Stride, Inc.
Stride, Inc. LRN Peers
See (LRN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRN | $149.43 | -4.52% | 6.50B | 23.42 | $6.38 | N/A |
| TAL | $10.26 | +8.92% | 18.60B | 73.29 | $0.14 | N/A |
| LOPE | $195.73 | -0.19% | 5.55B | 24.62 | $7.95 | N/A |
| ATGE | $131.83 | -3.24% | 4.74B | 25.06 | $5.26 | N/A |
| GHC | $987.50 | +1.75% | 4.31B | 7.00 | $141.16 | +0.71% |
| LAUR | $22.51 | -1.62% | 3.35B | 12.10 | $1.86 | N/A |
| STRA | $89.02 | -0.27% | 2.15B | 19.02 | $4.68 | +2.70% |
| PRDO | $31.08 | +0.06% | 2.04B | 13.81 | $2.25 | +1.62% |
| UTI | $34.19 | -0.41% | 1.86B | 34.89 | $0.98 | N/A |
| AFYA | $19.43 | -0.92% | 1.76B | 15.93 | $1.22 | +1.22% |
Stock Comparison
LRN vs TAL Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, TAL has a market cap of 18.60B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while TAL trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas TAL's P/E ratio is 73.29. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TAL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to TAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs LOPE Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, LOPE has a market cap of 5.55B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while LOPE trades at $195.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas LOPE's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LOPE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to LOPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs ATGE Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, ATGE has a market cap of 4.74B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while ATGE trades at $131.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas ATGE's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATGE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to ATGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs GHC Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, GHC has a market cap of 4.31B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while GHC trades at $987.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas GHC's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GHC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to GHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs LAUR Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, LAUR has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while LAUR trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas LAUR's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LAUR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to LAUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs STRA Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, STRA has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while STRA trades at $89.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas STRA's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STRA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to STRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs PRDO Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, PRDO has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while PRDO trades at $31.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas PRDO's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PRDO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to PRDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs UTI Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, UTI has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while UTI trades at $34.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas UTI's P/E ratio is 34.89. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UTI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to UTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs AFYA Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, AFYA has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while AFYA trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas AFYA's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AFYA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to AFYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs KLC Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, KLC has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while KLC trades at $13.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas KLC's P/E ratio is -14.08. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KLC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to KLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs COUR Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, COUR has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while COUR trades at $8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas COUR's P/E ratio is -21.32. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COUR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to COUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs GOTU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, GOTU has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while GOTU trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas GOTU's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GOTU's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to GOTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs DAO Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, DAO has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while DAO trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas DAO's P/E ratio is 91.50. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DAO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to DAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs UDMY Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, UDMY has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while UDMY trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas UDMY's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UDMY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to UDMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs ARCE Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, ARCE has a market cap of 927.43M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while ARCE trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas ARCE's P/E ratio is -73.58. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ARCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to ARCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs EDU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, EDU has a market cap of 808.24M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while EDU trades at $49.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas EDU's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to EDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs REDU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, REDU has a market cap of 730.29M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while REDU trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas REDU's P/E ratio is -23.04. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to REDU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to REDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs LINC Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, LINC has a market cap of 673.56M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while LINC trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas LINC's P/E ratio is 66.63. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LINC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to LINC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs APEI Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, APEI has a market cap of 469.67M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while APEI trades at $26.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas APEI's P/E ratio is 47.35. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APEI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to APEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs RYET Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, RYET has a market cap of 434.36M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while RYET trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas RYET's P/E ratio is -429.00. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RYET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to RYET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs QSG Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, QSG has a market cap of 352.17M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while QSG trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas QSG's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QSG's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to QSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs VSTA Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, VSTA has a market cap of 316.80M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while VSTA trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas VSTA's P/E ratio is 3.76. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VSTA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to VSTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs VTRU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, VTRU has a market cap of 304.24M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while VTRU trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas VTRU's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VTRU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to VTRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs SKIL Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, SKIL has a market cap of 177.93M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while SKIL trades at $21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas SKIL's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SKIL's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to SKIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs LGCY Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, LGCY has a market cap of 92.85M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while LGCY trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas LGCY's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LGCY's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to LGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs CHGG Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, CHGG has a market cap of 76.63M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while CHGG trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas CHGG's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHGG's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to CHGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs STG Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, STG has a market cap of 74.59M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while STG trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas STG's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STG's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to STG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs KIDZ Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, KIDZ has a market cap of 61.95M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while KIDZ trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas KIDZ's P/E ratio is -123.33. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KIDZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to KIDZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs ONE Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, ONE has a market cap of 51.31M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while ONE trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas ONE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ONE's ROE of +37.