Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. (FMST) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FMST) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMST | $1.56 | +2.63% | 19.4M | -15.60 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.86% |
| DOW | $32.50 | -1.40% | 23.4B | -8.13 | -$4.00 | +4.27% |
| LYB | $61.81 | -1.25% | 19.9B | -29.15 | -$2.12 | +6.62% |
| EMN | $72.12 | -1.58% | 8.2B | 20.83 | $3.46 | +4.57% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| CE | $51.23 | -1.35% | 5.6B | -5.20 | -$9.86 | +0.23% |
| MEOH | $55.17 | -1.22% | 4.3B | -75.58 | -$0.73 | +1.33% |
| HUN | $12.73 | -3.41% | 2.2B | -6.77 | -$1.88 | +3.91% |
| AACQU | $11.05 | +4.74% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FMST vs SHLM Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check SHLM's competition here
FMST vs DOW Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while DOW trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -8.13. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check DOW's competition here
FMST vs LYB Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while LYB trades at $61.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is -29.15. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check LYB's competition here
FMST vs EMN Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while EMN trades at $72.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check EMN's competition here
FMST vs UNVR Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check UNVR's competition here
FMST vs CE Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while CE trades at $51.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas CE's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check CE's competition here
FMST vs MEOH Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while MEOH trades at $55.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is -75.58. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MEOH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check MEOH's competition here
FMST vs HUN Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while HUN trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is less volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check HUN's competition here
FMST vs AACQU Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while AACQU trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check AACQU's competition here
FMST vs BAK Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while BAK trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BAK's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is less volatile compared to BAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check BAK's competition here
FMST vs TROX Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while TROX trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check TROX's competition here
FMST vs LXU Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 842M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while LXU trades at $11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check LXU's competition here
FMST vs WLKP Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 797.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while WLKP trades at $22.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check WLKP's competition here
FMST vs RYAM Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 611.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while RYAM trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check RYAM's competition here
FMST vs ASIX Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 561.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while ASIX trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 57.83. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check ASIX's competition here
FMST vs ASPI Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 555.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while ASPI trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check ASPI's competition here
FMST vs SIRE Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check SIRE's competition here
FMST vs CINR Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check CINR's competition here
FMST vs VHI Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 400.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while VHI trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check VHI's competition here
FMST vs FF Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 185.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while FF trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check FF's competition here
FMST vs FMSTW Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while FMSTW trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check FMSTW's competition here
FMST vs ORGN Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while ORGN trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check ORGN's competition here
FMST vs ORGNW Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 29.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check ORGNW's competition here
FMST vs OCIP Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, OCIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while OCIP trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas OCIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OCIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to OCIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check OCIP's competition here
FMST vs MKD Comparison June 2026
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 19.4M. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $1.56, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.60, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check MKD's competition here