Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation
Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AUB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUB | $37.56 | +0.70% | 5.4B | 16.05 | $2.34 | +3.86% |
| USB-PA | $774.47 | +0.32% | 1.2T | 220.65 | $3.51 | +3.76% |
| HDB | $24.74 | +0.49% | 126.9B | 17.80 | $1.39 | +4.53% |
| MFG | $9.32 | +0.54% | 113.6B | 14.79 | $0.63 | +1.86% |
| IBN | $25.98 | +0.35% | 93B | 16.76 | $1.55 | +0.96% |
| PNC | $219.23 | +0.39% | 88B | 12.74 | $17.21 | +3.10% |
| ITUB | $7.82 | -2.25% | 86.2B | 9.54 | $0.82 | +8.00% |
| LYG | $5.36 | -0.92% | 78.8B | 13.07 | $0.41 | +3.66% |
| USB-PS | $17.45 | +0.17% | 66.3B | N/A | N/A | +3.76% |
| DB | $32.43 | -1.43% | 62B | 8.84 | $3.67 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AUB vs USB-PA Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while USB-PA trades at $774.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 220.65. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check USB-PA's competition here
AUB vs HDB Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 126.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while HDB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check HDB's competition here
AUB vs MFG Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 113.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while MFG trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check MFG's competition here
AUB vs IBN Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while IBN trades at $25.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check IBN's competition here
AUB vs PNC Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 88B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while PNC trades at $219.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check PNC's competition here
AUB vs ITUB Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 86.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while ITUB trades at $7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check ITUB's competition here
AUB vs LYG Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while LYG trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check LYG's competition here
AUB vs USB-PS Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while USB-PS trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check USB-PS's competition here
AUB vs DB Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while DB trades at $32.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check DB's competition here
AUB vs TFC Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while TFC trades at $48.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check TFC's competition here
AUB vs HBANZ Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HBANZ has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while HBANZ trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas HBANZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HBANZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to HBANZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check HBANZ's competition here
AUB vs BSBR Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while BSBR trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check BSBR's competition here
AUB vs HBANL Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while HBANL trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check HBANL's competition here
AUB vs KB Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while KB trades at $104.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check KB's competition here
AUB vs BBD Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while BBD trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check BBD's competition here
AUB vs FITB Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while FITB trades at $49.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FITB's competition here
AUB vs HBANM Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while HBANM trades at $22.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 28.37. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check HBANM's competition here
AUB vs BBDO Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while BBDO trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check BBDO's competition here
AUB vs MTB Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while MTB trades at $213.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check MTB's competition here
AUB vs SHG Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while SHG trades at $64.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check SHG's competition here
AUB vs KEY-PL Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while KEY-PL trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check KEY-PL's competition here
AUB vs CFG Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while CFG trades at $62.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CFG's competition here
AUB vs TFC-PO Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while TFC-PO trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check TFC-PO's competition here
AUB vs HBANP Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while HBANP trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check HBANP's competition here
AUB vs HBAN Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while HBAN trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check HBAN's competition here
AUB vs TFC-PI Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while TFC-PI trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check TFC-PI's competition here
AUB vs RF Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while RF trades at $27.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check RF's competition here
AUB vs FITBM Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FITBM has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while FITBM trades at $26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas FITBM's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FITBM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FITBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FITBM's competition here
AUB vs KEY Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while KEY trades at $21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check KEY's competition here
AUB vs TFC-PR Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while TFC-PR trades at $18.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check TFC-PR's competition here
AUB vs FCNCA Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while FCNCA trades at $1,991.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FCNCA's competition here
AUB vs FCNCN Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FCNCN has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while FCNCN trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas FCNCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FCNCN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FCNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FCNCN's competition here
AUB vs RF-PF Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while RF-PF trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check RF-PF's competition here
AUB vs KEY-PJ Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check KEY-PJ's competition here
AUB vs RF-PC Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while RF-PC trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check RF-PC's competition here
AUB vs KEY-PI Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while KEY-PI trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check KEY-PI's competition here
AUB vs BCH Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while BCH trades at $37.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check BCH's competition here
AUB vs FHN-PC Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while FHN-PC trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FHN-PC's competition here
AUB vs KEY-PK Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while KEY-PK trades at $20.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check KEY-PK's competition here
AUB vs FITBI Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while FITBI trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FITBI's competition here
AUB vs FITBP Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while FITBP trades at $23.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FITBP's competition here
AUB vs CIB Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while CIB trades at $65.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CIB's competition here
AUB vs WF Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while WF trades at $62.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check WF's competition here
AUB vs CFG-PD Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CFG-PD's competition here
AUB vs BSAC Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while BSAC trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check BSAC's competition here
AUB vs RF-PE Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while RF-PE trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check RF-PE's competition here
AUB vs VLYPN Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while VLYPN trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check VLYPN's competition here
AUB vs FITBO Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while FITBO trades at $18.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FITBO's competition here
