LandBridge Company LLC
LandBridge Company LLC LB Peers
See (LB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LB | $72.96 | +3.99% | 5.58B | -30.92 | -$2.36 | +0.27% |
| SLB | $34.15 | +1.16% | 46.44B | 10.98 | $3.11 | +3.09% |
| BKR | $37.62 | +3.10% | 37.27B | 12.84 | $2.93 | +2.35% |
| TS | $34.73 | +2.00% | 18.62B | 10.59 | $3.28 | +3.86% |
| HAL | $21.25 | +4.36% | 18.27B | 8.89 | $2.39 | +3.21% |
| FTI | $30.76 | +3.01% | 12.90B | 16.28 | $1.89 | +0.65% |
| CHX | $26.06 | +3.82% | 4.99B | 17.26 | $1.51 | +1.46% |
| NOV | $12.95 | +3.68% | 4.87B | 8.69 | $1.49 | +2.32% |
| AROC | $25.31 | +2.47% | 4.48B | 21.27 | $1.19 | +2.82% |
| WFRD | $48.88 | +6.10% | 3.55B | 7.78 | $6.28 | +2.04% |
Stock Comparison
LB vs SLB Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 46.44B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while SLB trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs BKR Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 37.27B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while BKR trades at $37.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs TS Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 18.62B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while TS trades at $34.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs HAL Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 18.27B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while HAL trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs FTI Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 12.90B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while FTI trades at $30.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs CHX Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.99B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while CHX trades at $26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs NOV Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 4.87B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while NOV trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs AROC Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while AROC trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs WFRD Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while WFRD trades at $48.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs KGS Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while KGS trades at $36.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 65.11. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs WHD Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while WHD trades at $44.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs VAL-WT Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while VAL-WT trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs VAL Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while VAL trades at $39.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs USAC Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while USAC trades at $24.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 33.44. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to USAC's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs TDW-WT Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs NEX Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs TDW Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while TDW trades at $42.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs FLOC Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while FLOC trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FLOC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs LBRT Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while LBRT trades at $12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs OII Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while OII trades at $19.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs AESI Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while AESI trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AESI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs DNOW Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while DNOW trades at $15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DNOW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs SEI Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while SEI trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 45.03. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs SLCA Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs PFHC Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs MRC Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while MRC trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs RES Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while RES trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs HLX Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while HLX trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs INVX Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while INVX trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs XPRO Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 999.86M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while XPRO trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs WTTR Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, WTTR has a market cap of 895.91M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while WTTR trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas WTTR's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to WTTR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to WTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs EFXT Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 889.48M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while EFXT trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs VTOL Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 867.85M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while VTOL trades at $30.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs ACDC Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 791.28M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while ACDC trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs NPKI Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 716.75M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while NPKI trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NPKI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs NESRW Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 663.78M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while NESRW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs NR Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.11M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs PUMP Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 623.46M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while PUMP trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs NESR Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 623.34M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while NESR trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs CLB Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 566.81M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while CLB trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs DRQ Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.91M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DRQ's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs SOI Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.11M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs NOA Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 481.07M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while NOA trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs TTI Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 406.54M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while TTI trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs FTK Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 377.16M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while FTK trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 37.19. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs CCLP Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.84M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs OIS Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 295.11M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while OIS trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is 59.62. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to OIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs NGS Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 270.30M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while NGS trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs RNGR Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 268.40M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while RNGR trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs FET Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 191.85M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while FET trades at $15.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs BOOM Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 142.00M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while BOOM trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs PFIE Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.35M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs DTI Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 93.25M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while DTI trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DTI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs SND Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 91.25M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while SND trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas SND's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs LSE Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 89.04M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while LSE trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LSE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs NCSM Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 83.80M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while NCSM trades at $32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs GEOS Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 78.83M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while GEOS trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs RCON Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 52.90M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while RCON trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs DWSN Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 36.56M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while DWSN trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -9.08. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DWSN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs KLXE Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 34.28M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while KLXE trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KLXE's ROE of -11.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs SDPI Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.70M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs NINE Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 29.56M. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while NINE trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NINE's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.
LB vs ENSV Comparison
LB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LB stands at 5.58B. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 989108.00. Regarding current trading prices, LB is priced at $72.96, while ENSV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LB currently has a P/E ratio of -30.92, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LB's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -4.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LB is less volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LB.