M&T Bank Corporation (MTB-PH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MTB-PH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTB-PH | $25.03 | +0.00% | 32.9B | 1.91 | $13.09 | +2.60% |
| HDB | $24.17 | +1.51% | 124B | 17.02 | $1.42 | +4.63% |
| MFG | $9.68 | +1.68% | 117.7B | 15.84 | $0.61 | +1.89% |
| IBN | $27.79 | +1.20% | 99.6B | 17.70 | $1.57 | +0.89% |
| PNC | $237.66 | +1.59% | 95.4B | 13.82 | $17.20 | +2.86% |
| ITUB | $7.99 | +1.01% | 88.1B | 9.99 | $0.80 | +7.82% |
| USB-PA | $765.00 | +0.18% | 88.1B | 217.95 | $3.51 | +3.50% |
| LYG | $5.50 | +1.48% | 80.2B | 13.43 | $0.41 | +3.57% |
| USB-PS | $17.54 | +0.52% | 66.5B | N/A | N/A | +3.50% |
| TFC | $51.66 | +1.93% | 64.3B | 12.78 | $4.04 | +4.03% |
Stock Comparison
MTB-PH vs HDB Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 124B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while HDB trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check HDB's competition here
MTB-PH vs MFG Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 117.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while MFG trades at $9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check MFG's competition here
MTB-PH vs IBN Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 99.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while IBN trades at $27.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check IBN's competition here
MTB-PH vs PNC Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while PNC trades at $237.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check PNC's competition here
MTB-PH vs ITUB Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while ITUB trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check ITUB's competition here
MTB-PH vs USB-PA Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while USB-PA trades at $765.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 217.95. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check USB-PA's competition here
MTB-PH vs LYG Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 80.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while LYG trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check LYG's competition here
MTB-PH vs USB-PS Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while USB-PS trades at $17.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check USB-PS's competition here
MTB-PH vs TFC Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while TFC trades at $51.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check TFC's competition here
MTB-PH vs DB Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while DB trades at $33.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check DB's competition here
MTB-PH vs TFC-PR Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while TFC-PR trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check TFC-PR's competition here
MTB-PH vs TFC-PO Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while TFC-PO trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check TFC-PO's competition here
MTB-PH vs TFC-PI Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while TFC-PI trades at $18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check TFC-PI's competition here
MTB-PH vs FITB Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while FITB trades at $54.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FITB's competition here
MTB-PH vs FITBM Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, FITBM has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while FITBM trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas FITBM's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FITBM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to FITBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FITBM's competition here
MTB-PH vs FITBO Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while FITBO trades at $18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FITBO's competition here
MTB-PH vs FITBI Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while FITBI trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FITBI's competition here
MTB-PH vs FITBP Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while FITBP trades at $23.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FITBP's competition here
MTB-PH vs BSBR Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while BSBR trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check BSBR's competition here
MTB-PH vs KB Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while KB trades at $107.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check KB's competition here
MTB-PH vs BBD Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while BBD trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check BBD's competition here
MTB-PH vs HBAN Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while HBAN trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check HBAN's competition here
MTB-PH vs HBANM Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while HBANM trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check HBANM's competition here
MTB-PH vs HBANZ Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, HBANZ has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while HBANZ trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas HBANZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HBANZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to HBANZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check HBANZ's competition here
MTB-PH vs HBANL Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while HBANL trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check HBANL's competition here
MTB-PH vs HBANP Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while HBANP trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check HBANP's competition here
MTB-PH vs MTB Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while MTB trades at $231.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check MTB's competition here
MTB-PH vs MTB-PJ Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, MTB-PJ has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while MTB-PJ trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas MTB-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTB-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to MTB-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check MTB-PJ's competition here
MTB-PH vs BBDO Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while BBDO trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check BBDO's competition here
MTB-PH vs SHG Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while SHG trades at $67.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check SHG's competition here
MTB-PH vs CFG Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while CFG trades at $67.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CFG's competition here
MTB-PH vs CFG-PE Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while CFG-PE trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 3.84. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CFG-PE's competition here
MTB-PH vs CFG-PH Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while CFG-PH trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CFG-PH's competition here
MTB-PH vs KEY-PL Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while KEY-PL trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check KEY-PL's competition here
MTB-PH vs RF Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while RF trades at $29.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check RF's competition here
MTB-PH vs RF-PE Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while RF-PE trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check RF-PE's competition here
MTB-PH vs RF-PF Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while RF-PF trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check RF-PF's competition here
MTB-PH vs RF-PC Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while RF-PC trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check RF-PC's competition here
MTB-PH vs KEY Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while KEY trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check KEY's competition here
MTB-PH vs FCNCA Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while FCNCA trades at $2,108.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FCNCA's competition here
MTB-PH vs KEY-PK Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while KEY-PK trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check KEY-PK's competition here
MTB-PH vs KEY-PJ Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while KEY-PJ trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check KEY-PJ's competition here
MTB-PH vs FCNCN Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, FCNCN has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while FCNCN trades at $24.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas FCNCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FCNCN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to FCNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FCNCN's competition here
MTB-PH vs BCH Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while BCH trades at $40.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check BCH's competition here
MTB-PH vs KEY-PI Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while KEY-PI trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check KEY-PI's competition here
MTB-PH vs CIB Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while CIB trades at $80.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CIB's competition here
MTB-PH vs FHN-PC Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while FHN-PC trades at $38.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FHN-PC's competition here
