Howmet Aerospace Inc.
Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM-P) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HWM-P) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HWM-P | $69.02 | +0.00% | 27.9B | 96.80 | $0.71 | +0.19% |
| ETN | $392.76 | +0.15% | 153.7B | 39.60 | $9.92 | +1.01% |
| PH | $739.06 | +0.03% | 94.4B | 28.40 | $26.01 | +0.91% |
| EMR | $149.48 | -0.10% | 84.1B | 43.19 | $3.46 | +1.41% |
| ITW | $260.01 | -0.65% | 76.2B | 22.88 | $11.36 | +2.31% |
| HWM | $188.17 | -0.71% | 76B | 61.69 | $3.05 | +0.19% |
| ROP | $559.03 | -0.71% | 60.1B | 39.26 | $14.24 | +0.57% |
| CMI | $370.70 | +0.32% | 51.1B | 18.27 | $20.29 | +1.97% |
| AME | $178.84 | -0.69% | 41.3B | 29.28 | $6.11 | +0.66% |
| ROK | $356.03 | -0.69% | 40.1B | 44.95 | $7.92 | +1.45% |
Stock Comparison
HWM-P vs ETN Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 153.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while ETN trades at $392.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 39.60. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check ETN's competition here
HWM-P vs PH Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 94.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while PH trades at $739.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check PH's competition here
HWM-P vs EMR Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 84.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while EMR trades at $149.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 43.19. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check EMR's competition here
HWM-P vs ITW Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 76.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while ITW trades at $260.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check ITW's competition here
HWM-P vs HWM Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, HWM has a market cap of 76B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while HWM trades at $188.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas HWM's P/E ratio is 61.69. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HWM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to HWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check HWM's competition here
HWM-P vs ROP Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while ROP trades at $559.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 39.26. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check ROP's competition here
HWM-P vs CMI Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while CMI trades at $370.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check CMI's competition here
HWM-P vs AME Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while AME trades at $178.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check AME's competition here
HWM-P vs ROK Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while ROK trades at $356.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 44.95. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check ROK's competition here
HWM-P vs B Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, B has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while B trades at $21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas B's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check B's competition here
HWM-P vs IR Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while IR trades at $87.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 43.48. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check IR's competition here
HWM-P vs OTIS Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while OTIS trades at $87.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check OTIS's competition here
HWM-P vs XYL Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while XYL trades at $132.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 35.66. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check XYL's competition here
HWM-P vs DOV Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while DOV trades at $184.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check DOV's competition here
HWM-P vs PNR Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while PNR trades at $103.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check PNR's competition here
HWM-P vs GGG Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while GGG trades at $84.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 29.96. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check GGG's competition here
HWM-P vs IEX Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while IEX trades at $184.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 29.32. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check IEX's competition here
HWM-P vs ITT Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while ITT trades at $162.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check ITT's competition here
HWM-P vs NDSN Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while NDSN trades at $219.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check NDSN's competition here
HWM-P vs CR Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while CR trades at $189.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 38.66. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check CR's competition here
HWM-P vs RRX Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while RRX trades at $159.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 45.58. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check RRX's competition here
HWM-P vs AOS Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while AOS trades at $71.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check AOS's competition here
HWM-P vs GNRC Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while GNRC trades at $155.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check GNRC's competition here
HWM-P vs SPXC Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while SPXC trades at $180.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 41.57. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check SPXC's competition here
HWM-P vs WTS Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while WTS trades at $252.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 28.93. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check WTS's competition here
HWM-P vs DCI Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while DCI trades at $72.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check DCI's competition here
HWM-P vs PSN Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while PSN trades at $75.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 32.03. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check PSN's competition here
HWM-P vs MIDD Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while MIDD trades at $149.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MIDD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check MIDD's competition here
HWM-P vs GTLS Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while GTLS trades at $171.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 34.21. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GTLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check GTLS's competition here
HWM-P vs JBTM Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while JBTM trades at $138.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is -97.21. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JBTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check JBTM's competition here
HWM-P vs FLS Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while FLS trades at $54.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check FLS's competition here
HWM-P vs GTES Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while GTES trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 30.42. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check GTES's competition here
HWM-P vs MIR Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while MIR trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is -446.00. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MIR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check MIR's competition here
HWM-P vs CSWI Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check CSWI's competition here
HWM-P vs NPO Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while NPO trades at $211.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 52.85. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check NPO's competition here
HWM-P vs FELE Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while FELE trades at $93.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check FELE's competition here
HWM-P vs KAI Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while KAI trades at $344.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 36.50. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check KAI's competition here
HWM-P vs AIMC Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check AIMC's competition here
HWM-P vs JBT Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JBT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check JBT's competition here
HWM-P vs MWA Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while MWA trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check MWA's competition here
HWM-P vs CXT Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while CXT trades at $59.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check CXT's competition here
HWM-P vs ATS Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while ATS trades at $32.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is -152.38. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ATS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check ATS's competition here
HWM-P vs GTLS-PB Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while GTLS-PB trades at $63.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check GTLS-PB's competition here
HWM-P vs CFX Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check CFX's competition here
HWM-P vs EPAC Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while EPAC trades at $38.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check EPAC's competition here
HWM-P vs SHPW Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P and SHPW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHPW's competition here
HWM-P vs PSIX Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while PSIX trades at $89.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check PSIX's competition here
HWM-P vs SXI Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while SXI trades at $165.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 32.83. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check SXI's competition here
HWM-P vs AMSC Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while AMSC trades at $43.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 273.50. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check AMSC's competition here
HWM-P vs XMTR Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while XMTR trades at $32.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -33.17. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check XMTR's competition here
HWM-P vs NNE Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while NNE trades at $37.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -38.65. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check NNE's competition here
HWM-P vs ENOV Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while ENOV trades at $27.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check ENOV's competition here
HWM-P vs TNC Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while TNC trades at $82.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check TNC's competition here
