Genius Group Limited
Genius Group Limited (GNS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GNS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNS | $0.88 | -13.25% | 70.4M | -0.83 | -$1.03 | N/A |
| EDU | $44.65 | +1.24% | 7.3B | 19.41 | $2.30 | +1.31% |
| TAL | $10.64 | -2.74% | 6.5B | 75.96 | $0.14 | N/A |
| LRN | $129.26 | +0.80% | 5.6B | 20.27 | $6.38 | N/A |
| LOPE | $170.15 | +0.90% | 4.8B | 21.40 | $7.95 | N/A |
| ATGE | $114.77 | +0.44% | 4.1B | 19.41 | $5.91 | N/A |
| GHC | $920.42 | -3.54% | 4B | 5.98 | $154.10 | +0.77% |
| LAUR | $22.91 | +1.37% | 3.4B | 13.72 | $1.67 | N/A |
| COUR | $12.17 | -3.72% | 2B | -36.86 | -$0.33 | N/A |
| PRDO | $29.70 | +3.20% | 1.9B | 12.91 | $2.30 | +1.75% |
Stock Comparison
GNS vs EDU Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, EDU has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while EDU trades at $44.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas EDU's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to EDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check EDU's competition here
GNS vs TAL Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, TAL has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while TAL trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas TAL's P/E ratio is 75.96. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TAL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to TAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check TAL's competition here
GNS vs LRN Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, LRN has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while LRN trades at $129.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas LRN's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LRN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to LRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check LRN's competition here
GNS vs LOPE Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, LOPE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while LOPE trades at $170.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas LOPE's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LOPE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to LOPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check LOPE's competition here
GNS vs ATGE Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, ATGE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while ATGE trades at $114.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ATGE's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ATGE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to ATGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check ATGE's competition here
GNS vs GHC Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, GHC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while GHC trades at $920.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas GHC's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GHC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to GHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check GHC's competition here
GNS vs LAUR Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, LAUR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while LAUR trades at $22.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas LAUR's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LAUR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to LAUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check LAUR's competition here
GNS vs COUR Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, COUR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while COUR trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas COUR's P/E ratio is -36.86. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to COUR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to COUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check COUR's competition here
GNS vs PRDO Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, PRDO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while PRDO trades at $29.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas PRDO's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PRDO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to PRDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check PRDO's competition here
GNS vs STRA Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, STRA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while STRA trades at $74.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas STRA's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to STRA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to STRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check STRA's competition here
GNS vs UTI Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, UTI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while UTI trades at $32.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas UTI's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to UTI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to UTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check UTI's competition here
GNS vs GOTU Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, GOTU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while GOTU trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas GOTU's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GOTU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to GOTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check GOTU's competition here
GNS vs AFYA Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, AFYA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while AFYA trades at $13.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas AFYA's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AFYA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to AFYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check AFYA's competition here
GNS vs KLC Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, KLC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while KLC trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas KLC's P/E ratio is -16.12. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to KLC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to KLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check KLC's competition here
GNS vs UDMY Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, UDMY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while UDMY trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas UDMY's P/E ratio is -34.62. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to UDMY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to UDMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check UDMY's competition here
GNS vs DAO Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, DAO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while DAO trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas DAO's P/E ratio is 51.15. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to DAO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to DAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check DAO's competition here
GNS vs ARCE Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, ARCE has a market cap of 927.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while ARCE trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ARCE's P/E ratio is -73.58. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ARCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to ARCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check ARCE's competition here
GNS vs REDU Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, REDU has a market cap of 730.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while REDU trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas REDU's P/E ratio is -23.04. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to REDU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to REDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check REDU's competition here
GNS vs LINC Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, LINC has a market cap of 727.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while LINC trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas LINC's P/E ratio is 59.08. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LINC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to LINC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check LINC's competition here
GNS vs APEI Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, APEI has a market cap of 529.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while APEI trades at $29.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas APEI's P/E ratio is 28.79. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to APEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to APEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check APEI's competition here
GNS vs QSG Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, QSG has a market cap of 407.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while QSG trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas QSG's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to QSG's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to QSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check QSG's competition here
GNS vs VSTA Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, VSTA has a market cap of 334.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while VSTA trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas VSTA's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VSTA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to VSTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check VSTA's competition here
GNS vs VTRU Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, VTRU has a market cap of 304.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while VTRU trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas VTRU's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VTRU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to VTRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check VTRU's competition here
GNS vs CHGG Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, CHGG has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while CHGG trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas CHGG's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CHGG's ROE of -3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to CHGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check CHGG's competition here
GNS vs LGCY Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, LGCY has a market cap of 132.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while LGCY trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas LGCY's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LGCY's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to LGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check LGCY's competition here
GNS vs SKIL Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, SKIL has a market cap of 126.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while SKIL trades at $14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas SKIL's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SKIL's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to SKIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check SKIL's competition here
GNS vs STG Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, STG has a market cap of 100.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while STG trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas STG's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to STG's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to STG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check STG's competition here
GNS vs VSA Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while VSA trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VSA's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check VSA's competition here
GNS vs RYET Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, RYET has a market cap of 54.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while RYET trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas RYET's P/E ratio is -54.00. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RYET's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to RYET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check RYET's competition here
GNS vs ONE Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, ONE has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while ONE trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ONE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ONE's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to ONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check ONE's competition here
GNS vs JZ Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, JZ has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while JZ trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas JZ's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to JZ's ROE of -846.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to JZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check JZ's competition here
GNS vs IH Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, IH has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while IH trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas IH's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to IH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to IH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check IH's competition here