MTB-PH vs BSAC Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while BSAC trades at $32.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check BSAC's competition here
MTB-PH vs CFG-PD Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CFG-PD's competition here
MTB-PH vs WF Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while WF trades at $62.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check WF's competition here
MTB-PH vs VLYPN Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while VLYPN trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check VLYPN's competition here
MTB-PH vs FHN-PB Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FHN-PB's competition here
MTB-PH vs FHN Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while FHN trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FHN's competition here
MTB-PH vs WBS Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while WBS trades at $73.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check WBS's competition here
MTB-PH vs FHN-PE Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while FHN-PE trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FHN-PE's competition here
MTB-PH vs FHN-PF Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while FHN-PF trades at $17.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FHN-PF's competition here
MTB-PH vs CMA Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while CMA trades at $88.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CMA's competition here
MTB-PH vs WTFC Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while WTFC trades at $159.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check WTFC's competition here
MTB-PH vs BPOP Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while BPOP trades at $160.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check BPOP's competition here
MTB-PH vs UMBF Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while UMBF trades at $135.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check UMBF's competition here
MTB-PH vs ZION Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while ZION trades at $67.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check ZION's competition here
MTB-PH vs ONB Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while ONB trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check ONB's competition here
MTB-PH vs SSB Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while SSB trades at $98.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check SSB's competition here
MTB-PH vs ZIONP Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, ZIONP has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while ZIONP trades at $18.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas ZIONP's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZIONP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to ZIONP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check ZIONP's competition here
MTB-PH vs ONBPO Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while ONBPO trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check ONBPO's competition here
MTB-PH vs ONBPP Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while ONBPP trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check ONBPP's competition here
MTB-PH vs CFR Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while CFR trades at $148.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CFR's competition here
MTB-PH vs CFR-PB Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, CFR-PB has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while CFR-PB trades at $16.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas CFR-PB's P/E ratio is 2.53. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFR-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to CFR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CFR-PB's competition here
MTB-PH vs WAL Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while WAL trades at $83.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check WAL's competition here
MTB-PH vs WAL-PA Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, WAL-PA has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while WAL-PA trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas WAL-PA's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WAL-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to WAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check WAL-PA's competition here
MTB-PH vs FHN-PD Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FHN-PD's competition here
MTB-PH vs GGAL Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while GGAL trades at $55.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 149.08. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check GGAL's competition here
MTB-PH vs BOKF Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while BOKF trades at $134.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check BOKF's competition here
MTB-PH vs CBSH Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while CBSH trades at $55.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CBSH's competition here
MTB-PH vs VLY Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while VLY trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check VLY's competition here
MTB-PH vs CADE Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while CADE trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CADE's competition here
MTB-PH vs COLB Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while COLB trades at $31.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check COLB's competition here
MTB-PH vs PNFP Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while PNFP trades at $96.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check PNFP's competition here
MTB-PH vs BSMX Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check BSMX's competition here
MTB-PH vs PB Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while PB trades at $72.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check PB's competition here
MTB-PH vs SNV Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while SNV trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check SNV's competition here
MTB-PH vs CBC Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while CBC trades at $28.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to CBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CBC's competition here
MTB-PH vs SNV-PD Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check SNV-PD's competition here
MTB-PH vs FNB Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while FNB trades at $18.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FNB's competition here
MTB-PH vs AVAL Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, AVAL has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while AVAL trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas AVAL's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVAL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to AVAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check AVAL's competition here
MTB-PH vs CUBI-PE Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CUBI-PE's competition here
MTB-PH vs GBCI Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while GBCI trades at $49.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check GBCI's competition here
MTB-PH vs CHYM Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while CHYM trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check CHYM's competition here
MTB-PH vs BMA Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while BMA trades at $98.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check BMA's competition here
MTB-PH vs IFS Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, IFS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while IFS trades at $56.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas IFS's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to IFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check IFS's competition here
MTB-PH vs UBSI Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while UBSI trades at $45.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check UBSI's competition here
MTB-PH vs FLG Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while FLG trades at $14.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -71.19. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check FLG's competition here
MTB-PH vs ABCB Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while ABCB trades at $88.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check ABCB's competition here
MTB-PH vs HWC Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while HWC trades at $72.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check HWC's competition here
MTB-PH vs AUB Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while AUB trades at $40.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check AUB's competition here
MTB-PH vs HOMB Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while HOMB trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check HOMB's competition here
MTB-PH vs OZK Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while OZK trades at $52.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check OZK's competition here
MTB-PH vs VLYPO Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while VLYPO trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check VLYPO's competition here
MTB-PH vs VLYPP Comparison June 2026
MTB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTB-PH stands at 32.9B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTB-PH is priced at $25.03, while VLYPP trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 1.91, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, MTB-PH's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTB-PH is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTB-PH.Check VLYPP's competition here