Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for AUB
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for AUB
Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AUB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUB | $38.03 | -1.93% | 5.4B | 18.73 | $2.03 | +3.71% |
| USB-PA | $763.55 | +0.20% | 1.3T | 217.54 | $3.51 | +3.68% |
| HDB | $26.73 | -0.19% | 137.2B | 18.44 | $1.45 | +4.10% |
| MFG | $8.63 | +0.35% | 106.4B | 16.25 | $0.53 | +2.00% |
| ITUB | $9.16 | +1.66% | 101.2B | 11.77 | $0.78 | +6.62% |
| IBN | $27.73 | +0.95% | 99.2B | 17.67 | $1.57 | +0.92% |
| PNC | $221.13 | -0.94% | 89.2B | 13.33 | $16.59 | +3.01% |
| USB | $55.66 | -1.19% | 86.5B | 12.05 | $4.62 | +3.68% |
| LYG | $5.49 | -1.96% | 80.6B | 15.24 | $0.36 | +5.41% |
| USB-PP | $21.95 | -0.36% | 68.9B | 4.73 | $4.64 | +3.68% |
Stock Comparison
AUB vs USB-PA Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while USB-PA trades at $763.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 217.54. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check USB-PA's competition here
AUB vs HDB Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 137.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while HDB trades at $26.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check HDB's competition here
AUB vs MFG Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 106.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while MFG trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check MFG's competition here
AUB vs ITUB Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 101.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while ITUB trades at $9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check ITUB's competition here
AUB vs IBN Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 99.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while IBN trades at $27.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check IBN's competition here
AUB vs PNC Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 89.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while PNC trades at $221.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check PNC's competition here
AUB vs USB Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while USB trades at $55.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check USB's competition here
AUB vs LYG Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 80.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while LYG trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check LYG's competition here
AUB vs USB-PP Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while USB-PP trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check USB-PP's competition here
AUB vs USB-PS Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while USB-PS trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check USB-PS's competition here
AUB vs USB-PH Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while USB-PH trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check USB-PH's competition here
AUB vs TFC Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while TFC trades at $49.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check TFC's competition here
AUB vs DB Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while DB trades at $32.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check DB's competition here
AUB vs BSBR Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while BSBR trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check BSBR's competition here
AUB vs BBD Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while BBD trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check BBD's competition here
AUB vs KB Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while KB trades at $109.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check KB's competition here
AUB vs BBDO Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while BBDO trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check BBDO's competition here
AUB vs HBANL Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while HBANL trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check HBANL's competition here
AUB vs HBANZ Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HBANZ has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while HBANZ trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas HBANZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HBANZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to HBANZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check HBANZ's competition here
AUB vs SHG Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while SHG trades at $67.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check SHG's competition here
AUB vs FITB Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while FITB trades at $49.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FITB's competition here
AUB vs MTB Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while MTB trades at $219.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check MTB's competition here
AUB vs HBANM Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while HBANM trades at $21.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check HBANM's competition here
AUB vs BAP Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while BAP trades at $349.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check BAP's competition here
AUB vs TFC-PO Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while TFC-PO trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check TFC-PO's competition here
AUB vs CFG Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while CFG trades at $64.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CFG's competition here
AUB vs KEY-PL Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while KEY-PL trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check KEY-PL's competition here
AUB vs HBANP Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while HBANP trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check HBANP's competition here
AUB vs USB-PR Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while USB-PR trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check USB-PR's competition here
AUB vs TFC-PI Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while TFC-PI trades at $19.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check TFC-PI's competition here
AUB vs HBAN Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while HBAN trades at $16.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check HBAN's competition here
AUB vs TFC-PR Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while TFC-PR trades at $18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check TFC-PR's competition here
AUB vs RF Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while RF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check RF's competition here
AUB vs FCNCA Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while FCNCA trades at $1,989.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FCNCA's competition here
AUB vs FITBM Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FITBM has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while FITBM trades at $26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas FITBM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FITBM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FITBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FITBM's competition here
AUB vs USB-PQ Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while USB-PQ trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check USB-PQ's competition here
AUB vs KEY Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while KEY trades at $21.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check KEY's competition here
AUB vs RF-PF Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while RF-PF trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check RF-PF's competition here
AUB vs FCNCN Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FCNCN has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while FCNCN trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas FCNCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCNCN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FCNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FCNCN's competition here
AUB vs KEY-PJ Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check KEY-PJ's competition here
AUB vs RF-PC Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while RF-PC trades at $24.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check RF-PC's competition here
AUB vs KEY-PI Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while KEY-PI trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check KEY-PI's competition here
AUB vs BCH Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while BCH trades at $38.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check BCH's competition here
AUB vs CIB Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while CIB trades at $74.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CIB's competition here
AUB vs WF Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while WF trades at $70.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check WF's competition here
