Huntsman Corporation (HUN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while SHLM trades at $44.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check SHLM's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while DOW trades at $27.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -25.08. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check DOW's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while LYB trades at $52.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 28.48. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check LYB's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while EMN trades at $68.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check EMN's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while UNVR trades at $36.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check UNVR's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while MEOH trades at $43.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MEOH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check MEOH's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while AACQU trades at $11.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check AACQU's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 961.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while TROX trades at $6.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check TROX's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 956.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while BAK trades at $2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BAK's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to BAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check BAK's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 780M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while WLKP trades at $22.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check WLKP's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 775.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while LXU trades at $10.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check LXU's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 541.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while ASIX trades at $20.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check ASIX's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while SIRE trades at $25.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check SIRE's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 475.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while RYAM trades at $7.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check RYAM's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 459.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while ASPI trades at $5.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check ASPI's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while CINR trades at $20.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check CINR's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 401.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while VHI trades at $14.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check VHI's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 199.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while FF trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check FF's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while FMST trades at $1.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check FMST's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while SNES trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SNES's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check SNES's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while FMSTW trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check FMSTW's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while NITO trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check NITO's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 470.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check ORGNW's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while MKD trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check MKD's competition here

HUN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUN stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OCIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HUN is priced at $10.58, while OCIP trades at $11.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.21, whereas OCIP's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, HUN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OCIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUN is more volatile compared to OCIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUN.Check OCIP's competition here