AUB vs FHN-PB Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FHN-PB's competition here
AUB vs CFG-PH Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while CFG-PH trades at $25.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CFG-PH's competition here
AUB vs FHN-PE Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while FHN-PE trades at $24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FHN-PE's competition here
AUB vs WBS Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while WBS trades at $71.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check WBS's competition here
AUB vs FHN Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while FHN trades at $24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FHN's competition here
AUB vs CMA Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while CMA trades at $88.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CMA's competition here
AUB vs WTFC Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while WTFC trades at $149.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check WTFC's competition here
AUB vs UMBF Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while UMBF trades at $131.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check UMBF's competition here
AUB vs BPOP Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while BPOP trades at $150.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check BPOP's competition here
AUB vs ONBPO Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while ONBPO trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check ONBPO's competition here
AUB vs ONBPP Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while ONBPP trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check ONBPP's competition here
AUB vs ONB Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while ONB trades at $23.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check ONB's competition here
AUB vs SSB Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while SSB trades at $94.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check SSB's competition here
AUB vs ZION Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while ZION trades at $62.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check ZION's competition here
AUB vs FHN-PD Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FHN-PD's competition here
AUB vs CFR Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while CFR trades at $139.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CFR's competition here
AUB vs FHN-PF Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while FHN-PF trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FHN-PF's competition here
AUB vs WAL Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while WAL trades at $78.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check WAL's competition here
AUB vs CFG-PE Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while CFG-PE trades at $18.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 3.93. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CFG-PE's competition here
AUB vs BOKF Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while BOKF trades at $130.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check BOKF's competition here
AUB vs CADE Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while CADE trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CADE's competition here
AUB vs CBSH Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while CBSH trades at $52.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CBSH's competition here
AUB vs VLY Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while VLY trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check VLY's competition here
AUB vs PNFP Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while PNFP trades at $97.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check PNFP's competition here
AUB vs BSMX Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check BSMX's competition here
AUB vs COLB Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while COLB trades at $29.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check COLB's competition here
AUB vs GGAL Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while GGAL trades at $43.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 114.61. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check GGAL's competition here
AUB vs PB Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while PB trades at $69.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check PB's competition here
AUB vs SNV Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while SNV trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check SNV's competition here
AUB vs CBC Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while CBC trades at $28.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 711.25. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to CBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CBC's competition here
AUB vs CHYM Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while CHYM trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CHYM's competition here
AUB vs SNV-PD Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check SNV-PD's competition here
AUB vs CUBI-PE Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check CUBI-PE's competition here
AUB vs FNB Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while FNB trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FNB's competition here
AUB vs GBCI Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while GBCI trades at $47.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check GBCI's competition here
AUB vs UBSI Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while UBSI trades at $43.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check UBSI's competition here
AUB vs FLG Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while FLG trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -65.95. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FLG's competition here
AUB vs ABCB Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while ABCB trades at $84.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check ABCB's competition here
AUB vs HWC Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while HWC trades at $67.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check HWC's competition here
AUB vs VLYPO Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while VLYPO trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check VLYPO's competition here
AUB vs IFS Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, IFS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while IFS trades at $49.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas IFS's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to IFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check IFS's competition here
AUB vs VLYPP Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while VLYPP trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check VLYPP's competition here
AUB vs HOMB Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while HOMB trades at $26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check HOMB's competition here
AUB vs OZK Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while OZK trades at $48.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check OZK's competition here
AUB vs BXS Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check BXS's competition here
AUB vs AVAL Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, AVAL has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while AVAL trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas AVAL's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVAL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to AVAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check AVAL's competition here
AUB vs NYCB-PA Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, NYCB-PA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while NYCB-PA trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas NYCB-PA's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NYCB-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to NYCB-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check NYCB-PA's competition here
AUB vs AX Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, AX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while AX trades at $86.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas AX's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check AX's competition here
AUB vs BMA Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while BMA trades at $75.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check BMA's competition here
AUB vs ASB Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ASB has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while ASB trades at $28.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas ASB's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is more volatile compared to ASB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check ASB's competition here
AUB vs FFIN Comparison May 2026
AUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUB stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AUB is priced at $37.56, while FFIN trades at $32.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.05, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, AUB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AUB is less volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUB.Check FFIN's competition here