Kodiak Gas Services, Inc.
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. (KGS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KGS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KGS | $32.48 | +3.87% | 2.8B | 63.26 | $0.50 | +5.33% |
| SLB | $35.88 | +1.14% | 54B | 12.33 | $2.92 | +3.11% |
| BKR | $45.88 | -0.37% | 45.9B | 15.22 | $3.06 | +1.89% |
| TS | $37.87 | -0.53% | 20.1B | 11.59 | $3.28 | +5.80% |
| HAL | $22.92 | +2.07% | 19.6B | 10.72 | $2.13 | +2.98% |
| FTI | $37.11 | +1.81% | 15.1B | 17.53 | $2.10 | +0.54% |
| NOV | $12.94 | -7.41% | 5.3B | 9.51 | $1.49 | +3.62% |
| CHX | $25.81 | -2.97% | 4.9B | 17.09 | $1.51 | +1.47% |
| WFRD | $58.65 | +3.14% | 4.2B | 9.09 | $6.49 | +1.69% |
| AROC | $23.74 | +1.87% | 4.1B | 19.58 | $1.19 | +3.08% |
Stock Comparison
KGS vs SLB Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while SLB trades at $35.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check SLB's competition here
KGS vs BKR Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while BKR trades at $45.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check BKR's competition here
KGS vs TS Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while TS trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check TS's competition here
KGS vs HAL Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while HAL trades at $22.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check HAL's competition here
KGS vs FTI Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while FTI trades at $37.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check FTI's competition here
KGS vs NOV Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while NOV trades at $12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check NOV's competition here
KGS vs CHX Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while CHX trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check CHX's competition here
KGS vs WFRD Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while WFRD trades at $58.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check WFRD's competition here
KGS vs AROC Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while AROC trades at $23.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check AROC's competition here
KGS vs VAL-WT Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while VAL-WT trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check VAL-WT's competition here
KGS vs VAL Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while VAL trades at $50.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check VAL's competition here
KGS vs WHD Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while WHD trades at $47.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check WHD's competition here
KGS vs USAC Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while USAC trades at $23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 35.81. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to USAC's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check USAC's competition here
KGS vs TDW-WT Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check TDW-WT's competition here
KGS vs TDW Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while TDW trades at $52.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check TDW's competition here
KGS vs NEX Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check NEX's competition here
KGS vs OII Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while OII trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check OII's competition here
KGS vs SEI Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while SEI trades at $32.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 65.19. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check SEI's competition here
KGS vs LBRT Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while LBRT trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check LBRT's competition here
KGS vs FLOC Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while FLOC trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FLOC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check FLOC's competition here
KGS vs AESI Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while AESI trades at $14.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is 47.23. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AESI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check AESI's competition here
KGS vs DNOW Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while DNOW trades at $16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DNOW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check DNOW's competition here
KGS vs ACDC Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while ACDC trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check ACDC's competition here
KGS vs MRC Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while MRC trades at $15.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 30.08. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check MRC's competition here
KGS vs LB Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while LB trades at $55.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas LB's P/E ratio is -18.92. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check LB's competition here
KGS vs SLCA Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check SLCA's competition here
KGS vs INVX Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while INVX trades at $18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check INVX's competition here
KGS vs PFHC Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check PFHC's competition here
KGS vs RES Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while RES trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check RES's competition here
KGS vs VTOL Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while VTOL trades at $36.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check VTOL's competition here
KGS vs XPRO Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while XPRO trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check XPRO's competition here
KGS vs WTTR Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WTTR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while WTTR trades at $9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas WTTR's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WTTR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to WTTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check WTTR's competition here
KGS vs EFXT Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while EFXT trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check EFXT's competition here
KGS vs HLX Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 917.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while HLX trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check HLX's competition here
KGS vs NPKI Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 770.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while NPKI trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NPKI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check NPKI's competition here
KGS vs NESR Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 701.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while NESR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check NESR's competition here
KGS vs PUMP Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 641.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while PUMP trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check PUMP's competition here
KGS vs NR Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NR's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check NR's competition here
KGS vs NESRW Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 564.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while NESRW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check NESRW's competition here
KGS vs CLB Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 560.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while CLB trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check CLB's competition here
KGS vs DRQ Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check DRQ's competition here
KGS vs TTI Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while TTI trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 4.28. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check TTI's competition here
KGS vs SOI Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check SOI's competition here
KGS vs NOA Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 454.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while NOA trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check NOA's competition here
KGS vs FTK Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 362.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while FTK trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 26.37. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check FTK's competition here
KGS vs OIS Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 361.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while OIS trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is 73.06. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check OIS's competition here
KGS vs CCLP Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check CCLP's competition here
KGS vs NGS Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 306.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while NGS trades at $24.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check NGS's competition here
KGS vs RNGR Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 292.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while RNGR trades at $14.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check RNGR's competition here
KGS vs FET Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 254.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while FET trades at $20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check FET's competition here
KGS vs GEOS Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 202.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while GEOS trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -12.73. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check GEOS's competition here
KGS vs BOOM Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 181.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while BOOM trades at $8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check BOOM's competition here
KGS vs PFIE Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check PFIE's competition here
KGS vs LSE Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 94.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while LSE trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LSE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check LSE's competition here
KGS vs RCON Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 90.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while RCON trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check RCON's competition here
KGS vs SND Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 88.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while SND trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas SND's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SND's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check SND's competition here
KGS vs DTI Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while DTI trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is -32.14. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check DTI's competition here
KGS vs NCSM Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while NCSM trades at $30.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check NCSM's competition here
KGS vs DWSN Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while DWSN trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DWSN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check DWSN's competition here
KGS vs KLXE Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while KLXE trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check KLXE's competition here
KGS vs NINE Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while NINE trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NINE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check NINE's competition here
KGS vs SDPI Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check SDPI's competition here
KGS vs ENSV Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 369.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while ENSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -4.70%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check ENSV's competition here
KGS vs CELP Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while CELP trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check CELP's competition here
KGS vs ACDCW Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ACDCW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check ACDCW's competition here
KGS vs FTSI Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while FTSI trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check FTSI's competition here
KGS vs IO Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while IO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check IO's competition here
KGS vs EXTN Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while EXTN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check EXTN's competition here
KGS vs USWS Comparison July 2025
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $32.48, while USWS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.26, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check USWS's competition here