OCI Partners LP
OCI Partners LP (OCIP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (OCIP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCIP | $11.45 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | +7.42% |
| DOW | $37.98 | -0.31% | 27.3B | -9.49 | -$4.00 | +4.60% |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.86% |
| CE | $64.65 | -0.68% | 7.2B | -6.19 | -$10.44 | +0.18% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $60.40 | -0.59% | 4.7B | 64.95 | $0.93 | +1.22% |
| HUN | $13.66 | -0.44% | 2.4B | -8.60 | -$1.59 | +4.92% |
| AACQU | $11.05 | +4.74% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TROX | $9.79 | -3.40% | 1.6B | -3.30 | -$2.97 | +2.71% |
| BAK | $3.44 | +1.78% | 1.4B | -0.69 | -$4.97 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
OCIP vs DOW Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while DOW trades at $37.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -9.49. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check DOW's competition here
OCIP vs SHLM Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check SHLM's competition here
OCIP vs CE Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while CE trades at $64.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CE's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check CE's competition here
OCIP vs UNVR Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check UNVR's competition here
OCIP vs MEOH Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while MEOH trades at $60.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 64.95. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MEOH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check MEOH's competition here
OCIP vs HUN Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while HUN trades at $13.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -8.60. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check HUN's competition here
OCIP vs AACQU Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while AACQU trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check AACQU's competition here
OCIP vs TROX Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while TROX trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check TROX's competition here
OCIP vs BAK Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while BAK trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BAK's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to BAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check BAK's competition here
OCIP vs LXU Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while LXU trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 43.68. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check LXU's competition here
OCIP vs WLKP Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 800.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while WLKP trades at $22.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check WLKP's competition here
OCIP vs RYAM Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 667.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while RYAM trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check RYAM's competition here
OCIP vs ASIX Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 636.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while ASIX trades at $23.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check ASIX's competition here
OCIP vs SIRE Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check SIRE's competition here
OCIP vs ASPI Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 435.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while ASPI trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check ASPI's competition here
OCIP vs VHI Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 420.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while VHI trades at $14.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check VHI's competition here
OCIP vs CINR Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check CINR's competition here
OCIP vs FF Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while FF trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check FF's competition here
OCIP vs FMST Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while FMST trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -17.30. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check FMST's competition here
OCIP vs ORGN Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while ORGN trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check ORGN's competition here
OCIP vs FMSTW Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while FMSTW trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check FMSTW's competition here
OCIP vs ORGNW Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 235.1K. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check ORGNW's competition here
OCIP vs MKD Comparison May 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check MKD's competition here