Chart Industries, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for GTLS-PB
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for GTLS-PB
Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS-PB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GTLS-PB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTLS-PB | $72.29 | +0.33% | 3.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ETN | $361.10 | -1.22% | 140.1B | 34.52 | $10.46 | +1.17% |
| PH | $908.06 | -1.38% | 114.6B | 33.09 | $27.44 | +0.79% |
| HWM | $232.68 | -2.66% | 93.7B | 62.89 | $3.70 | +0.20% |
| CMI | $549.68 | -0.07% | 75.9B | 26.79 | $20.52 | +1.42% |
| ITW | $258.21 | -0.89% | 74.4B | 24.59 | $10.50 | +2.45% |
| EMR | $131.70 | -0.51% | 74.1B | 32.28 | $4.08 | +1.64% |
| AME | $218.29 | -0.16% | 50B | 34.05 | $6.41 | +0.58% |
| ROK | $365.02 | -1.06% | 41B | 41.76 | $8.74 | +1.47% |
| HWM-P | $100.35 | -0.05% | 40.3B | 140.74 | $0.71 | +0.20% |
Stock Comparison
GTLS-PB vs ETN Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 140.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while ETN trades at $361.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 34.52. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check ETN's competition here
GTLS-PB vs PH Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 114.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while PH trades at $908.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 33.09. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check PH's competition here
GTLS-PB vs HWM Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HWM has a market cap of 93.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while HWM trades at $232.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWM's P/E ratio is 62.89. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HWM's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to HWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check HWM's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CMI Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 75.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while CMI trades at $549.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CMI's competition here
GTLS-PB vs ITW Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while ITW trades at $258.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ITW's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check ITW's competition here
GTLS-PB vs EMR Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while EMR trades at $131.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 32.28. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check EMR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs AME Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while AME trades at $218.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check AME's competition here
GTLS-PB vs ROK Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while ROK trades at $365.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 41.76. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check ROK's competition here
GTLS-PB vs HWM-P Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HWM-P has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while HWM-P trades at $100.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWM-P's P/E ratio is 140.74. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HWM-P's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to HWM-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check HWM-P's competition here
GTLS-PB vs ROP Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while ROP trades at $357.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check ROP's competition here
GTLS-PB vs SYM Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while SYM trades at $53.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is -485.18. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SYM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check SYM's competition here
GTLS-PB vs IR Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while IR trades at $77.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 53.73. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check IR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs OTIS Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while OTIS trades at $77.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check OTIS's competition here
GTLS-PB vs XYL Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while XYL trades at $121.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check XYL's competition here
GTLS-PB vs DOV Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while DOV trades at $205.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check DOV's competition here
GTLS-PB vs ITT Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while ITT trades at $193.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check ITT's competition here
GTLS-PB vs NDSN Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while NDSN trades at $263.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check NDSN's competition here
GTLS-PB vs IEX Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while IEX trades at $190.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check IEX's competition here
GTLS-PB vs GGG Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while GGG trades at $84.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check GGG's competition here
GTLS-PB vs PNR Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while PNR trades at $85.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check PNR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs RRX Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while RRX trades at $183.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 43.91. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check RRX's competition here
GTLS-PB vs GNRC Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while GNRC trades at $194.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 72.15. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check GNRC's competition here
GTLS-PB vs GTLS Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while GTLS trades at $207.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 627.55. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GTLS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check GTLS's competition here
GTLS-PB vs DCI Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while DCI trades at $85.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check DCI's competition here
GTLS-PB vs SPXC Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while SPXC trades at $197.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 38.99. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check SPXC's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CR Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while CR trades at $168.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 29.73. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs WTS Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while WTS trades at $288.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check WTS's competition here
GTLS-PB vs FLS Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while FLS trades at $75.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check FLS's competition here
GTLS-PB vs AOS Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while AOS trades at $64.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check AOS's competition here
GTLS-PB vs MIDD Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while MIDD trades at $132.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check MIDD's competition here
GTLS-PB vs JBTM Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while JBTM trades at $125.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is -130.36. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JBTM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check JBTM's competition here
GTLS-PB vs AEBIV Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check AEBIV's competition here
GTLS-PB vs PSN Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while PSN trades at $56.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check PSN's competition here
GTLS-PB vs GTES Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while GTES trades at $22.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check GTES's competition here
GTLS-PB vs NPO Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while NPO trades at $252.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 132.05. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check NPO's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CSWI Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CSWI's competition here
GTLS-PB vs MIR Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while MIR trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 172.73. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check MIR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CSW Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CSW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while CSW trades at $263.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSW's P/E ratio is 34.86. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CSW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to CSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CSW's competition here
GTLS-PB vs MWA Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while MWA trades at $27.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check MWA's competition here
GTLS-PB vs FELE Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while FELE trades at $93.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 28.94. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check FELE's competition here
GTLS-PB vs AIMC Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check AIMC's competition here
GTLS-PB vs JBT Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JBT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check JBT's competition here
GTLS-PB vs KAI Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while KAI trades at $286.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 33.09. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check KAI's competition here
GTLS-PB vs SXI Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while SXI trades at $257.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 57.65. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check SXI's competition here
GTLS-PB vs ATS Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while ATS trades at $28.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 203.29. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check ATS's competition here
GTLS-PB vs MIR-WT Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check MIR-WT's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CXT Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while CXT trades at $40.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CXT's competition here
GTLS-PB vs HI Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while HI trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check HI's competition here
GTLS-PB vs HLIO Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while HLIO trades at $67.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 46.39. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check HLIO's competition here
