M&T Bank Corporation (MTB-PH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MTB-PH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTB-PH | $25.01 | -0.02% | 35.4B | 1.37 | $18.22 | +2.51% |
| HDB | $25.77 | +0.86% | 132.2B | 15.43 | $1.67 | +3.41% |
| MFG | $9.94 | +1.43% | 121.1B | 13.54 | $0.73 | +1.85% |
| IBN | $29.49 | +1.79% | 105.8B | 18.66 | $1.58 | +0.84% |
| PNC | $249.49 | -0.85% | 100.2B | 14.50 | $17.21 | +2.73% |
| USB-PA | $770.00 | +0.46% | 93B | 157.79 | $4.88 | +3.37% |
| ITUB | $8.12 | -0.08% | 89.5B | 11.12 | $0.73 | +7.24% |
| LYG | $6.06 | +2.71% | 88.1B | 13.77 | $0.44 | +3.23% |
| DB | $35.86 | +5.91% | 68.6B | 9.88 | $3.63 | +3.26% |
| USB-PS | $17.47 | +0.00% | 66.4B | 3.58 | $4.88 | +3.37% |
Stock Comparison
MTB-PH vs HDB Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 132.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while HDB trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check HDB's competition here
MTB-PH vs MFG Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 121.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while MFG trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check MFG's competition here
MTB-PH vs IBN Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 105.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while IBN trades at $29.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check IBN's competition here
MTB-PH vs PNC Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 100.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while PNC trades at $249.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check PNC's competition here
MTB-PH vs USB-PA Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while USB-PA trades at $770.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 157.79. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check USB-PA's competition here
MTB-PH vs ITUB Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 89.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while ITUB trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check ITUB's competition here
MTB-PH vs LYG Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while LYG trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check LYG's competition here
MTB-PH vs DB Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while DB trades at $35.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check DB's competition here
MTB-PH vs USB-PS Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while USB-PS trades at $17.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check USB-PS's competition here
MTB-PH vs NU Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while NU trades at $13.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check NU's competition here
MTB-PH vs TFC Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while TFC trades at $50.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check TFC's competition here
MTB-PH vs TFC-PI Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while TFC-PI trades at $18.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check TFC-PI's competition here
MTB-PH vs TFC-PR Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while TFC-PR trades at $18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check TFC-PR's competition here
MTB-PH vs TFC-PO Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while TFC-PO trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check TFC-PO's competition here
MTB-PH vs FITB Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while FITB trades at $57.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FITB's competition here
MTB-PH vs FITBI Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while FITBI trades at $25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FITBI's competition here
MTB-PH vs FITBO Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while FITBO trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FITBO's competition here
MTB-PH vs FITBP Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while FITBP trades at $23.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FITBP's competition here
MTB-PH vs BSBR Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while BSBR trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check BSBR's competition here
MTB-PH vs KB Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while KB trades at $109.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check KB's competition here
MTB-PH vs BBD Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while BBD trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check BBD's competition here
MTB-PH vs HBAN Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while HBAN trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check HBAN's competition here
MTB-PH vs HBANM Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while HBANM trades at $20.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check HBANM's competition here
MTB-PH vs HBANZ Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, HBANZ has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while HBANZ trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas HBANZ's P/E ratio is 35.97. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HBANZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to HBANZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check HBANZ's competition here
MTB-PH vs HBANL Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while HBANL trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check HBANL's competition here
MTB-PH vs MTB-PJ Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, MTB-PJ has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while MTB-PJ trades at $25.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas MTB-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTB-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to MTB-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check MTB-PJ's competition here
MTB-PH vs HBANP Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while HBANP trades at $16.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check HBANP's competition here
MTB-PH vs MTB Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while MTB trades at $238.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check MTB's competition here
MTB-PH vs SHG Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while SHG trades at $66.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check SHG's competition here
MTB-PH vs CFG Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while CFG trades at $70.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CFG's competition here
MTB-PH vs CFG-PE Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while CFG-PE trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.19. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CFG-PE's competition here
MTB-PH vs CFG-PH Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while CFG-PH trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CFG-PH's competition here
MTB-PH vs KEY-PL Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while KEY-PL trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check KEY-PL's competition here
MTB-PH vs RF Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while RF trades at $30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check RF's competition here
MTB-PH vs RF-PF Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while RF-PF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check RF-PF's competition here
MTB-PH vs RF-PE Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while RF-PE trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check RF-PE's competition here
MTB-PH vs RF-PC Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while RF-PC trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check RF-PC's competition here
MTB-PH vs KEY Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while KEY trades at $23.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check KEY's competition here
MTB-PH vs KEY-PK Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while KEY-PK trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check KEY-PK's competition here
MTB-PH vs KEY-PJ Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while KEY-PJ trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check KEY-PJ's competition here
MTB-PH vs FCNCO Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while FCNCO trades at $20.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FCNCO's competition here
MTB-PH vs FCNCP Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while FCNCP trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FCNCP's competition here
MTB-PH vs FCNCA Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while FCNCA trades at $2,082.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FCNCA's competition here
MTB-PH vs FITBM Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, FITBM has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while FITBM trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas FITBM's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FITBM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to FITBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FITBM's competition here
MTB-PH vs FCNCN Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, FCNCN has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while FCNCN trades at $25.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas FCNCN's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FCNCN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to FCNCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FCNCN's competition here
MTB-PH vs KEY-PI Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while KEY-PI trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check KEY-PI's competition here
MTB-PH vs BCH Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while BCH trades at $39.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check BCH's competition here
MTB-PH vs CIB Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while CIB trades at $79.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CIB's competition here
