Gulfmark Offshore, Inc.
Gulfmark Offshore, Inc. (GLF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLF | $28.37 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SLB | $53.50 | +2.27% | 80B | 22.77 | $2.35 | +2.16% |
| BKR | $63.22 | +1.38% | 62.5B | 24.60 | $2.57 | +1.45% |
| HAL | $40.42 | +4.20% | 34B | 26.94 | $1.50 | +1.69% |
| TS | $58.29 | -0.07% | 31.3B | 15.92 | $3.66 | +2.92% |
| FTI | $71.19 | +1.22% | 28.5B | 30.96 | $2.30 | +0.28% |
| NOV | $19.88 | -0.20% | 7.3B | 50.99 | $0.39 | +2.63% |
| VAL | $102.24 | +0.29% | 7.1B | 7.38 | $13.86 | N/A |
| WFRD | $95.89 | -0.05% | 6.9B | 16.17 | $5.93 | +1.06% |
| AROC | $35.52 | -0.50% | 6.2B | 19.41 | $1.83 | +2.32% |
Stock Comparison
GLF vs SLB Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 80B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while SLB trades at $53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check SLB's competition here
GLF vs BKR Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 62.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while BKR trades at $63.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check BKR's competition here
GLF vs HAL Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while HAL trades at $40.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check HAL's competition here
GLF vs TS Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while TS trades at $58.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check TS's competition here
GLF vs FTI Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while FTI trades at $71.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 30.96. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check FTI's competition here
GLF vs NOV Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while NOV trades at $19.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 50.99. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check NOV's competition here
GLF vs VAL Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while VAL trades at $102.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check VAL's competition here
GLF vs WFRD Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while WFRD trades at $95.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check WFRD's competition here
GLF vs AROC Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while AROC trades at $35.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check AROC's competition here
GLF vs LB Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while LB trades at $72.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LB's P/E ratio is 76.43. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check LB's competition here
GLF vs KGS Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while KGS trades at $58.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 65.68. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check KGS's competition here
GLF vs CHX Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while CHX trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check CHX's competition here
GLF vs LBRT Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while LBRT trades at $29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check LBRT's competition here
GLF vs SEI Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while SEI trades at $57.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 87.65. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check SEI's competition here
GLF vs TDW Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while TDW trades at $82.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check TDW's competition here
GLF vs OII Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while OII trades at $36.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check OII's competition here
GLF vs USAC Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while USAC trades at $28.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to USAC's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check USAC's competition here
GLF vs WHD Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while WHD trades at $48.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check WHD's competition here
GLF vs CAM Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, CAM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while CAM trades at $66.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CAM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to CAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check CAM's competition here
GLF vs TDW-WT Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check TDW-WT's competition here
GLF vs EFXT Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while EFXT trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 41.38. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check EFXT's competition here
GLF vs NEX Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check NEX's competition here
GLF vs NESR Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while NESR trades at $21.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 41.37. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check NESR's competition here
GLF vs XPRO Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while XPRO trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 39.80. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check XPRO's competition here
GLF vs FLOC Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while FLOC trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FLOC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check FLOC's competition here
GLF vs PUMP Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while PUMP trades at $14.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is 1469.00. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PUMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check PUMP's competition here
GLF vs INVX Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while INVX trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 20.93. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check INVX's competition here
GLF vs AESI Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while AESI trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is -32.23. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AESI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check AESI's competition here
GLF vs RES Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while RES trades at $7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 48.83. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check RES's competition here
GLF vs HLX Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while HLX trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 48.12. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check HLX's competition here
GLF vs DNOW Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while DNOW trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is -16.12. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DNOW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check DNOW's competition here
GLF vs VTOL Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while VTOL trades at $46.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check VTOL's competition here
GLF vs VAL-WT Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while VAL-WT trades at $18.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check VAL-WT's competition here
GLF vs NPKI Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while NPKI trades at $14.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 34.76. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NPKI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check NPKI's competition here
GLF vs SLCA Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check SLCA's competition here
GLF vs PFHC Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check PFHC's competition here
GLF vs ACDC Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while ACDC trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check ACDC's competition here
GLF vs MRC Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while MRC trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 59.91. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is less volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check MRC's competition here
GLF vs TTI Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while TTI trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 288.83. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check TTI's competition here
GLF vs CLB Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 820.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while CLB trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check CLB's competition here
GLF vs OIS Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 734.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while OIS trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OIS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check OIS's competition here
GLF vs NESRW Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while NESRW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check NESRW's competition here
GLF vs FET Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 703.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while FET trades at $61.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -76.34. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check FET's competition here
GLF vs NR Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check NR's competition here
GLF vs DRQ Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check DRQ's competition here
GLF vs FTK Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 524.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while FTK trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check FTK's competition here
GLF vs NGS Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 500.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while NGS trades at $39.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check NGS's competition here
GLF vs SOI Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check SOI's competition here
GLF vs RNGR Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 412.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while RNGR trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 32.46. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check RNGR's competition here
GLF vs NOA Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 385.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while NOA trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check NOA's competition here
GLF vs CCLP Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check CCLP's competition here
GLF vs SND Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 217.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while SND trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SND's P/E ratio is 182.33. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check SND's competition here
GLF vs OMSE Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, OMSE has a market cap of 193.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while OMSE trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMSE's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OMSE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to OMSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check OMSE's competition here
GLF vs NCSM Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 185.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while NCSM trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check NCSM's competition here
GLF vs GEOS Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 157M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while GEOS trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is less volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check GEOS's competition here
GLF vs DTI Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 129.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while DTI trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is -33.36. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check DTI's competition here
GLF vs PFIE Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check PFIE's competition here
GLF vs BOOM Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 107.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while BOOM trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check BOOM's competition here
GLF vs DWSN Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 100.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while DWSN trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DWSN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is less volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check DWSN's competition here
GLF vs LSE Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 79.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while LSE trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 58.06. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check LSE's competition here
GLF vs KLXE Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 54.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while KLXE trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check KLXE's competition here
GLF vs SDPI Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check SDPI's competition here
GLF vs RCON Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while RCON trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check RCON's competition here
GLF vs STAK Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, STAK has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while STAK trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAK's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STAK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is less volatile compared to STAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check STAK's competition here
GLF vs NINE Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 537.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while NINE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NINE's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is less volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check NINE's competition here
GLF vs ENSV Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while ENSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -28.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check ENSV's competition here
GLF vs ACDCW Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, ACDCW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is less volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check ACDCW's competition here
GLF vs EXTN Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while EXTN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check EXTN's competition here
GLF vs TDW-WTA Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, TDW-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while TDW-WTA trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDW-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TDW-WTA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is less volatile compared to TDW-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check TDW-WTA's competition here
GLF vs IO Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while IO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is less volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check IO's competition here
GLF vs USWSW Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, USWSW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while USWSW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USWSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to USWSW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is less volatile compared to USWSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check USWSW's competition here
GLF vs USWS Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while USWS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check USWS's competition here
GLF vs FTSI Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while FTSI trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check FTSI's competition here
GLF vs APLP Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, APLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while APLP trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to APLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is more volatile compared to APLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check APLP's competition here
GLF vs VLI Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, VLI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while VLI trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VLI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is less volatile compared to VLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check VLI's competition here
GLF vs CETC Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, CETC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while CETC trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CETC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CETC's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is less volatile compared to CETC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check CETC's competition here
GLF vs CELP Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while CELP trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is less volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check CELP's competition here
GLF vs TDW-WTB Comparison April 2026
GLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLF stands at 0. In comparison, TDW-WTB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLF is priced at $28.37, while TDW-WTB trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDW-WTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TDW-WTB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GLF is less volatile compared to TDW-WTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLF.Check TDW-WTB's competition here