Industrial Investment Trust Limited
Industrial Investment Trust Limited (IITL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IITL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IITL.BO | ₹131.35 | +0.00% | 3B | -52.78 | -₹2.52 | N/A |
| BAJFINANCE.NS | ₹1,023.55 | +0.00% | 6.3T | 35.25 | ₹28.97 | +0.55% |
| BAJFINANCE.BO | ₹1,023.80 | +0.00% | 6.3T | 35.20 | ₹29.00 | +0.55% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.NS | ₹1,061.70 | +0.00% | 2T | 22.37 | ₹48.55 | +0.72% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.BO | ₹1,062.15 | +0.00% | 2T | 22.35 | ₹48.58 | +0.72% |
| CHOLAFIN.BO | ₹1,735.35 | +0.00% | 1.5T | 30.52 | ₹57.48 | +0.11% |
| CHOLAFIN.NS | ₹1,735.10 | +0.00% | 1.5T | 30.55 | ₹57.43 | +0.11% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.NS | ₹3,494.00 | +0.00% | 1.4T | 16.14 | ₹217.08 | +0.74% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.BO | ₹3,497.55 | +0.00% | 1.4T | 16.14 | ₹217.11 | +0.74% |
| PFC.NS | ₹419.40 | +0.00% | 1.4T | 5.54 | ₹76.43 | +4.82% |
Stock Comparison
IITL.BO vs BAJFINANCE.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 6.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while BAJFINANCE.NS trades at ₹1,023.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas BAJFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BAJFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check BAJFINANCE.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs BAJFINANCE.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 6.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while BAJFINANCE.BO trades at ₹1,023.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas BAJFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 35.20. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BAJFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check BAJFINANCE.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs SHRIRAMFIN.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.NS has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while SHRIRAMFIN.NS trades at ₹1,061.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SHRIRAMFIN.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs SHRIRAMFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.BO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while SHRIRAMFIN.BO trades at ₹1,062.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SHRIRAMFIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs CHOLAFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while CHOLAFIN.BO trades at ₹1,735.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas CHOLAFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 30.52. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHOLAFIN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CHOLAFIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs CHOLAFIN.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while CHOLAFIN.NS trades at ₹1,735.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas CHOLAFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHOLAFIN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CHOLAFIN.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs MUTHOOTFIN.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while MUTHOOTFIN.NS trades at ₹3,494.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MUTHOOTFIN.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs MUTHOOTFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while MUTHOOTFIN.BO trades at ₹3,497.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MUTHOOTFIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs PFC.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, PFC.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while PFC.NS trades at ₹419.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas PFC.NS's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PFC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to PFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check PFC.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs PFC.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, PFC.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while PFC.BO trades at ₹419.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas PFC.BO's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PFC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to PFC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check PFC.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs IRFC.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, IRFC.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while IRFC.NS trades at ₹109.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas IRFC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IRFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to IRFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check IRFC.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs IRFC.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, IRFC.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while IRFC.BO trades at ₹109.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas IRFC.BO's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IRFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to IRFC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check IRFC.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs RECLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, RECLTD.NS has a market cap of 932.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while RECLTD.NS trades at ₹354.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas RECLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RECLTD.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to RECLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check RECLTD.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs RECLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, RECLTD.BO has a market cap of 931.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while RECLTD.BO trades at ₹353.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas RECLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RECLTD.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to RECLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check RECLTD.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs LTF.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, LTF.NS has a market cap of 759.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while LTF.NS trades at ₹297.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas LTF.NS's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LTF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to LTF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check LTF.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs SBICARD.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, SBICARD.NS has a market cap of 750.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while SBICARD.NS trades at ₹779.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas SBICARD.NS's P/E ratio is 35.88. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SBICARD.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to SBICARD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SBICARD.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs SBICARD.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, SBICARD.BO has a market cap of 747.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while SBICARD.BO trades at ₹778.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas SBICARD.BO's P/E ratio is 35.69. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SBICARD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to SBICARD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SBICARD.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs SUNDARMFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.BO has a market cap of 611.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while SUNDARMFIN.BO trades at ₹5,467.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas SUNDARMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 29.44. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SUNDARMFIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs SUNDARMFIN.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.NS has a market cap of 605.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while SUNDARMFIN.NS trades at ₹5,467.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas SUNDARMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 29.40. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SUNDARMFIN.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs M&MFIN.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, M&MFIN.NS has a market cap of 525.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while M&MFIN.NS trades at ₹364.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas M&MFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to M&MFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to M&MFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check M&MFIN.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs L&TFH.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, L&TFH.NS has a market cap of 410.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while L&TFH.NS trades at ₹164.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas L&TFH.NS's P/E ratio is 39.65. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to L&TFH.NS's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to L&TFH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check L&TFH.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs MMFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, MMFIN.BO has a market cap of 392.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while MMFIN.BO trades at ₹282.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas MMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to MMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MMFIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs HUDCO.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, HUDCO.NS has a market cap of 381.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while HUDCO.NS trades at ₹190.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas HUDCO.NS's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HUDCO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to HUDCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check HUDCO.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs HUDCO.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, HUDCO.BO has a market cap of 381.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while HUDCO.BO trades at ₹190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas HUDCO.BO's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HUDCO.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to HUDCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check HUDCO.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs POONAWALLA.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.NS has a market cap of 372.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while POONAWALLA.NS trades at ₹468.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas POONAWALLA.NS's P/E ratio is 103.61. