Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 135B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while MFG trades at $11.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to MFG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check MFG's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 116.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while HDB trades at $22.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to HDB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check HDB's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 100.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while IBN trades at $28.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to IBN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check IBN's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while PNC trades at $232.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to PNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check PNC's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 86.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while LYG trades at $5.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to LYG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check LYG's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 73.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while DB trades at $39.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to DB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check DB's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while NU trades at $13.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check NU's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while TFC-PI trades at $17.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check TFC-PI's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while TFC-PO trades at $19.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check TFC-PO's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while TFC-PR trades at $17.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check TFC-PR's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while TFC trades at $48.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to TFC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check TFC's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FITB-PM has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while FITB-PM trades at $25.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FITB-PM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITB-PM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to FITB-PM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check FITB-PM's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while FITBI trades at $25.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check FITBI's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while FITB trades at $53.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check FITB's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while KB trades at $129.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to KB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check KB's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while BSBR trades at $5.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check BSBR's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while SHG trades at $82.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to SHG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check SHG's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while NWG trades at $18.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to NWG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check NWG's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while BBD trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check BBD's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, MTB-PJ has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while MTB-PJ trades at $25.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas MTB-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.34. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTB-PJ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to MTB-PJ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check MTB-PJ's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, MTB-PH has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while MTB-PH trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas MTB-PH's P/E ratio is 1.31. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTB-PH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is more volatile compared to MTB-PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check MTB-PH's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while HBANP trades at $16.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check HBANP's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while BBDO trades at $3.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check BBDO's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while HBANL trades at $25.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check HBANL's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, HBANZ has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while HBANZ trades at $19.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas HBANZ's P/E ratio is 34.76. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to HBANZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check HBANZ's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while HBANM trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check HBANM's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while MTB trades at $226.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to MTB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check MTB's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while HBAN trades at $15.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check HBAN's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while CFG-PH trades at $26.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check CFG-PH's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while CFG-PE trades at $17.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check CFG-PE's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while CFG trades at $67.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check CFG's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while KEY-PL trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check KEY-PL's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while RF-PC trades at $24.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check RF-PC's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while RF-PF trades at $25.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check RF-PF's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while RF-PE trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check RF-PE's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while RF trades at $28.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to RF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check RF's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while KEY-PI trades at $24.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check KEY-PI's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while FCNCA trades at $2,120.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check FCNCA's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while FCNCO trades at $19.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check FCNCO's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FITBM has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while FITBM trades at $26.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FITBM's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is more volatile compared to FITBM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check FITBM's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while FCNCP trades at $19.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check FCNCP's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while CIB trades at $98.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check CIB's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while KEY-PJ trades at $20.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check KEY-PJ's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while KEY-PK trades at $20.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check KEY-PK's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while KEY trades at $20.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to KEY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check KEY's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FCNCN has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while FCNCN trades at $23.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FCNCN's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to FCNCN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check FCNCN's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while BCH trades at $41.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check BCH's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FITB-PA has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while FITB-PA trades at $22.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FITB-PA's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITB-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to FITB-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check FITB-PA's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while EWBC trades at $125.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check EWBC's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while FHN-PC trades at $34.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check FHN-PC's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while BSAC trades at $34.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check BSAC's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check CFG-PD's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while PNFP trades at $96.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check PNFP's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check FHN-PB's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while FHN-PE trades at $23.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check FHN-PE's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while FHN-PF trades at $16.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check FHN-PF's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while FHN trades at $24.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check FHN's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while CMA trades at $88.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check CMA's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BPOPM has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while BPOPM trades at $25.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas BPOPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPOPM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to BPOPM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check BPOPM's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while BPOP trades at $160.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check BPOP's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while ONBPO trades at $24.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check ONBPO's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while UMBF trades at $134.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check UMBF's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while ONBPP trades at $24.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check ONBPP's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while SSB trades at $103.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check SSB's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ZIONP has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while ZIONP trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas ZIONP's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZIONP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is more volatile compared to ZIONP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check ZIONP's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CFR-PB has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while CFR-PB trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas CFR-PB's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFR-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to CFR-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check CFR-PB's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while WTFC trades at $147.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check WTFC's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while CFR trades at $159.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to CFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check CFR's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while ONB trades at $25.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to ONB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check ONB's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while ZION trades at $65.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check ZION's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, WAL-PA has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while WAL-PA trades at $24.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas WAL-PA's P/E ratio is 2.86. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WAL-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is more volatile compared to WAL-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check WAL-PA's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check FHN-PD's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while WAL trades at $79.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check WAL's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while COLB trades at $29.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check COLB's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while PB trades at $70.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check PB's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while CBSH trades at $57.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check CBSH's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while BOKF trades at $133.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check BOKF's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while VLYPN trades at $25.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check VLYPN's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while CADE trades at $42.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check CADE's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while CBC trades at $31.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to CBC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check CBC's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while VLY trades at $13.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to VLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check VLY's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while BSMX trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check BSMX's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while SNV trades at $50.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check SNV's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while GGAL trades at $42.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 44.86. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check GGAL's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check SNV-PD's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check CUBI-PE's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while UBSI trades at $47.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check UBSI's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while FNB trades at $18.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to FNB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check FNB's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, AVAL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while AVAL trades at $5.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas AVAL's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVAL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to AVAL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check AVAL's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, IFS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while IFS trades at $55.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas IFS's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to IFS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check IFS's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while HWCPZ trades at $21.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check HWCPZ's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while HWC trades at $74.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check HWC's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while HOMB trades at $29.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check HOMB's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while GBCI trades at $44.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check GBCI's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ASB-PF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while ASB-PF trades at $18.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas ASB-PF's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASB-PF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to ASB-PF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check ASB-PF's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ASB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while ASB trades at $29.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas ASB's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to ASB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check ASB's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ASB-PE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while ASB-PE trades at $19.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas ASB-PE's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASB-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to ASB-PE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check ASB-PE's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while ABCB trades at $83.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check ABCB's competition here

Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE: WBS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WBS stands at 12.6B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WBS is priced at $77.57 on the NYSE, while AUB trades at $38.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WBS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.47, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, WBS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WBS is less volatile compared to AUB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WBS.Check AUB's competition here