AUB vs KEY-PK Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while KEY-PK trades at $21.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check KEY-PK's competition here
AUB vs BSAC Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while BSAC trades at $35.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check BSAC's competition here
AUB vs FITBI Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while FITBI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FITBI's competition here
AUB vs FITBP Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while FITBP trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FITBP's competition here
AUB vs RF-PE Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while RF-PE trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check RF-PE's competition here
AUB vs CFG-PD Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CFG-PD's competition here
AUB vs VLYPN Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while VLYPN trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check VLYPN's competition here
AUB vs FHN-PC Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while FHN-PC trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FHN-PC's competition here
AUB vs FITBO Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while FITBO trades at $19.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FITBO's competition here
AUB vs FHN-PB Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FHN-PB's competition here
AUB vs FHN-PE Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while FHN-PE trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FHN-PE's competition here
AUB vs CFG-PH Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while CFG-PH trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CFG-PH's competition here
AUB vs FHN Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while FHN trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FHN's competition here
AUB vs WBS Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while WBS trades at $71.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check WBS's competition here
AUB vs CMA Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while CMA trades at $88.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CMA's competition here
AUB vs SSB Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while SSB trades at $97.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check SSB's competition here
AUB vs WTFC Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while WTFC trades at $145.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check WTFC's competition here
AUB vs BPOP Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while BPOP trades at $144.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check BPOP's competition here
AUB vs UMBF Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while UMBF trades at $120.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check UMBF's competition here
AUB vs ONB Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while ONB trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check ONB's competition here
AUB vs ONBPP Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while ONBPP trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check ONBPP's competition here
AUB vs ONBPO Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while ONBPO trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 28.07. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check ONBPO's competition here
AUB vs ZION Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while ZION trades at $61.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check ZION's competition here
AUB vs CFR Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while CFR trades at $142.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CFR's competition here
AUB vs FHN-PF Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while FHN-PF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FHN-PF's competition here
AUB vs FHN-PD Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FHN-PD's competition here
AUB vs WAL Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while WAL trades at $76.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check WAL's competition here
AUB vs CFG-PE Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while CFG-PE trades at $18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CFG-PE's competition here
AUB vs BOKF Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while BOKF trades at $134.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check BOKF's competition here
AUB vs CADE Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while CADE trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CADE's competition here
AUB vs GGAL Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while GGAL trades at $48.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 54.68. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check GGAL's competition here
AUB vs CHYM Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while CHYM trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CHYM's competition here
AUB vs CBSH Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while CBSH trades at $50.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CBSH's competition here
AUB vs BSMX Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check BSMX's competition here
AUB vs VLY Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while VLY trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check VLY's competition here
AUB vs PNFP Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while PNFP trades at $92.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check PNFP's competition here
AUB vs PB Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while PB trades at $68.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check PB's competition here
AUB vs SNV Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while SNV trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check SNV's competition here
AUB vs COLB Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while COLB trades at $28.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check COLB's competition here
AUB vs SNV-PD Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check SNV-PD's competition here
AUB vs CUBI-PE Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CUBI-PE's competition here
AUB vs FNB Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while FNB trades at $17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FNB's competition here
AUB vs GBCI Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while GBCI trades at $48.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check GBCI's competition here
AUB vs UBSI Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while UBSI trades at $43.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check UBSI's competition here
AUB vs CBC Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while CBC trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CBC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to CBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CBC's competition here
AUB vs FLG Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while FLG trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -28.08. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FLG's competition here
AUB vs ABCB Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while ABCB trades at $82.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check ABCB's competition here
AUB vs HOMB Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while HOMB trades at $27.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check HOMB's competition here
AUB vs IFS Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, IFS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while IFS trades at $50.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas IFS's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to IFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check IFS's competition here
AUB vs HWC Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while HWC trades at $67.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check HWC's competition here
AUB vs VLYPP Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while VLYPP trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check VLYPP's competition here
AUB vs VLYPO Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while VLYPO trades at $24.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check VLYPO's competition here
AUB vs OZK Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while OZK trades at $47.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check OZK's competition here
AUB vs AVAL Comparison April 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, AVAL has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $38.03, while AVAL trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.73, whereas AVAL's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVAL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to AVAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check AVAL's competition here