Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while SHLM trades at $44.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check SHLM's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while DOW trades at $27.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -25.67. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to DOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check DOW's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while DD trades at $129.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check DD's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while SSL trades at $13.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check SSL's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while UNVR trades at $36.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check UNVR's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while CE trades at $44.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas CE's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to CE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check CE's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while MEOH trades at $58.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 49.10. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MEOH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check MEOH's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while OLN trades at $15.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -20.38. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check OLN's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while AACQU trades at $11.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check AACQU's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while HUN trades at $8.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to HUN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check HUN's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while REX trades at $43.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check REX's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while GPRE trades at $15.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GPRE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check GPRE's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 748.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while WLKP trades at $21.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check WLKP's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 710.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while LXU trades at $9.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to LXU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check LXU's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 626.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while TROX trades at $3.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to TROX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check TROX's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while SIRE trades at $25.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check SIRE's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 419.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while VHI trades at $14.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -8.28. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to VHI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check VHI's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while CINR trades at $20.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to CINR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check CINR's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, NPT has a market cap of 54.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while NPT trades at $2.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas NPT's P/E ratio is -18.83. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NPT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to NPT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check NPT's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while GURE trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check GURE's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while NITO trades at $3.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check NITO's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 14.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ORGNW's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while MKD trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check MKD's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 619.6M. In comparison, OCIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $1.55 on the NYSE, while OCIP trades at $11.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.90, whereas OCIP's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OCIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to OCIP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check OCIP's competition here