Braskem S.A. (BAK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BAK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAK | $3.67 | -4.18% | 1.5B | -0.83 | -$4.42 | N/A |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.86% |
| DOW | $33.85 | +0.65% | 24.4B | -8.46 | -$4.00 | +4.16% |
| LYB | $64.58 | +1.75% | 20.8B | -30.45 | -$2.12 | +6.40% |
| EMN | $75.22 | +2.59% | 8.6B | 21.74 | $3.46 | +4.42% |
| CE | $53.48 | +3.50% | 5.9B | -5.42 | -$9.86 | +0.22% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $59.39 | +0.75% | 4.6B | -81.36 | -$0.73 | +1.25% |
| HUN | $15.74 | +4.38% | 2.8B | -8.38 | -$1.88 | +4.30% |
| AACQU | $11.05 | +4.74% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BAK vs SHLM Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check SHLM's competition here
BAK vs DOW Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while DOW trades at $33.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check DOW's competition here
BAK vs LYB Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while LYB trades at $64.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is -30.45. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check LYB's competition here
BAK vs EMN Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while EMN trades at $75.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check EMN's competition here
BAK vs CE Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while CE trades at $53.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas CE's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check CE's competition here
BAK vs UNVR Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check UNVR's competition here
BAK vs MEOH Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while MEOH trades at $59.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is -81.36. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to MEOH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check MEOH's competition here
BAK vs HUN Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while HUN trades at $15.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -8.38. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check HUN's competition here
BAK vs AACQU Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while AACQU trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check AACQU's competition here
BAK vs TROX Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while TROX trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check TROX's competition here
BAK vs LXU Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 878.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while LXU trades at $12.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check LXU's competition here
BAK vs WLKP Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 819.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while WLKP trades at $23.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check WLKP's competition here
BAK vs ASIX Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 615.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while ASIX trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 63.40. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ASIX's competition here
BAK vs RYAM Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 577.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while RYAM trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check RYAM's competition here
BAK vs ASPI Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 544.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while ASPI trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ASPI's competition here
BAK vs SIRE Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check SIRE's competition here
BAK vs VHI Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 423.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while VHI trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -5.89. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check VHI's competition here
BAK vs CINR Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check CINR's competition here
BAK vs FF Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 201.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while FF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check FF's competition here
BAK vs FMST Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while FMST trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check FMST's competition here
BAK vs FMSTW Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while FMSTW trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check FMSTW's competition here
BAK vs ORGN Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while ORGN trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ORGN's competition here
BAK vs ORGNW Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 29.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ORGNW's competition here
BAK vs OCIP Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OCIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while OCIP trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas OCIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to OCIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to OCIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check OCIP's competition here
BAK vs MKD Comparison June 2026
BAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $3.67, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check MKD's competition here