Regions Financial Corporation (RF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 131.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while HDB trades at $25.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check HDB's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 119.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while MFG trades at $9.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check MFG's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while IBN trades at $28.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check IBN's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while PNC trades at $251.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check PNC's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while USB-PA trades at $766.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 157.07. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check USB-PA's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 89.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while ITUB trades at $8.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check ITUB's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 86B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while LYG trades at $5.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check LYG's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while USB-PS trades at $17.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check USB-PS's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while DB trades at $33.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check DB's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while NU trades at $13.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check NU's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 63.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while TFC-PI trades at $18.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check TFC-PI's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while TFC-PO trades at $20.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check TFC-PO's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while TFC trades at $50.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check TFC's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while TFC-PR trades at $18.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check TFC-PR's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while FITB trades at $57.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FITB's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while FITBI trades at $25.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FITBI's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while FITBO trades at $17.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FITBO's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while FITBP trades at $23.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FITBP's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while BSBR trades at $5.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check BSBR's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while HBAN trades at $18.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check HBAN's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while BBD trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check BBD's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while KB trades at $102.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check KB's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while HBANM trades at $20.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check HBANM's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while HBANL trades at $24.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check HBANL's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, HBANZ has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while HBANZ trades at $19.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas HBANZ's P/E ratio is 35.91. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to HBANZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check HBANZ's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while MTB trades at $241.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check MTB's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while HBANP trades at $16.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check HBANP's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, MTB-PJ has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while MTB-PJ trades at $25.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MTB-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTB-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to MTB-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check MTB-PJ's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, MTB-PH has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while MTB-PH trades at $25.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MTB-PH's P/E ratio is 1.37. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTB-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to MTB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check MTB-PH's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while CFG trades at $71.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CFG's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while CFG-PE trades at $18.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CFG-PE's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while CFG-PH trades at $25.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CFG-PH's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while SHG trades at $62.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check SHG's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while KEY-PL trades at $25.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check KEY-PL's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while RF-PE trades at $16.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check RF-PE's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while RF-PC trades at $24.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check RF-PC's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while RF-PF trades at $25.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check RF-PF's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while KEY-PJ trades at $20.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check KEY-PJ's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while KEY-PK trades at $20.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check KEY-PK's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while KEY trades at $23.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check KEY's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while FCNCA trades at $2,121.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FCNCA's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while FCNCO trades at $20.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FCNCO's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while FCNCP trades at $19.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FCNCP's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, FITBM has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while FITBM trades at $26.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FITBM's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FITBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FITBM's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, FCNCN has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while FCNCN trades at $25.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FCNCN's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FCNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FCNCN's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while KEY-PI trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check KEY-PI's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while BCH trades at $38.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check BCH's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while CIB trades at $78.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CIB's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while FHN-PC trades at $34.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FHN-PC's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while BSAC trades at $32.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check BSAC's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CFG-PD's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FHN-PB's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while WBS trades at $76.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check WBS's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while FHN trades at $26.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FHN's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, WBS-PF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while WBS-PF trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas WBS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WBS-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to WBS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check WBS-PF's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while FHN-PE trades at $23.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FHN-PE's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while FHN-PF trades at $17.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FHN-PF's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, WBS-PG has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while WBS-PG trades at $23.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas WBS-PG's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WBS-PG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to WBS-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check WBS-PG's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while CMA trades at $88.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CMA's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while UMBF trades at $145.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check UMBF's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while WTFC trades at $162.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check WTFC's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while BPOP trades at $168.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check BPOP's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while ZION trades at $70.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check ZION's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while ONB trades at $26.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check ONB's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, ZIONP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while ZIONP trades at $18.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ZIONP's P/E ratio is 2.82. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZIONP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to ZIONP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check ZIONP's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while ONBPO trades at $24.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check ONBPO's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while ONBPP trades at $24.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check ONBPP's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while SSB trades at $101.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check SSB's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while CFR trades at $155.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CFR's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, CFR-PB has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while CFR-PB trades at $16.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CFR-PB's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFR-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to CFR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CFR-PB's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while WAL trades at $83.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check WAL's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, WAL-PA has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while WAL-PA trades at $23.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas WAL-PA's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAL-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to WAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check WAL-PA's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FHN-PD's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while BOKF trades at $141.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check BOKF's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while CBSH trades at $58.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CBSH's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while VLY trades at $14.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check VLY's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while VLYPN trades at $25.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check VLYPN's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while CHYM trades at $21.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CHYM's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while GGAL trades at $49.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 51.63. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check GGAL's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while CADE trades at $42.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CADE's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while PNFP trades at $100.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check PNFP's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while COLB trades at $32.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check COLB's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while CBC trades at $31.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 33.72. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to CBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CBC's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while BSMX trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check BSMX's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while PB trades at $73.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check PB's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while SNV trades at $50.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check SNV's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while FNB trades at $19.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FNB's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while GBCI trades at $52.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check GBCI's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check SNV-PD's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check CUBI-PE's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, IFS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while IFS trades at $58.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas IFS's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to IFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check IFS's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while UBSI trades at $46.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check UBSI's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while FLG trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -136.32. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check FLG's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while AUB trades at $43.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check AUB's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while ABCB trades at $91.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is less volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check ABCB's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while HWC trades at $75.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check HWC's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while HWCPZ trades at $21.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check HWCPZ's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, ASB has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while ASB trades at $31.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ASB's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to ASB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check ASB's competition here

RF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RF stands at 26.3B. In comparison, ASB-PF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF is priced at $30.80, while ASB-PF trades at $19.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ASB-PF's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, RF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASB-PF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF is more volatile compared to ASB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.Check ASB-PF's competition here