KinderCare Learning Companies, Inc.

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EDU has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while EDU trades at $46.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas EDU's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to EDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check EDU's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TAL has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while TAL trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas TAL's P/E ratio is 71.43. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TAL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to TAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check TAL's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LRN has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while LRN trades at $129.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas LRN's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LRN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is more volatile compared to LRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check LRN's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LOPE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while LOPE trades at $168.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas LOPE's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LOPE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is more volatile compared to LOPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check LOPE's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ATGE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while ATGE trades at $115.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas ATGE's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ATGE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to ATGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check ATGE's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GHC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while GHC trades at $918.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas GHC's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GHC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to GHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check GHC's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LAUR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while LAUR trades at $23.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas LAUR's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LAUR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is more volatile compared to LAUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check LAUR's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COUR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while COUR trades at $12.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas COUR's P/E ratio is -29.48. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to COUR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to COUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check COUR's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STRA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while STRA trades at $78.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas STRA's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to STRA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to STRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check STRA's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PRDO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while PRDO trades at $28.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas PRDO's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PRDO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is more volatile compared to PRDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check PRDO's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, UTI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while UTI trades at $31.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas UTI's P/E ratio is 30.01. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UTI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is more volatile compared to UTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check UTI's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GOTU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while GOTU trades at $3.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas GOTU's P/E ratio is -7.32. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GOTU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to GOTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check GOTU's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AFYA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while AFYA trades at $14.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas AFYA's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AFYA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to AFYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check AFYA's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, UDMY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while UDMY trades at $7.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas UDMY's P/E ratio is -16.56. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UDMY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to UDMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check UDMY's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DAO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while DAO trades at $8.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas DAO's P/E ratio is 51.29. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DAO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is more volatile compared to DAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check DAO's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ARCE has a market cap of 927.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while ARCE trades at $13.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas ARCE's P/E ratio is -73.58. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ARCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is more volatile compared to ARCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check ARCE's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, REDU has a market cap of 730.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while REDU trades at $3.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas REDU's P/E ratio is -23.04. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to REDU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to REDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check REDU's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LINC has a market cap of 721.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while LINC trades at $22.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas LINC's P/E ratio is 58.59. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LINC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to LINC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check LINC's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, APEI has a market cap of 547.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while APEI trades at $30.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas APEI's P/E ratio is 29.74. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to APEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to APEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check APEI's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, QSG has a market cap of 492.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while QSG trades at $9.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas QSG's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QSG's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to QSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check QSG's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VSTA has a market cap of 331.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while VSTA trades at $4.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas VSTA's P/E ratio is 4.05. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VSTA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to VSTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check VSTA's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VTRU has a market cap of 304.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while VTRU trades at $9.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas VTRU's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VTRU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is more volatile compared to VTRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check VTRU's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CHGG has a market cap of 168.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while CHGG trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas CHGG's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CHGG's ROE of -3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to CHGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check CHGG's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STG has a market cap of 141.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while STG trades at $10.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas STG's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to STG's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to STG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check STG's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LGCY has a market cap of 139.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while LGCY trades at $11.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas LGCY's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LGCY's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to LGCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check LGCY's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SKIL has a market cap of 125.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while SKIL trades at $14.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas SKIL's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SKIL's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to SKIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check SKIL's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GNS has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while GNS trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas GNS's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GNS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to GNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check GNS's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RYET has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while RYET trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas RYET's P/E ratio is -66.00. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RYET's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to RYET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check RYET's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ONE has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while ONE trades at $1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas ONE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ONE's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to ONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check ONE's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KIDZ has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while KIDZ trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas KIDZ's P/E ratio is -102.50. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KIDZ's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to KIDZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check KIDZ's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JZ has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while JZ trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas JZ's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to JZ's ROE of -846.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to JZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check JZ's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IH has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while IH trades at $2.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas IH's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to IH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check IH's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BTCT has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while BTCT trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas BTCT's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BTCT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to BTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check BTCT's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AIU has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while AIU trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas AIU's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AIU's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to AIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check AIU's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, YQ has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while YQ trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas YQ's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to YQ's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to YQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check YQ's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GEHI has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while GEHI trades at $13.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas GEHI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GEHI's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to GEHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check GEHI's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AACG has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while AACG trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas AACG's P/E ratio is -7.19. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AACG's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to AACG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check AACG's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EDTK has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while EDTK trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas EDTK's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EDTK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to EDTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check EDTK's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BEDU has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while BEDU trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas BEDU's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BEDU's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is more volatile compared to BEDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check BEDU's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while VSA trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VSA's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check VSA's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TEDU has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while TEDU trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas TEDU's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TEDU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to TEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check TEDU's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VEDU has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while VEDU trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas VEDU's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VEDU's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to VEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check VEDU's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EEIQ has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while EEIQ trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas EEIQ's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EEIQ's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to EEIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check EEIQ's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GV has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while GV trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas GV's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GV's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to GV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check GV's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WAFU has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while WAFU trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas WAFU's P/E ratio is -7.94. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WAFU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is more volatile compared to WAFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check WAFU's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GSUN has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while GSUN trades at $2.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas GSUN's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GSUN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to GSUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check GSUN's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TCTM has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while TCTM trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas TCTM's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TCTM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to TCTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check TCTM's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TWOU has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while TWOU trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas TWOU's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TWOU's ROE of -14.93%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to TWOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check TWOU's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MYND has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while MYND trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas MYND's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MYND's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to MYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check MYND's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CLEU has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while CLEU trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas CLEU's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CLEU's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to CLEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check CLEU's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FEDU has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while FEDU trades at $14.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas FEDU's P/E ratio is 245.67. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FEDU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to FEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check FEDU's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, METX has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while METX trades at $2.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas METX's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to METX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to METX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check METX's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COE has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while COE trades at $28.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas COE's P/E ratio is -49.42. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to COE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is more volatile compared to COE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check COE's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KIDZW has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while KIDZW trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas KIDZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KIDZW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to KIDZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check KIDZW's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ASPU has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while ASPU trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas ASPU's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ASPU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to ASPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check ASPU's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RYB has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while RYB trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas RYB's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RYB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to RYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check RYB's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LXEH has a market cap of 960.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while LXEH trades at $1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas LXEH's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LXEH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to LXEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check LXEH's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMBO has a market cap of 369.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while AMBO trades at $2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas AMBO's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AMBO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to AMBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check AMBO's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BTCTW has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while BTCTW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas BTCTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BTCTW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to BTCTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check BTCTW's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZVO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while ZVO trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas ZVO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ZVO's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to ZVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check ZVO's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HMHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while HMHC trades at $21.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas HMHC's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HMHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is more volatile compared to HMHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check HMHC's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GPX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while GPX trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas GPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GPX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is more volatile compared to GPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check GPX's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while HLG trades at $14.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas HLG's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HLG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is more volatile compared to HLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check HLG's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while NEW trades at $1.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas NEW's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NEW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to NEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check NEW's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FHS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while FHS trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas FHS's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FHS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to FHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check FHS's competition here

KLC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLC stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZME has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KLC is priced at $10.04, while ZME trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLC currently has a P/E ratio of -17.03, whereas ZME's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KLC's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ZME's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, KLC is less volatile compared to ZME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLC.Check ZME's competition here