GNS vs KIDZ Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, KIDZ has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while KIDZ trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas KIDZ's P/E ratio is -144.00. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to KIDZ's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to KIDZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check KIDZ's competition here
GNS vs BTCT Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, BTCT has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while BTCT trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas BTCT's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BTCT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to BTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check BTCT's competition here
GNS vs AIU Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, AIU has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while AIU trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas AIU's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AIU's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to AIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check AIU's competition here
GNS vs GEHI Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, GEHI has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while GEHI trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas GEHI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GEHI's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to GEHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check GEHI's competition here
GNS vs AACG Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, AACG has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while AACG trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas AACG's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AACG's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to AACG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check AACG's competition here
GNS vs YQ Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, YQ has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while YQ trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas YQ's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to YQ's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to YQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check YQ's competition here
GNS vs EDTK Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, EDTK has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while EDTK trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas EDTK's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EDTK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to EDTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check EDTK's competition here
GNS vs BEDU Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, BEDU has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while BEDU trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas BEDU's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BEDU's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to BEDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check BEDU's competition here
GNS vs TEDU Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, TEDU has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while TEDU trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas TEDU's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TEDU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to TEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check TEDU's competition here
GNS vs VEDU Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, VEDU has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while VEDU trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas VEDU's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VEDU's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to VEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check VEDU's competition here
GNS vs EEIQ Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, EEIQ has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while EEIQ trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas EEIQ's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EEIQ's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to EEIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check EEIQ's competition here
GNS vs WAFU Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, WAFU has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while WAFU trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas WAFU's P/E ratio is -7.74. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to WAFU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to WAFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check WAFU's competition here
GNS vs GV Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, GV has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while GV trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas GV's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GV's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to GV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check GV's competition here
GNS vs TCTM Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, TCTM has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while TCTM trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas TCTM's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TCTM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to TCTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check TCTM's competition here
GNS vs GSUN Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, GSUN has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while GSUN trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas GSUN's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GSUN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to GSUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check GSUN's competition here
GNS vs TWOU Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, TWOU has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while TWOU trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas TWOU's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TWOU's ROE of -14.93%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to TWOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check TWOU's competition here
GNS vs CLEU Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, CLEU has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while CLEU trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas CLEU's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CLEU's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to CLEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check CLEU's competition here
GNS vs MYND Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, MYND has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while MYND trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas MYND's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MYND's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to MYND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check MYND's competition here
GNS vs FEDU Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, FEDU has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while FEDU trades at $13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas FEDU's P/E ratio is 232.33. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FEDU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to FEDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check FEDU's competition here
GNS vs METX Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, METX has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while METX trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas METX's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to METX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to METX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check METX's competition here
GNS vs COE Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, COE has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while COE trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas COE's P/E ratio is -50.83. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to COE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to COE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check COE's competition here
GNS vs LXEH Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, LXEH has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while LXEH trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas LXEH's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LXEH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to LXEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check LXEH's competition here
GNS vs ASPU Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, ASPU has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while ASPU trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ASPU's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ASPU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to ASPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check ASPU's competition here
GNS vs KIDZW Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, KIDZW has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while KIDZW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas KIDZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to KIDZW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to KIDZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check KIDZW's competition here
GNS vs RYB Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, RYB has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while RYB trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas RYB's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RYB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to RYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check RYB's competition here
GNS vs AMBO Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, AMBO has a market cap of 408.5K. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while AMBO trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas AMBO's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AMBO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to AMBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check AMBO's competition here
GNS vs BTCTW Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, BTCTW has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while BTCTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas BTCTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BTCTW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to BTCTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check BTCTW's competition here
GNS vs NEW Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, NEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while NEW trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas NEW's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NEW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to NEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check NEW's competition here
GNS vs HLG Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, HLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while HLG trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas HLG's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to HLG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to HLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check HLG's competition here
GNS vs GPX Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, GPX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while GPX trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas GPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GPX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to GPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check GPX's competition here
GNS vs FHS Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, FHS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while FHS trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas FHS's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FHS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to FHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check FHS's competition here
GNS vs HMHC Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, HMHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while HMHC trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas HMHC's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to HMHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to HMHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check HMHC's competition here
GNS vs ZME Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, ZME has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while ZME trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ZME's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ZME's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to ZME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check ZME's competition here
GNS vs ZVO Comparison August 2025
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 70.4M. In comparison, ZVO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $0.88, while ZVO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.83, whereas ZVO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ZVO's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to ZVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.Check ZVO's competition here