Sisecam Resources LP (CINR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CINR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CINR | $20.31 | -0.15% | 402.1M | 21.93 | $0.93 | +3.20% |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | 42.74 | $1.03 | +1.86% |
| DOW | $27.33 | -1.37% | 19.7B | -25.08 | -$1.09 | +5.15% |
| LYB | $52.97 | -0.73% | 17.1B | 28.48 | $1.86 | +7.84% |
| EMN | $68.90 | +0.06% | 7.9B | 15.05 | $4.58 | +4.87% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $43.82 | -3.63% | 3.4B | 36.82 | $1.19 | +1.69% |
| HUN | $10.58 | -2.22% | 1.9B | -13.21 | -$0.80 | +4.87% |
| AACQU | $11.05 | +4.74% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TROX | $6.03 | -2.90% | 961.9M | -3.19 | -$1.89 | +3.37% |
Stock Comparison
CINR vs SHLM Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check SHLM's competition here
CINR vs DOW Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while DOW trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -25.08. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check DOW's competition here
CINR vs LYB Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while LYB trades at $52.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 28.48. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check LYB's competition here
CINR vs EMN Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while EMN trades at $68.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check EMN's competition here
CINR vs UNVR Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check UNVR's competition here
CINR vs MEOH Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while MEOH trades at $43.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MEOH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check MEOH's competition here
CINR vs HUN Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while HUN trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check HUN's competition here
CINR vs AACQU Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while AACQU trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check AACQU's competition here
CINR vs TROX Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 961.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while TROX trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check TROX's competition here
CINR vs BAK Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 956.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while BAK trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BAK's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to BAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check BAK's competition here
CINR vs WLKP Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 780M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while WLKP trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check WLKP's competition here
CINR vs LXU Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 775.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while LXU trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check LXU's competition here
CINR vs ASIX Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 541.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while ASIX trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check ASIX's competition here
CINR vs SIRE Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check SIRE's competition here
CINR vs RYAM Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 475.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while RYAM trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check RYAM's competition here
CINR vs ASPI Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 459.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while ASPI trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check ASPI's competition here
CINR vs VHI Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 401.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while VHI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check VHI's competition here
CINR vs FF Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 199.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while FF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check FF's competition here
CINR vs FMST Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while FMST trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check FMST's competition here
CINR vs SNES Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while SNES trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SNES's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check SNES's competition here
CINR vs FMSTW Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while FMSTW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check FMSTW's competition here
CINR vs NITO Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while NITO trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check NITO's competition here
CINR vs ORGNW Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 470.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check ORGNW's competition here
CINR vs MKD Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check MKD's competition here
CINR vs OCIP Comparison July 2026
CINR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINR stands at 402.1M. In comparison, OCIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CINR is priced at $20.31, while OCIP trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINR currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas OCIP's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, CINR's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OCIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CINR is more volatile compared to OCIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINR.Check OCIP's competition here