Genius Group Limited
Genius Group Limited GNS Peers
See (GNS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNS | $1.58 | +0.01% | 111.6M | -1.51 | -$1.03 | N/A |
| EDU | $52.35 | -1.08% | 8.6B | 22.74 | $2.30 | +1.11% |
| TAL | $10.50 | -0.43% | 6.4B | 75.14 | $0.14 | N/A |
| LRN | $134.49 | -1.05% | 5.9B | 21.08 | $6.38 | N/A |
| LOPE | $172.79 | -0.83% | 4.9B | 21.70 | $7.96 | N/A |
| ATGE | $117.99 | -0.72% | 4.2B | 19.92 | $5.92 | N/A |
| GHC | $921.47 | -0.60% | 4B | 6.53 | $141.08 | +0.95% |
| LAUR | $23.57 | -1.19% | 3.5B | 12.68 | $1.86 | N/A |
| STRA | $80.22 | -1.01% | 1.9B | 17.14 | $4.68 | +3.73% |
| PRDO | $29.31 | -0.75% | 1.9B | 13.03 | $2.25 | +2.17% |
Stock Comparison
GNS vs EDU Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, EDU has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while EDU trades at $52.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas EDU's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to EDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs TAL Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, TAL has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while TAL trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas TAL's P/E ratio is 75.14. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TAL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to TAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs LRN Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, LRN has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while LRN trades at $134.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas LRN's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LRN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to LRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs LOPE Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, LOPE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while LOPE trades at $172.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas LOPE's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LOPE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to LOPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs ATGE Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, ATGE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while ATGE trades at $117.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas ATGE's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ATGE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to ATGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs GHC Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, GHC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while GHC trades at $921.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas GHC's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GHC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to GHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs LAUR Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, LAUR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while LAUR trades at $23.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas LAUR's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LAUR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to LAUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs STRA Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, STRA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while STRA trades at $80.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas STRA's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to STRA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to STRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs PRDO Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, PRDO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while PRDO trades at $29.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas PRDO's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PRDO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to PRDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs UTI Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, UTI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while UTI trades at $31.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas UTI's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to UTI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to UTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs AFYA Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, AFYA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while AFYA trades at $15.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas AFYA's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AFYA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to AFYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs GOTU Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, GOTU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while GOTU trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas GOTU's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GOTU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to GOTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs COUR Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, COUR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while COUR trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas COUR's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to COUR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to COUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs KLC Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, KLC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while KLC trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas KLC's P/E ratio is -16.22. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KLC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to KLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs DAO Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, DAO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while DAO trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas DAO's P/E ratio is 51.56. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DAO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to DAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs UDMY Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, UDMY has a market cap of 972M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while UDMY trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas UDMY's P/E ratio is -14.52. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to UDMY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to UDMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs ARCE Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, ARCE has a market cap of 927.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while ARCE trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas ARCE's P/E ratio is -73.58. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ARCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to ARCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs REDU Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, REDU has a market cap of 730.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while REDU trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas REDU's P/E ratio is -23.04. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to REDU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to REDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs LINC Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, LINC has a market cap of 716.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while LINC trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas LINC's P/E ratio is 58.15. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LINC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to LINC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs RYET Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, RYET has a market cap of 681.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while RYET trades at $20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas RYET's P/E ratio is -673.00. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RYET's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to RYET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs APEI Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, APEI has a market cap of 572.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while APEI trades at $31.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas APEI's P/E ratio is 31.13. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to APEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to APEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs QSG Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, QSG has a market cap of 455.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while QSG trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas QSG's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QSG's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to QSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs VSTA Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, VSTA has a market cap of 324.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while VSTA trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas VSTA's P/E ratio is 3.86. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VSTA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to VSTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs VTRU Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, VTRU has a market cap of 304.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while VTRU trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas VTRU's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VTRU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to VTRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs LGCY Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, LGCY has a market cap of 143.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while LGCY trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas LGCY's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LGCY's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to LGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs CHGG Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, CHGG has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while CHGG trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas CHGG's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CHGG's ROE of -3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to CHGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs SKIL Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, SKIL has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while SKIL trades at $15.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas SKIL's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SKIL's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to SKIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs STG Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, STG has a market cap of 120.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while STG trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas STG's P/E ratio is 2.85. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to STG's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to STG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs KIDZ Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, KIDZ has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while KIDZ trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas KIDZ's P/E ratio is -103.67. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KIDZ's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to KIDZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs ONE Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, ONE has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while ONE trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas ONE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ONE's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to ONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs JZ Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, JZ has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while JZ trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas JZ's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JZ's ROE of -846.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to JZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs BTCT Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, BTCT has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while BTCT trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas BTCT's P/E ratio is -6.47. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BTCT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to BTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs IH Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, IH has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while IH trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas IH's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to IH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs YQ Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, YQ has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while YQ trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas YQ's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to YQ's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to YQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs AIU Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, AIU has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while AIU trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas AIU's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AIU's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to AIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs GEHI Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, GEHI has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while GEHI trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas GEHI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GEHI's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to GEHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs EDTK Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, EDTK has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while EDTK trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas EDTK's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EDTK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to EDTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs AACG Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, AACG has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while AACG trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas AACG's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AACG's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to AACG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs BEDU Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, BEDU has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while BEDU trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas BEDU's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BEDU's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to BEDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs TEDU Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, TEDU has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while TEDU trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas TEDU's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TEDU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to TEDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs VSA Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while VSA trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VSA's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs VEDU Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, VEDU has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while VEDU trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas VEDU's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VEDU's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to VEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs GV Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, GV has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while GV trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas GV's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GV's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to GV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs EEIQ Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, EEIQ has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while EEIQ trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas EEIQ's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EEIQ's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to EEIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs WAFU Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, WAFU has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while WAFU trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas WAFU's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WAFU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to WAFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs GSUN Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, GSUN has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while GSUN trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas GSUN's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GSUN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to GSUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs TCTM Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, TCTM has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while TCTM trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas TCTM's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TCTM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to TCTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs TWOU Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, TWOU has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while TWOU trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas TWOU's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TWOU's ROE of -14.93%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to TWOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs MYND Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, MYND has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while MYND trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas MYND's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MYND's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to MYND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs CLEU Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, CLEU has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while CLEU trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas CLEU's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CLEU's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to CLEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs FEDU Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, FEDU has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while FEDU trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas FEDU's P/E ratio is 263.33. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FEDU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to FEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs METX Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, METX has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while METX trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas METX's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to METX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to METX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs COE Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, COE has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while COE trades at $28.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas COE's P/E ratio is -47.87. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to COE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to COE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs KIDZW Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, KIDZW has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while KIDZW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas KIDZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KIDZW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to KIDZW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs ASPU Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, ASPU has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while ASPU trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas ASPU's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ASPU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to ASPU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs LXEH Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, LXEH has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while LXEH trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas LXEH's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LXEH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to LXEH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs RYB Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, RYB has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while RYB trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas RYB's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RYB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to RYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs AMBO Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, AMBO has a market cap of 421.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while AMBO trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas AMBO's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMBO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to AMBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs BTCTW Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, BTCTW has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while BTCTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas BTCTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BTCTW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to BTCTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs GPX Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, GPX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while GPX trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas GPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GPX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to GPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs HLG Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, HLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while HLG trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas HLG's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HLG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to HLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs NEW Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, NEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while NEW trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas NEW's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NEW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to NEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs HMHC Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, HMHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while HMHC trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas HMHC's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HMHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to HMHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs ZME Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, ZME has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while ZME trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas ZME's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ZME's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to ZME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs FHS Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, FHS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while FHS trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas FHS's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FHS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is less volatile compared to FHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.
GNS vs ZVO Comparison
GNS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNS stands at 111.6M. In comparison, ZVO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNS is priced at $1.58, while ZVO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.51, whereas ZVO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GNS's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ZVO's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNS is more volatile compared to ZVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNS.