UMB Financial Corporation
UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UMBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMBF | $124.65 | -2.02% | 9.5B | 10.91 | $11.43 | +1.33% |
| USB-PA | $778.03 | -0.82% | 1.2T | 221.65 | $3.51 | +3.89% |
| HDB | $24.45 | -1.57% | 125.4B | 17.34 | $1.41 | +4.60% |
| MFG | $8.69 | -1.92% | 107.3B | 16.08 | $0.54 | +2.25% |
| IBN | $26.05 | -0.50% | 93.3B | 16.60 | $1.57 | +0.96% |
| ITUB | $7.84 | -3.21% | 86.4B | 9.33 | $0.84 | +8.02% |
| PNC | $212.84 | -0.29% | 85.5B | 12.36 | $17.22 | +3.19% |
| LYG | $5.05 | -2.13% | 74.4B | 12.34 | $0.41 | +3.92% |
| USB-PS | $17.66 | -0.98% | 67.2B | N/A | N/A | +3.89% |
| DB | $30.90 | -2.62% | 59.1B | 8.29 | $3.73 | +2.49% |
Stock Comparison
UMBF vs USB-PA Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while USB-PA trades at $778.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 221.65. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check USB-PA's competition here
UMBF vs HDB Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 125.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while HDB trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check HDB's competition here
UMBF vs MFG Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while MFG trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check MFG's competition here
UMBF vs IBN Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 93.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while IBN trades at $26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check IBN's competition here
UMBF vs ITUB Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 86.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while ITUB trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check ITUB's competition here
UMBF vs PNC Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while PNC trades at $212.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check PNC's competition here
UMBF vs LYG Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while LYG trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check LYG's competition here
UMBF vs USB-PS Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while USB-PS trades at $17.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check USB-PS's competition here
UMBF vs DB Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while DB trades at $30.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check DB's competition here
UMBF vs TFC Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while TFC trades at $46.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check TFC's competition here
UMBF vs HBANZ Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HBANZ has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while HBANZ trades at $20.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas HBANZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to HBANZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check HBANZ's competition here
UMBF vs BSBR Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while BSBR trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check BSBR's competition here
UMBF vs HBANL Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while HBANL trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check HBANL's competition here
UMBF vs KB Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while KB trades at $104.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check KB's competition here
UMBF vs BBD Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while BBD trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check BBD's competition here
UMBF vs HBANM Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while HBANM trades at $22.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check HBANM's competition here
UMBF vs FITB Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while FITB trades at $47.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check FITB's competition here
UMBF vs BBDO Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while BBDO trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check BBDO's competition here
UMBF vs SHG Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while SHG trades at $64.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check SHG's competition here
UMBF vs MTB Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while MTB trades at $204.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check MTB's competition here
UMBF vs KEY-PL Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while KEY-PL trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check KEY-PL's competition here
UMBF vs TFC-PO Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while TFC-PO trades at $20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check TFC-PO's competition here
UMBF vs HBANP Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while HBANP trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check HBANP's competition here
UMBF vs CFG Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while CFG trades at $60.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check CFG's competition here
UMBF vs TFC-PI Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while TFC-PI trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check TFC-PI's competition here
UMBF vs HBAN Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while HBAN trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check HBAN's competition here
UMBF vs FITBM Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FITBM has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while FITBM trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FITBM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to FITBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check FITBM's competition here
UMBF vs TFC-PR Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while TFC-PR trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check TFC-PR's competition here
UMBF vs KEY Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while KEY trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check KEY's competition here
UMBF vs RF Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while RF trades at $26.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check RF's competition here
UMBF vs FCNCN Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FCNCN has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while FCNCN trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FCNCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to FCNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check FCNCN's competition here
UMBF vs RF-PF Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while RF-PF trades at $25.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check RF-PF's competition here
UMBF vs FCNCA Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while FCNCA trades at $1,928.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check FCNCA's competition here
UMBF vs KEY-PJ Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check KEY-PJ's competition here
UMBF vs RF-PC Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while RF-PC trades at $24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check RF-PC's competition here
UMBF vs KEY-PI Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while KEY-PI trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check KEY-PI's competition here
UMBF vs BCH Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while BCH trades at $35.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check BCH's competition here
UMBF vs KEY-PK Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while KEY-PK trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check KEY-PK's competition here
UMBF vs FITBI Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while FITBI trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check FITBI's competition here
UMBF vs FITBP Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while FITBP trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check FITBP's competition here
UMBF vs FHN-PC Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while FHN-PC trades at $32.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is less volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check FHN-PC's competition here
UMBF vs WF Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while WF trades at $63.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is less volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check WF's competition here
UMBF vs CIB Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while CIB trades at $63.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check CIB's competition here
UMBF vs CFG-PD Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check CFG-PD's competition here
UMBF vs RF-PE Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while RF-PE trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check RF-PE's competition here
UMBF vs VLYPN Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while VLYPN trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check VLYPN's competition here
UMBF vs BSAC Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while BSAC trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is less volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check BSAC's competition here
UMBF vs FITBO Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while FITBO trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check FITBO's competition here
UMBF vs FHN-PB Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check FHN-PB's competition here
UMBF vs CFG-PH Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while CFG-PH trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check CFG-PH's competition here
UMBF vs FHN-PE Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while FHN-PE trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check FHN-PE's competition here
UMBF vs WBS Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while WBS trades at $71.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check WBS's competition here
UMBF vs CMA Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while CMA trades at $88.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check CMA's competition here
UMBF vs FHN Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while FHN trades at $23.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check FHN's competition here
UMBF vs WTFC Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while WTFC trades at $144.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check WTFC's competition here
UMBF vs ONBPO Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while ONBPO trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check ONBPO's competition here
UMBF vs ONBPP Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while ONBPP trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check ONBPP's competition here
UMBF vs BPOP Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while BPOP trades at $144.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check BPOP's competition here
UMBF vs SSB Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while SSB trades at $92.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check SSB's competition here
UMBF vs ONB Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while ONB trades at $23.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check ONB's competition here
UMBF vs FHN-PD Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check FHN-PD's competition here
UMBF vs ZION Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while ZION trades at $59.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check ZION's competition here
UMBF vs FHN-PF Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while FHN-PF trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check FHN-PF's competition here
UMBF vs CFR Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while CFR trades at $134.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check CFR's competition here
UMBF vs CFG-PE Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while CFG-PE trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.03. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check CFG-PE's competition here
UMBF vs WAL Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while WAL trades at $74.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check WAL's competition here
UMBF vs CADE Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while CADE trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check CADE's competition here
UMBF vs BOKF Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while BOKF trades at $126.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check BOKF's competition here
UMBF vs CBSH Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while CBSH trades at $50.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check CBSH's competition here
UMBF vs BSMX Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check BSMX's competition here
UMBF vs PNFP Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while PNFP trades at $94.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check PNFP's competition here
UMBF vs VLY Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while VLY trades at $12.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check VLY's competition here
UMBF vs SNV Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while SNV trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check SNV's competition here
UMBF vs COLB Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while COLB trades at $28.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check COLB's competition here
UMBF vs CHYM Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while CHYM trades at $17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is less volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check CHYM's competition here
UMBF vs SNV-PD Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check SNV-PD's competition here
UMBF vs PB Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while PB trades at $66.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check PB's competition here
UMBF vs GGAL Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while GGAL trades at $40.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 42.94. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check GGAL's competition here
UMBF vs CUBI-PE Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check CUBI-PE's competition here
UMBF vs CBC Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while CBC trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 665.00. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to CBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check CBC's competition here
UMBF vs FNB Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while FNB trades at $17.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check FNB's competition here
UMBF vs GBCI Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while GBCI trades at $45.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check GBCI's competition here
UMBF vs UBSI Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while UBSI trades at $41.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check UBSI's competition here
UMBF vs ABCB Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while ABCB trades at $82.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check ABCB's competition here
UMBF vs FLG Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while FLG trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -62.98. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check FLG's competition here
UMBF vs VLYPO Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while VLYPO trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check VLYPO's competition here
UMBF vs VLYPP Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while VLYPP trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check VLYPP's competition here
UMBF vs BXS Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check BXS's competition here
UMBF vs HWC Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while HWC trades at $64.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check HWC's competition here
UMBF vs AUB Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while AUB trades at $36.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is less volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check AUB's competition here
UMBF vs HOMB Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while HOMB trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check HOMB's competition here
UMBF vs OZK Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while OZK trades at $46.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is less volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check OZK's competition here
UMBF vs IFS Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, IFS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while IFS trades at $44.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas IFS's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is less volatile compared to IFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check IFS's competition here
UMBF vs NYCB-PA Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, NYCB-PA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while NYCB-PA trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas NYCB-PA's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NYCB-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to NYCB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check NYCB-PA's competition here
UMBF vs AX Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while AX trades at $83.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas AX's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check AX's competition here
UMBF vs AVAL Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AVAL has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while AVAL trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas AVAL's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVAL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is less volatile compared to AVAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check AVAL's competition here
UMBF vs AUBAP Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AUBAP has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while AUBAP trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas AUBAP's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUBAP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to AUBAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check AUBAP's competition here
UMBF vs BMA Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while BMA trades at $70.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check BMA's competition here
UMBF vs ASB Comparison May 2026
UMBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMBF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ASB has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMBF is priced at $124.65, while ASB trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ASB's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, UMBF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMBF is more volatile compared to ASB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMBF.Check ASB's competition here