Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FITB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FITB | $56.78 | +0.83% | 51.5B | 18.49 | $3.07 | +2.77% |
| HDB | $25.91 | +0.66% | 132.8B | 15.51 | $1.67 | +3.42% |
| MFG | $9.56 | -1.54% | 116.7B | 13.05 | $0.73 | +1.92% |
| IBN | $29.36 | -0.64% | 105.2B | 18.57 | $1.58 | +0.85% |
| PNC | $246.73 | +0.71% | 99.1B | 14.33 | $17.21 | +2.76% |
| USB-PA | $769.91 | +0.00% | 93B | 157.77 | $4.88 | +3.36% |
| ITUB | $8.22 | -0.12% | 90.5B | 11.25 | $0.73 | +7.12% |
| LYG | $5.75 | +1.05% | 83.9B | 13.11 | $0.44 | +3.41% |
| USB-PS | $17.64 | +1.09% | 67.1B | 3.62 | $4.88 | +3.36% |
| DB | $33.81 | +0.84% | 64.7B | 9.31 | $3.63 | +3.45% |
Stock Comparison
FITB vs HDB Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 132.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while HDB trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check HDB's competition here
FITB vs MFG Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 116.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while MFG trades at $9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check MFG's competition here
FITB vs IBN Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while IBN trades at $29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check IBN's competition here
FITB vs PNC Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 99.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while PNC trades at $246.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check PNC's competition here
FITB vs USB-PA Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while USB-PA trades at $769.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 157.77. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check USB-PA's competition here
FITB vs ITUB Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while ITUB trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check ITUB's competition here
FITB vs LYG Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 83.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while LYG trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check LYG's competition here
FITB vs USB-PS Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while USB-PS trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check USB-PS's competition here
FITB vs DB Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while DB trades at $33.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check DB's competition here
FITB vs NU Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while NU trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check NU's competition here
FITB vs TFC-PR Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while TFC-PR trades at $18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.45. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check TFC-PR's competition here
FITB vs TFC-PO Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while TFC-PO trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.92. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check TFC-PO's competition here
FITB vs TFC Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while TFC trades at $50.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check TFC's competition here
FITB vs TFC-PI Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while TFC-PI trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.28. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check TFC-PI's competition here
FITB vs FITBI Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while FITBI trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check FITBI's competition here
FITB vs FITBO Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while FITBO trades at $18.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check FITBO's competition here
FITB vs FITBP Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while FITBP trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check FITBP's competition here
FITB vs BSBR Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while BSBR trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check BSBR's competition here
FITB vs BBD Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while BBD trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check BBD's competition here
FITB vs HBANM Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while HBANM trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check HBANM's competition here
FITB vs HBANP Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while HBANP trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check HBANP's competition here
FITB vs HBAN Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while HBAN trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check HBAN's competition here
FITB vs HBANL Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while HBANL trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check HBANL's competition here
FITB vs HBANZ Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, HBANZ has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while HBANZ trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas HBANZ's P/E ratio is 36.33. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HBANZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to HBANZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check HBANZ's competition here
FITB vs KB Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while KB trades at $101.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check KB's competition here
FITB vs MTB Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while MTB trades at $239.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check MTB's competition here
FITB vs MTB-PH Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, MTB-PH has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while MTB-PH trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas MTB-PH's P/E ratio is 1.37. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTB-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to MTB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check MTB-PH's competition here
FITB vs MTB-PJ Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, MTB-PJ has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while MTB-PJ trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas MTB-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.41. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTB-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to MTB-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check MTB-PJ's competition here
FITB vs CFG-PE Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while CFG-PE trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check CFG-PE's competition here
FITB vs CFG Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while CFG trades at $70.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check CFG's competition here
FITB vs CFG-PH Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while CFG-PH trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check CFG-PH's competition here
FITB vs SHG Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while SHG trades at $62.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check SHG's competition here
FITB vs KEY-PL Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while KEY-PL trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check KEY-PL's competition here
FITB vs RF-PC Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while RF-PC trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check RF-PC's competition here
FITB vs RF-PE Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while RF-PE trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check RF-PE's competition here
FITB vs RF Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while RF trades at $30.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check RF's competition here
FITB vs RF-PF Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while RF-PF trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check RF-PF's competition here
FITB vs KEY-PK Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while KEY-PK trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check KEY-PK's competition here
FITB vs KEY-PJ Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while KEY-PJ trades at $20.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check KEY-PJ's competition here
FITB vs KEY Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while KEY trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check KEY's competition here
FITB vs FCNCP Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while FCNCP trades at $19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check FCNCP's competition here
FITB vs FCNCO Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while FCNCO trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check FCNCO's competition here
FITB vs FCNCA Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while FCNCA trades at $2,079.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check FCNCA's competition here
FITB vs FITBM Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, FITBM has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while FITBM trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas FITBM's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FITBM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to FITBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check FITBM's competition here
FITB vs FCNCN Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, FCNCN has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while FCNCN trades at $25.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas FCNCN's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCNCN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to FCNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check FCNCN's competition here
FITB vs KEY-PI Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while KEY-PI trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check KEY-PI's competition here
FITB vs BCH Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while BCH trades at $39.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check BCH's competition here