HWM-P vs HI Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while HI trades at $21.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas HI's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check HI's competition here
HWM-P vs HLIO Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while HLIO trades at $38.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 34.38. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check HLIO's competition here
HWM-P vs CIR Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check CIR's competition here
HWM-P vs GRC Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while GRC trades at $41.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check GRC's competition here
HWM-P vs KRNT Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 953M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while KRNT trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -116.81. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check KRNT's competition here
HWM-P vs BW-PA Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 943.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while BW-PA trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check BW-PA's competition here
HWM-P vs THR Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 941.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while THR trades at $28.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check THR's competition here
HWM-P vs CYD Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 867.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while CYD trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check CYD's competition here
HWM-P vs SERV Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while SERV trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -12.20. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check SERV's competition here
HWM-P vs BLDP Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 611.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while BLDP trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check BLDP's competition here
HWM-P vs GHM Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 611.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while GHM trades at $55.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 50.19. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check GHM's competition here
HWM-P vs BGRY Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check BGRY's competition here
HWM-P vs OFLX Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 340.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while OFLX trades at $33.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check OFLX's competition here
HWM-P vs LXFR Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 331.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while LXFR trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check LXFR's competition here
HWM-P vs SIMA Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, SIMA has a market cap of 319.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while SIMA trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas SIMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SIMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P and SIMA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIMA's competition here
HWM-P vs PKOH Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while PKOH trades at $17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check PKOH's competition here
HWM-P vs RR Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 226.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while RR trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -14.07. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check RR's competition here
HWM-P vs NPWR Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 223.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while NPWR trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check NPWR's competition here
HWM-P vs TAYD Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 142.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while TAYD trades at $45.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check TAYD's competition here
HWM-P vs HUHU Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 130.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while HUHU trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -61.60. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check HUHU's competition here
HWM-P vs HURC Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 126M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while HURC trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -6.47. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check HURC's competition here
HWM-P vs TWIN Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 124.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while TWIN trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 30.41. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check TWIN's competition here
HWM-P vs SHMD Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 117.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while SHMD trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check SHMD's competition here
HWM-P vs BW Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while BW trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check BW's competition here
HWM-P vs XCH Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 76.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while XCH trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XCH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check XCH's competition here
HWM-P vs PYR Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check PYR's competition here
HWM-P vs BWEN Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while BWEN trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BWEN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check BWEN's competition here
HWM-P vs TPIC Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 43M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while TPIC trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check TPIC's competition here
HWM-P vs LASE Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while LASE trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LASE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check LASE's competition here
HWM-P vs GTEC Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while GTEC trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check GTEC's competition here
HWM-P vs LBGJ Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, LBGJ has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while LBGJ trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas LBGJ's P/E ratio is -26.33. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LBGJ's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to LBGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check LBGJ's competition here
HWM-P vs CVV Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while CVV trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -414.00. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check CVV's competition here
HWM-P vs WFF Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while WFF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check WFF's competition here
HWM-P vs HCAI Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while HCAI trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check HCAI's competition here
HWM-P vs BURU Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while BURU trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BURU's ROE of +1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check BURU's competition here
HWM-P vs INLF Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, INLF has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while INLF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas INLF's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to INLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check INLF's competition here
HWM-P vs CETY Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, CETY has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while CETY trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas CETY's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CETY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to CETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check CETY's competition here
HWM-P vs SHMDW Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while SHMDW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P and SHMDW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHMDW's competition here
HWM-P vs CGRN Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while CGRN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CGRN's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check CGRN's competition here
HWM-P vs JCSE Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while JCSE trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check JCSE's competition here
HWM-P vs NMHI Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, NMHI has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while NMHI trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas NMHI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NMHI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to NMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check NMHI's competition here
HWM-P vs NMHIW Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, NMHIW has a market cap of 37.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while NMHIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas NMHIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NMHIW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to NMHIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check NMHIW's competition here
HWM-P vs CFXA Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, CFXA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while CFXA trades at $177.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas CFXA's P/E ratio is 248.89. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CFXA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to CFXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check CFXA's competition here
HWM-P vs WBT Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, WBT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while WBT trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas WBT's P/E ratio is 47.08. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WBT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to WBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check WBT's competition here
HWM-P vs RAVN Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, RAVN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while RAVN trades at $58.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas RAVN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RAVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to RAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check RAVN's competition here
HWM-P vs BGRYW Comparison July 2025
HWM-P plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWM-P stands at 27.9B. In comparison, BGRYW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HWM-P is priced at $69.02, while BGRYW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWM-P currently has a P/E ratio of 96.80, whereas BGRYW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HWM-P's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BGRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HWM-P is less volatile compared to BGRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWM-P.Check BGRYW's competition here