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to POONAWALLA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to POONAWALLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check POONAWALLA.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs POONAWALLA.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.BO has a market cap of 372.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while POONAWALLA.BO trades at ₹467.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas POONAWALLA.BO's P/E ratio is 103.54. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to POONAWALLA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to POONAWALLA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check POONAWALLA.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs IREDA.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, IREDA.NS has a market cap of 352.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while IREDA.NS trades at ₹126.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas IREDA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IREDA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to IREDA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check IREDA.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs IREDA.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, IREDA.BO has a market cap of 352.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while IREDA.BO trades at ₹126.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas IREDA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IREDA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to IREDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check IREDA.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs CHOLAHLDNG.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.NS has a market cap of 314.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while CHOLAHLDNG.NS trades at ₹1,662.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.NS's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CHOLAHLDNG.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs CHOLAHLDNG.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.BO has a market cap of 314.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while CHOLAHLDNG.BO trades at ₹1,661.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.BO's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CHOLAHLDNG.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs MANAPPURAM.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.NS has a market cap of 251.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while MANAPPURAM.NS trades at ₹305.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas MANAPPURAM.NS's P/E ratio is 62.97. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MANAPPURAM.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MANAPPURAM.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs MANAPPURAM.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.BO has a market cap of 251B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while MANAPPURAM.BO trades at ₹304.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas MANAPPURAM.BO's P/E ratio is 62.96. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MANAPPURAM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MANAPPURAM.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs IIFL.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, IIFL.BO has a market cap of 216.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while IIFL.BO trades at ₹502.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas IIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IIFL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to IIFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check IIFL.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs IIFL.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, IIFL.NS has a market cap of 216.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while IIFL.NS trades at ₹502.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas IIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IIFL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to IIFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check IIFL.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs CREDITACC.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, CREDITACC.NS has a market cap of 209.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while CREDITACC.NS trades at ₹1,279.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas CREDITACC.NS's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CREDITACC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to CREDITACC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CREDITACC.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs CREDITACC.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, CREDITACC.BO has a market cap of 208.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while CREDITACC.BO trades at ₹1,279.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas CREDITACC.BO's P/E ratio is 43.19. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CREDITACC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to CREDITACC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CREDITACC.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs CGCL.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, CGCL.BO has a market cap of 163.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while CGCL.BO trades at ₹168.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas CGCL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CGCL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to CGCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CGCL.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs CGCL.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, CGCL.NS has a market cap of 163.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while CGCL.NS trades at ₹167.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas CGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CGCL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to CGCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CGCL.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs IFCI.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, IFCI.BO has a market cap of 157.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while IFCI.BO trades at ₹58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas IFCI.BO's P/E ratio is 39.23. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IFCI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to IFCI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check IFCI.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs IFCI.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, IFCI.NS has a market cap of 157.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while IFCI.NS trades at ₹58.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas IFCI.NS's P/E ratio is 39.17. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IFCI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to IFCI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check IFCI.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs SHRIRAMCIT.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, SHRIRAMCIT.NS has a market cap of 148.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while SHRIRAMCIT.NS trades at ₹2,210.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas SHRIRAMCIT.NS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SHRIRAMCIT.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs FIVESTAR.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.NS has a market cap of 125.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while FIVESTAR.NS trades at ₹426.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas FIVESTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FIVESTAR.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to FIVESTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check FIVESTAR.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs FIVESTAR.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.BO has a market cap of 125.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while FIVESTAR.BO trades at ₹426.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas FIVESTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FIVESTAR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to FIVESTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check FIVESTAR.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs SBFC.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, SBFC.NS has a market cap of 105.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while SBFC.NS trades at ₹96.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas SBFC.NS's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SBFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to SBFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SBFC.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs SBFC.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, SBFC.BO has a market cap of 105.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while SBFC.BO trades at ₹96.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas SBFC.BO's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SBFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to SBFC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SBFC.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs UJJIVAN.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.NS has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while UJJIVAN.NS trades at ₹591.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas UJJIVAN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UJJIVAN.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to UJJIVAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check UJJIVAN.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs UJJIVAN.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.BO has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while UJJIVAN.BO trades at ₹590.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas UJJIVAN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UJJIVAN.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to UJJIVAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check UJJIVAN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs MASFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, MASFIN.BO has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while MASFIN.BO trades at ₹337.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas MASFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MASFIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to MASFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MASFIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs MASFIN.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, MASFIN.NS has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while MASFIN.NS trades at ₹338.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas MASFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MASFIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to MASFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MASFIN.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs FEDFINA.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, FEDFINA.NS has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while FEDFINA.NS trades at ₹136.