FITB vs CIB Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while CIB trades at $79.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check CIB's competition here
FITB vs FHN-PC Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while FHN-PC trades at $32.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check FHN-PC's competition here
FITB vs BSAC Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while BSAC trades at $32.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check BSAC's competition here
FITB vs CFG-PD Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check CFG-PD's competition here
FITB vs FHN-PB Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check FHN-PB's competition here
FITB vs WBS-PF Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, WBS-PF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while WBS-PF trades at $21.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas WBS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WBS-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to WBS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check WBS-PF's competition here
FITB vs WBS Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while WBS trades at $76.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check WBS's competition here
FITB vs WBS-PG Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, WBS-PG has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while WBS-PG trades at $23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas WBS-PG's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WBS-PG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to WBS-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check WBS-PG's competition here
FITB vs FHN-PF Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while FHN-PF trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check FHN-PF's competition here
FITB vs FHN Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while FHN trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check FHN's competition here
FITB vs FHN-PE Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while FHN-PE trades at $23.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check FHN-PE's competition here
FITB vs CMA Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while CMA trades at $88.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check CMA's competition here
FITB vs WTFC Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while WTFC trades at $160.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check WTFC's competition here
FITB vs UMBF Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while UMBF trades at $141.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check UMBF's competition here
FITB vs BPOP Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while BPOP trades at $164.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check BPOP's competition here
FITB vs ZION Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while ZION trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check ZION's competition here
FITB vs ZIONP Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, ZIONP has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while ZIONP trades at $18.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas ZIONP's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZIONP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to ZIONP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check ZIONP's competition here
FITB vs ONBPP Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while ONBPP trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check ONBPP's competition here
FITB vs ONB Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while ONB trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check ONB's competition here
FITB vs ONBPO Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while ONBPO trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check ONBPO's competition here
FITB vs CFR-PB Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, CFR-PB has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while CFR-PB trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CFR-PB's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFR-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to CFR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check CFR-PB's competition here
FITB vs SSB Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while SSB trades at $99.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check SSB's competition here
FITB vs CFR Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while CFR trades at $154.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check CFR's competition here
FITB vs WAL Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while WAL trades at $82.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check WAL's competition here
FITB vs FHN-PD Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check FHN-PD's competition here
FITB vs WAL-PA Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, WAL-PA has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while WAL-PA trades at $23.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas WAL-PA's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WAL-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to WAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check WAL-PA's competition here
FITB vs CBSH Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while CBSH trades at $58.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check CBSH's competition here
FITB vs BOKF Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while BOKF trades at $138.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check BOKF's competition here
FITB vs VLYPN Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while VLYPN trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check VLYPN's competition here
FITB vs GGAL Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while GGAL trades at $50.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 53.58. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check GGAL's competition here
FITB vs VLY Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while VLY trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check VLY's competition here
FITB vs CHYM Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while CHYM trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check CHYM's competition here
FITB vs CADE Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while CADE trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check CADE's competition here
FITB vs PNFP Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while PNFP trades at $100.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check PNFP's competition here
FITB vs COLB Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while COLB trades at $31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check COLB's competition here
FITB vs PB Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while PB trades at $73.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check PB's competition here
FITB vs BSMX Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check BSMX's competition here
FITB vs CBC Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while CBC trades at $30.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to CBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check CBC's competition here
FITB vs SNV Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while SNV trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check SNV's competition here
FITB vs FNB Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while FNB trades at $19.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check FNB's competition here
FITB vs GBCI Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while GBCI trades at $51.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check GBCI's competition here
FITB vs SNV-PD Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check SNV-PD's competition here
FITB vs CUBI-PE Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check CUBI-PE's competition here
FITB vs UBSI Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while UBSI trades at $45.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check UBSI's competition here
FITB vs IFS Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, IFS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while IFS trades at $56.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas IFS's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to IFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check IFS's competition here
FITB vs FLG Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while FLG trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -136.09. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check FLG's competition here
FITB vs ABCB Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while ABCB trades at $90.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check ABCB's competition here
FITB vs HWC Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while HWC trades at $74.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check HWC's competition here
FITB vs HWCPZ Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while HWCPZ trades at $22.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check HWCPZ's competition here
FITB vs AUB Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while AUB trades at $42.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check AUB's competition here
FITB vs BMA Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while BMA trades at $92.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is less volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check BMA's competition here
FITB vs ASB-PE Comparison July 2026
FITB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITB stands at 51.5B. In comparison, ASB-PE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FITB is priced at $56.78, while ASB-PE trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas ASB-PE's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, FITB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASB-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITB is more volatile compared to ASB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITB.Check ASB-PE's competition here