Howmet Aerospace Inc.
Howmet Aerospace Inc. HWM Peers
See (HWM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HWM | $157.04 | -0.24% | 63.39B | 51.32 | $3.06 | +0.23% |
| ETN | $322.14 | +3.96% | 126.05B | 32.51 | $9.91 | +1.22% |
| PH | $668.75 | +3.27% | 85.45B | 25.74 | $25.98 | +1.00% |
| ITW | $250.26 | +3.20% | 73.33B | 22.01 | $11.37 | +2.35% |
| EMR | $119.49 | +6.17% | 67.21B | 33.66 | $3.55 | +1.76% |
| ROP | $575.84 | +0.94% | 61.91B | 41.43 | $13.90 | +0.55% |
| CMI | $330.50 | +7.76% | 45.53B | 16.29 | $20.29 | +2.16% |
| AME | $179.39 | +4.45% | 41.42B | 29.36 | $6.11 | +0.64% |
| OTIS | $98.00 | +1.03% | 38.68B | 25.65 | $3.82 | +1.59% |
| IR | $84.23 | +6.18% | 33.98B | 41.70 | $2.02 | +0.09% |
Stock Comparison
HWM vs ETN Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 126.05B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while ETN trades at $322.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 32.51. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs PH Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 85.45B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while PH trades at $668.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs ITW Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 73.33B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while ITW trades at $250.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs EMR Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 67.21B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while EMR trades at $119.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 33.66. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs ROP Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 61.91B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while ROP trades at $575.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 41.43. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs CMI Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 45.53B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while CMI trades at $330.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs AME Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 41.42B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while AME trades at $179.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs OTIS Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 38.68B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while OTIS trades at $98.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs IR Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 33.98B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while IR trades at $84.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 41.70. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs ROK Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 33.78B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while ROK trades at $299.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 37.80. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs XYL Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 30.97B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while XYL trades at $127.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 34.30. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs HWM-P Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, HWM-P has a market cap of 29.65B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while HWM-P trades at $73.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas HWM-P's P/E ratio is 103.03. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HWM-P's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to HWM-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs DOV Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 25.18B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while DOV trades at $183.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs PNR Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 16.15B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while PNR trades at $98.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs IEX Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 14.45B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while IEX trades at $191.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 30.36. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs GGG Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 14.45B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while GGG trades at $86.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs ITT Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 11.76B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while ITT trades at $149.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs NDSN Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 11.55B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while NDSN trades at $203.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs CR Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 10.08B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while CR trades at $175.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 35.63. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs AOS Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 10.01B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while AOS trades at $70.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs RRX Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 9.63B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while RRX trades at $145.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 41.60. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs DCI Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 8.41B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while DCI trades at $70.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs WTS Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 8.20B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while WTS trades at $245.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs MIDD Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 7.86B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while MIDD trades at $146.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MIDD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs GTLS Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 7.80B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while GTLS trades at $170.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GTLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs GNRC Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 7.52B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while GNRC trades at $127.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs SPXC Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 7.20B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while SPXC trades at $154.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 35.60. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs PSN Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 6.95B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while PSN trades at $65.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs FLS Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 6.65B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while FLS trades at $50.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs JBTM Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 6.12B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while JBTM trades at $117.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is -82.29. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JBTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs GTES Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while GTES trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 26.51. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs CSWI Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 5.53B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while CSWI trades at $329.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 39.48. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs FELE Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while FELE trades at $89.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs AIMC Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.05B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs JBT Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JBT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs MWA Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while MWA trades at $25.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs NPO Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 3.83B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while NPO trades at $182.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 45.44. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs MIR Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while MIR trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is -339.00. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MIR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs KAI Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.78B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while KAI trades at $321.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs CXT Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while CXT trades at $55.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs GTLS-PB Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 2.93B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while GTLS-PB trades at $64.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs ATS Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while ATS trades at $26.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 41.43. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs EPAC Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while EPAC trades at $45.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs B Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, B has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while B trades at $47.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas B's P/E ratio is -60.87. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to B's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs CFX Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs ENOV Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while ENOV trades at $36.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs SXI Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while SXI trades at $157.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 31.10. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs HI Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while HI trades at $22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas HI's P/E ratio is -5.88. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs XMTR Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while XMTR trades at $32.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -32.64. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs TNC Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while TNC trades at $76.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs CIR Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs HLIO Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while HLIO trades at $32.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs GRC Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while GRC trades at $38.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs THR Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while THR trades at $30.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs NNE Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 933.12M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while NNE trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -59.93. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs AMSC Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 899.68M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while AMSC trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 253.33. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs KRNT Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 874.82M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while KRNT trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -55.14. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs PSIX Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 794.01M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while PSIX trades at $34.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs CYD Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 653.57M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while CYD trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs SERV Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 492.40M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while SERV trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -8.06. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs BLDP Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 419.77M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while BLDP trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs GHM Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 393.67M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while GHM trades at $36.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 43.50. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs BGRY Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.69M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs OFLX Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 333.11M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while OFLX trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs LXFR Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 331.88M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while LXFR trades at $12.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs BW-PA Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 298.16M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while BW-PA trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs HCAI Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 287.42M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while HCAI trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is 85.20. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HCAI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs PKOH Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 284.59M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while PKOH trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs RR Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 239.94M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while RR trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -17.42. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs NPWR Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 163.06M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while NPWR trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NPWR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs TAYD Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 115.65M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while TAYD trades at $36.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs SHMD Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 114.55M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while SHMD trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs WFF Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 106.29M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while WFF trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is 213.00. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs HUHU Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 103.75M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while HUHU trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -49.00. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HUHU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs TWIN Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 102.43M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while TWIN trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs HURC Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 100.83M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while HURC trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -5.22. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs PYR Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 67.96M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs BW Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 63.30M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while BW trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs TPIC Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 48.11M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while TPIC trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs LASE Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 43.42M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while LASE trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LASE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs BWEN Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 36.17M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while BWEN trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs LBGJ Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, LBGJ has a market cap of 27.04M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while LBGJ trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas LBGJ's P/E ratio is -20.86. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LBGJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to LBGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs GTEC Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 26.99M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while GTEC trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs CVV Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 19.96M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while CVV trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -10.36. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs INLF Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, INLF has a market cap of 19.07M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while INLF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas INLF's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to INLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs SHMDW Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 9.11M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while SHMDW trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs BURU Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 8.07M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while BURU trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BURU's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs JCSE Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 7.41M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while JCSE trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs CGRN Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.79M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while CGRN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CGRN's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs SHPW Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 1.98M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs XCH Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 1.98M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while XCH trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XCH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is less volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs NMHI Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, NMHI has a market cap of 576325.00. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while NMHI trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas NMHI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NMHI's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to NMHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.
HWM vs NMHIW Comparison
HWM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM stands at 63.39B. In comparison, NMHIW has a market cap of 16323.00. Regarding current trading prices, HWM is priced at $157.04, while NMHIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM currently has a P/E ratio of 51.32, whereas NMHIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWM's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NMHIW's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM is more volatile compared to NMHIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM.