF vs GGAL Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while GGAL trades at $42.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 44.53. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check GGAL's competition here
RF vs SNV-PD Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check SNV-PD's competition here
RF vs CHYM Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while CHYM trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CHYM's competition here
RF vs CBC Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while CBC trades at $27.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 915.00. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to CBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CBC's competition here
RF vs CUBI-PE Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CUBI-PE's competition here
RF vs FNB Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while FNB trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FNB's competition here
RF vs GBCI Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while GBCI trades at $46.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check GBCI's competition here
RF vs UBSI Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while UBSI trades at $42.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check UBSI's competition here
RF vs ABCB Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while ABCB trades at $83.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check ABCB's competition here
RF vs FLG Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while FLG trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -63.52. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FLG's competition here
RF vs VLYPO Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while VLYPO trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check VLYPO's competition here
RF vs VLYPP Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while VLYPP trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check VLYPP's competition here
RF vs HWC Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while HWC trades at $66.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check HWC's competition here
RF vs AUB Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while AUB trades at $36.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check AUB's competition here
RF vs HOMB Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while HOMB trades at $26.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check HOMB's competition here
RF vs BXS Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check BXS's competition here
RF vs OZK Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while OZK trades at $47.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check OZK's competition here
RF vs IFS Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, IFS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while IFS trades at $44.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas IFS's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to IFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check IFS's competition here
RF vs AVAL Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, AVAL has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while AVAL trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas AVAL's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVAL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to AVAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check AVAL's competition here
RF vs NYCB-PA Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, NYCB-PA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while NYCB-PA trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas NYCB-PA's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NYCB-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to NYCB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check NYCB-PA's competition here
RF vs AX Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, AX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while AX trades at $84.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas AX's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check AX's competition here
RF vs BMA Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while BMA trades at $72.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check BMA's competition here
RF vs ASB Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, ASB has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while ASB trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas ASB's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to ASB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check ASB's competition here
RF vs FFIN Comparison May 2026
RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 23B. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $26.97, while FFIN trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.19, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FFIN's competition here