IFCI Limited
IFCI Limited (IFCI.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IFCI.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFCI.NS | ₹50.56 | -6.72% | 136.2B | 33.71 | ₹1.50 | N/A |
| BAJFINANCE.NS | ₹812.60 | -2.16% | 5.1T | 28.03 | ₹28.99 | +0.69% |
| BAJFINANCE.BO | ₹811.90 | -2.23% | 5T | 28.00 | ₹29.00 | +0.69% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.BO | ₹878.35 | -6.62% | 1.7T | 18.06 | ₹48.63 | +0.89% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.NS | ₹877.70 | -6.49% | 1.7T | 18.05 | ₹48.62 | +0.89% |
| PFC.NS | ₹398.00 | -3.60% | 1.3T | 5.21 | ₹76.42 | +4.18% |
| PFC.BO | ₹397.95 | -3.64% | 1.3T | 5.21 | ₹76.41 | +4.18% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.NS | ₹3,115.60 | -5.77% | 1.3T | 14.35 | ₹217.19 | +0.83% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.BO | ₹3,114.10 | -6.11% | 1.3T | 14.33 | ₹217.24 | +0.83% |
| CHOLAFIN.BO | ₹1,381.55 | -4.08% | 1.2T | 24.04 | ₹57.47 | +0.14% |
Stock Comparison
IFCI.NS vs BAJFINANCE.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while BAJFINANCE.NS trades at ₹812.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas BAJFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BAJFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check BAJFINANCE.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs BAJFINANCE.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while BAJFINANCE.BO trades at ₹811.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas BAJFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BAJFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check BAJFINANCE.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SHRIRAMFIN.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while SHRIRAMFIN.BO trades at ₹878.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SHRIRAMFIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SHRIRAMFIN.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while SHRIRAMFIN.NS trades at ₹877.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SHRIRAMFIN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs PFC.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, PFC.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while PFC.NS trades at ₹398.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas PFC.NS's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PFC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to PFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check PFC.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs PFC.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, PFC.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while PFC.BO trades at ₹397.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas PFC.BO's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PFC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to PFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check PFC.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MUTHOOTFIN.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while MUTHOOTFIN.NS trades at ₹3,115.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MUTHOOTFIN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MUTHOOTFIN.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while MUTHOOTFIN.BO trades at ₹3,114.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MUTHOOTFIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CHOLAFIN.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while CHOLAFIN.BO trades at ₹1,381.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas CHOLAFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHOLAFIN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CHOLAFIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CHOLAFIN.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while CHOLAFIN.NS trades at ₹1,380.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas CHOLAFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHOLAFIN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CHOLAFIN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs IRFC.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, IRFC.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while IRFC.NS trades at ₹89.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas IRFC.NS's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IRFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to IRFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check IRFC.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs IRFC.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, IRFC.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while IRFC.BO trades at ₹89.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas IRFC.BO's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IRFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to IRFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check IRFC.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs RECLTD.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, RECLTD.NS has a market cap of 833.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while RECLTD.NS trades at ₹316.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas RECLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RECLTD.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to RECLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check RECLTD.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs RECLTD.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, RECLTD.BO has a market cap of 833.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while RECLTD.BO trades at ₹316.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas RECLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RECLTD.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to RECLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check RECLTD.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SBICARD.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, SBICARD.NS has a market cap of 621.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while SBICARD.NS trades at ₹653.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas SBICARD.NS's P/E ratio is 29.74. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SBICARD.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to SBICARD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SBICARD.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SBICARD.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, SBICARD.BO has a market cap of 621.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while SBICARD.BO trades at ₹653.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas SBICARD.BO's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SBICARD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to SBICARD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SBICARD.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs LTF.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, LTF.NS has a market cap of 620.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while LTF.NS trades at ₹247.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas LTF.NS's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LTF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to LTF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check LTF.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SUNDARMFIN.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.BO has a market cap of 501.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while SUNDARMFIN.BO trades at ₹4,514.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas SUNDARMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SUNDARMFIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SUNDARMFIN.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.NS has a market cap of 498.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while SUNDARMFIN.NS trades at ₹4,527.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas SUNDARMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SUNDARMFIN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs L&TFH.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, L&TFH.NS has a market cap of 410.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while L&TFH.NS trades at ₹164.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas L&TFH.NS's P/E ratio is 39.65. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to L&TFH.NS's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to L&TFH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check L&TFH.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs M&MFIN.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, M&MFIN.NS has a market cap of 407.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while M&MFIN.NS trades at ₹293.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas M&MFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to M&MFIN.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to M&MFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check M&MFIN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MMFIN.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, MMFIN.BO has a market cap of 392.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while MMFIN.BO trades at ₹282.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas MMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to MMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MMFIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs HUDCO.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, HUDCO.NS has a market cap of 330.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while HUDCO.NS trades at ₹165.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas HUDCO.NS's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HUDCO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to HUDCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check HUDCO.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs HUDCO.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, HUDCO.BO has a market cap of 330.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while HUDCO.BO trades at ₹165.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas HUDCO.BO's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HUDCO.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to HUDCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check HUDCO.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs IREDA.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, IREDA.NS has a market cap of 310.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while IREDA.NS trades at ₹110.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas IREDA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IREDA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to IREDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check IREDA.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs IREDA.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, IREDA.BO has a market cap of 310.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while IREDA.BO trades at ₹110.