Laser Photonics Corporation
Laser Photonics Corporation LASE Peers
See (LASE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LASE | $3.04 | +0.16% | 43.42M | -8.00 | -$0.38 | N/A |
| ETN | $330.76 | +2.69% | 129.43B | 33.38 | $9.91 | +1.19% |
| PH | $678.54 | +1.46% | 86.70B | 26.12 | $25.98 | +0.98% |
| ITW | $249.17 | -0.46% | 73.01B | 21.91 | $11.37 | +2.35% |
| EMR | $121.48 | +1.73% | 68.33B | 34.22 | $3.55 | +1.72% |
| HWM | $158.30 | +0.85% | 63.90B | 51.73 | $3.06 | +0.23% |
| ROP | $577.07 | +0.21% | 62.04B | 41.52 | $13.90 | +0.54% |
| CMI | $334.58 | +1.21% | 46.09B | 16.49 | $20.29 | +2.13% |
| AME | $180.53 | +0.64% | 41.68B | 29.55 | $6.11 | +0.63% |
| OTIS | $96.99 | -1.03% | 38.28B | 25.39 | $3.82 | +1.60% |
Stock Comparison
LASE vs ETN Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 129.43B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while ETN trades at $330.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 33.38. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs PH Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 86.70B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while PH trades at $678.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs ITW Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 73.01B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while ITW trades at $249.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs EMR Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 68.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while EMR trades at $121.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs HWM Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, HWM has a market cap of 63.90B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while HWM trades at $158.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas HWM's P/E ratio is 51.73. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to HWM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to HWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs ROP Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 62.04B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while ROP trades at $577.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 41.52. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs CMI Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 46.09B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while CMI trades at $334.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs AME Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 41.68B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while AME trades at $180.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 29.55. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs OTIS Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 38.28B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while OTIS trades at $96.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs ROK Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 34.77B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while ROK trades at $308.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 38.90. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs IR Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 34.08B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while IR trades at $84.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs XYL Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 30.88B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while XYL trades at $126.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 34.20. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs HWM-P Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, HWM-P has a market cap of 28.76B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while HWM-P trades at $71.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas HWM-P's P/E ratio is 99.93. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to HWM-P's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to HWM-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs DOV Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 25.45B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while DOV trades at $185.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs PNR Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 16.20B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while PNR trades at $98.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs IEX Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 14.37B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while IEX trades at $190.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 30.20. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs GGG Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 14.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while GGG trades at $85.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs ITT Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 11.84B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while ITT trades at $150.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs NDSN Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 11.53B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while NDSN trades at $202.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs CR Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 10.10B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while CR trades at $175.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 35.70. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs AOS Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 9.96B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while AOS trades at $70.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs RRX Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 9.57B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while RRX trades at $144.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 41.36. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs DCI Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 8.41B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while DCI trades at $70.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs WTS Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 8.13B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while WTS trades at $243.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs MIDD Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 8.02B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while MIDD trades at $149.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MIDD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs GTLS Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 8.00B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while GTLS trades at $175.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 34.87. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GTLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs GNRC Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 7.63B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while GNRC trades at $129.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs SPXC Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while SPXC trades at $156.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 36.17. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs PSN Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 6.97B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while PSN trades at $65.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs FLS Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 6.81B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while FLS trades at $52.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs JBTM Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 6.18B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while JBTM trades at $118.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is -83.10. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to JBTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs GTES Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 5.82B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while GTES trades at $22.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs CSWI Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 5.64B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while CSWI trades at $336.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 40.32. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs FELE Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while FELE trades at $89.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs MWA Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while MWA trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs AIMC Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.05B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs JBT Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to JBT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs MIR Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 3.93B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while MIR trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is -348.60. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MIR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs NPO Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 3.92B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while NPO trades at $186.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 46.50. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs KAI Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.86B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while KAI trades at $327.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 34.81. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs CXT Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while CXT trades at $55.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs GTLS-PB Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while GTLS-PB trades at $65.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs ATS Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while ATS trades at $28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs EPAC Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while EPAC trades at $46.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs B Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, B has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while B trades at $47.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas B's P/E ratio is -60.87. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs ENOV Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while ENOV trades at $37.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs CFX Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs SXI Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while SXI trades at $156.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 31.01. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs HI Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while HI trades at $23.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas HI's P/E ratio is -5.98. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to HI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs XMTR Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while XMTR trades at $30.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -30.87. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs TNC Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while TNC trades at $77.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs CIR Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs HLIO Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while HLIO trades at $33.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 30.32. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs THR Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while THR trades at $30.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs GRC Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while GRC trades at $39.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs NNE Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while NNE trades at $27.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -65.05. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs AMSC Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 930.46M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while AMSC trades at $23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 262.00. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs KRNT Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 872.55M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while KRNT trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs PSIX Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 806.67M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while PSIX trades at $35.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs CYD Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 675.33M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while CYD trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs SERV Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 508.40M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while SERV trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -8.32. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs BLDP Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 416.77M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while BLDP trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs GHM Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 408.97M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while GHM trades at $37.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 45.19. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs OFLX Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 344.52M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while OFLX trades at $34.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs BGRY Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.69M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs LXFR Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 338.69M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while LXFR trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs BW-PA Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 331.62M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while BW-PA trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs HCAI Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 290.46M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while HCAI trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is 86.10. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to HCAI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs PKOH Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 284.45M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while PKOH trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs RR Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 260.60M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while RR trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -18.92. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs NPWR Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 149.86M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while NPWR trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NPWR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs TAYD Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 119.07M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while TAYD trades at $37.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs SHMD Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 114.55M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while SHMD trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs HUHU Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 111.16M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while HUHU trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -52.50. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to HUHU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs TWIN Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 106.67M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while TWIN trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs WFF Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 105.98M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while WFF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is 212.39. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to WFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs HURC Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 97.65M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while HURC trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs BW Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 91.54M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while BW trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs PYR Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 67.96M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs TPIC Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 50.60M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while TPIC trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs BWEN Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 37.06M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while BWEN trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BWEN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs GTEC Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 29.04M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while GTEC trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 2.07. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs LBGJ Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, LBGJ has a market cap of 25.19M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while LBGJ trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas LBGJ's P/E ratio is -19.43. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to LBGJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to LBGJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs CVV Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 20.03M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while CVV trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -10.39. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs INLF Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, INLF has a market cap of 19.86M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while INLF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas INLF's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to INLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to INLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs SHMDW Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 9.11M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while SHMDW trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs BURU Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 6.84M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while BURU trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BURU's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs CGRN Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.79M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while CGRN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CGRN's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs JCSE Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 6.77M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while JCSE trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs SHPW Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 1.98M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs XCH Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 1.95M. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while XCH trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to XCH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs NMHI Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, NMHI has a market cap of 433554.00. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while NMHI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas NMHI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NMHI's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is less volatile compared to NMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.
LASE vs NMHIW Comparison
LASE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LASE stands at 43.42M. In comparison, NMHIW has a market cap of 16323.00. Regarding current trading prices, LASE is priced at $3.04, while NMHIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LASE currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas NMHIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LASE's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NMHIW's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LASE is more volatile compared to NMHIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LASE.