Huntsman Corporation
Huntsman Corporation (HUN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HUN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUN | $13.65 | +0.70% | 2.4B | -8.57 | -$1.59 | +5.00% |
| DOW | $37.59 | -2.44% | 27.8B | -9.66 | -$4.00 | +4.53% |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.86% |
| CE | $65.09 | -0.21% | 7.3B | -6.23 | -$10.44 | +0.18% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $59.67 | -1.16% | 4.6B | 64.12 | $0.93 | +1.24% |
| TROX | $10.07 | +6.67% | 1.6B | -3.41 | -$2.97 | +2.76% |
| AACQU | $11.05 | +4.74% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BAK | $3.41 | +3.50% | 1.4B | -0.69 | -$4.95 | N/A |
| LXU | $14.34 | -1.58% | 1B | 42.29 | $0.34 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HUN vs DOW Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while DOW trades at $37.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -9.66. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check DOW's competition here
HUN vs SHLM Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check SHLM's competition here
HUN vs CE Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while CE trades at $65.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas CE's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check CE's competition here
HUN vs UNVR Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check UNVR's competition here
HUN vs MEOH Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while MEOH trades at $59.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 64.12. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MEOH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check MEOH's competition here
HUN vs TROX Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while TROX trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check TROX's competition here
HUN vs AACQU Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while AACQU trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check AACQU's competition here
HUN vs BAK Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while BAK trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BAK's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to BAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check BAK's competition here
HUN vs LXU Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while LXU trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 42.29. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check LXU's competition here
HUN vs WLKP Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 794.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while WLKP trades at $22.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check WLKP's competition here
HUN vs RYAM Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 648.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while RYAM trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check RYAM's competition here
HUN vs ASIX Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 630.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while ASIX trades at $23.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check ASIX's competition here
HUN vs SIRE Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check SIRE's competition here
HUN vs ASPI Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 444.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while ASPI trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check ASPI's competition here
HUN vs VHI Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 407.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while VHI trades at $14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check VHI's competition here
HUN vs CINR Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check CINR's competition here
HUN vs FF Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 181.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while FF trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check FF's competition here
HUN vs FMST Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while FMST trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -18.10. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check FMST's competition here
HUN vs ORGN Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while ORGN trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check ORGN's competition here
HUN vs FMSTW Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while FMSTW trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check FMSTW's competition here
HUN vs ORGNW Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 484.8K. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check ORGNW's competition here
HUN vs OCIP Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, OCIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while OCIP trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas OCIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to OCIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to OCIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check OCIP's competition here
HUN vs MKD Comparison May 2026
HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $13.65, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check MKD's competition here