
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See BAK's competitors and their performance on the NYSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for BAK and its NYSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAK | $2.08 | -1.42% | 830.8M | 29.37 | $0.07 | N/A |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | 42.74 | $1.03 | +1.86% |
| DOW | $29.03 | -2.06% | 21B | -26.62 | -$1.09 | +4.82% |
| DD | $126.99 | -0.26% | 17.1B | 24.99 | $5.08 | +1.89% |
| SSL | $14.59 | -0.44% | 9.3B | 19.03 | $0.77 | N/A |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| CE | $46.09 | +0.81% | 5.1B | 8.68 | $5.31 | +0.26% |
| MEOH | $62.90 | +0.29% | 4.9B | 52.86 | $1.19 | +1.19% |
| OLN | $17.20 | -0.66% | 2B | -22.04 | -$0.78 | +4.66% |
| HUN | $9.54 | +0.05% | 1.7B | -11.92 | -$0.80 | +5.39% |
Stock Comparison
A. Schulman, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHLM)
BAK vs SHLM Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check SHLM's competition here
Dow Inc. (NYSE: DOW)
BAK vs DOW Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while DOW trades at $29.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -26.62. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to DOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check DOW's competition here
DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (NYSE: DD)
BAK vs DD Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while DD trades at $126.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check DD's competition here
Sasol Limited (NYSE: SSL)
BAK vs SSL Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while SSL trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check SSL's competition here
Univar Solutions Inc. (NYSE: UNVR)
BAK vs UNVR Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check UNVR's competition here
Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE)
BAK vs CE Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while CE trades at $46.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas CE's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to CE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check CE's competition here
Methanex Corporation (NASDAQ: MEOH)
BAK vs MEOH Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while MEOH trades at $62.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 52.86. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MEOH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check MEOH's competition here
Olin Corporation (NYSE: OLN)
BAK vs OLN Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while OLN trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -22.04. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check OLN's competition here
Huntsman Corporation (NYSE: HUN)
BAK vs HUN Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while HUN trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -11.92. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to HUN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check HUN's competition here
Artius Acquisition Inc. (NASDAQ: AACQU)
BAK vs AACQU Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while AACQU trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check AACQU's competition here
REX American Resources Corporation (NYSE: REX)
BAK vs REX Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while REX trades at $41.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check REX's competition here
Green Plains Inc. (NASDAQ: GPRE)
BAK vs GPRE Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while GPRE trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GPRE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check GPRE's competition here
LSB Industries, Inc. (NYSE: LXU)
BAK vs LXU Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 832.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while LXU trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to LXU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check LXU's competition here
Westlake Chemical Partners LP (NYSE: WLKP)
BAK vs WLKP Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 757.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while WLKP trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check WLKP's competition here
Tronox Holdings plc (NYSE: TROX)
BAK vs TROX Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 706.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while TROX trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check TROX's competition here
Valhi, Inc. (NYSE: VHI)
BAK vs VHI Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 513.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while VHI trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -10.14. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to VHI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check VHI's competition here
Sisecam Resources LP (NYSE: SIRE)
BAK vs SIRE Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check SIRE's competition here
Sisecam Resources LP (NYSE: CINR)
BAK vs CINR Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to CINR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check CINR's competition here
Texxon Holding Limited Ordinary shares (NASDAQ: NPT)
BAK vs NPT Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, NPT has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while NPT trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas NPT's P/E ratio is -71.50. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NPT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to NPT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check NPT's competition here
Gulf Resources, Inc. (NASDAQ: GURE)
BAK vs GURE Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while GURE trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check GURE's competition here
Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO)
BAK vs NITO Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while NITO trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check NITO's competition here
Origin Materials, Inc. (NASDAQ: ORGNW)
BAK vs ORGNW Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 14.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ORGNW's competition here
OCI Partners LP (NYSE: OCIP)
BAK vs OCIP Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, OCIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while OCIP trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas OCIP's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OCIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to OCIP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check OCIP's competition here
Molecular Data Inc. (NASDAQ: MKD)
BAK vs MKD Comparison September 2026
Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 830.8M. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.08 on the NYSE, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.37, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check MKD's competition here