MTB-PH vs FHN-PC Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while FHN-PC trades at $34.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FHN-PC's competition here
MTB-PH vs BSAC Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while BSAC trades at $32.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check BSAC's competition here
MTB-PH vs CFG-PD Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CFG-PD's competition here
MTB-PH vs FHN-PB Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FHN-PB's competition here
MTB-PH vs WBS-PG Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, WBS-PG has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while WBS-PG trades at $23.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas WBS-PG's P/E ratio is 3.72. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WBS-PG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to WBS-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check WBS-PG's competition here
MTB-PH vs FHN-PF Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while FHN-PF trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FHN-PF's competition here
MTB-PH vs WBS Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while WBS trades at $76.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check WBS's competition here
MTB-PH vs FHN-PE Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while FHN-PE trades at $23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FHN-PE's competition here
MTB-PH vs WBS-PF Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, WBS-PF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while WBS-PF trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas WBS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WBS-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to WBS-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check WBS-PF's competition here
MTB-PH vs FHN Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while FHN trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FHN's competition here
MTB-PH vs CMA Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while CMA trades at $88.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CMA's competition here
MTB-PH vs UMBF Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while UMBF trades at $143.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check UMBF's competition here
MTB-PH vs WTFC Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while WTFC trades at $161.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check WTFC's competition here
MTB-PH vs BPOP Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while BPOP trades at $167.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check BPOP's competition here
MTB-PH vs ZIONP Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, ZIONP has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while ZIONP trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas ZIONP's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZIONP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to ZIONP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check ZIONP's competition here
MTB-PH vs ZION Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while ZION trades at $69.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check ZION's competition here
MTB-PH vs ONB Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while ONB trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check ONB's competition here
MTB-PH vs ONBPP Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while ONBPP trades at $24.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check ONBPP's competition here
MTB-PH vs ONBPO Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while ONBPO trades at $24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check ONBPO's competition here
MTB-PH vs SSB Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while SSB trades at $100.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check SSB's competition here
MTB-PH vs CFR Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while CFR trades at $154.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CFR's competition here
MTB-PH vs CFR-PB Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, CFR-PB has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while CFR-PB trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas CFR-PB's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFR-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to CFR-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CFR-PB's competition here
MTB-PH vs WAL-PA Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, WAL-PA has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while WAL-PA trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas WAL-PA's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WAL-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to WAL-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check WAL-PA's competition here
MTB-PH vs WAL Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while WAL trades at $81.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check WAL's competition here
MTB-PH vs FHN-PD Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FHN-PD's competition here
MTB-PH vs BOKF Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while BOKF trades at $139.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check BOKF's competition here
MTB-PH vs CBSH Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while CBSH trades at $58.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CBSH's competition here
MTB-PH vs VLYPN Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while VLYPN trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check VLYPN's competition here
MTB-PH vs GGAL Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while GGAL trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 53.02. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check GGAL's competition here
MTB-PH vs VLY Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while VLY trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check VLY's competition here
MTB-PH vs CHYM Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while CHYM trades at $20.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CHYM's competition here
MTB-PH vs CADE Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while CADE trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CADE's competition here
MTB-PH vs PNFP Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while PNFP trades at $99.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check PNFP's competition here
MTB-PH vs COLB Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while COLB trades at $31.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check COLB's competition here
MTB-PH vs CBC Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while CBC trades at $31.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 33.83. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to CBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CBC's competition here
MTB-PH vs BSMX Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check BSMX's competition here
MTB-PH vs PB Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while PB trades at $70.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check PB's competition here
MTB-PH vs SNV Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while SNV trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check SNV's competition here
MTB-PH vs FNB Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while FNB trades at $19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FNB's competition here
MTB-PH vs GBCI Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while GBCI trades at $51.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check GBCI's competition here
MTB-PH vs SNV-PD Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check SNV-PD's competition here
MTB-PH vs CUBI-PE Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CUBI-PE's competition here
MTB-PH vs IFS Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, IFS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while IFS trades at $58.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas IFS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to IFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check IFS's competition here
MTB-PH vs UBSI Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while UBSI trades at $46.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check UBSI's competition here
MTB-PH vs FLG Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while FLG trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -132.64. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FLG's competition here
MTB-PH vs ABCB Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while ABCB trades at $90.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check ABCB's competition here
MTB-PH vs HWC Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while HWC trades at $74.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check HWC's competition here
MTB-PH vs HWCPZ Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while HWCPZ trades at $21.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check HWCPZ's competition here
MTB-PH vs AUB Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while AUB trades at $42.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check AUB's competition here
MTB-PH vs ASB-PE Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, ASB-PE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while ASB-PE trades at $20.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas ASB-PE's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASB-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to ASB-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check ASB-PE's competition here
MTB-PH vs ASB-PF Comparison July 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 35.4B. In comparison, ASB-PF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.01, while ASB-PF trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.37, whereas ASB-PF's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASB-PF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to ASB-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check ASB-PF's competition here