Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while SHLM trades at $44.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check SHLM's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while DOW trades at $32.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -30.19. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to DOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check DOW's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while DD trades at $138.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check DD's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while UNVR trades at $36.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check UNVR's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while MEOH trades at $58.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 49.34. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MEOH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check MEOH's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while OLN trades at $18.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -23.87. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check OLN's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while HUN trades at $10.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -12.69. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to HUN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check HUN's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while AACQU trades at $11.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check AACQU's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while REX trades at $44.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check REX's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while GPRE trades at $16.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GPRE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check GPRE's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 893.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while TROX trades at $5.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to TROX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check TROX's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 792.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while BAK trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BAK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to BAK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check BAK's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 768.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while LXU trades at $10.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to LXU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check LXU's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 762.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while WLKP trades at $21.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check WLKP's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while SIRE trades at $25.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check SIRE's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 497.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while ASPI trades at $3.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check ASPI's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 466.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while VHI trades at $16.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -12.31. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to VHI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check VHI's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while CINR trades at $20.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to CINR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check CINR's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 135.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while ACNT trades at $15.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -62.54. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ACNT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check ACNT's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while FMST trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check FMST's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while GURE trades at $3.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check GURE's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while FMSTW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check FMSTW's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while NITO trades at $3.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check NITO's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 14.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check ORGNW's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while MKD trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check MKD's competition here

Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CE stands at 5.2B. In comparison, OCIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CE is priced at $46.98 on the NYSE, while OCIP trades at $11.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.85, whereas OCIP's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, CE's ROE is -0.29%, compared to OCIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CE is more volatile compared to OCIP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CE.Check OCIP's competition here