LanzaTech Global, Inc.
LanzaTech Global, Inc. (LNZA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LNZA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNZA | $9.16 | +0.00% | 23.6M | -0.28 | -$36.59 | N/A |
| WM | $233.42 | +0.00% | 92.9B | 34.43 | $6.69 | +1.43% |
| RSG | $221.63 | +0.00% | 68.6B | 31.96 | $6.87 | +1.10% |
| WCN | $166.06 | +0.00% | 41.9B | 39.17 | $4.18 | +0.79% |
| GFLU | $70.30 | +4.32% | 25B | -91.90 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| CLH | $281.34 | +0.00% | 15.3B | 39.55 | $7.20 | N/A |
| GFL | $43.47 | +0.00% | 14.8B | 104.10 | $0.41 | +0.14% |
| CWST | $101.28 | +0.00% | 6B | 397.75 | $0.24 | N/A |
| SRCL | $61.98 | +0.83% | 5.8B | 158.92 | $0.39 | N/A |
| NVRI | $19.34 | +0.00% | 1.5B | -9.44 | -$2.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LNZA vs WM Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 92.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while WM trades at $233.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 34.43. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to WM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check WM's competition here
LNZA vs RSG Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while RSG trades at $221.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 31.96. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check RSG's competition here
LNZA vs WCN Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while WCN trades at $166.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 39.17. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check WCN's competition here
LNZA vs GFLU Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while GFLU trades at $70.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is less volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check GFLU's competition here
LNZA vs CLH Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while CLH trades at $281.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 39.55. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check CLH's competition here
LNZA vs GFL Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while GFL trades at $43.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is 104.10. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check GFL's competition here
LNZA vs CWST Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while CWST trades at $101.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 397.75. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check CWST's competition here
LNZA vs SRCL Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while SRCL trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check SRCL's competition here
LNZA vs NVRI Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while NVRI trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -9.44. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to NVRI's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check NVRI's competition here
LNZA vs HCCI Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while HCCI trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check HCCI's competition here
LNZA vs MEG Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 816.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while MEG trades at $22.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -27.51. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to MEG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check MEG's competition here
LNZA vs HSC Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while HSC trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check HSC's competition here
LNZA vs YDDL Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 277.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while YDDL trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 39.38. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is less volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check YDDL's competition here
LNZA vs PESI Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 248.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while PESI trades at $13.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -20.97. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check PESI's competition here
LNZA vs ESGL Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 133.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while ESGL trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -52.50. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is less volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check ESGL's competition here
LNZA vs QRHC Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while QRHC trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check QRHC's competition here
LNZA vs LICY Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while LICY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to LICY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check LICY's competition here
LNZA vs JAN Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, JAN has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while JAN trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas JAN's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to JAN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is less volatile compared to JAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check JAN's competition here
LNZA vs AMBI Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while AMBI trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check AMBI's competition here
LNZA vs CHRA Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while CHRA trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check CHRA's competition here
LNZA vs AQMS Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while AQMS trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to AQMS's ROE of -2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check AQMS's competition here
LNZA vs ENGS Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while ENGS trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is less volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check ENGS's competition here
LNZA vs AWX Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while AWX trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 65.38. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check AWX's competition here
LNZA vs CHNR Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while CHNR trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is less volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check CHNR's competition here
LNZA vs GWAV Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while GWAV trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is less volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check GWAV's competition here
LNZA vs CDTG Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while CDTG trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check CDTG's competition here
LNZA vs DXST Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while DXST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is 1.68. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to DXST's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check DXST's competition here
LNZA vs SMED Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while SMED trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check SMED's competition here
LNZA vs NES Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while NES trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check NES's competition here
LNZA vs ECOLW Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check ECOLW's competition here
LNZA vs CVA Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while CVA trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check CVA's competition here
LNZA vs ECOL Comparison February 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 23.6M. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $9.16, while ECOL trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +16.96%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check ECOL's competition here