U.S. Bancorp Depositary Shares, (USB-PS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (USB-PS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USB-PS | $17.48 | +0.34% | 66.5B | 3.59 | $4.88 | +3.42% |
| HDB | $25.56 | +2.16% | 131.2B | 15.31 | $1.67 | +3.43% |
| MFG | $9.58 | -1.03% | 116.9B | 13.07 | $0.73 | +1.92% |
| IBN | $29.00 | +2.40% | 104B | 18.35 | $1.58 | +0.86% |
| PNC | $239.92 | +0.52% | 96.3B | 13.94 | $17.21 | +2.83% |
| USB-PA | $772.00 | +0.00% | 91.9B | 155.95 | $4.88 | +3.42% |
| ITUB | $7.88 | -0.76% | 86.7B | 9.84 | $0.80 | +7.40% |
| LYG | $5.61 | -2.09% | 81.7B | 12.76 | $0.44 | +3.48% |
| DB | $34.00 | -3.35% | 65B | 9.36 | $3.63 | +3.43% |
| TFC | $49.79 | +0.24% | 62B | 12.32 | $4.04 | +4.15% |
Stock Comparison
USB-PS vs HDB Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 131.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while HDB trades at $25.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check HDB's competition here
USB-PS vs MFG Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 116.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while MFG trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check MFG's competition here
USB-PS vs IBN Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 104B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while IBN trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check IBN's competition here
USB-PS vs PNC Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while PNC trades at $239.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check PNC's competition here
USB-PS vs USB-PA Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 91.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while USB-PA trades at $772.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 155.95. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check USB-PA's competition here
USB-PS vs ITUB Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 86.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while ITUB trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check ITUB's competition here
USB-PS vs LYG Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while LYG trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check LYG's competition here
USB-PS vs DB Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while DB trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check DB's competition here
USB-PS vs TFC Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while TFC trades at $49.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check TFC's competition here
USB-PS vs TFC-PR Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while TFC-PR trades at $18.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check TFC-PR's competition here
USB-PS vs TFC-PO Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while TFC-PO trades at $20.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check TFC-PO's competition here
USB-PS vs TFC-PI Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 61.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while TFC-PI trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check TFC-PI's competition here
USB-PS vs FITB Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while FITB trades at $54.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check FITB's competition here
USB-PS vs FITBO Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while FITBO trades at $18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check FITBO's competition here
USB-PS vs FITBP Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while FITBP trades at $23.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check FITBP's competition here
USB-PS vs FITBI Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while FITBI trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check FITBI's competition here
USB-PS vs FITBM Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, FITBM has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while FITBM trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas FITBM's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to FITBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check FITBM's competition here
USB-PS vs BSBR Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while BSBR trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check BSBR's competition here
USB-PS vs HBANZ Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, HBANZ has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while HBANZ trades at $19.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas HBANZ's P/E ratio is 36.10. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is more volatile compared to HBANZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check HBANZ's competition here
USB-PS vs HBANP Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while HBANP trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check HBANP's competition here
USB-PS vs HBAN Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while HBAN trades at $17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check HBAN's competition here
USB-PS vs BBD Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while BBD trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check BBD's competition here
USB-PS vs HBANM Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while HBANM trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check HBANM's competition here
USB-PS vs HBANL Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while HBANL trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check HBANL's competition here
USB-PS vs KB Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while KB trades at $99.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check KB's competition here
USB-PS vs MTB Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while MTB trades at $233.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check MTB's competition here
USB-PS vs MTB-PH Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, MTB-PH has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while MTB-PH trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas MTB-PH's P/E ratio is 1.37. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTB-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is more volatile compared to MTB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check MTB-PH's competition here
USB-PS vs MTB-PJ Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, MTB-PJ has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while MTB-PJ trades at $25.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas MTB-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.41. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTB-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to MTB-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check MTB-PJ's competition here
USB-PS vs BBDO Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while BBDO trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check BBDO's competition here
USB-PS vs SHG Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while SHG trades at $62.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check SHG's competition here
USB-PS vs CFG Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while CFG trades at $69.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check CFG's competition here
USB-PS vs CFG-PE Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while CFG-PE trades at $17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.08. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check CFG-PE's competition here
USB-PS vs CFG-PH Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while CFG-PH trades at $25.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check CFG-PH's competition here
USB-PS vs KEY-PL Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while KEY-PL trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check KEY-PL's competition here
USB-PS vs RF Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while RF trades at $29.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check RF's competition here
USB-PS vs RF-PC Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while RF-PC trades at $24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check RF-PC's competition here
USB-PS vs KEY Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while KEY trades at $23.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check KEY's competition here
USB-PS vs RF-PF Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while RF-PF trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check RF-PF's competition here
USB-PS vs KEY-PJ Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while KEY-PJ trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check KEY-PJ's competition here
USB-PS vs RF-PE Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while RF-PE trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check RF-PE's competition here
USB-PS vs KEY-PK Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while KEY-PK trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check KEY-PK's competition here
USB-PS vs FCNCA Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while FCNCA trades at $2,117.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check FCNCA's competition here
USB-PS vs FCNCN Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, FCNCN has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while FCNCN trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas FCNCN's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is more volatile compared to FCNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check FCNCN's competition here
USB-PS vs KEY-PI Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while KEY-PI trades at $24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check KEY-PI's competition here
USB-PS vs BCH Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while BCH trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check BCH's competition here
USB-PS vs CIB Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while CIB trades at $79.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check CIB's competition here
USB-PS vs CFG-PD Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check CFG-PD's competition here
USB-PS vs BSAC Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while BSAC trades at $31.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check BSAC's competition here
USB-PS vs VLYPN Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while VLYPN trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check VLYPN's competition here
USB-PS vs WF Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while WF trades at $57.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check WF's competition here
USB-PS vs FHN-PC Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while FHN-PC trades at $29.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check FHN-PC's competition here
USB-PS vs FHN-PB Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check FHN-PB's competition here
USB-PS vs WBS-PF Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, WBS-PF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while WBS-PF trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas WBS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WBS-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to WBS-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check WBS-PF's competition here
USB-PS vs WBS-PG Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, WBS-PG has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while WBS-PG trades at $23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas WBS-PG's P/E ratio is 3.78. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WBS-PG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to WBS-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check WBS-PG's competition here
USB-PS vs WBS Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while WBS trades at $75.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check WBS's competition here
USB-PS vs FHN Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while FHN trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check FHN's competition here
USB-PS vs FHN-PF Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while FHN-PF trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check FHN-PF's competition here
USB-PS vs FHN-PE Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while FHN-PE trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check FHN-PE's competition here
USB-PS vs CMA Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while CMA trades at $88.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check CMA's competition here
USB-PS vs WTFC Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while WTFC trades at $159.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check WTFC's competition here
USB-PS vs UMBF Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while UMBF trades at $141.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check UMBF's competition here
USB-PS vs BPOP Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while BPOP trades at $165.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check BPOP's competition here
USB-PS vs ZIONP Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, ZIONP has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while ZIONP trades at $18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas ZIONP's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZIONP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is more volatile compared to ZIONP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check ZIONP's competition here
USB-PS vs ZION Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while ZION trades at $68.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check ZION's competition here
USB-PS vs ONB Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while ONB trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check ONB's competition here
USB-PS vs SSB Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while SSB trades at $99.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check SSB's competition here
USB-PS vs ONBPP Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while ONBPP trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check ONBPP's competition here
USB-PS vs CFR Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while CFR trades at $150.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check CFR's competition here
USB-PS vs ONBPO Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while ONBPO trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check ONBPO's competition here
USB-PS vs CFR-PB Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, CFR-PB has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while CFR-PB trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas CFR-PB's P/E ratio is 1.58. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFR-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is more volatile compared to CFR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check CFR-PB's competition here
USB-PS vs FHN-PD Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check FHN-PD's competition here
USB-PS vs WAL-PA Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, WAL-PA has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while WAL-PA trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas WAL-PA's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAL-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is more volatile compared to WAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check WAL-PA's competition here
USB-PS vs WAL Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while WAL trades at $80.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check WAL's competition here
USB-PS vs BOKF Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while BOKF trades at $137.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check BOKF's competition here
USB-PS vs CBSH Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while CBSH trades at $56.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check CBSH's competition here
USB-PS vs VLY Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while VLY trades at $14.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check VLY's competition here
USB-PS vs GGAL Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while GGAL trades at $49.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 51.68. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check GGAL's competition here
USB-PS vs CADE Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while CADE trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check CADE's competition here
USB-PS vs COLB Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while COLB trades at $31.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check COLB's competition here
USB-PS vs PNFP Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while PNFP trades at $97.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check PNFP's competition here
USB-PS vs BSMX Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check BSMX's competition here
USB-PS vs PB Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while PB trades at $72.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check PB's competition here
USB-PS vs CBC Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while CBC trades at $29.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to CBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check CBC's competition here
USB-PS vs SNV Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while SNV trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check SNV's competition here
USB-PS vs FNB Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while FNB trades at $18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check FNB's competition here
USB-PS vs SNV-PD Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check SNV-PD's competition here
USB-PS vs CHYM Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while CHYM trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check CHYM's competition here
USB-PS vs GBCI Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while GBCI trades at $50.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 23.51. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check GBCI's competition here
USB-PS vs CUBI-PE Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check CUBI-PE's competition here
USB-PS vs UBSI Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while UBSI trades at $45.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check UBSI's competition here
USB-PS vs FLG Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while FLG trades at $15.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -137.23. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check FLG's competition here
USB-PS vs AVAL Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, AVAL has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while AVAL trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas AVAL's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVAL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to AVAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check AVAL's competition here
USB-PS vs IFS Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, IFS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while IFS trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas IFS's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to IFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check IFS's competition here
USB-PS vs ABCB Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while ABCB trades at $89.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check ABCB's competition here
USB-PS vs HWC Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while HWC trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check HWC's competition here
USB-PS vs AUB Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while AUB trades at $40.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check AUB's competition here
USB-PS vs HOMB Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while HOMB trades at $28.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check HOMB's competition here
USB-PS vs ASB Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, ASB has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while ASB trades at $30.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas ASB's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to ASB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check ASB's competition here
USB-PS vs BMA Comparison June 2026
USB-PS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PS stands at 66.5B. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PS is priced at $17.48, while BMA trades at $89.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.59, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, USB-PS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PS is less volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PS.Check BMA's competition here