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas FEDFINA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FEDFINA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to FEDFINA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check FEDFINA.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs FEDFINA.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, FEDFINA.BO has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while FEDFINA.BO trades at ₹137.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas FEDFINA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FEDFINA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to FEDFINA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check FEDFINA.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs NORTHARC.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, NORTHARC.NS has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while NORTHARC.NS trades at ₹253.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas NORTHARC.NS's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NORTHARC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to NORTHARC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check NORTHARC.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs EQUITAS.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, EQUITAS.NS has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while EQUITAS.NS trades at ₹118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas EQUITAS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EQUITAS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to EQUITAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check EQUITAS.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs TFCILTD.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, TFCILTD.NS has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while TFCILTD.NS trades at ₹78.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas TFCILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TFCILTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to TFCILTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check TFCILTD.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs TFCILTD.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, TFCILTD.BO has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while TFCILTD.BO trades at ₹78.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas TFCILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TFCILTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to TFCILTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check TFCILTD.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs PAISALO.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, PAISALO.NS has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while PAISALO.NS trades at ₹35.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas PAISALO.NS's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PAISALO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to PAISALO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check PAISALO.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs PAISALO.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, PAISALO.BO has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while PAISALO.BO trades at ₹35.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas PAISALO.BO's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PAISALO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to PAISALO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check PAISALO.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs DHANI.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, DHANI.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while DHANI.BO trades at ₹51.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas DHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 86.78. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DHANI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to DHANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check DHANI.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs INDOSTAR.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.BO has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while INDOSTAR.BO trades at ₹223.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas INDOSTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INDOSTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to INDOSTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check INDOSTAR.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs INDOSTAR.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.NS has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while INDOSTAR.NS trades at ₹224.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas INDOSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INDOSTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to INDOSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check INDOSTAR.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs MUTHOOTMF.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, MUTHOOTMF.NS has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while MUTHOOTMF.NS trades at ₹177.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas MUTHOOTMF.NS's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MUTHOOTMF.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs FUSION.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, FUSION.BO has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while FUSION.BO trades at ₹186.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas FUSION.BO's P/E ratio is -8.41. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FUSION.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to FUSION.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check FUSION.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs FUSION.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, FUSION.NS has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while FUSION.NS trades at ₹186.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas FUSION.NS's P/E ratio is -8.42. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FUSION.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to FUSION.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check FUSION.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs MUFIN.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, MUFIN.NS has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while MUFIN.NS trades at ₹116.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas MUFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 95.34. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MUFIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to MUFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MUFIN.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs MUFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, MUFIN.BO has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while MUFIN.BO trades at ₹116.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas MUFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 95.41. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MUFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to MUFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MUFIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs PFS.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, PFS.BO has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while PFS.BO trades at ₹31.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas PFS.BO's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PFS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to PFS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check PFS.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs PFS.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, PFS.NS has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while PFS.NS trades at ₹31.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas PFS.NS's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PFS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to PFS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check PFS.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs SPANDANA.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, SPANDANA.NS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while SPANDANA.NS trades at ₹249.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas SPANDANA.NS's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SPANDANA.NS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to SPANDANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SPANDANA.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs SPANDANA.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, SPANDANA.BO has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while SPANDANA.BO trades at ₹249.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas SPANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SPANDANA.BO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to SPANDANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SPANDANA.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs SATIN.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, SATIN.BO has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while SATIN.BO trades at ₹155.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas SATIN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SATIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to SATIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SATIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs SATIN.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, SATIN.NS has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while SATIN.NS trades at ₹154.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas SATIN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SATIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to SATIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SATIN.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs ARMANFIN.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.NS has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while ARMANFIN.NS trades at ₹1,617.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas ARMANFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 60.09. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARMANFIN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to ARMANFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check ARMANFIN.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs ARMANFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.BO has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while ARMANFIN.BO trades at ₹1,620.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas ARMANFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 59.83. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARMANFIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to ARMANFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check ARMANFIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs MOBIKWIK.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.BO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while MOBIKWIK.BO trades at ₹205.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas MOBIKWIK.BO's P/E ratio is -12.26. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MOBIKWIK.BO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MOBIKWIK.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs MOBIKWIK.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.NS has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while MOBIKWIK.NS trades at ₹205.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas MOBIKWIK.NS's P/E ratio is -12.25. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MOBIKWIK.NS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MOBIKWIK.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs UGROCAP.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, UGROCAP.NS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while UGROCAP.NS trades at ₹114.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas UGROCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UGROCAP.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to UGROCAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check UGROCAP.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs UGROCAP.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, UGROCAP.BO has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while UGROCAP.BO trades at ₹114.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas UGROCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UGROCAP.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to UGROCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check UGROCAP.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs CIFL.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, CIFL.NS has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while CIFL.NS trades at ₹31.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas CIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 30.42. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to CIFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CIFL.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs CIFL.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, CIFL.BO has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while CIFL.BO trades at ₹31.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas CIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIFL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to CIFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CIFL.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs FINKURVE.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, FINKURVE.BO has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while FINKURVE.BO trades at ₹81.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas FINKURVE.BO's P/E ratio is 49.97. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FINKURVE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to FINKURVE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check FINKURVE.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs FINKURVE.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, FINKURVE.NS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while FINKURVE.NS trades at ₹81.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas FINKURVE.NS's P/E ratio is 49.96. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FINKURVE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to FINKURVE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check FINKURVE.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs VHL.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, VHL.NS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while VHL.NS trades at ₹3,265.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas VHL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VHL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to VHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check VHL.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs VHL.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, VHL.BO has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while VHL.BO trades at ₹3,286.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas VHL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VHL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to VHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check VHL.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs FEDDERSHOL.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, FEDDERSHOL.BO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while FEDDERSHOL.BO trades at ₹45.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas FEDDERSHOL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check FEDDERSHOL.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs HEXATRADEX.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while HEXATRADEX.BO trades at ₹159.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas HEXATRADEX.BO's P/E ratio is -96.36. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HEXATRADEX.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check HEXATRADEX.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs HEXATRADEX.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.NS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while HEXATRADEX.NS trades at ₹157.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas HEXATRADEX.NS's P/E ratio is -96.01. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HEXATRADEX.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check HEXATRADEX.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs MANBA.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, MANBA.NS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while MANBA.NS trades at ₹121.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas MANBA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MANBA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to MANBA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MANBA.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs CSLFINANCE.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while CSLFINANCE.BO trades at ₹265.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas CSLFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CSLFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CSLFINANCE.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs CSLFINANCE.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while CSLFINANCE.NS trades at ₹261.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas CSLFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CSLFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CSLFINANCE.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs IFINSEC.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, IFINSEC.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while IFINSEC.BO trades at ₹187.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas IFINSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IFINSEC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to IFINSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check IFINSEC.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs LAXMIINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, LAXMIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while LAXMIINDIA.NS trades at ₹93.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas LAXMIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check LAXMIINDIA.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs NIYOGIN.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, NIYOGIN.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while NIYOGIN.BO trades at ₹42.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas NIYOGIN.BO's P/E ratio is -337.08. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NIYOGIN.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to NIYOGIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check NIYOGIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs MUTHOOTCAP.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, MUTHOOTCAP.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while MUTHOOTCAP.NS trades at ₹230.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas MUTHOOTCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 31.01. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MUTHOOTCAP.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to MUTHOOTCAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MUTHOOTCAP.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs MUTHOOTCAP.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, MUTHOOTCAP.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while MUTHOOTCAP.BO trades at ₹230.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas MUTHOOTCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 30.96. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MUTHOOTCAP.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to MUTHOOTCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MUTHOOTCAP.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs MANCREDIT.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, MANCREDIT.NS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while MANCREDIT.NS trades at ₹175.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas MANCREDIT.NS's P/E ratio is 28.45. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MANCREDIT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to MANCREDIT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MANCREDIT.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs MANCREDIT.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, MANCREDIT.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while MANCREDIT.BO trades at ₹174.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas MANCREDIT.BO's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MANCREDIT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to MANCREDIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MANCREDIT.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs MKVENTURES.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, MKVENTURES.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while MKVENTURES.BO trades at ₹895.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas MKVENTURES.BO's P/E ratio is 43.73. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MKVENTURES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to MKVENTURES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MKVENTURES.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs PURPLEFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, PURPLEFIN.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while PURPLEFIN.BO trades at ₹63.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas PURPLEFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -31.81. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PURPLEFIN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to PURPLEFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check PURPLEFIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs AFIL.NS Comparison February 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3B. In comparison, AFIL.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹131.35, while AFIL.NS trades at ₹7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -52.78, whereas AFIL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AFIL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to AFIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check AFIL.NS's competition here