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas IREDA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IREDA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to IREDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check IREDA.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs POONAWALLA.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.BO has a market cap of 304.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while POONAWALLA.BO trades at ₹376.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas POONAWALLA.BO's P/E ratio is 84.66. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POONAWALLA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to POONAWALLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check POONAWALLA.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs POONAWALLA.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.NS has a market cap of 304B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while POONAWALLA.NS trades at ₹376.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas POONAWALLA.NS's P/E ratio is 84.54. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POONAWALLA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to POONAWALLA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check POONAWALLA.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CHOLAHLDNG.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.BO has a market cap of 254.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while CHOLAHLDNG.BO trades at ₹1,354.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.BO's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CHOLAHLDNG.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CHOLAHLDNG.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.NS has a market cap of 253.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while CHOLAHLDNG.NS trades at ₹1,350.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.NS's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CHOLAHLDNG.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MANAPPURAM.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.BO has a market cap of 213.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while MANAPPURAM.BO trades at ₹252.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas MANAPPURAM.BO's P/E ratio is 53.82. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MANAPPURAM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MANAPPURAM.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MANAPPURAM.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.NS has a market cap of 213.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while MANAPPURAM.NS trades at ₹252.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas MANAPPURAM.NS's P/E ratio is 53.80. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MANAPPURAM.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MANAPPURAM.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs IIFL.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, IIFL.NS has a market cap of 192.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while IIFL.NS trades at ₹453.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas IIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IIFL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to IIFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check IIFL.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs IIFL.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, IIFL.BO has a market cap of 192.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while IIFL.BO trades at ₹453.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas IIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IIFL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to IIFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check IIFL.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CREDITACC.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, CREDITACC.NS has a market cap of 181.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while CREDITACC.NS trades at ₹1,134.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas CREDITACC.NS's P/E ratio is 37.44. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CREDITACC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to CREDITACC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CREDITACC.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CREDITACC.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, CREDITACC.BO has a market cap of 181.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while CREDITACC.BO trades at ₹1,134.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas CREDITACC.BO's P/E ratio is 37.42. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CREDITACC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to CREDITACC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CREDITACC.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CGCL.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, CGCL.NS has a market cap of 153.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while CGCL.NS trades at ₹159.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas CGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CGCL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to CGCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CGCL.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CGCL.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, CGCL.BO has a market cap of 153.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while CGCL.BO trades at ₹159.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas CGCL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CGCL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to CGCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CGCL.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SHRIRAMCIT.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, SHRIRAMCIT.NS has a market cap of 148.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while SHRIRAMCIT.NS trades at ₹2,210.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas SHRIRAMCIT.NS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SHRIRAMCIT.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs IFCI.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, IFCI.BO has a market cap of 136.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while IFCI.BO trades at ₹50.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas IFCI.BO's P/E ratio is 33.95. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IFCI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to IFCI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check IFCI.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs FIVESTAR.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.BO has a market cap of 102.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while FIVESTAR.BO trades at ₹348.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas FIVESTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FIVESTAR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to FIVESTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check FIVESTAR.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs FIVESTAR.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.NS has a market cap of 102.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while FIVESTAR.NS trades at ₹347.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas FIVESTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FIVESTAR.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to FIVESTAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check FIVESTAR.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SBFC.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, SBFC.BO has a market cap of 93.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while SBFC.BO trades at ₹84.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas SBFC.BO's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SBFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to SBFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SBFC.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SBFC.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, SBFC.NS has a market cap of 93.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while SBFC.NS trades at ₹84.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas SBFC.NS's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SBFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to SBFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SBFC.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs UJJIVAN.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.NS has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while UJJIVAN.NS trades at ₹591.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas UJJIVAN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UJJIVAN.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to UJJIVAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check UJJIVAN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs UJJIVAN.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.BO has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while UJJIVAN.BO trades at ₹590.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas UJJIVAN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UJJIVAN.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to UJJIVAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check UJJIVAN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MASFIN.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, MASFIN.NS has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while MASFIN.NS trades at ₹293.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas MASFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MASFIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MASFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MASFIN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MASFIN.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, MASFIN.BO has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while MASFIN.BO trades at ₹292.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas MASFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MASFIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MASFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MASFIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs FEDFINA.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, FEDFINA.BO has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while FEDFINA.BO trades at ₹124.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas FEDFINA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FEDFINA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to FEDFINA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check FEDFINA.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs FEDFINA.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, FEDFINA.NS has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while FEDFINA.NS trades at ₹124.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas FEDFINA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FEDFINA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to FEDFINA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check FEDFINA.