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to ONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs GNS Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, GNS has a market cap of 27.51M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while GNS trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas GNS's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GNS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to GNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs BTCT Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, BTCT has a market cap of 27.47M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while BTCT trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas BTCT's P/E ratio is -6.47. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BTCT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to BTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs AIU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, AIU has a market cap of 18.78M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while AIU trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas AIU's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AIU's ROE of +37.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to AIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs GEHI Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, GEHI has a market cap of 18.25M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while GEHI trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas GEHI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GEHI's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to GEHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs EDTK Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, EDTK has a market cap of 15.66M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while EDTK trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas EDTK's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EDTK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to EDTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs AACG Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, AACG has a market cap of 15.65M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while AACG trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas AACG's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AACG's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to AACG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs BEDU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, BEDU has a market cap of 12.78M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while BEDU trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas BEDU's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BEDU's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to BEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs TEDU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, TEDU has a market cap of 12.16M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while TEDU trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas TEDU's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TEDU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to TEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs IH Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, IH has a market cap of 10.95M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while IH trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas IH's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to IH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs VEDU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, VEDU has a market cap of 9.31M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while VEDU trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas VEDU's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VEDU's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to VEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs EEIQ Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, EEIQ has a market cap of 8.02M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while EEIQ trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas EEIQ's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EEIQ's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to EEIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs GV Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, GV has a market cap of 7.88M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while GV trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas GV's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GV's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to GV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs VSA Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 7.57M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while VSA trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs WAFU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, WAFU has a market cap of 7.23M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while WAFU trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas WAFU's P/E ratio is -9.11. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WAFU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to WAFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs GSUN Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, GSUN has a market cap of 6.97M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while GSUN trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas GSUN's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GSUN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to GSUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs CLEU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, CLEU has a market cap of 6.83M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while CLEU trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas CLEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CLEU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to CLEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs TCTM Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, TCTM has a market cap of 4.92M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while TCTM trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas TCTM's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TCTM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to TCTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs TWOU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, TWOU has a market cap of 4.43M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while TWOU trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas TWOU's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TWOU's ROE of -6.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to TWOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs MYND Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, MYND has a market cap of 3.86M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while MYND trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas MYND's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MYND's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to MYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs ASPU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, ASPU has a market cap of 3.73M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while ASPU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas ASPU's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASPU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to ASPU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs METX Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, METX has a market cap of 3.10M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while METX trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas METX's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to METX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to METX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs JZ Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, JZ has a market cap of 2.19M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while JZ trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas JZ's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JZ's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to JZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs COE Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, COE has a market cap of 1.94M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while COE trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas COE's P/E ratio is -16.58. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COE's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to COE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs FEDU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, FEDU has a market cap of 1.67M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while FEDU trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas FEDU's P/E ratio is 78.90. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FEDU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to FEDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs RYB Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, RYB has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while RYB trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas RYB's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RYB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to RYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs AMBO Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, AMBO has a market cap of 458446.00. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while AMBO trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas AMBO's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMBO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to AMBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs YQ Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, YQ has a market cap of 295529.00. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while YQ trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas YQ's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YQ's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to YQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs KIDZW Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, KIDZW has a market cap of 291872.00. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while KIDZW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas KIDZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KIDZW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to KIDZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs LXEH Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, LXEH has a market cap of 33831.00. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while LXEH trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas LXEH's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LXEH's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to LXEH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs BTCTW Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.50B. In comparison, BTCTW has a market cap of 13555.00. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $149.43, while BTCTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.42, whereas BTCTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BTCTW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to BTCTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.