Lavoro Limited

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while CTA-PB trades at $68.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check CTA-PB's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while CTVA trades at $75.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 43.62. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check CTVA's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while CTA-PA trades at $54.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check CTA-PA's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while NTR trades at $71.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check NTR's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while CF trades at $95.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check CF's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while MOS trades at $28.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check MOS's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while ICL trades at $5.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check ICL's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while SMG trades at $68.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 25.09. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check SMG's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while FMC trades at $13.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to FMC's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check FMC's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while UAN trades at $98.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check UAN's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 531.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while PURR trades at $3.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to PURR's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to PURR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check PURR's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 450.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while IPI trades at $32.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to IPI's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check IPI's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 151.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while AVD trades at $5.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check AVD's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, BHST has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while BHST trades at $4.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas BHST's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to BHST's ROE of -11.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to BHST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check BHST's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while MULG trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check MULG's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check BHIL-WT's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while BIOX trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check BIOX's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while CGA trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to CGA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check CGA's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, AGRZ has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while AGRZ trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas AGRZ's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to AGRZ's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to AGRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check AGRZ's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while SEED trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to SEED's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check SEED's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while SVFD trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -366.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check SVFD's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while FMTO trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to FMTO's ROE of -35.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check FMTO's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while RKDA trades at $1.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check RKDA's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while BHIL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check BHIL's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 886.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while NITO trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to NITO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is more volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check NITO's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while YTEN trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to YTEN's ROE of -15.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check YTEN's competition here

LVRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 46.2M. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.35, while MBII trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is -1.11%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check MBII's competition here