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs EQUITAS.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, EQUITAS.NS has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while EQUITAS.NS trades at ₹118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas EQUITAS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EQUITAS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to EQUITAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check EQUITAS.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs NORTHARC.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, NORTHARC.NS has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while NORTHARC.NS trades at ₹221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas NORTHARC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NORTHARC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to NORTHARC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check NORTHARC.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs DHANI.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, DHANI.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while DHANI.BO trades at ₹51.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas DHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 86.78. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DHANI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to DHANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check DHANI.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs PAISALO.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, PAISALO.NS has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while PAISALO.NS trades at ₹34.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas PAISALO.NS's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PAISALO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to PAISALO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check PAISALO.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs PAISALO.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, PAISALO.BO has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while PAISALO.BO trades at ₹33.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas PAISALO.BO's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PAISALO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to PAISALO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check PAISALO.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs TFCILTD.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, TFCILTD.NS has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while TFCILTD.NS trades at ₹63.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas TFCILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TFCILTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to TFCILTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check TFCILTD.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs TFCILTD.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, TFCILTD.BO has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while TFCILTD.BO trades at ₹63.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas TFCILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TFCILTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to TFCILTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check TFCILTD.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs INDOSTAR.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.BO has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while INDOSTAR.BO trades at ₹184.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas INDOSTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INDOSTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to INDOSTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check INDOSTAR.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs INDOSTAR.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.NS has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while INDOSTAR.NS trades at ₹183.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas INDOSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INDOSTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to INDOSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check INDOSTAR.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MUTHOOTMF.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, MUTHOOTMF.NS has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while MUTHOOTMF.NS trades at ₹148.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas MUTHOOTMF.NS's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MUTHOOTMF.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs FUSION.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, FUSION.BO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while FUSION.BO trades at ₹151.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas FUSION.BO's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FUSION.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to FUSION.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check FUSION.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs FUSION.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, FUSION.NS has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while FUSION.NS trades at ₹151.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas FUSION.NS's P/E ratio is -6.66. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FUSION.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to FUSION.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check FUSION.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs PFS.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, PFS.NS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while PFS.NS trades at ₹26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas PFS.NS's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PFS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to PFS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check PFS.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs PFS.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, PFS.BO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while PFS.BO trades at ₹26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas PFS.BO's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PFS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to PFS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check PFS.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MUFIN.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, MUFIN.NS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while MUFIN.NS trades at ₹98.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas MUFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 80.75. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MUFIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MUFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MUFIN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MUFIN.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, MUFIN.BO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while MUFIN.BO trades at ₹98.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas MUFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 80.74. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MUFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MUFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MUFIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SATIN.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, SATIN.NS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while SATIN.NS trades at ₹142.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas SATIN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SATIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to SATIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SATIN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SATIN.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, SATIN.BO has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while SATIN.BO trades at ₹142.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas SATIN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SATIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to SATIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SATIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs ARMANFIN.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.BO has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while ARMANFIN.BO trades at ₹1,462.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas ARMANFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 54.48. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARMANFIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to ARMANFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check ARMANFIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs ARMANFIN.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.NS has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while ARMANFIN.NS trades at ₹1,459.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas ARMANFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 54.56. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARMANFIN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to ARMANFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check ARMANFIN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SPANDANA.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, SPANDANA.BO has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while SPANDANA.BO trades at ₹197.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas SPANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPANDANA.BO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to SPANDANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SPANDANA.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SPANDANA.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, SPANDANA.NS has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while SPANDANA.NS trades at ₹196.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas SPANDANA.NS's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPANDANA.NS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to SPANDANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SPANDANA.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MOBIKWIK.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.BO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while MOBIKWIK.BO trades at ₹174.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas MOBIKWIK.BO's P/E ratio is -10.54. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MOBIKWIK.BO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MOBIKWIK.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MOBIKWIK.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.NS has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while MOBIKWIK.NS trades at ₹173.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas MOBIKWIK.NS's P/E ratio is -10.51. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MOBIKWIK.NS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MOBIKWIK.