Ingersoll Rand Inc.
Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IR | $80.63 | +4.11% | 32B | 62.50 | $1.29 | +0.10% |
| ETN | $347.61 | +0.65% | 135.3B | 34.96 | $9.94 | +1.16% |
| PH | $752.33 | +2.63% | 96.2B | 27.75 | $27.12 | +0.89% |
| ITW | $269.41 | +3.22% | 78.5B | 23.64 | $11.40 | +2.23% |
| EMR | $133.77 | +2.83% | 75.3B | 34.38 | $3.89 | +1.57% |
| HWM | $171.00 | -1.30% | 68.9B | 49.99 | $3.42 | +0.23% |
| ROP | $536.84 | +1.88% | 57.8B | 37.73 | $14.23 | +0.60% |
| CMI | $402.30 | +2.05% | 55.4B | 18.87 | $21.32 | +1.85% |
| B | $26.20 | +2.62% | 45.1B | 16.49 | $1.59 | +1.53% |
| AME | $186.95 | +1.91% | 43.2B | 30.06 | $6.22 | +0.63% |
Stock Comparison
IR vs ETN Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 135.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while ETN trades at $347.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 34.96. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check ETN's competition here
IR vs PH Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 96.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while PH trades at $752.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check PH's competition here
IR vs ITW Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 78.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while ITW trades at $269.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check ITW's competition here
IR vs EMR Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 75.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while EMR trades at $133.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 34.38. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check EMR's competition here
IR vs HWM Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, HWM has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while HWM trades at $171.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas HWM's P/E ratio is 49.99. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HWM's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to HWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check HWM's competition here
IR vs ROP Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while ROP trades at $536.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 37.73. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check ROP's competition here
IR vs CMI Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while CMI trades at $402.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check CMI's competition here
IR vs B Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, B has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while B trades at $26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas B's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check B's competition here
IR vs AME Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while AME trades at $186.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check AME's competition here
IR vs ROK Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while ROK trades at $351.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 41.23. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check ROK's competition here
IR vs XYL Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while XYL trades at $143.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 37.43. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check XYL's competition here
IR vs OTIS Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while OTIS trades at $88.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check OTIS's competition here
IR vs HWM-P Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, HWM-P has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while HWM-P trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas HWM-P's P/E ratio is 98.18. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HWM-P's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to HWM-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check HWM-P's competition here
IR vs DOV Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while DOV trades at $183.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check DOV's competition here
IR vs PNR Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while PNR trades at $108.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check PNR's competition here
IR vs GGG Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while GGG trades at $87.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 30.96. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check GGG's competition here
IR vs ITT Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while ITT trades at $170.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 26.93. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check ITT's competition here
IR vs NDSN Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while NDSN trades at $227.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check NDSN's competition here
IR vs IEX Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while IEX trades at $168.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check IEX's competition here
IR vs GNRC Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while GNRC trades at $194.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 32.38. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check GNRC's competition here
IR vs CR Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while CR trades at $194.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 37.71. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check CR's competition here
IR vs AOS Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while AOS trades at $73.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check AOS's competition here
IR vs RRX Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while RRX trades at $154.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check RRX's competition here
IR vs WTS Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while WTS trades at $280.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check WTS's competition here
IR vs SPXC Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while SPXC trades at $190.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 42.40. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check SPXC's competition here
IR vs GTLS Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while GTLS trades at $197.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 36.39. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check GTLS's competition here
IR vs DCI Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while DCI trades at $75.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check DCI's competition here
IR vs PSN Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while PSN trades at $79.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 35.79. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check PSN's competition here
IR vs JBTM Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while JBTM trades at $147.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is -63.95. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JBTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check JBTM's competition here
IR vs FLS Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while FLS trades at $53.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check FLS's competition here
IR vs MIDD Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while MIDD trades at $137.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MIDD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check MIDD's competition here
IR vs GTES Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while GTES trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check GTES's competition here
IR vs CSWI Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check CSWI's competition here
IR vs NPO Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while NPO trades at $227.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 57.28. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IR and NPO have similar daily volatility (4.30).Check NPO's competition here
IR vs MIR Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while MIR trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 416.50. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check MIR's competition here
IR vs FELE Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while FELE trades at $99.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check FELE's competition here
IR vs MWA Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while MWA trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check MWA's competition here
IR vs AIMC Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check AIMC's competition here
IR vs KAI Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while KAI trades at $340.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 37.99. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check KAI's competition here
IR vs JBT Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JBT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check JBT's competition here
IR vs CXT Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while CXT trades at $63.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check CXT's competition here
IR vs GTLS-PB Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while GTLS-PB trades at $71.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check GTLS-PB's competition here
IR vs ATS Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while ATS trades at $27.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is -94.93. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check ATS's competition here
IR vs SXI Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while SXI trades at $210.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 45.46. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check SXI's competition here
IR vs XMTR Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while XMTR trades at $49.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -40.04. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check XMTR's competition here
IR vs EPAC Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while EPAC trades at $43.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check EPAC's competition here
IR vs AMSC Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while AMSC trades at $50.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 126.70. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check AMSC's competition here
IR vs CFX Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CFX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check CFX's competition here
IR vs PSIX Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while PSIX trades at $91.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check PSIX's competition here
IR vs SHPW Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check SHPW's competition here
IR vs HI Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while HI trades at $26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas HI's P/E ratio is -89.97. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check HI's competition here
IR vs HLIO Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while HLIO trades at $54.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 52.15. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check HLIO's competition here
IR vs ENOV Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while ENOV trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check ENOV's competition here
