Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. (FMST) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FMST) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMST | $1.51 | +9.42% | 18.8M | -2.88 | -$0.52 | N/A |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | 42.74 | $1.03 | +1.86% |
| DOW | $27.71 | +2.55% | 20B | -25.42 | -$1.09 | +5.05% |
| LYB | $53.36 | +1.48% | 17.2B | 28.69 | $1.86 | +7.72% |
| EMN | $68.86 | +2.64% | 7.9B | 15.03 | $4.58 | +4.86% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $45.47 | +2.29% | 3.5B | 38.21 | $1.19 | +1.63% |
| HUN | $10.82 | +2.56% | 1.9B | -13.52 | -$0.80 | +4.74% |
| AACQU | $11.05 | +4.74% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TROX | $6.21 | -3.57% | 990.6M | -3.29 | -$1.89 | +3.22% |
Stock Comparison
FMST vs SHLM Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check SHLM's competition here
FMST vs DOW Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while DOW trades at $27.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -25.42. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check DOW's competition here
FMST vs LYB Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while LYB trades at $53.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 28.69. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check LYB's competition here
FMST vs EMN Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while EMN trades at $68.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check EMN's competition here
FMST vs UNVR Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check UNVR's competition here
FMST vs MEOH Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while MEOH trades at $45.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 38.21. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MEOH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check MEOH's competition here
FMST vs HUN Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while HUN trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -13.52. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check HUN's competition here
FMST vs AACQU Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while AACQU trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check AACQU's competition here
FMST vs TROX Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 990.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while TROX trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check TROX's competition here
FMST vs BAK Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 976.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while BAK trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is 49.00. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BAK's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to BAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check BAK's competition here
FMST vs WLKP Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 788.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while WLKP trades at $22.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check WLKP's competition here
FMST vs LXU Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 765.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while LXU trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check LXU's competition here
FMST vs ASIX Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 547M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while ASIX trades at $20.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check ASIX's competition here
FMST vs SIRE Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check SIRE's competition here
FMST vs RYAM Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 496.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while RYAM trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is less volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check RYAM's competition here
FMST vs ASPI Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 467.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while ASPI trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check ASPI's competition here
FMST vs VHI Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 407.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while VHI trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -6.89. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check VHI's competition here
FMST vs CINR Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check CINR's competition here
FMST vs FF Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 205.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while FF trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check FF's competition here
FMST vs SNES Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while SNES trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SNES's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check SNES's competition here
FMST vs FMSTW Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while FMSTW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check FMSTW's competition here
FMST vs NITO Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while NITO trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check NITO's competition here
FMST vs ORGNW Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 470.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check ORGNW's competition here
FMST vs OCIP Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, OCIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while OCIP trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas OCIP's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to OCIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to OCIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check OCIP's competition here
FMST vs MKD Comparison July 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 18.8M. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.51, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -2.88, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check MKD's competition here