Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while MFG trades at $10.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check MFG's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 121.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while HDB trades at $23.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check HDB's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 108B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while IBN trades at $30.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check IBN's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 100.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while PNC trades at $252.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check PNC's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 92.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while USB-PA trades at $768.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 157.48. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check USB-PA's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 91B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while LYG trades at $6.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check LYG's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while ITUB trades at $7.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check ITUB's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while DB trades at $38.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check DB's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while NU trades at $13.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to NU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check NU's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while TFC trades at $52.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check TFC's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while USB-PS trades at $17.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check USB-PS's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while TFC-PI trades at $18.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check TFC-PI's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while TFC-PR trades at $18.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check TFC-PR's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while TFC-PO trades at $20.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check TFC-PO's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FITB-PM has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while FITB-PM trades at $25.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas FITB-PM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FITB-PM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to FITB-PM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check FITB-PM's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while FITB trades at $57.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check FITB's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while FITBI trades at $25.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check FITBI's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while KB trades at $124.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check KB's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while BSBR trades at $5.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check BSBR's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MTB-PJ has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while MTB-PJ trades at $26.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas MTB-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.38. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTB-PJ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to MTB-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check MTB-PJ's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while MTB trades at $250.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check MTB's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while SHG trades at $75.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check SHG's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MTB-PH has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while MTB-PH trades at $25.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas MTB-PH's P/E ratio is 1.32. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTB-PH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to MTB-PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check MTB-PH's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while BBD trades at $3.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check BBD's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while HBAN trades at $17.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check HBAN's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HBANZ has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while HBANZ trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas HBANZ's P/E ratio is 35.55. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBANZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to HBANZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check HBANZ's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while HBANM trades at $20.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check HBANM's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while HBANL trades at $25.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check HBANL's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while HBANP trades at $16.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check HBANP's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while CFG-PE trades at $18.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.14. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check CFG-PE's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while CFG-PH trades at $25.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check CFG-PH's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while CFG trades at $72.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check CFG's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while KEY-PL trades at $25.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check KEY-PL's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while RF trades at $31.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check RF's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while RF-PF trades at $25.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check RF-PF's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while RF-PE trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check RF-PE's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while RF-PC trades at $24.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check RF-PC's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while FCNCA trades at $2,218.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check FCNCA's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while FCNCO trades at $20.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check FCNCO's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while FCNCP trades at $20.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check FCNCP's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while KEY-PI trades at $25.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check KEY-PI's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while KEY trades at $22.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check KEY's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check KEY-PJ's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while KEY-PK trades at $21.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check KEY-PK's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FITBM has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while FITBM trades at $26.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas FITBM's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FITBM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to FITBM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check FITBM's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FCNCN has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while FCNCN trades at $25.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas FCNCN's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCNCN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to FCNCN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check FCNCN's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while CIB trades at $88.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to CIB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check CIB's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while BCH trades at $41.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check BCH's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FITB-PA has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while FITB-PA trades at $22.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas FITB-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FITB-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to FITB-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check FITB-PA's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while BSAC trades at $35.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check BSAC's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while FHN-PC trades at $34.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is less volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check FHN-PC's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while PNFP trades at $104.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check PNFP's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check CFG-PD's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WBS-PF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while WBS-PF trades at $21.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas WBS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WBS-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to WBS-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check WBS-PF's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WBS-PG has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while WBS-PG trades at $24.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas WBS-PG's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WBS-PG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to WBS-PG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check WBS-PG's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while WBS trades at $79.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check WBS's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check FHN-PB's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while FHN-PF trades at $17.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check FHN-PF's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while FHN-PE trades at $23.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check FHN-PE's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while FHN trades at $25.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to FHN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check FHN's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while CMA trades at $88.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to CMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check CMA's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while BPOP trades at $174.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check BPOP's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while CHYM trades at $29.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -415.71. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is less volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check CHYM's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while UMBF trades at $145.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check UMBF's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while WTFC trades at $158.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check WTFC's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while SSB trades at $108.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check SSB's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CFR-PB has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while CFR-PB trades at $16.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas CFR-PB's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFR-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to CFR-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check CFR-PB's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while ZION trades at $70.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check ZION's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while ONBPP trades at $24.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check ONBPP's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while ONBPO trades at $24.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check ONBPO's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while CFR trades at $164.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check CFR's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ZIONP has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while ZIONP trades at $18.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas ZIONP's P/E ratio is 2.83. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZIONP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to ZIONP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check ZIONP's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while ONB trades at $26.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check ONB's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WAL-PA has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while WAL-PA trades at $24.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas WAL-PA's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WAL-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to WAL-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check WAL-PA's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check FHN-PD's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while WAL trades at $81.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to WAL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check WAL's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while COLB trades at $31.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check COLB's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while BOKF trades at $143.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check BOKF's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while CBSH trades at $59.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check CBSH's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while VLY trades at $14.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check VLY's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while CBC trades at $33.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to CBC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check CBC's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while CADE trades at $42.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to CADE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check CADE's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while VLYPN trades at $25.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check VLYPN's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while PB trades at $73.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check PB's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while GGAL trades at $46.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 48.61. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check GGAL's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while BSMX trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check BSMX's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while SNV trades at $50.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to SNV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check SNV's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while FNB trades at $18.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check FNB's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check SNV-PD's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while UBSI trades at $48.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check UBSI's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, IFS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while IFS trades at $58.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas IFS's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to IFS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check IFS's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check CUBI-PE's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while GBCI trades at $48.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check GBCI's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while HWC trades at $77.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to HWC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check HWC's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while HWCPZ trades at $22.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check HWCPZ's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while HOMB trades at $30.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check HOMB's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, AVAL has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while AVAL trades at $5.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas AVAL's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AVAL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to AVAL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check AVAL's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while AUB trades at $41.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to AUB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check AUB's competition here

Banco Macro S.A. (NYSE: BMA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BMA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BMA is priced at $83.65 on the NYSE, while ABCB trades at $87.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BMA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, BMA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMA is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMA.Check ABCB's competition here