IR vs TNC Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while TNC trades at $83.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IR and TNC have similar daily volatility (4.30).Check TNC's competition here
IR vs NNE Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while NNE trades at $31.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -32.97. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check NNE's competition here
IR vs BW-PA Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while BW-PA trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 43.36. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check BW-PA's competition here
IR vs CYD Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while CYD trades at $31.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check CYD's competition here
IR vs CIR Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check CIR's competition here
IR vs GRC Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while GRC trades at $42.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check GRC's competition here
IR vs THR Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 882.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while THR trades at $26.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check THR's competition here
IR vs KRNT Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 707.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while KRNT trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -62.40. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check KRNT's competition here
IR vs BLDP Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 602.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while BLDP trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check BLDP's competition here
IR vs SERV Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 581.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while SERV trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check SERV's competition here
IR vs GHM Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 552.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while GHM trades at $50.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 39.95. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check GHM's competition here
IR vs OFLX Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 366.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while OFLX trades at $36.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check OFLX's competition here
IR vs LXFR Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 351.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while LXFR trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check LXFR's competition here
IR vs BGRY Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check BGRY's competition here
IR vs SIMA Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, SIMA has a market cap of 319.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while SIMA trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas SIMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to SIMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check SIMA's competition here
IR vs PKOH Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 287.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while PKOH trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check PKOH's competition here
IR vs RR Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 210.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while RR trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -13.06. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check RR's competition here
IR vs NPWR Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 196.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while NPWR trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check NPWR's competition here
IR vs BW Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 173.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while BW trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check BW's competition here
IR vs TWIN Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 155.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while TWIN trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is -78.36. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TWIN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check TWIN's competition here
IR vs TAYD Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 147.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while TAYD trades at $47.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check TAYD's competition here
IR vs HUHU Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 141.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while HUHU trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -66.90. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check HUHU's competition here
IR vs HURC Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 120.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while HURC trades at $18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check HURC's competition here
IR vs SHMD Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 112M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while SHMD trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check SHMD's competition here
IR vs LASE Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 72.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while LASE trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -16.35. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LASE's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check LASE's competition here
IR vs XCH Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 71.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while XCH trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XCH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check XCH's competition here
IR vs PYR Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check PYR's competition here
IR vs BWEN Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while BWEN trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -22.10. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BWEN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check BWEN's competition here
IR vs WFF Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while WFF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check WFF's competition here
IR vs GTEC Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while GTEC trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 2.53. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check GTEC's competition here
IR vs LBGJ Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, LBGJ has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while LBGJ trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas LBGJ's P/E ratio is -21.33. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LBGJ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to LBGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check LBGJ's competition here
IR vs HCAI Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while HCAI trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check HCAI's competition here
IR vs CVV Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while CVV trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -58.20. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check CVV's competition here
IR vs INLF Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, INLF has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while INLF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas INLF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to INLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check INLF's competition here
IR vs CETY Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, CETY has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while CETY trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas CETY's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CETY's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to CETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check CETY's competition here
IR vs BURU Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while BURU trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BURU's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check BURU's competition here
IR vs SHMDW Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while SHMDW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check SHMDW's competition here
IR vs CGRN Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while CGRN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGRN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check CGRN's competition here
IR vs TPIC Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while TPIC trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check TPIC's competition here
IR vs JCSE Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while JCSE trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check JCSE's competition here
IR vs NMHI Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, NMHI has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while NMHI trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas NMHI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NMHI's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to NMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check NMHI's competition here
IR vs NMHIW Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, NMHIW has a market cap of 92K. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while NMHIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas NMHIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NMHIW's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to NMHIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check NMHIW's competition here
IR vs WBT Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, WBT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while WBT trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas WBT's P/E ratio is 47.08. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WBT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to WBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check WBT's competition here
IR vs BGRYW Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, BGRYW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while BGRYW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas BGRYW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BGRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to BGRYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check BGRYW's competition here
IR vs RAVN Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, RAVN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while RAVN trades at $58.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas RAVN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to RAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check RAVN's competition here
IR vs CFXA Comparison August 2025
IR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 32B. In comparison, CFXA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $80.63, while CFXA trades at $177.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IR currently has a P/E ratio of 62.50, whereas CFXA's P/E ratio is 248.89. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CFXA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to CFXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check CFXA's competition here