Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while SHLM trades at $44.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check SHLM's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while DOW trades at $30.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -27.97. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to DOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check DOW's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while UNVR trades at $36.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check UNVR's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while MEOH trades at $54.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 44.71. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to MEOH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check MEOH's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while HUN trades at $11.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -14.94. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to HUN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check HUN's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while AACQU trades at $11.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check AACQU's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 966.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while TROX trades at $6.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to TROX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check TROX's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 822.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while LXU trades at $11.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to LXU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check LXU's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 771.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while WLKP trades at $21.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check WLKP's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 561.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while RYAM trades at $8.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check RYAM's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 542.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while ASIX trades at $20.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ASIX's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while SIRE trades at $25.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check SIRE's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while CINR trades at $20.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to CINR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check CINR's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 388.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while VHI trades at $13.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to VHI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check VHI's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while ASPI trades at $3.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ASPI's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while FMST trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to FMST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check FMST's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while SNES trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to SNES's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to SNES. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check SNES's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while FMSTW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check FMSTW's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while NITO trades at $3.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check NITO's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 14.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check ORGNW's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while MKD trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check MKD's competition here

Braskem S.A. (NYSE: BAK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BAK stands at 902.6M. In comparison, OCIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAK is priced at $2.26 on the NYSE, while OCIP trades at $11.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BAK currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas OCIP's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, BAK's ROE is +0.94%, compared to OCIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAK is more volatile compared to OCIP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAK.Check OCIP's competition here