Chart Industries, Inc.
Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS-PB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GTLS-PB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTLS-PB | $71.12 | -0.10% | 3.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ETN | $345.76 | -0.53% | 134.6B | 34.80 | $9.94 | +1.17% |
| PH | $750.30 | -0.27% | 95.9B | 27.70 | $27.08 | +0.89% |
| ITW | $266.74 | -0.99% | 77.7B | 23.38 | $11.40 | +2.25% |
| EMR | $132.38 | -1.04% | 74.5B | 34.03 | $3.89 | +1.59% |
| HWM | $171.24 | +0.14% | 69B | 50.08 | $3.42 | +0.23% |
| ROP | $530.29 | -1.22% | 57.1B | 37.27 | $14.23 | +0.61% |
| CMI | $396.10 | -1.54% | 54.6B | 18.57 | $21.32 | +1.88% |
| B | $26.28 | +0.31% | 45.2B | 16.53 | $1.59 | +1.52% |
| AME | $185.57 | -0.74% | 42.9B | 29.88 | $6.21 | +0.64% |
Stock Comparison
GTLS-PB vs ETN Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 134.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while ETN trades at $345.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 34.80. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check ETN's competition here
GTLS-PB vs PH Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 95.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while PH trades at $750.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check PH's competition here
GTLS-PB vs ITW Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while ITW trades at $266.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check ITW's competition here
GTLS-PB vs EMR Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 74.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while EMR trades at $132.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 34.03. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check EMR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs HWM Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HWM has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while HWM trades at $171.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWM's P/E ratio is 50.08. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HWM's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to HWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check HWM's competition here
GTLS-PB vs ROP Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while ROP trades at $530.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 37.27. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check ROP's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CMI Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while CMI trades at $396.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CMI's competition here
GTLS-PB vs B Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, B has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while B trades at $26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas B's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check B's competition here
GTLS-PB vs AME Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while AME trades at $185.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 29.88. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check AME's competition here
GTLS-PB vs ROK Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while ROK trades at $349.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 41.02. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check ROK's competition here
GTLS-PB vs XYL Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while XYL trades at $142.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 37.17. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check XYL's competition here
GTLS-PB vs OTIS Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while OTIS trades at $86.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check OTIS's competition here
GTLS-PB vs IR Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while IR trades at $79.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 61.78. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check IR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs HWM-P Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HWM-P has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while HWM-P trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWM-P's P/E ratio is 98.18. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HWM-P's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to HWM-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check HWM-P's competition here
GTLS-PB vs DOV Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while DOV trades at $180.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check DOV's competition here
GTLS-PB vs PNR Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while PNR trades at $107.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 29.49. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check PNR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs GGG Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while GGG trades at $86.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 30.79. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check GGG's competition here
GTLS-PB vs ITT Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while ITT trades at $169.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 26.69. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check ITT's competition here
GTLS-PB vs NDSN Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while NDSN trades at $225.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check NDSN's competition here
GTLS-PB vs IEX Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while IEX trades at $165.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check IEX's competition here
GTLS-PB vs GNRC Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while GNRC trades at $193.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 32.16. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check GNRC's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CR Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while CR trades at $191.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 37.13. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs AOS Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while AOS trades at $72.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check AOS's competition here
GTLS-PB vs RRX Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while RRX trades at $153.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 40.67. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check RRX's competition here
GTLS-PB vs WTS Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while WTS trades at $281.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 30.27. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check WTS's competition here
GTLS-PB vs GTLS Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while GTLS trades at $197.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 36.40. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GTLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check GTLS's competition here
GTLS-PB vs SPXC Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while SPXC trades at $188.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 42.00. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check SPXC's competition here
GTLS-PB vs DCI Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while DCI trades at $75.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check DCI's competition here
GTLS-PB vs PSN Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while PSN trades at $79.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 35.75. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check PSN's competition here
GTLS-PB vs JBTM Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while JBTM trades at $146.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is -63.56. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JBTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check JBTM's competition here
GTLS-PB vs FLS Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while FLS trades at $53.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check FLS's competition here
GTLS-PB vs MIDD Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while MIDD trades at $136.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIDD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check MIDD's competition here
GTLS-PB vs GTES Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while GTES trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check GTES's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CSWI Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CSWI's competition here
GTLS-PB vs NPO Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while NPO trades at $224.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 56.53. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check NPO's competition here
GTLS-PB vs MIR Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while MIR trades at $20.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 413.80. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check MIR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs FELE Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while FELE trades at $98.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check FELE's competition here
GTLS-PB vs MWA Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while MWA trades at $26.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check MWA's competition here
GTLS-PB vs AIMC Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check AIMC's competition here
GTLS-PB vs KAI Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while KAI trades at $340.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 37.98. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check KAI's competition here
GTLS-PB vs JBT Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JBT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check JBT's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CXT Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while CXT trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CXT's competition here
GTLS-PB vs ATS Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while ATS trades at $26.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is -92.79. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check ATS's competition here
GTLS-PB vs SXI Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while SXI trades at $209.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 45.25. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check SXI's competition here
GTLS-PB vs XMTR Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while XMTR trades at $47.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -38.91. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check XMTR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs EPAC Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while EPAC trades at $43.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check EPAC's competition here
GTLS-PB vs AMSC Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while AMSC trades at $49.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 123.95. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check AMSC's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CFX Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CFX's competition here
GTLS-PB vs SHPW Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check SHPW's competition here
GTLS-PB vs PSIX Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while PSIX trades at $88.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check PSIX's competition here
GTLS-PB vs HLIO Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while HLIO trades at $54.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 52.54. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check HLIO's competition here
GTLS-PB vs HI Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while HI trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HI's P/E ratio is -87.48. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check HI's competition here