GTLS-PB vs XMTR Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while XMTR trades at $42.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -34.71. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check XMTR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CFX Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CFX's competition here
GTLS-PB vs BW-PA Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while BW-PA trades at $19.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 69.37. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check BW-PA's competition here
GTLS-PB vs SHPW Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check SHPW's competition here
GTLS-PB vs EPAC Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while EPAC trades at $35.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check EPAC's competition here
GTLS-PB vs THR Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while THR trades at $52.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 29.42. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check THR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs BW Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while BW trades at $15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -34.93. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check BW's competition here
GTLS-PB vs GRC Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while GRC trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check GRC's competition here
GTLS-PB vs PSIX Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while PSIX trades at $67.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check PSIX's competition here
GTLS-PB vs AMSC Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while AMSC trades at $32.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check AMSC's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CYD Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while CYD trades at $39.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CYD's competition here
GTLS-PB vs ENOV Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while ENOV trades at $22.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check ENOV's competition here
GTLS-PB vs TNC Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while TNC trades at $69.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check TNC's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CIR Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CIR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs GHM Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 899.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while GHM trades at $81.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 60.19. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check GHM's competition here
GTLS-PB vs NNE Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 889M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while NNE trades at $21.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -19.44. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check NNE's competition here
GTLS-PB vs BLDP Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 746.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while BLDP trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check BLDP's competition here
GTLS-PB vs KRNT Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 684.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while KRNT trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -49.23. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check KRNT's competition here
GTLS-PB vs SERV Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 521M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while SERV trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -5.18. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check SERV's competition here
GTLS-PB vs RR Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 378.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while RR trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -15.85. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check RR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs PKOH Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 345M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while PKOH trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check PKOH's competition here
GTLS-PB vs BGRY Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check BGRY's competition here
GTLS-PB vs OFLX Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 325.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while OFLX trades at $32.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check OFLX's competition here
GTLS-PB vs LXFR Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 324.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while LXFR trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check LXFR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs HUHU Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 231.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while HUHU trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -18.44. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check HUHU's competition here
GTLS-PB vs SHMD Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 230.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while SHMD trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check SHMD's competition here
GTLS-PB vs TWIN Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while TWIN trades at $15.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check TWIN's competition here
GTLS-PB vs TAYD Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 181.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while TAYD trades at $57.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check TAYD's competition here
GTLS-PB vs NPWR Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 132.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while NPWR trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check NPWR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs HURC Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 97.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while HURC trades at $15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check HURC's competition here
GTLS-PB vs SHMDW Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 70.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while SHMDW trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check SHMDW's competition here
GTLS-PB vs PYR Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check PYR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs XCH Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while XCH trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XCH's ROE of +45.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check XCH's competition here
GTLS-PB vs BWEN Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while BWEN trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check BWEN's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CVV Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while CVV trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -18.61. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CVV's competition here
GTLS-PB vs BURU Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while BURU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BURU's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check BURU's competition here
GTLS-PB vs GTEC Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while GTEC trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check GTEC's competition here
GTLS-PB vs LASE Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while LASE trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LASE's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check LASE's competition here
GTLS-PB vs JCSE Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while JCSE trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JCSE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check JCSE's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CGRN Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while CGRN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CGRN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CGRN's competition here
GTLS-PB vs WFF Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while WFF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check WFF's competition here
GTLS-PB vs TPIC Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while TPIC trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check TPIC's competition here
GTLS-PB vs HCAI Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while HCAI trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is 2.82. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check HCAI's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CETY Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CETY has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while CETY trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CETY's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CETY's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to CETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CETY's competition here
GTLS-PB vs INLF Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, INLF has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while INLF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INLF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to INLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check INLF's competition here
GTLS-PB vs LBGJ Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LBGJ has a market cap of 193.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while LBGJ trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBGJ's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LBGJ's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to LBGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check LBGJ's competition here
GTLS-PB vs NMHIW Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NMHIW has a market cap of 76K. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while NMHIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMHIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NMHIW's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to NMHIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check NMHIW's competition here
GTLS-PB vs NMHI Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NMHI has a market cap of 41K. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while NMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NMHI's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to NMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check NMHI's competition here
GTLS-PB vs WSCI Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WSCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while WSCI trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WSCI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is more volatile compared to WSCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check WSCI's competition here
GTLS-PB vs SHPW-WT Comparison April 2026
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SHPW-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $72.29, while SHPW-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHPW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHPW-WT's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is more volatile compared to SHPW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check SHPW-WT's competition here