OCI Partners LP (OCIP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (OCIP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCIP | $11.45 | +0.00% | 0 | 24.37 | $0.47 | +7.42% |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | 42.74 | $1.03 | +1.86% |
| DOW | $29.03 | +1.36% | 20.9B | -26.62 | -$1.09 | +4.78% |
| LYB | $55.72 | +2.05% | 18B | 29.95 | $1.86 | +7.38% |
| EMN | $66.90 | -3.91% | 7.7B | 14.61 | $4.58 | +4.95% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $48.87 | +6.35% | 3.8B | 41.07 | $1.19 | +1.52% |
| HUN | $11.30 | +3.01% | 2B | -14.11 | -$0.80 | +4.51% |
| AACQU | $11.05 | +4.74% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BAK | $2.46 | +2.50% | 976.3M | 49.00 | $0.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
OCIP vs SHLM Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check SHLM's competition here
OCIP vs DOW Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while DOW trades at $29.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -26.62. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check DOW's competition here
OCIP vs LYB Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while LYB trades at $55.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 29.95. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check LYB's competition here
OCIP vs EMN Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while EMN trades at $66.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check EMN's competition here
OCIP vs UNVR Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check UNVR's competition here
OCIP vs MEOH Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while MEOH trades at $48.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 41.07. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MEOH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check MEOH's competition here
OCIP vs HUN Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while HUN trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -14.11. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check HUN's competition here
OCIP vs AACQU Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while AACQU trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check AACQU's competition here
OCIP vs BAK Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 976.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while BAK trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is 49.00. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BAK's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to BAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check BAK's competition here
OCIP vs TROX Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 960.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while TROX trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check TROX's competition here
OCIP vs LXU Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 805M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while LXU trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check LXU's competition here
OCIP vs WLKP Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 787.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while WLKP trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check WLKP's competition here
OCIP vs ASIX Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 551.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while ASIX trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check ASIX's competition here
OCIP vs SIRE Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check SIRE's competition here
OCIP vs RYAM Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 487.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while RYAM trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check RYAM's competition here
OCIP vs ASPI Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 410.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while ASPI trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check ASPI's competition here
OCIP vs CINR Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check CINR's competition here
OCIP vs VHI Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 388.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while VHI trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check VHI's competition here
OCIP vs FF Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 205.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while FF trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check FF's competition here
OCIP vs FMST Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while FMST trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check FMST's competition here
OCIP vs SNES Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while SNES trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNES's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check SNES's competition here
OCIP vs FMSTW Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while FMSTW trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check FMSTW's competition here
OCIP vs NITO Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while NITO trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check NITO's competition here
OCIP vs ORGNW Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 14.7K. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check ORGNW's competition here
OCIP vs MKD Comparison July 2026
OCIP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCIP stands at 0. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OCIP is priced at $11.45, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCIP currently has a P/E ratio of 24.37, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, OCIP's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, OCIP is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCIP.Check MKD's competition here