GTLS-PB vs ENOV Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while ENOV trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check ENOV's competition here
GTLS-PB vs TNC Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while TNC trades at $83.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check TNC's competition here
GTLS-PB vs BW-PA Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while BW-PA trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 45.09. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check BW-PA's competition here
GTLS-PB vs NNE Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while NNE trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -32.61. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check NNE's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CYD Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while CYD trades at $31.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CYD's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CIR Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CIR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs GRC Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while GRC trades at $42.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check GRC's competition here
GTLS-PB vs THR Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 862M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while THR trades at $26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check THR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs KRNT Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 697.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while KRNT trades at $15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -61.56. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check KRNT's competition here
GTLS-PB vs BLDP Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 602.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while BLDP trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check BLDP's competition here
GTLS-PB vs SERV Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 589.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while SERV trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -9.37. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check SERV's competition here
GTLS-PB vs GHM Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 536.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while GHM trades at $48.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 38.81. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check GHM's competition here
GTLS-PB vs OFLX Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 355.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while OFLX trades at $35.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check OFLX's competition here
GTLS-PB vs LXFR Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 352.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while LXFR trades at $13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check LXFR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs BGRY Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check BGRY's competition here
GTLS-PB vs SIMA Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SIMA has a market cap of 321.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while SIMA trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is more volatile compared to SIMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check SIMA's competition here
GTLS-PB vs PKOH Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 279.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while PKOH trades at $19.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check PKOH's competition here
GTLS-PB vs RR Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 239.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while RR trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -14.87. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check RR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs NPWR Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while NPWR trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check NPWR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs BW Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 177.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while BW trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check BW's competition here
GTLS-PB vs TWIN Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 176M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while TWIN trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is -88.86. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWIN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check TWIN's competition here
GTLS-PB vs TAYD Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 143.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while TAYD trades at $45.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check TAYD's competition here
GTLS-PB vs HUHU Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 135.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while HUHU trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -63.80. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check HUHU's competition here
GTLS-PB vs HURC Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 114.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while HURC trades at $17.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check HURC's competition here
GTLS-PB vs SHMD Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 112.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while SHMD trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check SHMD's competition here
GTLS-PB vs LASE Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 94.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while LASE trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -21.35. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LASE's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check LASE's competition here
GTLS-PB vs XCH Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while XCH trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XCH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check XCH's competition here
GTLS-PB vs PYR Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check PYR's competition here
GTLS-PB vs BWEN Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while BWEN trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -22.10. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BWEN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check BWEN's competition here
GTLS-PB vs WFF Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while WFF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is 50.50. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check WFF's competition here
GTLS-PB vs GTEC Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while GTEC trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 2.53. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check GTEC's competition here
GTLS-PB vs LBGJ Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LBGJ has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while LBGJ trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBGJ's P/E ratio is -19.67. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LBGJ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to LBGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check LBGJ's competition here
GTLS-PB vs HCAI Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while HCAI trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check HCAI's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CVV Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while CVV trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -57.60. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CVV's competition here
GTLS-PB vs INLF Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, INLF has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while INLF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INLF's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to INLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check INLF's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CETY Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CETY has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while CETY trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CETY's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CETY's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to CETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CETY's competition here
GTLS-PB vs BURU Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while BURU trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BURU's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check BURU's competition here
GTLS-PB vs SHMDW Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while SHMDW trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check SHMDW's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CGRN Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while CGRN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGRN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CGRN's competition here
GTLS-PB vs TPIC Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while TPIC trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check TPIC's competition here
GTLS-PB vs JCSE Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while JCSE trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check JCSE's competition here
GTLS-PB vs NMHI Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NMHI has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while NMHI trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMHI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NMHI's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to NMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check NMHI's competition here
GTLS-PB vs NMHIW Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NMHIW has a market cap of 34K. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while NMHIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMHIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NMHIW's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is more volatile compared to NMHIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check NMHIW's competition here
GTLS-PB vs BGRYW Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BGRYW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while BGRYW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGRYW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BGRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to BGRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check BGRYW's competition here
GTLS-PB vs WBT Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WBT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while WBT trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBT's P/E ratio is 47.08. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WBT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is more volatile compared to WBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check WBT's competition here
GTLS-PB vs CFXA Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CFXA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while CFXA trades at $177.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFXA's P/E ratio is 248.89. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFXA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to CFXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check CFXA's competition here
GTLS-PB vs RAVN Comparison August 2025
GTLS-PB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTLS-PB stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RAVN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTLS-PB is priced at $71.12, while RAVN trades at $58.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTLS-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAVN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTLS-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTLS-PB is less volatile compared to RAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTLS-PB.Check RAVN's competition here