Sisecam Resources LP (CINR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CINR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CINR | $20.31 | -0.15% | 402.1M | 21.93 | $0.93 | +4.87% |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.86% |
| DOW | $32.84 | -2.98% | 24B | -8.31 | -$4.00 | +4.22% |
| LYB | $62.26 | -3.59% | 20.4B | -29.85 | -$2.12 | +6.47% |
| EMN | $73.26 | -2.61% | 8.6B | 21.76 | $3.46 | +4.41% |
| CE | $51.45 | -3.81% | 5.9B | -5.45 | -$9.86 | +0.22% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $55.83 | -5.99% | 4.4B | -77.05 | -$0.73 | +1.31% |
| HUN | $13.16 | -16.42% | 2.8B | -8.45 | -$1.88 | +3.19% |
| AACQU | $11.05 | +4.74% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CINR vs SHLM Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check SHLM's competition here
CINR vs DOW Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while DOW trades at $32.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check DOW's competition here
CINR vs LYB Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while LYB trades at $62.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is -29.85. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check LYB's competition here
CINR vs EMN Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while EMN trades at $73.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check EMN's competition here
CINR vs CE Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while CE trades at $51.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas CE's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check CE's competition here
CINR vs UNVR Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check UNVR's competition here
CINR vs MEOH Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while MEOH trades at $55.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is -77.05. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MEOH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check MEOH's competition here
CINR vs HUN Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while HUN trades at $13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -8.45. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check HUN's competition here
CINR vs AACQU Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while AACQU trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check AACQU's competition here
CINR vs BAK Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while BAK trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BAK's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to BAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check BAK's competition here
CINR vs TROX Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while TROX trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check TROX's competition here
CINR vs LXU Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 857.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while LXU trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check LXU's competition here
CINR vs WLKP Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 819.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while WLKP trades at $23.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check WLKP's competition here
CINR vs RYAM Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 612M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while RYAM trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check RYAM's competition here
CINR vs ASIX Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 603.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while ASIX trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 62.14. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check ASIX's competition here
CINR vs ASPI Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 551.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while ASPI trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check ASPI's competition here
CINR vs SIRE Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check SIRE's competition here
CINR vs VHI Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 412.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while VHI trades at $14.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check VHI's competition here
CINR vs FF Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 191.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while FF trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check FF's competition here
CINR vs FMST Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while FMST trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -16.40. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check FMST's competition here
CINR vs FMSTW Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while FMSTW trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check FMSTW's competition here
CINR vs ORGN Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while ORGN trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check ORGN's competition here
CINR vs ORGNW Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 73.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check ORGNW's competition here
CINR vs OCIP Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, OCIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while OCIP trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas OCIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OCIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to OCIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check OCIP's competition here
CINR vs MKD Comparison June 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check MKD's competition here