Stride, Inc.
Stride, Inc. LRN Peers
See (LRN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRN | $145.19 | -0.30% | 6.3B | 22.78 | $6.37 | N/A |
| EDU | $53.95 | -0.35% | 8.8B | 23.44 | $2.30 | +1.08% |
| TAL | $10.22 | -4.40% | 6.2B | 73.00 | $0.14 | N/A |
| LOPE | $189.00 | -0.24% | 5.4B | 23.74 | $7.96 | N/A |
| ATGE | $127.23 | -0.98% | 4.6B | 21.53 | $5.91 | N/A |
| GHC | $946.17 | -1.32% | 4.1B | 6.69 | $141.17 | +0.74% |
| LAUR | $23.38 | +1.21% | 3.5B | 12.57 | $1.86 | N/A |
| PRDO | $32.69 | -0.88% | 2.1B | 14.53 | $2.25 | +1.58% |
| STRA | $85.13 | -0.88% | 2.1B | 18.19 | $4.68 | +2.80% |
| UTI | $33.89 | -1.83% | 1.8B | 32.29 | $1.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LRN vs EDU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, EDU has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while EDU trades at $53.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas EDU's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to EDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs TAL Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TAL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while TAL trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas TAL's P/E ratio is 73.00. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TAL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to TAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs LOPE Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LOPE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while LOPE trades at $189.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas LOPE's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LOPE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to LOPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs ATGE Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ATGE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while ATGE trades at $127.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas ATGE's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATGE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to ATGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs GHC Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GHC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while GHC trades at $946.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas GHC's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GHC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to GHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs LAUR Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LAUR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while LAUR trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas LAUR's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LAUR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to LAUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs PRDO Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PRDO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while PRDO trades at $32.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas PRDO's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PRDO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to PRDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs STRA Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, STRA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while STRA trades at $85.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas STRA's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STRA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to STRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs UTI Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, UTI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while UTI trades at $33.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas UTI's P/E ratio is 32.29. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UTI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to UTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs AFYA Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AFYA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while AFYA trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas AFYA's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AFYA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to AFYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs COUR Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, COUR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while COUR trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas COUR's P/E ratio is -20.86. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COUR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to COUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs GOTU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GOTU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while GOTU trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas GOTU's P/E ratio is -7.35. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GOTU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to GOTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs KLC Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, KLC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while KLC trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas KLC's P/E ratio is -17.10. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KLC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to KLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs UDMY Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, UDMY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while UDMY trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas UDMY's P/E ratio is -15.62. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UDMY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to UDMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs DAO Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DAO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while DAO trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas DAO's P/E ratio is 50.41. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DAO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to DAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs ARCE Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ARCE has a market cap of 927.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while ARCE trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas ARCE's P/E ratio is -73.58. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ARCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to ARCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs REDU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, REDU has a market cap of 730.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while REDU trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas REDU's P/E ratio is -23.04. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to REDU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to REDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs LINC Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LINC has a market cap of 728.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while LINC trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas LINC's P/E ratio is 59.10. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LINC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to LINC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs APEI Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, APEI has a market cap of 549.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while APEI trades at $30.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas APEI's P/E ratio is 29.86. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to APEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs QSG Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, QSG has a market cap of 483M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while QSG trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas QSG's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QSG's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to QSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs VSTA Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, VSTA has a market cap of 342.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while VSTA trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas VSTA's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VSTA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to VSTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs VTRU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, VTRU has a market cap of 304.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while VTRU trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas VTRU's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VTRU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to VTRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs RYET Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RYET has a market cap of 276.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while RYET trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas RYET's P/E ratio is -273.33. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RYET's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to RYET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs SKIL Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SKIL has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while SKIL trades at $15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas SKIL's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SKIL's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to SKIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs LGCY Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LGCY has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while LGCY trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas LGCY's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LGCY's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to LGCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs CHGG Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CHGG has a market cap of 129.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while CHGG trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas CHGG's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHGG's ROE of -3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to CHGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs GNS Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GNS has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while GNS trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas GNS's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GNS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to GNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs STG Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, STG has a market cap of 77.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while STG trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas STG's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STG's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to STG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs ONE Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ONE has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while ONE trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas ONE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ONE's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to ONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs KIDZ Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, KIDZ has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while KIDZ trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas KIDZ's P/E ratio is -98.00. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KIDZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to KIDZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs JZ Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, JZ has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while JZ trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas JZ's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JZ's ROE of -846.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to JZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs IH Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, IH has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while IH trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas IH's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to IH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs BTCT Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BTCT has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while BTCT trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas BTCT's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BTCT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to BTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs YQ Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, YQ has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while YQ trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas YQ's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YQ's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to YQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs AIU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AIU has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while AIU trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas AIU's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AIU's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to AIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs GEHI Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GEHI has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while GEHI trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas GEHI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GEHI's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to GEHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs EDTK Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, EDTK has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while EDTK trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas EDTK's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EDTK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to EDTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs BEDU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BEDU has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while BEDU trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas BEDU's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BEDU's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to BEDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs AACG Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AACG has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while AACG trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas AACG's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AACG's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to AACG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs TEDU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TEDU has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while TEDU trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas TEDU's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TEDU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to TEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs VSA Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while VSA trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VSA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs VEDU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, VEDU has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while VEDU trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas VEDU's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VEDU's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to VEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs GV Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GV has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while GV trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas GV's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GV's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to GV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs EEIQ Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, EEIQ has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while EEIQ trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas EEIQ's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EEIQ's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to EEIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs WAFU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, WAFU has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while WAFU trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas WAFU's P/E ratio is -7.76. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WAFU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to WAFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs TCTM Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TCTM has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while TCTM trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas TCTM's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TCTM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to TCTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs GSUN Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GSUN has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while GSUN trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas GSUN's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GSUN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to GSUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs TWOU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TWOU has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while TWOU trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas TWOU's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TWOU's ROE of -14.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to TWOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs MYND Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MYND has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while MYND trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas MYND's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MYND's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to MYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs CLEU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CLEU has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while CLEU trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas CLEU's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CLEU's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to CLEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs COE Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, COE has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while COE trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas COE's P/E ratio is -54.33. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to COE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs METX Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, METX has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while METX trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas METX's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to METX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to METX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs FEDU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FEDU has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while FEDU trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas FEDU's P/E ratio is 171.17. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FEDU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to FEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs ASPU Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ASPU has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while ASPU trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas ASPU's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASPU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to ASPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs KIDZW Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, KIDZW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while KIDZW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas KIDZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KIDZW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to KIDZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs RYB Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RYB has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while RYB trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas RYB's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RYB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to RYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs LXEH Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LXEH has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while LXEH trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas LXEH's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LXEH's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to LXEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs AMBO Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AMBO has a market cap of 362.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while AMBO trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas AMBO's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMBO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to AMBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs BTCTW Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BTCTW has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while BTCTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas BTCTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BTCTW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to BTCTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs FHS Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FHS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while FHS trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas FHS's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FHS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to FHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs HLG Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while HLG trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas HLG's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HLG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to HLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs GPX Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GPX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while GPX trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas GPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GPX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to GPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs NEW Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while NEW trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas NEW's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NEW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to NEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs HMHC Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HMHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while HMHC trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas HMHC's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HMHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is more volatile compared to HMHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs ZME Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ZME has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while ZME trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas ZME's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZME's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to ZME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.
LRN vs ZVO Comparison
LRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRN stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ZVO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LRN is priced at $145.19, while ZVO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas ZVO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LRN's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZVO's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRN is less volatile compared to ZVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRN.