LandBridge Company LLC

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while SLB trades at $33.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check SLB's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while BKR trades at $43.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check BKR's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while TS trades at $36.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check TS's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while HAL trades at $21.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check HAL's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while FTI trades at $35.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check FTI's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while CHX trades at $25.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check CHX's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while NOV trades at $12.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check NOV's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while AROC trades at $23.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check AROC's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while WFRD trades at $56.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check WFRD's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while VAL-WT trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check VAL-WT's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while VAL trades at $46.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check VAL's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while KGS trades at $35.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 38.30. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check KGS's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while USAC trades at $24.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 36.73. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USAC's ROE of +12.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check USAC's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while TDW trades at $55.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check TDW's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while WHD trades at $40.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check WHD's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check TDW-WT's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while NEX trades at $10.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check NEX's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while OII trades at $22.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check OII's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while SEI trades at $27.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 46.97. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check SEI's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while LBRT trades at $11.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check LBRT's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while DNOW trades at $14.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNOW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check DNOW's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while FLOC trades at $16.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLOC's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check FLOC's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while AESI trades at $11.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is 93.67. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AESI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check AESI's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while XPRO trades at $10.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check XPRO's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while SLCA trades at $15.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check SLCA's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while PFHC trades at $22.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check PFHC's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while EFXT trades at $9.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check EFXT's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while MRC trades at $13.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 59.83. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MRC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check MRC's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while INVX trades at $16.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check INVX's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while VTOL trades at $37.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check VTOL's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 966.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while RES trades at $4.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check RES's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 840M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while HLX trades at $5.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check HLX's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 832.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while NPKI trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NPKI's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check NPKI's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, WTTR has a market cap of 825.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while WTTR trades at $8.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas WTTR's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WTTR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to WTTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check WTTR's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while NESRW trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check NESRW's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while NESR trades at $6.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check NESR's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while NR trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NR's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check NR's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 567.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while ACDC trades at $3.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check ACDC's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while DRQ trades at $15.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check DRQ's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 524.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while TTI trades at $3.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 4.28. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check TTI's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while SOI trades at $11.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check SOI's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 497.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while PUMP trades at $4.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check PUMP's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 489.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while CLB trades at $10.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check CLB's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 362.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while NOA trades at $12.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check NOA's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 356.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while FTK trades at $12.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check FTK's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while CCLP trades at $2.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check CCLP's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 306.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while NGS trades at $24.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check NGS's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 301.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while OIS trades at $5.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is 45.23. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check OIS's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 280M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while FET trades at $23.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check FET's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 275.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while RNGR trades at $12.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check RNGR's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 208.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while GEOS trades at $15.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -15.93. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check GEOS's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 128.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while BOOM trades at $6.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check BOOM's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while PFIE trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check PFIE's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 94.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while LSE trades at $5.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LSE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check LSE's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 87.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while NCSM trades at $31.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check NCSM's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 82.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while SND trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas SND's P/E ratio is 63.33. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SND's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check SND's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while RCON trades at $2.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check RCON's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while DTI trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check DTI's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while DWSN trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DWSN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check DWSN's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while KLXE trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check KLXE's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while SDPI trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check SDPI's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while NINE trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NINE's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check NINE's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 189.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while ENSV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check ENSV's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while USWS trades at $7.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check USWS's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while IO trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check IO's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while CELP trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check CELP's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while FTSI trades at $26.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check FTSI's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ACDCW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check ACDCW's competition here

LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $53.63, while EXTN trades at $4.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LB currently has a P/E ratio of 67.00, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.Check EXTN's competition here