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs VHL.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, VHL.NS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while VHL.NS trades at ₹3,105.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas VHL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VHL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to VHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check VHL.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs VHL.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, VHL.BO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while VHL.BO trades at ₹3,020.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas VHL.BO's P/E ratio is 3.95. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VHL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to VHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check VHL.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs UGROCAP.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, UGROCAP.BO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while UGROCAP.BO trades at ₹86.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas UGROCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UGROCAP.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to UGROCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check UGROCAP.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs UGROCAP.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, UGROCAP.NS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while UGROCAP.NS trades at ₹86.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas UGROCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UGROCAP.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to UGROCAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check UGROCAP.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CIFL.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, CIFL.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while CIFL.BO trades at ₹23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas CIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIFL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to CIFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CIFL.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CIFL.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, CIFL.NS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while CIFL.NS trades at ₹23.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas CIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to CIFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CIFL.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs HEXATRADEX.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.NS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while HEXATRADEX.NS trades at ₹158.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas HEXATRADEX.NS's P/E ratio is -96.50. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HEXATRADEX.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check HEXATRADEX.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs HEXATRADEX.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.BO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while HEXATRADEX.BO trades at ₹153.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas HEXATRADEX.BO's P/E ratio is -92.88. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HEXATRADEX.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check HEXATRADEX.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs FINKURVE.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, FINKURVE.NS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while FINKURVE.NS trades at ₹56.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas FINKURVE.NS's P/E ratio is 35.59. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FINKURVE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to FINKURVE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check FINKURVE.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs FINKURVE.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, FINKURVE.BO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while FINKURVE.BO trades at ₹56.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas FINKURVE.BO's P/E ratio is 35.47. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FINKURVE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to FINKURVE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check FINKURVE.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs FEDDERSHOL.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, FEDDERSHOL.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while FEDDERSHOL.BO trades at ₹33.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas FEDDERSHOL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check FEDDERSHOL.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CSLFINANCE.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while CSLFINANCE.BO trades at ₹242.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas CSLFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CSLFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CSLFINANCE.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CSLFINANCE.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while CSLFINANCE.NS trades at ₹242.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas CSLFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CSLFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CSLFINANCE.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MANBA.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, MANBA.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while MANBA.NS trades at ₹108.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas MANBA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MANBA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MANBA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MANBA.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs IFINSEC.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, IFINSEC.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while IFINSEC.BO trades at ₹179.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas IFINSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IFINSEC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to IFINSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check IFINSEC.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs LAXMIINDIA.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, LAXMIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while LAXMIINDIA.NS trades at ₹82.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas LAXMIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check LAXMIINDIA.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MANCREDIT.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, MANCREDIT.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while MANCREDIT.BO trades at ₹169.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas MANCREDIT.BO's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MANCREDIT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to MANCREDIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MANCREDIT.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MANCREDIT.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, MANCREDIT.NS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while MANCREDIT.NS trades at ₹168.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas MANCREDIT.NS's P/E ratio is 28.07. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MANCREDIT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to MANCREDIT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MANCREDIT.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs NIYOGIN.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, NIYOGIN.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while NIYOGIN.BO trades at ₹31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas NIYOGIN.BO's P/E ratio is -264.58. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NIYOGIN.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to NIYOGIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check NIYOGIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs AFIL.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, AFIL.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while AFIL.NS trades at ₹8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas AFIL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AFIL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to AFIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check AFIL.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MKVENTURES.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, MKVENTURES.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while MKVENTURES.BO trades at ₹814.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas MKVENTURES.BO's P/E ratio is 64.71. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MKVENTURES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MKVENTURES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MKVENTURES.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs IITL.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, IITL.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while IITL.NS trades at ₹134.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas IITL.NS's P/E ratio is 54.73. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IITL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to IITL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check IITL.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs IITL.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, IITL.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while IITL.BO trades at ₹134.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas IITL.BO's P/E ratio is -53.27. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IITL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to IITL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check IITL.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MUTHOOTCAP.NS Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, MUTHOOTCAP.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while MUTHOOTCAP.NS trades at ₹180.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas MUTHOOTCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MUTHOOTCAP.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MUTHOOTCAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MUTHOOTCAP.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs PURPLEFIN.BO Comparison March 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 136.2B. In comparison, PURPLEFIN.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹50.56, while PURPLEFIN.BO trades at ₹54.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.71, whereas PURPLEFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -27.51. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PURPLEFIN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to PURPLEFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check PURPLEFIN.BO's competition here